Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Phase I chemoprevention study of piroxicam and alpha-difluoromethylornithine.

P P Carbone, J A Douglas, P O Larson, A K Verma, I A Blair, M Pomplun and K D Tutsch
P P Carbone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J A Douglas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P O Larson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A K Verma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I A Blair
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M Pomplun
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K D Tutsch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published October 1998
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A two-step Phase I study of piroxicam (PXM) and a-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) alone and in combination was initiated to assess toxicity and the impact of these drugs on several biological markers. In step 1, 12 subjects with a history of skin cancers were assigned to receive PXM 10 mg every day (q.d.) or 10 mg every other day (q.o.d.). The dosage of PXM 10 mg q.o.d. was tolerated. No changes were seen in 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) or urinary polyamine levels. Steady-state serum levels of PXM were consistent with the oral dose level. In step 2, 31 subjects with stage 0 or I nonmelanoma skin cancers, stage A or B prostate or colon cancer, or stage I breast cancer or who had a family history of cancer were randomized to receive DFMO 0.5 g/m2, PXM 10 mg q.o.d., or the combination of DFMO and PXM. In addition to the biological markers of TPA-induced ODC activity in skin biopsies and urinary polyamine levels, we measured urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2, a specific metabolite of thromboxane A2. Of the 12 subjects on DFMO/PXM, 2 dropped out for non-drug-related reasons. Three developed grade-2 drug-related toxicities. One subject developed dyspnea that resolved and was able to continue on the study for 6 months. One subject who developed diarrhea that resolved after 5 days was also able to restart the drug without a recurrence. A third subject described intermittent episodes of tinnitus starting 4 h after taking PXM that lasted only 5 s and did not progress on treatment. Comparing the 6-month measurements with pretreatment, DFMO/PXM or DFMO significantly reduced TPA-induced ODC levels (Ps, 0.03 and 0.05). Urinary polyamine levels of spermidine decreased slightly with the DFMO/PXM or DFMO alone, whereas putrescine decreased with PXM alone. Levels of 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 were depressed by PXM and PXM/DFMO. The doses of DFMO/PXM determined in step 2 are potential starting dosages for Phase IIa and IIb chemoprevention trials.

PreviousNext
Back to top
October 1998
Volume 7, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phase I chemoprevention study of piroxicam and alpha-difluoromethylornithine.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Phase I chemoprevention study of piroxicam and alpha-difluoromethylornithine.
P P Carbone, J A Douglas, P O Larson, A K Verma, I A Blair, M Pomplun and K D Tutsch
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 1998 (7) (10) 907-912;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Phase I chemoprevention study of piroxicam and alpha-difluoromethylornithine.
P P Carbone, J A Douglas, P O Larson, A K Verma, I A Blair, M Pomplun and K D Tutsch
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 1998 (7) (10) 907-912;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement