Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer Risk among Elderly Adults in the United States

Morgan A. Marks and Eric A. Engels
Morgan A. Marks
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric A. Engels
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1138 Published May 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Few studies have evaluated cancer risk following venous thromboembolism (VTE). Both VTE and cancer disproportionately affect older adults.

Methods: Using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare data, we evaluated 1.2 million cancer cases and 200,000 controls (66–99 years old, 1992–2005). VTEs occurring before selection were identified using Medicare claims. Logistic regression was used to estimate ORs.

Results: VTE was present in 2.5% of cases and 2.2% of controls. VTE was associated with risk of cancers of the lung [OR = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12–1.23], stomach (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09–1.30), small intestine (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17–1.71), colon (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18–1.31), gallbladder (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.16–1.67), pancreas (OR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.43–1.64), soft tissue (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.21–1.68), ovary (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22–1.50), and kidney/renal pelvis (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23–1.46), and melanoma (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08–1.27), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20- 1.35), myeloma (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35–1.63), and acute myeloid leukemia (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19–1.54). Strongest risks were observed within 1 year of VTE diagnosis, but risks were elevated more than 6 years after VTE for colon cancer (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12–1.37), pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.15–1.54), and myeloma (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.66). Few differences in risk were observed by VTE subtype. Cancers of the lung, stomach, and pancreas were more likely to have distant metastases within one year after VTE.

Conclusion: Among elderly adults, cancer risk is elevated following VTE diagnosis.

Impact: Short-term associations with cancer are likely driven by enhanced screening following VTE and reverse causation. While obesity, other comorbidities, and smoking cannot be excluded as explanations, longer-term elevations for select cancers suggest that some VTEs may be caused by cancer precursors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(5); 774–83. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) involves obstruction of blood flow caused by the presence of clots and includes pulmonary emboli and both deep venous thromboses (DVT) and superficial venous thromboses (SVT). VTE affects nearly 500,000 individuals each year (1, 2). The incidence of VTE increases steeply with age, with rates of 450 to 600 cases per 100,000 person-years among individuals >65 years of age (3, 4). Furthermore, VTE risk is 4- to 6-fold higher in individuals diagnosed and treated for cancer (5, 6). VTE also contributes significant morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer, with VTE detected within 1 year before cancer diagnosis being associated with advanced stage and poorer posttreatment survival (7).

Although much work has focused on understanding the sources of VTE and its management (1, 5, 7–10), only a handful of studies have assessed the association of VTE with the subsequent development of malignancies. Population and hospital-based studies have demonstrated a strong risk of cancer within a very short follow-up time interval after VTE (typically less than 1 year; refs. 11–15). Interestingly, prior studies show that those individuals with a longer follow-up time of 2 or more years after VTE also have elevated risk for certain malignancies such as cancers of the digestive tract, ovarian cancer, and lymphomas (11, 14, 16, 17). These associations seem to be similar across VTE subtypes of pulmonary embolism, DVT, and SVT (18).

Individuals older than 65 years have a disproportionately high burden of both cancer and VTE. We therefore, investigated the relationship of VTE with subsequent development of cancer in a large case–control study of elderly adults in the United States using data from cancer registries and Medicare claims files. The large number of cancer cases and controls in this study afforded us the opportunity to assess the relationship of VTE overall and subtypes of VTE with a wide range of solid-organ and hematologic malignancies.

Materials and Methods

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program comprises population-based state and metropolitan cancer registries that ascertain cancers occurring in approximately 26% of the U.S. population (19). Medicare is a federally funded program that provides health insurance for 97% of the U.S. population ages older than 65 years. All Medicare beneficiaries are entitled to coverage for inpatient care (Part A), and most purchase additional coverage for physician and outpatient services (Part B). The SEER–Medicare data set was created by electronically linking SEER and Medicare data (19). The resulting match links 94% of SEER cancer cases ages 65 years and older to Medicare data. In addition, data are available for a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries living in SEER regions. The SEER–Medicare dataset contains demographic and clinical information, and Medicare claims data (Part A beginning in 1986, Part B beginning in 1991) on these individuals.

The current study is a population-based case–control study derived from the SEER–Medicare data, as previously described (20). Cases were defined as individuals with first cancers identified in SEER, ages 66 to 99 years between the years 1992 to 2005. Cases identified solely at autopsy or by death certificates were excluded. Cases also were required to have at least 13 months of Part A and Part B Medicare coverage, during which they were not enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO), before diagnosis. Cancers were categorized based on the SEER program “site recode with Kaposi sarcoma and mesothelioma,” which we modified to collapse some rare categories. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was classified based on the World Health Organization scheme and included chronic lymphocytic leukemia (21).

Controls (N = 200,000) were selected from the 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries living in SEER areas and were frequency-matched to cases by sex, age (66–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, and 85–99 years), and calendar year of selection. As of July 1 of the calendar year of selection, controls were alive, cancer-free, and had at least 13 months of Part A, Part B, and non-HMO Medicare coverage. Controls could have been selected multiple times in different calendar years or could later have become a case.

The first recorded VTE was assessed using Medicare claims in hospital, outpatient, and provider files. We defined VTE based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) codes for pulmonary embolism (415.1), DVT (451.1, 451.2, 451.81, 451.83, 453.2, 453.3, and 453.4), SVT (451.0, and 451.82), and venous thrombosis not otherwise specified (VTE NOS; 451.84, 451.89, 453.1, 453.8, and 453.9).

Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI), comparing the prevalence of VTE in cases and controls. Given the incidence density sampling of cases and controls from the Medicare cohort, the odds ratios calculated in this study can be interpreted as estimates of relative risk. We accounted for the repeated sampling of controls and the fact that some controls later became cases in the variance calculation (20). All analyses were adjusted for sex, age, and calendar year of diagnosis/selection. Given the large number of cancer types assessed in this study, a conservative Bonferroni P value of <0.001 was used as the cut-off for statistical significance.

For cancers that were associated with VTE, we created additional models to evaluate the strength of the association with cancer in different latency intervals after VTE (<1, 1–2.5, 2.6–4.0, 4.1–6, and >6 years). The interaction of VTE and cancer risk across latency intervals was assessed by including a product term in the logistic regression model. We also fit logistic regression models to evaluate associations for each VTE subtype and used likelihood ratio tests to assess the differential effect of VTE subtypes on cancer risk (i.e., to compare the effects of pulmonary embolism or DVT vs. SVT, or of pulmonary embolism vs. DVT). A P value of <0.05 was used as the cut-off to determine whether the effect on cancer risk varied by latency or VTE subtype. Finally, among cases with solid-organ cancers, we compared the distribution of SEER cancer stage (local vs. regional vs. distant) among those with a VTE detected <1 year before cancer diagnosis, ≥1 year before cancer diagnosis, and those without a VTE.

Results

The characteristics of cases and controls are presented in Table 1. The majority of subjects were male, white, and selected between 1999 and 2002. Cases and controls were matched with respect to age, sex, and year of diagnosis/selection; they differed slightly by race/ethnicity and duration of Medicare coverage.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Subject characteristics

VTE was observed among 2.5% of cases and 2.2% controls. Overall, VTE was associated with a 15% increased risk of any cancer (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11–1.20; Table 2). Among the 45 solid-organ cancers assessed, 10 were associated with VTE (P < 0.001), including cancers of the lung (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12–1.23), stomach (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09–1.30), small intestine (OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17–1.71), colon (1.25; 95% CI, 1.18–1.31), gallbladder (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.16–1.67), pancreas (OR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.43–1.64), soft tissue including the heart (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.21–1.68), ovary (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22–1.50), and kidney/renal pelvis (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23–1.46), and melanoma (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08–1.27). Among 7 evaluated hematologic malignancies, VTE was associated with an increased risk of NHL (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20–1.35), myeloma (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35–1.63), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19–1.54). Among NHL subtypes, there was a significant association with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.28–1.55).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Associations of venous thromboembolism and cancer

We also investigated the association of VTE and cancer risk across different follow-up times (i.e., latency intervals) after VTE (Table 3). For most cancers, risk was strongest <1 year following VTE and significantly attenuated with longer time intervals (P < 0.001); an exception was melanoma, for which risk did not vary by time interval. Most associations were not significant >6 years after VTE. However, cancers for which risk was elevated >6 years after VTE included colon cancer (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12–1.37), pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.15–1.54), and myeloma (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.66).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Associations of VTE with cancer in different latency intervals following VTE

In total, 0.7%, 0.4%, 0.1%, and 1.3% of cases and 0.6%, 0.3%, 0.1%, and 1.2% of controls were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, DVT, SVT, or VTE NOS, respectively. Overall, for most cancers, risk seemed similar following pulmonary embolism and DVT, or for the combination of pulmonary embolism or DVT compared with SVT (Table 4). NHL and AML were exceptions in that risk was significantly higher following DVT as compared with pulmonary embolism.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Associations of pulmonary embolism, DVT, and SVT with cancer

The stage distribution of solid-organ cancers in relation to VTE diagnosis is shown in Table 5. A significantly higher proportion of distant stage diagnoses were observed among individuals with VTE diagnosed <1 year before cancer diagnosis, compared with cases without VTE for cancers of the lung (60.5% vs. 52.9%, P < 0.001), stomach (44.7% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.024), and pancreatic cancer (74.4% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Frequency and distribution of cancers by stage among those with and without VTE

Discussion

In our case–control study of over 1 million cancer cases of elderly individuals in the United States, we demonstrate a 15% increased risk of any cancer diagnosis associated with a prior diagnosis of VTE. This increased risk was not present for all cancers but instead was restricted to a large and somewhat heterogeneous subgroup of malignancies: cancers of the lung, stomach, small intestine, colon, gallbladder, pancreas, soft tissue, ovary, and kidney/renal pelvis, as well as for melanoma, NHL, myeloma, and AML. The elevated risks were generally stronger in the 1-year period following VTE diagnosis. Nonetheless, the risk of colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, and myeloma remained significantly elevated after more than 6 years of follow-up time.

The strongly elevated risk of cancer less than 1 year after VTE diagnosis observed in this study is consistent with results from prior population- and hospital-based studies (11–15). These previous studies have also shown distinct associations with cancers of digestive tract, pancreas, and NHL, as observed in our study. The short-term associations may be because of medical practice patterns in which clinicians search for cancer in people presenting with VTE. Prompted by VTE, screening tests such as colonoscopy or chest and abdominal/pelvic computed tomography scans could lead to diagnosis of previously unsuspected and asymptomatic malignancies.

Because cancer can itself cause VTE, an additional explanation is that VTE is a presenting manifestation of cancer and is diagnosed simultaneously with or slightly before the cancer. Many of the cancers diagnosed concurrently with VTE present at an advanced stage (7, 14). Indeed, we demonstrated that a larger proportion of lung, stomach, and pancreatic cancers diagnosed within 1 year of VTE presented with distant metastases, compared with when there was no history of VTE. Conversely, several large registry-based studies documented a significantly higher risk of VTE following diagnosis and treatment of these cancer types as well as kidney cancer, ovarian cancer, NHL, and myeloma (5, 6, 22). Furthermore, a separate study of over 66,000 cancer cases identified a near 2-fold increased risk of VTE associated with distant metastases as compared with a localized malignancy (23). Mechanistic studies have shown higher concentrations of pro-coagulant factors among individuals diagnosed with cancer (24, 25). Therefore, the short-term associations of VTE with cancer risk are most likely driven by a combination of enhanced screening for cancer among individuals with VTE (which would lead to detection of early stage cancers) and reverse causation (i.e., cancer causing VTE, with some cases manifesting aggressive biology and advanced stage).

In contrast, the long-term association of VTE with risk of cancer of the digestive tract and hematologic malignancies, for a period of greater than 6 years following VTE, cannot be readily explained by screening or reverse causation. Unlike the short-term associations with cancer risk, these longer-term associations have not been observed consistently in prior studies (11, 14, 16–18). Nonetheless, one plausible explanation is that the VTE may be caused by small, slow-growing tumor precursors that exist for extended periods of time. Such precursor tumors may induce procoagulant activity, possibly through production of cytokines and other molecular factors (26). Of interest, the 3 cancers in our study that were associated with VTE over a long latency period have a prolonged precancerous phase. Specifically, colon cancer is preceded by preneoplastic polyps, pancreatic cancer develops over more than a decade, and myeloma is preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of underdetermined significance (MGUS; refs. 27–29). Indeed, an elevated rate of VTE and arterial thrombosis has been reported among those diagnosed with MGUS, which persists for up to 10 years after MGUS diagnosis (30–32). Furthermore, elevated serum concentrations of prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 are associated with increased risk of digestive tract cancers (33).

We found very little difference in cancer risk by VTE subtype. This observation is mostly in agreement with a previous study that also assessed VTE subtype-specific associations (18). However, we observed a higher risk of NHL and AML associated with DVT than pulmonary embolism. While pulmonary embolism is a more severe VTE event that results in higher mortality than DVT, a biologic basis for these differences in cancer risk is unclear. Notably, the otherwise general lack of difference in cancer risk by VTE subtype reinforces the need to consider all VTEs, including SVT, with equal importance as they relate to cancer risk.

This study also has several limitations. First, we lacked information on some risk factors that could confound the observed associations. Smoking and obesity both increase the risk of VTE in general and are identified risk factors for the development of cancers of the lung, stomach, pancreas, colon, and ovary (2, 34–43). In addition to smoking and obesity, other comorbid conditions that occur at an elevated rate in this elderly population may also play a role as potential confounders. Second, our study was limited to people ages 66 years and older, and we could not ascertain the occurrence of VTE before the age of 65 years. The high prevalence of other cancer risk factors in this elderly Medicare population may explain why the associations observed in our study are weaker than relative risks estimated in other, mostly younger, populations (11, 17). Third, because information on VTE subtype was based on billing claims submitted by health care providers, rather than a detailed medical record abstraction, there may be some misclassification of VTE subtypes.

This study has several strengths, including the large sample size and population-based selection of cases and controls. Furthermore, because we included a large representative sample of elderly adults, our results are directly relevant to this population, among whom both VTE and cancer are disproportionately common. In addition, the large sample of this study allowed for systematic evaluation across a range of multiple cancer types. However, given the rarity of VTE, some true associations may have failed to reach statistical significance.

The association of VTE with subsequent diagnosis of cancer, as well as the increased mortality of individuals with cancer who were previously diagnosed with VTE, has led to the suggested use of enhanced cancer screening strategies among individuals diagnosed with VTE. This approach may be most relevant for those cancers with an asymptomatic precursor condition and for which we observed associations with VTE over a latency period of several years (i.e., colon and pancreatic cancers, myeloma). A number of prospective and retrospective studies have indeed demonstrated that the use of basic screening strategies such as physical examination, computed tomography scans, or targeted laboratory testing among individuals diagnosed with unprovoked or idiopathic VTE results in early detection of malignancies, particularly those of the pelvis and abdomen (44–46). However, a small randomized trial assessing the effect of targeted screening among individuals with VTE showed no increased benefit of early detection on survival (47). Therefore, cancer screening among individuals with VTE may only increase the lead-time in detecting cancer and may not improve survival among individuals diagnosed early with cancer.

In conclusion, we observed an elevated risk of specific solid-organ and hematologic cancers. The associations were most notable within 1 year following VTE diagnosis, and several cancers were more likely to present with distant metastases when they manifested in this short interval. The elevated risk of 3 cancers (colon and pancreatic cancers, myeloma) was significant at a period of more than 6 years following VTE diagnosis. Our study lends epidemiologic support to the view that cancer is related to the development of VTE. Additional studies are needed to better understand the underlying biologic mechanisms and evaluate the potential clinical role of VTE as an early predictor for the development of cancer.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: E.A. Engels

Development of methodology: E.A. Engels

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): M.A. Marks, E.A. Engels

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: M.A. Marks, E.A. Engels

Study supervision: E.A. Engels

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (M. Marks).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

This study used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors thank the efforts of the Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute; the Office of Research, Development, and Information, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Information Management Services, Inc.; and the SEER Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER–Medicare database. The authors thank W. Ricker (Information Management Services, Rockville, MD) for assistance with database management.

  • Received November 1, 2013.
  • Revision received December 26, 2013.
  • Accepted January 14, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lyman GH,
    2. Khorana AA
    . Cancer, clots and consensus: new understanding of an old problem. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4821–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. White RH
    . The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:I4–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Silverstein MD,
    2. Heit JA,
    3. Mohr DN,
    4. Petterson TM,
    5. O'Fallon WM,
    6. Melton LJ 3rd.
    . Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:585–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Anderson FA Jr..,
    2. Wheeler HB,
    3. Goldberg RJ,
    4. Hosmer DW,
    5. Patwardhan NA,
    6. Jovanovic B,
    7. et al.
    A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:933–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Heit JA,
    2. Silverstein MD,
    3. Mohr DN,
    4. Petterson TM,
    5. O'Fallon WM,
    6. Melton LJ 3rd.
    . Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:809–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Walker AJ,
    2. Card TR,
    3. West J,
    4. Crooks C,
    5. Grainge MJ
    . Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer—a cohort study using linked United Kingdom databases. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1404–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Sorensen HT,
    2. Mellemkjaer L,
    3. Olsen JH,
    4. Baron JA
    . Prognosis of cancers associated with venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1846–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Blom JW,
    2. Doggen CJ,
    3. Osanto S,
    4. Rosendaal FR
    . Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 2005;293:715–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Levitan N,
    2. Dowlati A,
    3. Remick SC,
    4. Tahsildar HI,
    5. Sivinski LD,
    6. Beyth R,
    7. et al.
    Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data. Medicine (Baltimore) 1999;78:285–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Stein PD,
    2. Beemath A,
    3. Meyers FA,
    4. Skaf E,
    5. Sanchez J,
    6. Olson RE
    . Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with cancer. Am J Med 2006;119:60–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Baron JA,
    2. Gridley G,
    3. Weiderpass E,
    4. Nyren O,
    5. Linet M
    . Venous thromboembolism and cancer. Lancet 1998;351:1077–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nordstrom M,
    2. Lindblad B,
    3. Anderson H,
    4. Bergqvist D,
    5. Kjellstrom T
    . Deep venous thrombosis and occult malignancy: an epidemiological study. BMJ 1994;308:891–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Prandoni P,
    2. Lensing AW,
    3. Buller HR,
    4. Cogo A,
    5. Prins MH,
    6. Cattelan AM,
    7. et al.
    Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1128–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sorensen HT,
    2. Mellemkjaer L,
    3. Steffensen FH,
    4. Olsen JH,
    5. Nielsen GL
    . The risk of a diagnosis of cancer after primary deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1169–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. White RH,
    2. Chew HK,
    3. Zhou H,
    4. Parikh-Patel A,
    5. Harris D,
    6. Harvey D,
    7. et al.
    Incidence of venous thromboembolism in the year before the diagnosis of cancer in 528,693 adults. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1782–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Douketis JD,
    2. Gu C,
    3. Piccioli A,
    4. Ghirarduzzi A,
    5. Pengo V,
    6. Prandoni P
    . The long-term risk of cancer in patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:546–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Murchison JT,
    2. Wylie L,
    3. Stockton DL
    . Excess risk of cancer in patients with primary venous thromboembolism: a national, population-based cohort study. Br J Cancer 2004;91:92–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Sorensen HT,
    2. Svaerke C,
    3. Farkas DK,
    4. Christiansen CF,
    5. Pedersen L,
    6. Lash TL,
    7. et al.
    Superficial and deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and subsequent risk of cancer. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:586–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Warren JL,
    2. Klabunde CN,
    3. Schrag D,
    4. Bach PB,
    5. Riley GF
    . Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 2002;40:IV-3–18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Engels EA,
    2. Pfeiffer RM,
    3. Ricker W,
    4. Wheeler W,
    5. Parsons R,
    6. Warren JL
    . Use of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results—Medicare data to conduct case-control studies of cancer among the US elderly. Am J Epidemiol 2011;174:860–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Morton LM,
    2. Turner JJ,
    3. Cerhan JR,
    4. Linet MS,
    5. Treseler PA,
    6. Clarke CA,
    7. et al.
    Proposed classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research from the Pathology Working Group of the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Blood 2007;110:695–708.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Khorana AA,
    2. Francis CW,
    3. Culakova E,
    4. Kuderer NM,
    5. Lyman GH
    . Frequency, risk factors, and trends for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer 2007;110:2339–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Blom JW,
    2. Vanderschoot JP,
    3. Oostindier MJ,
    4. Osanto S,
    5. van der Meer FJ,
    6. Rosendaal FR
    . Incidence of venous thrombosis in a large cohort of 66,329 cancer patients: results of a record linkage study. J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:529–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Auwerda JJ,
    2. Sonneveld P,
    3. de Maat MP,
    4. Leebeek FW
    . Prothrombotic coagulation abnormalities in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2007;92:279–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Rickles FR,
    2. Hair GA,
    3. Zeff RA,
    4. Lee E,
    5. Bona RD
    . Tissue factor expression in human leukocytes and tumor cells. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:391–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Silverstein R,
    2. Nachman R
    . Cancer and clotting: Trousseau's warning. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1163–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Landgren O,
    2. Korde N
    . Multiple myeloma precursor disease: current clinical and epidemiological insights and future opportunities. Oncology (Williston Park) 2011;25:589–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Yachida S,
    2. Jones S,
    3. Bozic I,
    4. Antal T,
    5. Leary R,
    6. Fu B,
    7. et al.
    Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature 2010;467:1114–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Vogelstein B,
    2. Fearon ER,
    3. Hamilton SR,
    4. Kern SE,
    5. Preisinger AC,
    6. Leppert M,
    7. et al.
    Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 1988;319:525–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gregersen H,
    2. Norgaard M,
    3. Severinsen MT,
    4. Engebjerg MC,
    5. Jensen P,
    6. Sorensen HT
    . Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of venous thromboembolism. Eur J Haematol 2011;86:129–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Muslimani AA,
    2. Spiro TP,
    3. Chaudhry AA,
    4. Taylor HC,
    5. Jaiyesimi I,
    6. Daw HA
    . Venous thromboembolism in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2009;7:827–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kristinsson SY,
    2. Fears TR,
    3. Gridley G,
    4. Turesson I,
    5. Mellqvist UH,
    6. Bjorkholm M,
    7. et al.
    Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma. Blood 2008;112:3582–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Miller GJ,
    2. Bauer KA,
    3. Howarth DJ,
    4. Cooper JA,
    5. Humphries SE,
    6. Rosenberg RD
    . Increased incidence of neoplasia of the digestive tract in men with persistent activation of the coagulant pathway. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:2107–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Dela Cruz CS,
    2. Tanoue LT,
    3. Matthay RA
    . Lung cancer: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin Chest Med 2011;32:605–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Ladeiras-Lopes R,
    2. Pereira AK,
    3. Nogueira A,
    4. Pinheiro-Torres T,
    5. Pinto I,
    6. Santos-Pereira R,
    7. et al.
    Smoking and gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:689–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Yang P,
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Chen B,
    4. Wan HW,
    5. Jia GQ,
    6. Bai HL,
    7. et al.
    Overweight, obesity and gastric cancer risk: results from a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:2867–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Patel AV,
    2. Rodriguez C,
    3. Bernstein L,
    4. Chao A,
    5. Thun MJ,
    6. Calle EE
    . Obesity, recreational physical activity, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large U.S. Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:459–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Tranah GJ,
    2. Holly EA,
    3. Wang F,
    4. Bracci PM
    . Cigarette, cigar and pipe smoking, passive smoke exposure, and risk of pancreatic cancer: a population-based study in the San Francisco Bay Area. BMC Cancer 2011;11:138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Bardou M,
    2. Barkun AN,
    3. Martel M
    . Obesity and colorectal cancer. Gut 2013;62:933–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Botteri E,
    2. Iodice S,
    3. Bagnardi V,
    4. Raimondi S,
    5. Lowenfels AB,
    6. Maisonneuve P
    . Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:2765–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Olsen CM,
    2. Nagle CM,
    3. Whiteman DC,
    4. Ness R,
    5. Pearce CL,
    6. Pike MC,
    7. et al.
    Obesity and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Endocr Relat Cancer 2013;20:251–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Beral V,
    2. Gaitskell K,
    3. Hermon C,
    4. Moser K,
    5. Reeves G,
    6. Peto R
    . Ovarian cancer and smoking: individual participant meta-analysis including 28,114 women with ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:946–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Anderson FA Jr..,
    2. Spencer FA
    . Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003;107:I9–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Carrier M,
    2. Le Gal G,
    3. Wells PS,
    4. Fergusson D,
    5. Ramsay T,
    6. Rodger MA
    . Systematic review: the Trousseau syndrome revisited: should we screen extensively for cancer in patients with venous thromboembolism? Ann Intern Med 2008;149:323–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cornuz J,
    2. Pearson SD,
    3. Creager MA,
    4. Cook EF,
    5. Goldman L
    . Importance of findings on the initial evaluation for cancer in patients with symptomatic idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:785–93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Monreal M,
    2. Lensing AW,
    3. Prins MH,
    4. Bonet M,
    5. Fernandez-Llamazares J,
    6. Muchart J,
    7. et al.
    Screening for occult cancer in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:876–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Piccioli A,
    2. Lensing AW,
    3. Prins MH,
    4. Falanga A,
    5. Scannapieco GL,
    6. Ieran M,
    7. et al.
    Extensive screening for occult malignant disease in idiopathic venous thromboembolism: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:884–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 23 (5)
May 2014
Volume 23, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer Risk among Elderly Adults in the United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer Risk among Elderly Adults in the United States
Morgan A. Marks and Eric A. Engels
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev May 1 2014 (23) (5) 774-783; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer Risk among Elderly Adults in the United States
Morgan A. Marks and Eric A. Engels
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev May 1 2014 (23) (5) 774-783; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1138
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Urinary Melatonin in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk
  • Endometrial Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Cross-Cancer GWAS
  • Risk Factors of Subsequent CNS Tumor after Pediatric Cancer
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement