Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Behavioral and Social Science

Abstract A37: Colorectal cancer screening: Does racial/ethnic and language concordance matter?

Karen Kim, Edwin Chandraskar and Helen Lam
Karen Kim
1The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edwin Chandraskar
2Asian Health Coalition, Chicago, IL.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Lam
1The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7755.DISP14-A37 Published October 2015
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading
Abstracts: Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; November 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX

Abstract

Objectives: Asian Americans are the only racial/ethnic population to experience cancer as the leading cause of death. Barriers to cancer screening among Asian Americans have been widely studied; however, the importance of concordance that may link to health care disparities has yet to be studied in the Asian-American population. Racial/ethnic and language concordance is found to foster trust, communication and better patient-provider interaction, but whether it can also improve compliance of cancer screening guidelines remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine how physician racial/ethnic and language concordance may motivate colorectal cancer screening (CRS) using Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) among Chinese Americans.

Methods: This study used a prospective, quasi-experimental design. Participants in this study were recruited through a Chinese American community-based organization's homemaker program. The homemaker program has six teams, about 40 homemakers per team, to provide basic care to local elderly clients. The six teams were randomly assigned to one of the three CRS education sessions. Presenters of the educational sessions were all male physicians and different in their race/ethnicity and language capacity: 1) Chinese and Chinese-speaking presenter, 2) Chinese and English-speaking presenter with interpreter; and 3) White and English-speaking presenter with interpreter. A culturally tailored presentation was given during the sessions. Participants who agreed to participate in the study were asked to fill out a bilingual pre- and post-survey. Each participant was offered a no-cost FOBT kit at the end of the session, and had four weeks to mail back the FOBT kit. The two main independent variables were racial/ethnic and language concordances. Racial/ethnic concordance was determined by the presenter's race/ethnicity, while language concordance was determined by the use of an interpreter. The main dependent variable of interest was the return of FOBT kit.

Results: A total of 337 homemakers participated in the education sessions. Following the recommendation guideline for CRS, only participants who were older than 49 years old were included in the final data analysis. A total of 224 participants met the age criterion. There were only 21 male participants. 99% of the participants were foreign-born and 59% had no high school education. Only 13% reported their English speaking skill fair to fluent. About half the participants had a primary care physician and only 27% have ever had CRS. 61% of the participants returned their FOBT within 4 weeks. The Chinese and Chinese-speaking presenter group had the lowest return rate, 49%, compared to 61% for the White and English-speaking presenter group and 72% for the Chinese and English-speaking presenter group (p = .019). For race/ethnic concordance only, the return rate was 60.7% for Chinese presenters and 60.5% for the White presenter; while for language concordance only, the return rate was 49.3 for Chinese-speaking presenter and 66.2% for the English-speaking presenters with interpreters (p =.016).

Conclusion: This preliminary study provides important information on how race/ethnic and language concordance might influence CRS behaviors. Our findings, which were congruent with other studies, showed that interpreter use could overcome language barrier. Although we couldn't find significant differences in race/ethnic concordance, Chinese and English-speaking presenter group had the highest return rate. Whether a Chinese and English-speaking physician is more trustworthy than a Chinese and Chinese-speaking physician among Chinese immigrants, further study is warranted to explore this phenomenon.

Citation Format: Karen Kim, Edwin Chandraskar, Helen Lam. Colorectal cancer screening: Does racial/ethnic and language concordance matter? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A37.

  • ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
Previous
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 24 (10 Supplement)
October 2015
Volume 24, Issue 10 Supplement
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abstract A37: Colorectal cancer screening: Does racial/ethnic and language concordance matter?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abstract A37: Colorectal cancer screening: Does racial/ethnic and language concordance matter?
Karen Kim, Edwin Chandraskar and Helen Lam
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 2015 (24) (10 Supplement) A37; DOI: 10.1158/1538-7755.DISP14-A37

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abstract A37: Colorectal cancer screening: Does racial/ethnic and language concordance matter?
Karen Kim, Edwin Chandraskar and Helen Lam
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 2015 (24) (10 Supplement) A37; DOI: 10.1158/1538-7755.DISP14-A37
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Behavioral and Social Science

  • Abstract C09: Building capacity to conduct cancer disparities research: Progress and evaluation of NCI CRCHD P20 GUIDE Project
  • Abstract B08: Acceptability of text messaging for communication of health information among Black and low-income women following abnormal cervical cancer screening
  • Abstract C34: [Advocate Abstract:] Does culture play a role in cancer survivorship?
Show more Behavioral and Social Science

Health Education

  • Abstract C09: Building capacity to conduct cancer disparities research: Progress and evaluation of NCI CRCHD P20 GUIDE Project
  • Abstract C06: Adapting a breast cancer education program to reach Arab Muslim women
  • Abstract C13: Knowledge and perceptions on colorectal cancer among male adults taking herbal remedies against anorectal or gastrointestinal disorders in rural Zaria, Nigeria
Show more Health Education

Health Education: Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts

  • Abstract C09: Building capacity to conduct cancer disparities research: Progress and evaluation of NCI CRCHD P20 GUIDE Project
  • Abstract C06: Adapting a breast cancer education program to reach Arab Muslim women
  • Abstract C13: Knowledge and perceptions on colorectal cancer among male adults taking herbal remedies against anorectal or gastrointestinal disorders in rural Zaria, Nigeria
Show more Health Education: Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement