Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Letters to the Editor

Telomere Length Varies by DNA Extraction Method: Implications for Epidemiologic Research—Response

Lisa A. Boardman, Halcyon G. Skinner and Kristin Litzelman
Lisa A. Boardman
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 2Truven Health Analytics, Durham, North Carolina; and 3Cancer Prevention Fellowship, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Halcyon G. Skinner
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 2Truven Health Analytics, Durham, North Carolina; and 3Cancer Prevention Fellowship, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristin Litzelman
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 2Truven Health Analytics, Durham, North Carolina; and 3Cancer Prevention Fellowship, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0234 Published June 2014
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We thank Hofmann and colleagues (1) for their report corroborating our discovery that the method used to extract DNA from blood cells influences the measurement of telomere length (2). Hoffman and colleagues found that peripheral leukocyte telomere lengths measured by quantitative PCR were significantly longer in DNA that had been extracted by the ReliaPrep magnetic bead capture chemistry than in DNA extracted by the QIAamp column method. This echoes our finding that QIAamp DNA extraction yielded shorter telomeres than DNA extracted by either liquid phase phenol/chloroform or the salting out method Puregene. In addition, Hofmann and colleagues determined that QIAamp extracted samples had a higher copy number of mitochondrial (mt)DNA than mtDNA extracted by ReliaPrep. We acknowledge their important contribution highlighting that DNA extraction method may affect our ability to compare results across studies of not only telomere length but also with regard to mtDNA copy number.

These new results underscore our conclusion that the use of QIAamp extracted DNA for telomere length quantification is subject to systematic measurement error that may limit studies in detecting associations between telomere length and outcomes.

See the original Letter to the Editor, p. 1129

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

  • Received March 5, 2014.
  • Accepted March 11, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hofmann JN,
    2. Hutchinson AA,
    3. Cawthon R,
    4. Liu CS,
    5. Lynch SM,
    6. Lan Q,
    7. et al.
    Telomere length varies by DNA extraction method: implications for epidemiologic research—letter. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:1129–30.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cunningham JM,
    2. Johnson RA,
    3. Litzelman K,
    4. Skinner HG,
    5. Seo S,
    6. Engelman CD,
    7. et al.
    Telomere length varies by DNA extraction method: implications for epidemiologic research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:2047–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 23 (6)
June 2014
Volume 23, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Telomere Length Varies by DNA Extraction Method: Implications for Epidemiologic Research—Response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Telomere Length Varies by DNA Extraction Method: Implications for Epidemiologic Research—Response
Lisa A. Boardman, Halcyon G. Skinner and Kristin Litzelman
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev June 1 2014 (23) (6) 1131; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0234

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Telomere Length Varies by DNA Extraction Method: Implications for Epidemiologic Research—Response
Lisa A. Boardman, Halcyon G. Skinner and Kristin Litzelman
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev June 1 2014 (23) (6) 1131; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0234
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Copy Number Variation and Ovarian Cancer Risk—Letter
  • Genome-wide Analysis of Common Copy Number Variation and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk—Response
  • Shift Work, Chronotype, and Cancer Risk—Response
Show more Letters to the Editor
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement