Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Coherence and Completeness of Population-based Family Cancer Reports

Louise Wideroff, Anne O. Garceau, Mark H. Greene, Marsha Dunn, Timothy McNeel, Phuong Mai, Gordon Willis, Lou Gonsalves, Michael Martin and Barry I. Graubard
Louise Wideroff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne O. Garceau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark H. Greene
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marsha Dunn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy McNeel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Phuong Mai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordon Willis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lou Gonsalves
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Martin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry I. Graubard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1138 Published March 2010
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Classification of 2,657 family history of cancer self-reports by consistency and site specificity (i.e., coherence).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Adjusted weighted percentages of cancer reports with varying levels of consistency and site specificity in relatives with a positive cancer history

    Type of report*Reports about all relatives (n = 2,657 reports)Reports about FDRs (n = 918 reports)Reports about SDRs (n = 1,739 reports)
    % (95% CI)% (95% CI)% (95% CI)
    Consistent with malignancy97.7 (96.9-98.3)95.3 (93.3-96.7)98.9 (98.2-99.3)
        Well-defined site79.0 (77.0-80.8)86.6 (83.6-89.2)75.0 (72.3-77.6)
        Unspecified site10.1 (8.5-11.9)2.1 (1.2-3.8)14.2 (11.8-16.9)
        Ill-defined site8.6 (7.5-9.9)6.5 (4.8-8.7)9.7 (8.2-11.4)
    Not consistent with malignancy1.3 (0.9-1.9)2.9 (1.9-4.3)0.4 (0.2-1.0)
    Indeterminate1.1 (0.7-1.7)1.8 (0.9-3.8)0.7 (0.4-1.2)

    NOTE: After identifying 2,408 relatives (781 first-degree and 1,627 second-degree) with a cancer history, the 1,019 respondents were asked to report the cancer type or where in the body the cancer started. All percentages of cancer reports are weighted to the Connecticut population and adjusted for differential selection probabilities, rates of nonresponse, and poststratification.

    • ↵*See Appendix I for examples of reports in the different categories.

  • Table 2.

    Unadjusted and adjusted weighted percentages of ill-defined or unspecified (versus well-defined) cancer reports, by relative and respondent characteristics

    CharacteristicsFDRsSDRs
    Unadjusted % (95% CI)Adjusted % (95% CI)Unadjusted % (95% CI)Adjusted % (95% CI)
    Respondent characteristics
        Sex
            Female9.0 (5.7-13.9)19.7 (16.9-22.9)19.7 (16.7-22.6)
            Male9.2 (6.3-13.1)30.6 (25.6-36.1)30.7 (25.3-36.0)
    P = 0.001
        Age
            25-343.1 (1.0-9.6)21.4 (14.7-30.1)
            35-447.3 (3.9-13.1)21.6 (17.1-26.9)
            45-547.0 (4.7-10.5)27.0 (22.5-32.1)
            55-6416.6 (10.3-25.7)27.0 (21.7-33.1)
        Race/ethnicity
            White7.3 (5.7-9.3)7.8 (5.7-9.8)24.2 (21.5-27.0)
            African-American46.2 (18.3-76.6)32.6 (12.1-53.0)29.4 (14.2-51.3)
            Hispanic21.4 (9.0-43.1)16.8 (0.0-34.8)15.9 (8.3-28.4)
            Other8.3 (2.3-25.7)5.9 (0.0-12.9)24.3 (11.9-43.1)
    P = 0.008
        Education
            <High school, vocational, or other13.8 (8.3-21.9)12.1 (5.9-18.3)24.9 (17.5-34.1)
            High school19.9 (11.2-32.8)15.2 (8.8-21.6)30.4 (23.3-38.6)
            1-4 y college7.3 (4.9-10.9)8.5 (4.9-12.1)21.2 (17.3-25.8)
            >College2.5 (1.0-6.1)2.9 (0.1-5.7)25.6 (20.7-31.1)
    P = 0.005, test for trend
        Main parental living arrangement during childhood
            Lived apart9.0 (4.3-17.9)20.7 (15.7-26.8)
            Lived together9.1 (6.7-12.2)24.7 (21.9-27.7)
        Ever had cancer
            No or unknown9.3 (6.8-12.6)24.8 (22.1-27.8)
            Yes7.6 (3.6-15.5)17.1 (10.5-26.6)
        Household income
            ≤$20,00017.1 (10.2-27.3)27.8 (20.0-37.3)
            $20,001-40,0007.9 (4.3-14.2)26.2 (18.7-35.5)
            $40,001-60,00014.3 (6.6-28.1)30.3 (22.0-40.0)
            $60,001-80,0007.6 (3.8-14.5)21.0 (16.3-26.5)
            >$80,0005.5 (3.2-9.5)21.9 (17.9-26.6)
            Don't know/refused10.3 (4.0-23.8)25.0 (13.6-41.4)
        Total number of relatives
            ≤158.0 (5.0-12.6)21.9 (16.5-28.5)
            16-197.0 (3.6-13.3)21.1 (15.5-28.1)
            20-259.0 (5.7-14.0)28.6 (24.0-33.7)
            ≥2611.5 (5.9-21.1)23.5 (18.7-29.2)
    Relative characteristics
        Sex
            Female6.5 (4.2-10.1)24.8 (21.6-28.4)
            Male11.4 (7.6-16.7)23.4 (19.9-27.2)
        Vital status
            Living5.2 (3.3-8.3)6.1 (3.4-8.8)16.9 (12.0-23.3)17.5 (11.8-23.2)
            Deceased12.8 (9.0-17.8)11.3 (7.3-15.3)26.1 (23.1-29.3)25.9 (22.6-29.1)
            UnknownNANA61.3 (0.4-99.9)70.4 (61.8-78.9)
    P = 0.03P < 0.00001
        Generation*
            Same or younger12.6 (5.6-25.9)10.7 (4.2-24.7)
            Next older8.1 (6.1-10.6)26.0 (22.7-29.6)
            OldestNA22.8 (18.8-27.4)

    NOTE: All percentages are weighted to the Connecticut population and adjusted for differential selection probabilities, rates of nonresponse, and poststratification. Adjusted percentages control for respondent age and race/ethnicity and for the other variables shown. Cells for variables that were not applicable to a particular model are labeled NA; cells for variables that were eliminated through backward stepwise regression are blank.

    • ↵*Same or younger generation as the respondent includes siblings, children, and/or nieces and nephews; next older includes parents, aunts, and uncles; oldest includes grandparents.

  • Table 3.

    Unadjusted and adjusted weighted percentages of relatives with unknown cancer history, by respondent and relative characteristics

    CharacteristicsFDRs (n = 6,242)SDRs (n = 14,262)
    Unadjusted % (95% CI)Adjusted % (95% CI)Unadjusted % (95% CI)Adjusted % (95% CI)
    Respondents
        Sex
            Female0.6 (0.4-0.9)7.0 (5.8-8.3)7.0 (5.7-8.2)
            Male0.7 (0.4-1.2)10.2 (8.5-12.3)10.3 (8.5-12.1)
    P = 0.002
        Age
            25-340.4 (0.2-1.0)6.2 (4.4-8.7)
            35-440.6 (0.3-1.2)8.5 (6.8-10.6)
            45-540.8 (0.4-1.3)8.5 (6.8-10.5)
            55-640.7 (0.3-1.6)10.6 (8.2-13.6)
        Race/ethnicity
            White0.5 (0.3-0.7)0.5 (0.3-0.7)8.1 (6.9-9.4)
            African-American0.7 (0.2-2.0)0.5 (0.0-1.1)9.0 (5.1-15.5)
            Hispanic1.7 (0.6-5.0)1.6 (0.0-3.3)6.8 (3.6-12.4)
            Other1.9 (0.8-4.5)2.4 (0.4-4.4)15.8 (9.5-25.1)
    P = 0.01
        Education
            <High school, vocational, or other1.6 (0.8-3.2)1.2 (0.5-1.8)12.2 (9.0-16.5)11.8 (8.3-15.3)
            High school1.0 (0.5-2.0)0.8 (0.1-1.5)8.1 (6.0-10.9)8.1 (5.9-10.3)
            1-4 y college0.3 (0.1-0.5)0.3 (0.1-0.6)7.2 (5.9-8.9)7.3 (6.1-8.6)
            >College0.4 (0.2-0.9)0.5 (0.1-0.9)8.4 (6.0-11.5)8.7 (6.4-11.0)
    P = 0.04, test for trendP = 0.05
        Main parental living arrangement during childhood
            Lived together0.5 (0.3-0.7)7.5 (6.5-8.8)7.8 (6.6-9.0)
            Lived apart1.8 (0.9-3.5)13.7 (10.9-17.1)12.4 (10.0-14.8)
    P = 0.0004
        Ever had cancer
            No or unknown0.6 (0.4-0.8)8.1 (7.0-9.3)8.0 (6.9-9.2)
            Yes1.3 (0.5-3.2)12.4 (8.3-18.2)13.2 (9.1-17.3)
    P = 0.006
        Household income
            ≤$20,0000.6 (0.1-2.9)9.3 (6.6-13.0)
            $20,001-40,0001.2 (0.6-2.3)11.4 (8.3-15.5)
            $40,001-60,0001.0 (0.5-2.0)7.2 (5.0-10.3)
            $60,001-80,0000.1 (0.0-0.7)7.8 (5.5-11.0)
            >$80,0000.5 (0.2-0.9)6.8 (5.4-8.5)
            Don't know/refused0.9 (0.3-2.8)13.4 (9.1-19.2)
        Total number of relatives
            ≤151.0 (0.5-1.7)8.5 (6.7-10.7)
            16-190.4 (0.2-1.1)6.0 (4.3-8.3)
            20-250.3 (0.1-0.7)9.0 (7.3-11.1)
            ≥260.8 (0.4-1.5)9.6 (7.4-12.3)
    Relatives
        Sex
            Female0.5 (0.3-0.9)7.5 (6.3-8.9)
            Male0.8 (0.5-1.2)9.4 (8.3-10.7)
        Vital status
            Living0.4 (0.3-0.6)0.5 (0.3-0.8)3.0 (2.2-3.9)4.0 (2.8-5.1)
            Deceased1.0 (0.5-2.1)0.5 (0.1-0.8)12.4 (10.7-14.3)9.7 (8.1-11.2)
            Unknown49.0 (22.7-75.9)22.7 (1.6-43.8)73.9 (61.8-83.2)58.6 (44.9-72.3)
    P < 0.0001P < 0.0001
        Generation*
            Same or younger0.2 (0.1-0.4)0.3 (0.1-0.4)1.2 (0.6-2.2)2.3 (0.9-3.7)
            Next older1.4 (1.0-2.1)1.4 (0.7-2.0)10.2 (8.5-12.2)9.9 (8.2-11.6)
            OldestNANA12.9 (11.1-14.8)9.7 (8.2-11.2)
    P = 0.0001P < 0.0001

    NOTE: All percentages are weighted to the Connecticut population and adjusted for differential selection probabilities, rates of nonresponse, and poststratification. Adjusted percentages control for respondent age and race/ethnicity and for other respondent and relative characteristics that were significantly associated with unknown cancer history in final logistic regression models. Cells for variables that were not applicable to a particular model are labeled NA; cells for variables that were eliminated through backward stepwise regression are blank.

    • ↵*Same or younger generation as the respondent includes siblings, children, and/or nieces and nephews; older includes parents, aunts, and uncles; oldest includes grandparents.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 19 (3)
March 2010
Volume 19, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Coherence and Completeness of Population-based Family Cancer Reports
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Coherence and Completeness of Population-based Family Cancer Reports
Louise Wideroff, Anne O. Garceau, Mark H. Greene, Marsha Dunn, Timothy McNeel, Phuong Mai, Gordon Willis, Lou Gonsalves, Michael Martin and Barry I. Graubard
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev March 1 2010 (19) (3) 799-810; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Coherence and Completeness of Population-based Family Cancer Reports
Louise Wideroff, Anne O. Garceau, Mark H. Greene, Marsha Dunn, Timothy McNeel, Phuong Mai, Gordon Willis, Lou Gonsalves, Michael Martin and Barry I. Graubard
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev March 1 2010 (19) (3) 799-810; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1138
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix 1: Examples of Reports about Relatives' Cancers
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Estimated Effects of Multi-Cancer Screening
  • Gene–Environment Interaction Portfolio Analysis
  • Risk Prediction for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement