Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Null Results in Brief

Long-term Particulate Matter Exposures during Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence in the Nurses' Health Study II Prospective Cohort

Jaime E. Hart, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Natalie DuPre, Peter James, Verónica M. Vieira, Rulla M. Tamimi and Francine Laden
Jaime E. Hart
1Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
2Exposure, Epidemiology, and Risk Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jaime.hart@channing.harvard.edu
Kimberly A. Bertrand
3Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie DuPre
4Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter James
2Exposure, Epidemiology, and Risk Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Verónica M. Vieira
5Program in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rulla M. Tamimi
1Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francine Laden
1Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
2Exposure, Epidemiology, and Risk Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0246 Published August 2016
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: There is increasing concern that environmental exposures, such as air pollution, may be related to increasing rates of breast cancer; however, results from cohort studies have been mixed. We examined the association between particulate matter (PM) and measures of distance to roadway with the risk of incident breast cancer in the prospective nationwide Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) cohort.

Methods: Incident invasive breast cancer from 1993 to 2011 (N = 3,416) was assessed among 115,921 women in the NHSII cohort. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for increases in ambient exposures to PM10, PM2.5–10, and PM2.5 and residential roadway proximity categories.

Results: In multivariable adjusted models, there was little evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer (or any of the receptor-specific subtypes) overall or by menopausal status with PM exposure. There was, however, a suggestion of increased risks among women living <50 m of the largest road type (HR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.80–3.21) or within <50 m of the two largest road types (1.14; 95% CI, 0.84–1.54) compared with women living farther (≥200 m) away.

Conclusions: Among women in the NHSII, we found no statistically significant associations between particulate matter exposures and incidence of breast cancer overall, by menopausal status, or by hormone receptor subtype. There was, however, a suggestion that residential proximity to major roadways may be associated with increased risk.

Impact: These results suggest no elevated breast cancer risk with increasing exposures to particulate matter air pollution, but that other traffic-related exposures may be important. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(8); 1274–6. ©2016 AACR.

Introduction

The International Agency for Research on Cancer monograph on the carcinogenicity of ambient air pollution presented mixed evidence for air pollution and breast cancer risk (1). However, some recent studies have suggested associations (2–7). Studies with large numbers of breast cancer cases, information on specific breast cancer subtypes, and the ability to control for other breast cancer risk factors are needed. Therefore, we examined the association of particulate matter (PM) exposures and roadway proximity on risk of overall, hormone receptor–specific, and menopausal status–specific breast cancer risk among women in the nationwide, prospective Nurses' Health Study II (NHSII) cohort.

Materials and Methods

The NHSII is a cohort of 116,430 female nurses with no previous history of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) enrolled in 1989 when they were aged 25 to 42 years. Mailed biennial follow-up questionnaires update information on risk factors and medical history. Self-reports of incident cancers are confirmed by medical record review.

Biennial residential addresses were geocoded, and roadway proximity was assigned as a proxy for traffic-related exposures. Specifically, we calculated the distance from each address to the nearest street segments in the ESRI StreetPro 2007 data layer listed as U.S. Census Feature class codes A1, A2, or A3. On the basis of case distributions and exposure studies, we categorized distance to road as 0 to 49 m, 50 to 199 m, and ≥200 m, for all three road types together, for the two largest road types (A1, A2) and for the largest road type (A1). Forty-eight–month moving average and cumulative average exposures to three size fractions of particulate matter, PM10, PM2.5–10, and PM2.5, were assigned to each participant based on monthly spatiotemporal prediction models applied to the geocoded address history (8). For participants who moved, we assumed they changed addresses at the beginning of the biennial cycle.

Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models on a biennial time scale were used to calculate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for each roadway proximity category compared with the farthest, and for each 10 μg/m3 increase in each of the PM size fractions, after assessing linearity using splines. All models were adjusted for age, race, and calendar year; multivariable models were additionally adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors. Separate models assessed risk of overall breast cancer, and hormone receptor–specific subtypes (ER+/PR+ and ER−/PR−). We also stratified models by menopausal status.

Results

Eligible participants (N = 115,921) were 47 years old on average during follow-up, with an average body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m2. Sixteen percent were nulliparous, 10% were current users of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and 64% were never smokers. There was no association between exposures to 48-month PM with breast cancer overall or for specific hormone receptor subtypes, or by menopausal status (Tables 1 and 2); estimates were similar for cumulative average exposures (not shown). Although case numbers were small, there was a suggestion of increasing risk with residential proximity to the two largest road types, with a multivariable adjusted HR of 1.60 (95% CI, 0.80–3.21) for women living <50 m of the largest road type and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.84–1.54) for women closest to the two largest road types compared with those living ≥200 m away. These risks were consistent across the various breast cancer subtypes

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Risk of overall and hormone receptor subtype–invasive breast cancer with exposures to particulate matter and roadway proximity among 115,921 women in the NHSII followed 1993–2011

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Risk of invasive breast cancer by menopausal status with exposures to particulate matter and roadway proximity among women in the NHSII

Discussion

We did not observe an association between PM exposures and breast cancer incidence in this prospective cohort study. This is in contrast to an earlier case–control study in Western New York, where total suspended particulate exposures were associated with increased odds of postmenopausal breast cancer, but not premenopausal breast cancer (detailed in ref. 1). Our results are similar to a recent analysis in the Sister Study, where no elevations in overall or hormone receptor–specific breast cancer risk were observed with increasing PM10 or PM2.5 exposures (2).

