Table 3.

Prevalence of increased endometrial thickness according to other miscellaneous factors

CharacteristicsAll (n = 1,271)
Non HRT users (n = 801)
HRT users (n = 461)
nET ≥3 mm (%)PnET ≥3 mm (%)PnET ≥3 mm (%)P
BMI (kg/m2)
  • NOTE: P indicates the statistical significance of differences in endometrial thickness (in mm), according to other miscellaneous factors, for all women, women not currently using HRT, and women currently using HRT. Status with respect to current HRT use was missing in nine instances. ET, endometrial thickness; *, missing.