Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Null Results in Brief

Chronic Use of NSAIDs and/or Statins Does Not Affect PSA or PSA Velocity in Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer

Amit M. Algotar, Roxanna Behnejad, M. Suzanne Stratton and Steven P. Stratton
Amit M. Algotar
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: algotar@email.arizona.edu
Roxanna Behnejad
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Suzanne Stratton
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven P. Stratton
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0605 Published October 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: PSA and PSA velocity (PSAV, rate of PSA change over time) are biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Men who are at high risk for prostate cancer also have associated comorbidities for which they are taking NSAIDs and statins for long periods; therefore, it is important to understand the effect of these medications on markers used to assess prostate cancer risk.

Methods: Using a population of 699 men, multiple linear regressions were used to investigate the associations between PSA and concomitant medications, and mixed-effects models were used to investigate these associations with PSAV.

Results: After adjusting for selenium use, age, race, body mass index, and pack-years of smoking, aspirin, other NSAIDs, or statins did not demonstrate statistically significant associations with PSA (P = 0.79, 0.68, and 0.79, respectively) or PSAV (P = 0.23, 0.43, and 0.84, respectively). Results were not altered upon stratifying the sample between men who developed prostate cancer during the course of the study and those who did not.

Conclusions: Results from this study indicate that chronic use of aspirin, other NSAIDs, or statins did not affect PSA levels or PSAV in men at high risk for prostate cancer. Larger prospective studies designed to investigate these relationships are needed to confirm this result.

Impact: Long-term use of NSAIDs or statins in men at high risk for prostate cancer may not interfere with the diagnosis or prognosis of this disease, and supports appropriate use of these medications with regard to prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(10); 2196–8. ©2014 AACR.

Introduction

NSAIDs and statins are of interest in cancer prevention. However, data thus far have been conflicting and inconclusive (1). The 2003 positive study on celecoxib showing an effect in familial adenomatous polyposis [28% (P = 0.003) polyp reduction in 88 patients] and the subsequent FDA approval of celecoxib for chemoprevention in this high-risk population (2) intensified the focus for examining the effects of NSAIDs in cancer chemoprevention, including prostate cancer. However, the positive effects have not translated into other diseases. Similarly, there are compelling data about chemopreventive effects of statins; however, these results are controversial (3, 4).

Many men at high risk for prostate cancer have associated comorbidities requiring long-term use of NSAIDs and statins, which presents a challenge in studying these agents in a randomized trial. Furthermore, an independent effect of these drugs on PSA and PSA velocity (rate of PSA change over time) in those at high-risk could interfere with appropriate diagnosis and monitoring of patients with a positive prostate biopsy. Thus, our goal was to determine whether these medications elicited an independent effect of PSA in high-risk men.

Materials and Methods

Data were obtained from the negative biopsy trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III chemoprevention trial designed to investigate the effect of selenium supplementation on prevention of prostate cancer in high-risk men, details of which are available in our earlier publication (5). In the current study, medication use data were obtained by questionnaire at baseline and at twice-yearly follow-up visits. Baseline association was investigated using multiple linear regression analysis. PSA values were transformed via the logarithmic function to correct for skewed distribution. Statistical significance of an interaction term between medication use and time-on-study was used to assess the impact of the association between medication use and change in PSA levels over time through mixed-effects regression models. We project to have 96% power using a two-sample t test to detect a difference between PSA levels at an α of 0.05. Using PSA velocity of 0.51 and 0.95 ng/mL/year for aspirin users and nonusers, respectively (6) and assuming an average of 5 repeated measures per subject, we project power of 99% for PSA velocity for the sample size.

Results

Table 1 displays the mean and SDs for subjects using aspirin, other NSAIDs, and statins at baseline. Using multiple linear regression analysis, the coefficient of association between baseline PSA and aspirin, other NSAID, or statins is −0.17, 0.66, and −0.24, with respective P values as 0.75, 0.36, and 0.62. Table 2 shows the PSA values and SD of participants for each visit number, with N denoting the number of subjects in each group at each visit. Results of mixed-effect regression models indicate that medication use is not associated with statistically significant change in PSA velocity (P values 0.76, 0.40, and 0.98, respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics by medication use

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

PSA values (ng/mL) by visit number

Discussion

This is the first study to use a longitudinal study design and mixed-model analysis to determine the effect of medication use on PSA and PSA velocity. These results indicated that aspirin, other NSAIDs, and statins may not interfere with the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer and hence may be safely used in men at high risk for prostate cancer. The Irish Tumor Registry showed that aspirin did not significantly affect prostate cancer risk [HR, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.67–1.15], and a modest survival effect was observed (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37–0.99) in the group defined as high-dose (75 mg daily; ref. 7). Although other studies suggest that there is an effect (8). Similarly, the data thus far on statins on prostate cancer risk are compelling but inconclusive. A meta-analysis of clinical data by Zhang and colleagues (4) suggests a protective effect (OR, 1.195; 95% CI, 1.018–1.403, P = 0.029); however, study limitations including lack of prospective trials confound conclusions. Another review by Moon and colleagues discussed the weaknesses in current data (3), which further demonstrates that more information is needed.

Strengths of the study include longitudinal study design that uses PSA data measured at multiple time points to increase the power of the study to provide a more reliable estimate of the patient's PSA velocity. Limitations include recall bias that may occur due to the medication data being obtained through questionnaires. However, attempts were made to minimize this bias by standardized administration of these questionnaires by trained study personnel. In addition, if recall bias does play a role, its effect would be reduced due to it affecting the medication users and nonusers equally. Average duration of time subjects were on the study was 3.5 years. This may not have been enough time for medication use to affect PSA. Role of medication compliance and dosage could not be addressed in this study due to small numbers.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: A.M. Algotar, M.S. Stratton, R. Behnejad, S.P. Stratton

Development of methodology: A.M. Algotar, R. Behnejad, S.P. Stratton

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): A.M. Algotar, M.S. Stratton, R. Behnejad, S.P. Stratton

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): A.M. Algotar, M.S. Stratton, R. Behnejad

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A.M. Algotar, M.S. Stratton, R. Behnejad

Study supervision: A.M. Algotar, M.S. Stratton, S.P. Stratton

Grant Support

This study was supported by PHS grants CA079080 and CA023074.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the study participants and families for their contribution to this work.

  • Received June 2, 2014.
  • Accepted June 19, 2014.
  • ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Half E,
    2. Arber N
    . Colon cancer: preventive agents and the present status of chemoprevention. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009;10:211–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Phillips RK,
    2. Wallace MH,
    3. Lynch PM,
    4. Hawk E,
    5. Gordon GB,
    6. Saunders BP,
    7. et al.
    A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor, on duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 2002;50:857–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Moon H,
    2. Hill MM,
    3. Roberts MJ,
    4. Gardiner RA,
    5. Brown AJ
    . Statins: protectors or pretenders in prostate cancer? Trends Endocrinol Metab 2014;25:188–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Zang T
    . Association between statin usage and prostate cancer prevention: a refined meta-analysis based on literature from the years 2005–2010. Urol Int 2013;90:259–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Algotar AM,
    2. Stratton MS,
    3. Ahmann FR,
    4. Ranger-Moore J,
    5. Nagle RB,
    6. Thompson PA,
    7. et al.
    Phase 3 clinical trial investigating the effect of selenium supplementation in men at high-risk for prostate cancer. Prostate 2013;73:328–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Algotar AM,
    2. Thompson PA,
    3. Ranger-Moore J,
    4. Stratton MS,
    5. Hsu CH,
    6. Ahmann FR,
    7. et al.
    Effect of aspirin, other NSAIDs, and statins on PSA and PSA velocity. Prostate 2010;70:883–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Flahavan EM,
    2. Bennett K,
    3. Sharp L,
    4. Barron TI
    . A cohort study investigating aspirin use and survival in men with prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2014;25:154–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bonovas S,
    2. Filioussi K,
    3. Sitaras NM
    . Statin use and the risk of prostate cancer: a metaanalysis of 6 randomized clinical trials and 13 observational studies. Int J Cancer 2008;123:899–904.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 23 (10)
October 2014
Volume 23, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chronic Use of NSAIDs and/or Statins Does Not Affect PSA or PSA Velocity in Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chronic Use of NSAIDs and/or Statins Does Not Affect PSA or PSA Velocity in Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer
Amit M. Algotar, Roxanna Behnejad, M. Suzanne Stratton and Steven P. Stratton
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 2014 (23) (10) 2196-2198; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0605

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chronic Use of NSAIDs and/or Statins Does Not Affect PSA or PSA Velocity in Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer
Amit M. Algotar, Roxanna Behnejad, M. Suzanne Stratton and Steven P. Stratton
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 2014 (23) (10) 2196-2198; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0605
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Soft drink and juice consumption and renal cell carcinoma
  • Associations of ACEi and ARB with CRC Risk
  • Telomere length and TGCT risk
Show more Null Results in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement