Table 2.

Patient rated importance of screening information and proportion that received information from physician (n = 415)

Type of informationPatients who rated information “very important”Patients receiving information (of those who rated information “very important”)
Screening purpose368/415 (88.7%)214/368 (58.2%)
Test accuracy354/415 (85.3%)26/354 (7.3%)
Testing alternatives346/415 (83.4%)101/346 (29.2%)
Testing pros/cons356/415 (85.8%)14/356 (3.9%)
Testing process323/415 (77.8%)323/323 (100.0%)