Our suggestive findings of an elevated risk with roadway proximity, although not statistically significant and based on small numbers of exposed cases, are in contrast to several studies that have found no association (1, 3) but do agree with some studies using other measures of traffic exposure (traffic density, motor vehicle density; refs. 1, 7). Our findings also agree with numerous studies that have observed positive associations between exposures to nitrogen oxides or other traffic-related pollutants and breast cancer (1–3, 5–7).

Our analyses in a large, nation-wide, prospective cohort has many strengths, including fine control for potential confounders, high spatial and temporal resolution estimates of PM exposure, and large numbers of cases in many subcategories of interest (e.g., premenopausal, ER−/PR−). However, we only had information on adult exposures, which may not be an important etiologic period. The findings in this cohort may not be generalizable to populations with more racial/ethnic diversity or a broader range of socioeconomic status. Future studies should examine the association of traffic-related exposures in these groups.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: J.E. Hart, K.A. Bertrand, V.M. Vieira, R.M. Tamimi, F. Laden

Development of methodology: J.E. Hart, R.M. Tamimi, F. Laden

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): J.E. Hart, F. Laden

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): J.E. Hart, K.A. Bertrand, R.M. Tamimi, F. Laden

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: J.E. Hart, K.A. Bertrand, N. DuPre, P. James, V.M. Vieira, R.M. Tamimi, F. Laden

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): R.M. Tamimi

Study supervision: R.M. Tamimi, F. Laden

Grant Support

All authors were funded by Susan G. Komen for the Cure grant IIR13264020. The NHSII cohort is funded by NIH grant UM1 CA176726. J.E. Hart and F. Laden received R01 ES017017, J.E. Hart received P30 ES000002, and P. James and N. DuPre were supported by T32 CA09001.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participants and staff of the Nurses' Health Study II and following state cancer registries: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY.

Footnotes

  • R.M. Tamimi and F. Laden share senior authorship of this article.

  • Received March 24, 2016.
  • Accepted May 10, 2016.
  • ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Outdoor air pollution. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2015.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Reding KW,
    2. Young MT,
    3. Szpiro AA,
    4. Han CJ,
    5. DeRoo LA,
    6. Weinberg C,
    7. et al.
    Breast cancer risk in relation to ambient air pollution exposure at residences in the sister study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24:1907–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hystad P,
    2. Villeneuve PJ,
    3. Goldberg MS,
    4. Crouse DL,
    5. Johnson K
    , Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and the risk of developing breast cancer among women in eight Canadian provinces: a case-control study. Environ Int 2015;74:240–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shekarrizfard M,
    2. Valois MF,
    3. Goldberg MS,
    4. Crouse D,
    5. Ross N,
    6. Parent ME,
    7. et al.
    Investigating the role of transportation models in epidemiologic studies of traffic related air pollution and health effects. Environ Res 2015;140:282–91.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mordukhovich I,
    2. Beyea J,
    3. Herring AH,
    4. Hatch M,
    5. Stellman SD,
    6. Teitelbaum SL,
    7. et al.
    Vehicular traffic-related polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and breast cancer incidence: The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP). Environ Health Perspect 2016;124:30–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Al-Ahmadi K,
    2. Al-Zahrani A
    . NO(2) and cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013;10:5844–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Chen F,
    2. Bina WF
    . Correlation of white female breast cancer incidence trends with nitrogen dioxide emission levels and motor vehicle density patterns. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;132:327–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Yanosky JD,
    2. Paciorek CJ,
    3. Laden F,
    4. Hart JE,
    5. Puett RC,
    6. Liao D,
    7. et al.
    Spatio-temporal modeling of particulate air pollution in the conterminous United States using geographic and meteorological predictors. Environ Health 2014;13:63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 25 (8)
August 2016
Volume 25, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Long-term Particulate Matter Exposures during Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence in the Nurses' Health Study II Prospective Cohort
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Long-term Particulate Matter Exposures during Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence in the Nurses' Health Study II Prospective Cohort
Jaime E. Hart, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Natalie DuPre, Peter James, Verónica M. Vieira, Rulla M. Tamimi and Francine Laden
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev August 1 2016 (25) (8) 1274-1276; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0246

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Long-term Particulate Matter Exposures during Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer Incidence in the Nurses' Health Study II Prospective Cohort
Jaime E. Hart, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Natalie DuPre, Peter James, Verónica M. Vieira, Rulla M. Tamimi and Francine Laden
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev August 1 2016 (25) (8) 1274-1276; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0246
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Diet Quality and Ovarian Cancer Survival
  • PDE5 inhibitors use and precursors of colorectal cancer
  • Association between serum iron biomarkers and breast cancer
Show more Null Results in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement