Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Letters to the Editor

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Iron and Cancer Risk—Letter

Craig A. Garmendia, Marika de los Reyes and Purnima Madhivanan
Craig A. Garmendia
Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: cgarm003@fiu.edu
Marika de los Reyes
Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Purnima Madhivanan
Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0214 Published July 2014
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We read Fonseca-Nunes and colleagues' recent systematic review and meta-analysis on iron and cancer risk in the January 2014 issue (1). Although the subject is timely and of great public health interest, the authors have failed to synthesize available research into a coherent body of evidence that informs practice. For instance, the review included only cohort and case–control studies without adequate explanation of why other study designs were excluded; experimental studies often have the highest level of methodologic rigor (2).

We also were concerned that the review only used a single database, PubMed. Searching a single source can reduce sensitivity to as low as 66% (3). A recent comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar found that Scholar's retrieval rate was double that of PubMed with similar precision (PubMed, 11%; Google Scholar, 22%; P < 0.001; ref. 4). We performed a search of EMBASE using the search strategy used by the authors and identified at least eight additional prospective studies that might have been eligible for the review (citations available upon request).

In addition, the authors have not addressed an important source of error in meta-analysis, inclusion of studies having substantial clinical and methodologic heterogeneity. When heterogeneity was identified and statistically confirmed, the researchers should then have conducted a post hoc subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore the reasons for the heterogeneity (5). The absence of such an analysis raises serious questions about the conclusions of the review.

Finally, when we applied the checklist for Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE; ref. 2) to the review, we found that 18 of the 33 elements were not reported in sufficient detail in the article (checklist available upon request). Items that were not reported included search strategy and assessment of quality. The importance of having this information is obvious because without it one cannot be certain of the review's robustness and applicability to the target audience.

Clinical decision making has benefited enormously from the availability of high-quality systematic reviews. Unfortunately, too few reviewers, as evidenced by this article, select and organize data in a way that will assist clinicians or researchers. Following guidelines from organizations like Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and others would have led to a more coherent review and conclusions. Among the most important recommendations are methodologies for assessing study quality and providing adequate information for decision makers to make judgments on the applicability and generalizability of the results.

See the Response, p. 1436

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

  • Received February 21, 2014.
  • Accepted March 13, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fonseca-Nunes A,
    2. Jakszyn P,
    3. Agudo A
    . Iron and cancer risk – a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:12–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Stroup DF,
    2. Berlin JA,
    3. Morton SC,
    4. Olkin I,
    5. Williamson D,
    6. Rennie D,
    7. et al.
    Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lemeshow AR,
    2. Blum RE,
    3. Berlin JA,
    4. Stoto MA,
    5. Colditz GA
    . Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:867–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Salimah Z,
    2. Shariff SZ,
    3. Math B,
    4. Bejaimal SAD,
    5. Sontrop JM,
    6. Arthur V,
    7. et al.
    Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e164.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Higgins JPT,
    2. Thompson SG,
    3. Deeks JJ,
    4. Altman DG
    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2003;327:557–60.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 23 (7)
July 2014
Volume 23, Issue 7
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Iron and Cancer Risk—Letter
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Iron and Cancer Risk—Letter
Craig A. Garmendia, Marika de los Reyes and Purnima Madhivanan
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev July 1 2014 (23) (7) 1435; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0214

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Iron and Cancer Risk—Letter
Craig A. Garmendia, Marika de los Reyes and Purnima Madhivanan
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev July 1 2014 (23) (7) 1435; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0214
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Genome-wide Analysis of Common Copy Number Variation and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk—Response
  • Copy Number Variation and Ovarian Cancer Risk—Letter
  • Shift Work, Chronotype, and Cancer Risk—Response
Show more Letters to the Editor
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement