Table 1.

Numbers of invasive cervical cancer cases (Finland, 2000–2009), by mode of detection in relation to screening and stage

FIGO stage
IAIB-IIAIIB+UnknownTotal
Mode of detectionN (%)N (%)N (%)N (%)N (%)
All332 (100.0)552 (100.0)482 (100.0)180 (100.0)1,546 (100.0)
Invited252 (75.9)337 (61.1)211 (43.8)91 (50.6)891 (57.6)
 Nonattender101 (30.4)136 (24.6)141 (29.3)49 (27.2)427 (27.6)
 Attender151 (45.5)201 (36.4)70 (14.5)42 (23.3)464 (30.0)
  Screen-detecteda82 (24.7)64 (11.6)10 (2.1)11 (6.1)167 (10.8)
  Detected in interval69 (20.8)137 (24.8)60 (12.4)31 (17.2)297 (19.2)
Not invited80 (24.1)215 (38.9)271 (56.2)89 (49.4)655 (42.4)
 Under screening age33 (9.9)23 (4.2)7 (1.5)5 (2.8)68 (4.4)
 Over screening age25 (7.5)140 (25.4)248 (51.5)78 (43.3)491 (31.8)
 Other reason22 (6.6)52 (9.4)16 (3.3)6 (3.3)96 (6.2)
  • aDetected by invitational screen