Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Short Communications

Serum Immunoglobulin E and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial

Sara H. Olson, Meier Hsu, Joseph L. Wiemels, Paige M. Bracci, Mi Zhou, Joseph Patoka, William R. Reisacher, Julie Wang, Robert C. Kurtz, Debra T. Silverman and Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon
Sara H. Olson
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: olsons@mskcc.org
Meier Hsu
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph L. Wiemels
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paige M. Bracci
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mi Zhou
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Patoka
5Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William R. Reisacher
4Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Wang
3Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Kurtz
2Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra T. Silverman
6Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon
7Branch of Nutritional Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1359 Published July 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have consistently found that self-reported allergies are associated with reduced risk of pancreatic cancer. Our aim was to prospectively assess the relationship between serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), a marker of allergy, and risk. This nested case–control study within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) included subjects enrolled in 1994 to 2001 and followed through 2010. There were 283 cases of pancreatic cancer and 544 controls matched on age, gender, race, and calendar date of blood draw. Using the ImmunoCAP system, we measured total IgE (normal, borderline, elevated), IgE to respiratory allergens, and IgE to food allergens (negative or positive) in serum collected at baseline. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. We assessed interactions with age, gender, smoking, body mass index, and time between randomization and case diagnosis. Overall, there was no association between the IgE measures and risk. We found a statistically significant interaction by baseline age: in those aged ≥65 years, elevated risks were observed for borderline total IgE (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.88–2.32) and elevated total IgE (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.16–3.37) and positive IgE to food allergens (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.29–6.20); among participants <65 years, ORs were <1. Other interactions were not statistically significant. The reduced risk of pancreatic cancer associated with self-reported allergies is not reflected in serum IgE. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(7); 1414–20. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is a deadly disease, with 5-year survival only 6% (1). A consistent finding in epidemiologic studies is reduced risk associated with self-reported allergies (2–5). Very little is known about the biologic basis of this association, which is found in other cancers as well (5). For pancreatic cancer, evidence of reduced risk is most consistent for respiratory allergies, whereas asthma is not associated with risk. Although few studies have investigated food allergies, there is little evidence of an association with risk (3).

Individuals with allergies are characterized by high levels of serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), both total IgE and allergen-specific IgE. We hypothesized that measures of total IgE and specific IgE to respiratory allergens would be inversely associated with risk of pancreatic cancer; we did not have a specific hypothesis about IgE to food allergens. Tests of total and specific IgE may point toward a functional allergy pathway that cannot be inferred from self-reported allergy. We tested this hypothesis in the National Cancer Institute's prospective Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO).

Materials and Methods

Study population

We used a nested case–control design within PLCO, a randomized trial investigating the effects of screening for prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancers (6). From 1994 to 2001, >150,000 men and women ages 55 to 74 years at entry were randomized at 10 screening centers to receive screening or usual care. Participants were eligible if they were not currently undergoing treatment for any cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer) and had not been diagnosed with one of the cancers under study. Participants completed baseline questionnaires on background characteristics and provided a blood sample. Questions on allergies were not included.

Cases had confirmed incident primary pancreatic adenocarcinomas diagnosed from 1994 to 2010 (ICDO3 codes C250–C259, excluding histology codes for endocrine neoplasms). They were identified by an annual mail survey to participants or next of kin and search of cancer registries and death certificates.

A total of 295 pancreatic cancer cases were identified. Controls unaffected by pancreatic cancer were alive in the year of the matched cases' diagnosis and were matched to each case in a 2:1 ratio on age at randomization (<60, 60–64, 65–69, ≥70), year of birth (in 5-year groups from 1920–1924 to 1945–1949), gender, race, and calendar date of blood draw (in 2-month groups, beginning with January/February). Twelve cases and 26 controls were excluded from analysis because they had missing information on all 3 IgE measures; in addition, 20 more controls were excluded because their matched cases were excluded, resulting in a total of 283 cases and 544 matched controls.

The PLCO study was approved by the institutional review boards of the screening centers and the National Cancer Institute. This analysis was reviewed by the institutional review board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Measurement of total and allergen-specific IgE

Blood samples were collected at study entry, processed within 2 hours, and stored at −70°C. IgE measures were undertaken in the Laboratory for Molecular Epidemiology at the University of California San Francisco using the ImmunoCAP Fluorescent Enzyme Immunoassay system (Thermo Fisher Scientific; ref. 7). ImmunoCAP is a fluorescent assay in which the solid phase is a flexible, hydrophobic cellulose polymer to which allergen has been covalently linked. The system has a very high binding capacity and minimal nonspecific binding. For allergen-specific IgE, ImmunoCAP's Phadiatop combines specific respiratory allergens that identify about 97% of individuals with respiratory allergies in the United States; information on the specific allergens included is not provided. The food panel includes peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish, milk, egg, and codfish. Laboratory technicians were blinded to case–control status. We categorized the IgE measures using standard cut points: for total IgE, normal (<25 kU/L), borderline (25–100 kU/L), and elevated (>100 kU/L); for IgE for respiratory allergens and food allergens, negative (<0.35 kU/L) or positive (i.e., detectable; ≥0.35 kU/L). For total IgE, we additionally analyzed risk for those with very elevated levels (>310 kU/L, the 90th percentile). In the UCSF laboratory, the range of coefficients of variation percent for measures of total IgE is 2.0 to 2.8 within assays and 5.3 to 9.1 between. For specific IgE, the corresponding ranges are 5 to 6 and 10 to 11.

Statistical analysis

We prepared descriptive statistics for cases and controls of demographic characteristics (education, marital status, occupation), design factors (study center and season of blood draw), and risk factors for pancreatic cancer [cigarette smoking, body mass index (BMI, weight (k)/height (m2))], diabetes, alcohol intake, and family history of pancreatic cancer. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In the controls, we determined the associations of total and specific IgE measures with demographic characteristics, design factors, and risk factors, using χ2 tests to compare groups. For total IgE, results were log transformed to adjust for skewness in order to determine the geometric mean and SD and to assess the linear association of total IgE with risk. To identify potential confounding factors, we entered each of the demographic, design, and risk factors individually into the conditional logistic models and included those factors that changed the risk estimate by ≥5%. Confounders included in final models were cigarette smoking for total IgE and IgE to respiratory allergens and study center for IgE to food allergens.

We explored whether the risk of pancreatic cancer associated with serum IgE varied by age at baseline (<65 or ≥65), gender, smoking history (never smokers and former smokers who quit ≥15 years ago; current smokers and former smokers who quit <15 years ago), and BMI (dichotomized at the median value, 26.55). Stratum-specific ORs and 95% CIs were estimated from multivariable conditional logistic regression models with cross-product terms composed of the IgE measure and the potential effect modifier variable. To determine whether the association between IgE and risk varied by the length of time between randomization and diagnosis, we categorized cases and matched controls into groups of 0 to 5, 6 to 9, and 10 to 15 years between randomization and diagnosis and analyzed this association using conditional logistic regression with interaction terms.

All statistical analyses were performed in SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc.).

Results

Characteristics of cases and controls are shown in Table 1. Slightly more than half the cases and controls were aged ≥65 years at baseline. Sixty-two percent were men, 90% were white, and 38% were college graduates. Cases were more likely to be current or recent cigarette smokers and more likely to report having diabetes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of cases and controls

For total IgE, the distribution of results in controls was as follows: normal, 41% (n = 224); borderline, 35% (n = 192); elevated, 23% (n = 126). Men were more likely than women to have borderline or elevated total IgE, as were current smokers and those who quit <15 years ago (data not shown in tables). Twenty-eight percent of controls (n = 150) had positive IgE to respiratory allergens. They were more likely to be men and non-white, more likely to be currently working, and less likely to report family history of pancreatic cancer. There was a higher percentage with positive results from the University of Colorado, Georgetown University, and Hawaii. Six percent of controls (n = 35) had positive results for IgE to foods. They were more likely to be younger (<65 years), women, and not married, although these results were not statistically significant.

There were no differences between cases and controls in the IgE measures (Table 2). For total IgE, the adjusted ORs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.59–1.20) for borderline IgE and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.84–1.78) for elevated IgE, compared with normal levels. For a higher category of total IgE (>310 kU/L), risk was slightly higher (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.85–2.37). There was no association with risk when total IgE was analyzed as a log-transformed continuous variable (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95–1.15, data not shown in tables). For positive results for IgE to respiratory allergens, the adjusted OR was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.84–1.61) and for food allergens, the adjusted OR was 1.57 (95% CI, 0.90–2.74).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Risk of pancreatic cancer associated with measures of IgE

Associations of the total and food IgE measures varied according to age (Table 3), with higher IgE related to increased risk in those ages ≥65 years, whereas in those <65 years, ORs were <1. For total IgE, OR = 1.43 (95% CI, 0.88–2.32) for borderline and OR = 1.98 (95% CI, 1.16–3.37) for elevated IgE in older respondents, in contrast to OR = 0.45 (95% CI, 0.26–0.77) for borderline and OR = 0.71 (95% CI, 0.41–1.24) for elevated IgE in younger respondents (Pinteraction 0.003). The patterns were consistent when we examined a higher category of total IgE (>310 kU/L; data not shown). IgE to food was positively associated with risk for older respondents (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.29–6.20) but not for younger respondents (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34–1.91; Pinteraction 0.03). The pattern was similar for IgE to respiratory allergens but neither the ORs within strata nor the interaction was significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Interactions of IgE measures with age groups and length of time until case diagnosis

For other stratified analyses, there were few differences between stratum-specific ORs and no statistically significant interactions (data not shown in tables). There was no pattern of association according to time between randomization and diagnosis for any of the IgE measures (Table 3). For IgE to respiratory allergens, there was a suggestion that positive results were inversely associated with risk in those with 10 to 15 years between randomization and diagnosis (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.43–1.48). We investigated whether there was a difference between younger and older age groups in time from randomization to diagnosis, but results were very similar (mean 90.8 months in cases ages <65 and 88.7 months in cases ages ≥65 years).

Discussion

In the sample as a whole, there were no statistically significant associations of the 3 measures of IgE with risk. Although there is a well-documented relationship between self-reported allergies and reduced risk of pancreatic cancer (2–5), the concordance between self-reported allergy and serum IgE measures is notably poor (8, 9): in data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), only 52% of those who reported any allergy had positive results for IgE to 1 or more of 10 specific IgEs studied (9). Few studies of pancreatic cancer have included questions about food allergies and findings to date are inconsistent (4). It may be particularly difficult for people to distinguish between IgE-mediated sensitivity and other types of food intolerance.

The finding of differences in risk according to age was unexpected and was not related to time between enrollment and diagnosis. Older individuals generally have lower levels of IgE (10); whether the cases harbored higher IgE levels over the long term or whether some immune factor triggered this closer to the time of diagnosis cannot be determined. Our findings on differences in age groups could also be because of chance.

Only one study to date has reported on total IgE and IgE for airborne allergens in relation to risk of pancreatic cancer (11). This Swedish study linked records from patients at an immunology clinic to records from a cancer registry and concluded that there were no increased or decreased risks. This study is limited by the young age of the patients with allergies (65% <40 years) and the short average follow-up (<7 years). In glioma, another cancer for which self-reported allergies are also related to reduced risk, 3 prospective studies investigated serum IgE (12–14). Although some measures showed reduced risk with higher IgE, overall there were few significant findings and little consistency among studies.

The proportion of controls in this study with positive IgE measures was similar to those reported in other recent studies, for borderline and elevated total IgE (10, 15), IgE to panels of specific respiratory allergens (9, 15–17), and IgE to foods (8, 18). Total IgE (19–21) and IgE to respiratory allergens (20, 22) have been found to be stable over time in individuals for about 10 years, although less is known about the stability over time for food IgE in adults.

Strengths of this study include a sample size large enough to identify an inverse OR of ∼0.60 for borderline and elevated total IgE and for respiratory allergies, although there was less power for food allergies. Higher IgE levels are used clinically to identify food allergies (23, 24), but there were too few exposed to evaluate higher levels in our study. In addition, the longest time between cohort entry and diagnosis was 15 years, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Although pancreatic cancer often appears to develop and metastasize quickly, there is recent evidence that it develops, like other cancers, over a period of about 20 years (25).

In conclusion, the reported association of self-reported allergies with reduced risk of pancreatic cancer is not reflected in lower levels of IgE among cases, suggesting that this association operates through some mechanism other than a systemic immune response to allergens.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: S.H. Olson, R.C. Kurtz, R.Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon

Development of methodology: S.H. Olson, J.L. Wiemels, R.Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, W.R. Reisacher

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): J.L. Wiemels, M. Zhou, R.Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, J. Patoka

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): S.H. Olson, J. Wang, M. Hsu

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: S.H. Olson, M. Hsu, J.L. Wiemels, W.R. Reisacher, J. Wang, D.T. Silverman, R.Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, P.M. Bracci

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): J.L. Wiemels, R.C. Kurtz, J. Patoka

Study supervision: J.L. Wiemels, R.C. Kurtz

Grant Support

This project was supported by U01CA150138 to Dr. S.H. Olson.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Received December 27, 2013.
  • Revision received March 14, 2014.
  • Accepted March 19, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas
    . SEER Cancer Statistics [cited 2014 02/17]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/pancreas.html.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Gandini S,
    2. Lowenfels AB,
    3. Jaffee EM,
    4. Armstrong TD,
    5. Maisonneuve P
    . Allergies and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis with review of epidemiology and biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:1908–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Olson SH
    . Selected medical conditions and risk of pancreatic cancer. Mol Carcinog 2012;51:75–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Olson SH,
    2. Hsu M,
    3. Satagopan JM,
    4. Maisonneuve P,
    5. Silverman DT,
    6. Lucenteforte E,
    7. et al.
    Allergies and risk of pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the pancreatic cancer case-control consortium. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178:691–700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Turner MC
    . Epidemiology: allergy history, IgE, and cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2012;61:1493–510.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Prorok PC,
    2. Andriole GL,
    3. Bresalier RS,
    4. Buys SS,
    5. Chia D,
    6. Crawford ED,
    7. et al.
    Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:273S–309S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pharmacia Diagnostics
    . [cited 2013 09/05]. Available from: http://www.phadia.com/en-GB/5/Products/ImmunoCAP-Assays/1/
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gislason D,
    2. Bjornsson E,
    3. Gislason T,
    4. Janson C,
    5. Sjoberg O,
    6. Elfman L,
    7. et al.
    Sensitization to airborne and food allergens in Reykjavik (Iceland) and Uppsala (Sweden)—a comparative study. Allergy 1999;54:1160–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hoppin JA,
    2. Jaramillo R,
    3. Salo P,
    4. Sandler DP,
    5. London SJ,
    6. Zeldin DC
    . Questionnaire predictors of atopy in a US population sample: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2006. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:544–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tschopp JM,
    2. Sistek D,
    3. Schindler C,
    4. Leuenberger P,
    5. Perruchoud AP,
    6. Wuthrich B,
    7. et al.
    Current allergic asthma and rhinitis: diagnostic efficiency of three commonly used atopic markers (IgE, skin prick tests, and Phadiatop). Results from 8329 randomized adults from the SAPALDIA Study. Swiss Study on Air Pollution and Lung Diseases in Adults. Allergy 1998;53:608–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lindelof B,
    2. Granath F,
    3. Tengvall-Linder M,
    4. Ekbom A
    . Allergy and cancer. Allergy 2005;60:1116–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Calboli FC,
    2. Cox DG,
    3. Buring JE,
    4. Gaziano JM,
    5. Ma J,
    6. Stampfer M,
    7. et al.
    Prediagnostic plasma IgE levels and risk of adult glioma in four prospective cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1588–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Schlehofer B,
    2. Siegmund B,
    3. Linseisen J,
    4. Schuz J,
    5. Rohrmann S,
    6. Becker S,
    7. et al.
    Primary brain tumours and specific serum immunoglobulin E: a case-control study nested in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Allergy 2011;66:1434–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Schwartzbaum J,
    2. Ding B,
    3. Johannesen TB,
    4. Osnes LT,
    5. Karavodin L,
    6. Ahlbom A,
    7. et al.
    Association between prediagnostic IgE levels and risk of glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:1251–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Wiemels JL,
    2. Wiencke JK,
    3. Patoka J,
    4. Moghadassi M,
    5. Chew T,
    6. McMillan A,
    7. et al.
    Reduced immunoglobulin E and allergy among adults with glioma compared with controls. Cancer Res 2004;64:8468–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Court CS,
    2. Cook DG,
    3. Strachan DP
    . The descriptive epidemiology of house dust mite-specific and total immunoglobin E in England using a nationally representative sample. Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32:1033–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kerkhof M,
    2. Dubois AE,
    3. Postma DS,
    4. Schouten JP,
    5. de Monchy JG
    . Role and interpretation of total serum IgE measurements in the diagnosis of allergic airway disease in adults. Allergy 2003;58:905–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Keet CA,
    2. Wood RA,
    3. Matsui EC
    . Limitations of reliance on specific IgE for epidemiologic surveillance of food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:1207–9 e10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Barbee RA,
    2. Halonen M,
    3. Kaltenborn W,
    4. Lebowitz M,
    5. Burrows B
    . A longitudinal study of serum IgE in a community cohort: correlations with age, sex, smoking, and atopic status. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987;79:919–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jarvis D,
    2. Luczynska C,
    3. Chinn S,
    4. Potts J,
    5. Sunyer J,
    6. Janson C,
    7. et al.
    Change in prevalence of IgE sensitization and mean total IgE with age and cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:675–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Oryszczyn MP,
    2. Annesi I,
    3. Neukirch F,
    4. Dore MF,
    5. Kauffmann F
    . Longitudinal observations of serum IgE and skin prick test response. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;151:663–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Linneberg A,
    2. Nielsen NH,
    3. Madsen F,
    4. Frolund L,
    5. Dirksen A,
    6. Jorgensen T
    . Is the increase in allergic respiratory disease caused by a cohort effect? Clin Exp Allergy 2002;32:1702–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Liu AH,
    2. Jaramillo R,
    3. Sicherer SH,
    4. Wood RA,
    5. Bock SA,
    6. Burks AW,
    7. et al.
    National prevalence and risk factors for food allergy and relationship to asthma: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:798–806 e13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sampson HA
    . Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;113:805–19; quiz 20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Yachida S,
    2. Jones S,
    3. Bozic I,
    4. Antal T,
    5. Leary R,
    6. Fu B,
    7. et al.
    Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2010;467:1114–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 23 (7)
July 2014
Volume 23, Issue 7
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Serum Immunoglobulin E and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Serum Immunoglobulin E and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
Sara H. Olson, Meier Hsu, Joseph L. Wiemels, Paige M. Bracci, Mi Zhou, Joseph Patoka, William R. Reisacher, Julie Wang, Robert C. Kurtz, Debra T. Silverman and Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev July 1 2014 (23) (7) 1414-1420; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1359

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Serum Immunoglobulin E and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
Sara H. Olson, Meier Hsu, Joseph L. Wiemels, Paige M. Bracci, Mi Zhou, Joseph Patoka, William R. Reisacher, Julie Wang, Robert C. Kurtz, Debra T. Silverman and Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev July 1 2014 (23) (7) 1414-1420; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1359
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Tamoxifen and Longitudinal Mammographic Density Change
  • Cancer Predisposition Gene Mutations and Pancreatic Cancer
  • Statin Use and Breast Cancer Risk
Show more Short Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement