Pigmentary Characteristics, UV Radiation Exposure, and Risk of Non–Hodgkin Lymphoma: a Prospective Study among Scandinavian Women

Introduction

Increasing attention has been directed toward possible protective effects of UV radiation chiefly from sun exposure on the development of several cancer forms, including non–Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; refs. 1-4). The first two large case-control studies of sun exposure and NHL risk reported protective effects, especially in relation to recreational sun exposure (5, 6). However, in more recent case-control studies, the inverse association was less convincing (7-10), lacking (11), or even the opposite (12). A pooled analysis from the InterLymph Consortium (13) that included some of these studies (5-8, 12) found a protective effect of recreational sun exposure, although there was significant interstudy heterogeneity. An inverse association between use of artificial tanning devices and NHL risk has also been reported in some but not all case-control studies (5, 7, 8, 10-12). A recent review concluded that the available epidemiologic evidence does not confirm that UV radiation exposure is a risk factor of NHL (14).

Pigmentary characteristics are indicators of sensitivity to UV radiation, and increased skin pigmentation reduces UV radiation–related vitamin D synthesis, one mechanism by which sun exposure might protect against NHL (2, 15). A handful of studies have investigated pigmentary characteristics and risk of NHL, but the results are inconsistent (5, 7, 10, 11, 16, 17).

Because most previous studies on pigmentary characteristics, UV radiation exposure, and NHL were of case-control design, prospective studies are needed to further explore the role of host susceptibility, and to confirm or refute the hypothesis of an association between UV radiation and risk of NHL.

Results

The study cohort of 104,953 women had a mean age at study entry of 40.4 years (range, 30-50 y). A total of 158 cases of NHL were reported to the cancer registries in Norway and Sweden during 1,596,143 person-years of observation. The mean age at diagnosis of NHL was 52 years (range, 34-64 y). In analyses adjusted for age and region of residence, risk of NHL was not significantly associated with level of education (as a proxy for socioeconomic status; P = 0.56) or the number of asymmetric nevi (>5 mm) on the legs (P = 0.26). Body surface area was significantly associated with NHL in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles; RRs for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartiles were 1.81 (95% CI, 1.12-2.91), 1.71 (95% CI, 1.06-2.77), and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.68-1.92), respectively, but no significant trend was found (P_trend = 0.79).

Pigmentary characteristics

Women with brown hair had a significantly increased risk of NHL compared with women with dark brown/black hair, whereas women with light eye color had a significantly decreased risk compared with women with brown eye color (Table 1). Women with a high propensity to burn after heavy sun exposure at the beginning of the summer (turning red with pain/blisters) also had a significantly decreased risk of NHL compared with women whose skin turned brown after heavy sun exposure. However, skin color after repeated sun exposure was not significantly associated with NHL risk (Table 1). The correlation coefficients between the above variables were all relatively low (all <0.30, except for acute and chronic skin reaction, 0.44).

Sunburns, bathing vacations, and artificial tanning exposure

There was no significant association between the number of sunburns in any decade of life and risk of NHL, neither in the age-adjusted analysis nor in the analysis adjusted for personal characteristics (Table 2). Similarly, there was no significant association between the number of weeks per year spent on bathing vacations in southern latitudes or within Norway/Sweden in successive decades of life and risk of NHL (Table 3). Use of artificial tanning devices was rare before the age of 20 years in this cohort. Use during ages 20 to 29 years was associated with an ∼50% significantly reduced risk of NHL. For such exposure during ages 40 to 49 years, there was also an indication of a decrease in risk, although this was not statistically significant (Table 4). Overall, there was no significant association between use of artificial tanning devices at ages 10 to 39 years and risk of NHL (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.67-1.46 for ever versus never use).

Discussion

In this large prospective cohort of Scandinavian women, we observed that individuals with light-colored eyes compared with those with brown eyes, or those with high propensity to burn compared with those with low propensity had a >40% decreased risk of NHL. Further, individuals with brown hair were at an increased risk compared with those with dark hair. In contrast, we found no consistent evidence of an association between UV radiation from sun exposure or artificial tanning devices and risk of NHL.

A handful of case-control studies have investigated pigmentary characteristics and risk of NHL with no consistent findings. Light eye color has been associated with both an increased (5) and a decreased risk of NHL (7), as well as with no association (10, 11, 20, 21) compared with dark eye color. Very fair skin was associated with an increased risk, whereas propensity to burn was not significantly associated with NHL in an Australian study (16). Other studies found no association between complexion (7, 21) or skin sensitivity (7, 11, 20) and NHL. Likewise, results for hair color have been mixed (5, 10, 11, 16, 17, 20, 21). As for melanoma, associations with pigmentary characteristics might, however, vary between populations (22, 23). Our study included only women. Consistent effect modification by sex has not been reported for pigmentary characteristics and NHL, although increasing risk with increasing measures of sun sensitivity for women only (10) and association with hair color only significant for men (11) have been reported.

NHL tumors occur more often in individuals who also develop UV radiation–related skin cancers, including basal and squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma (24, 25). Consequently, it was first assumed that sun exposure was a risk factor also for the development of NHL. However, results of ecologic studies on solar radiation in different geographical regions and NHL have been mixed (4, 26-31). Two large case-control studies (5, 6) found inverse associations between NHL and measures of personal sun exposure, especially recreational sun exposure, with 20%-to-40% lower risk among the most heavily exposed compared with the least exposed. In contrast, we did not find any significant associations between risk of NHL and sunburns or sunbathing vacations. However, results from case-control studies are conflicting: two studies did not find consistent inverse associations with sun exposure (8, 10), two reported no statistically significant associations with sun exposure (7, 11), one found significant associations restricted to farmers (9), and one study observed an increased risk of NHL among women with a history of frequent sun exposure (12). Heterogeneity between men and women has not been reported for sun exposure in case-control studies including both sexes (5, 7, 9), except in the study by Hughes et al. (6), in which some of the inverse associations seemed to be stronger rather than weaker in women. The pooled analysis of the InterLymph Consortium found that increased recreational sun exposure may protect against NHL, with similar risk estimates for men and women [ORs for highest versus lowest quarters were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.93) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-1.01), respectively; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.86; ref. 13]. However, the estimated association with total sun exposure was not significant, although it was somewhat stronger for men (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.02) than women (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17; P_{heterogeneity} = 0.60).

Exposure to artificial tanning devices at ages 20 to 29 years was associated with a significantly reduced risk of NHL, but an inverse association was not found overall. Significantly reduced risks associated with frequent use of tanning devices were found in some (5, 8, 10) but not in other case-control studies (7, 11, 12).

It is difficult to explain why NHL risk was associated with measures of sun sensitivity but not with sun and artificial tanning exposure in this cohort study. Sun-sensitive women may spend less time in the sun, but in accordance with previous studies (5, 7, 11, 12), we did not find confounding by pigmentation characteristics in the analyses of UV radiation exposure. It has been hypothesized that the UV radiation–NHL association may be mediated by activation of vitamin D (2, 15). Increased skin pigmentation reduces vitamin D synthesis. We found significantly reduced risks of NHL among women with lighter eye colors compared with brown-eyed women and among those with high propensity to burn compared with those with low propensity. A reduced risk was also found among those with poor ability to tan compared with those who become deep brown after repeated sun exposure. We have hypothesized that hair color is the best measure of sun sensitivity in the analysis of melanoma risk in this cohort (18). However, women with brown hair had significantly higher NHL risk than women with dark brown or black hair, whereas a weaker and nonsignificant increased risk was found when comparing women with blond, yellow, or red hair with those with dark brown or black hair. This lack of dose response for hair color and NHL risk weighs against a causal explanation.

Few studies have addressed the vitamin D and NHL association. Vitamin D intake was not associated with risk in four case-control studies (7, 9, 32, 33), whereas one reported a reduced risk of NHL after high intake of vitamin D stronger among women than men (34). In a male cohort, an inverse nonsignificant association was observed with plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D predicted from multiple determinants of vitamin D, including ambient UV radiation levels and dietary vitamin D intake (35). The majority of participants were White in these studies, and recent analyses of NHL risk in the multiethnic cohort suggested that vitamin D intake might be more relevant for ethnic groups with increased pigmentation (36). A recent nested case-control study within a male Finnish cohort also did not confirm an association between low prediagnostic serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of NHL overall. However, within 7 years of follow-up, high levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D measured in serum predicted a 60% reduction in risk of NHL, and the association was more pronounced among participants whose blood samples were drawn during less sunny seasons (20). If UV radiation influences risk of NHL through vitamin D, this latter finding may indicate two things: first, that a beneficial effect of vitamin D on risk of NHL is limited in time and does not accumulate infinitely; and second, that the level and/or duration of vitamin D deficiency during winter months is more important than the amount of sun exposure during sunny seasons. If so, self-reports of frequency of sunbathing and burns during summer periods may be less relevant than UV radiation exposure during winter months, such as sun vacations abroad and use of artificial tanning devices. Few published studies that use self-reports of UV radiation have distinguished between seasons of exposure, although one case-control study suggested that high exposure during a given season was less important than total hours of sun exposure (9).

The strengths of our study include the prospective design, detailed exposure information, and complete follow-up through high-quality national registries. Misclassification of exposure, which is inevitable in epidemiologic studies of lifetime UV radiation exposure, would be nondifferential in a cohort study and thus likely to bias effect estimates toward the null. Nevertheless, previous analyses of UV radiation exposure and pigmentary characteristics in this cohort have shown consistent effects on melanoma risk (18). The number of NHL cases in the present study was only slightly lower than in that melanoma analysis (187 cases), but we have considerably fewer cases than in past large case-control studies showing statistically inverse associations between sun exposure and NHL (5, 6, 13). Thus, the statistical power in our study to detect inverse associations of similar size as in previous studies may have been insufficient (see power calculations in Statistical methods). It is noteworthy, however, that we found no evidence of inverse associations between bathing vacations, sunburns, and NHL. Clearly, we could not investigate risk by histologic NHL subtype nor did we have any exposure information during follow-up.

Our prospective data do not support the hypothesis of a causal association between UV radiation exposure and risk of NHL. The reason for the discrepant results between this prospective study and our previous large case-control study (5) is, however, not obvious. It is, for instance, unlikely that selection bias would have created a spurious strong inverse association between UV radiation and NHL because the study was strictly population based, with high participation rates among both cases and controls (81% and 71%, respectively). It also seems less plausible that differential misclassification (recall bias, arising through over-reporting of UV radiation exposure among controls and/or under-reporting among cases) would create a spurious negative association with an exposure never publically linked to NHL. Alternative explanations include that we had inadequate statistical power to document a presumably weaker true negative association, or that timing of UV radiation exposure in periods with low natural sunlight, and presumably low vitamin D levels, is crucial. Future research should address these issues with high priority, because the answers are likely important both for etiologic understanding and for public health recommendations.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.