Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Breast Cancer Receptor Status: Do Results from a Centralized Pathology Laboratory Agree with SEER Registry Reports?

Huiyan Ma, Yaping Wang, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Linda Weiss, Ronald T. Burkman, Michael S. Simon, Kathleen E. Malone, Brian L. Strom, Giske Ursin, Polly A. Marchbanks, Jill A. McDonald, Robert Spirtas, Michael F. Press and Leslie Bernstein
Huiyan Ma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yaping Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Sullivan-Halley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Weiss
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald T. Burkman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Simon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen E. Malone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian L. Strom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giske Ursin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Polly A. Marchbanks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill A. McDonald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Spirtas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael F. Press
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leslie Bernstein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0301 Published August 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Table 1.

    ER and PR status from different data sources among women ages 35 to 64 y with invasive breast cancer in the Women's CARE Study

    Receptor status from a centralized pathology laboratoryReceptor status from SEER registries
    ER statusER−ER+
        ER−316 (92%)122 (17%)
        ER+28 (8%)582 (83%)
        κ (95% CI)0.70 (0.65-0.74)
    PR statusPR−PR+
        PR−296 (83%)121 (21%)
        PR+60 (17%)449 (79%)
        κ (95% CI)0.60 (0.55-0.65)
    Joint ER/PR statusER−/PR−ER+/PR+ER+/PR−ER−/PR+
        ER−/PR−240 (90%)48 (9%)18 (20%)36 (69%)
        ER+/PR+8 (3%)392 (76%)38 (43%)8 (15%)
        ER+/PR−8 (3%)35 (7%)29 (33%)2 (4%)
        ER−/PR+10 (4%)38 (8%)3 (3%)6 (12%)
        Overall κ (95% CI)0.55 (0.51-0.59)
        ER−/PR− κ (95% CI)0.69 (0.64-0.74)
        ER+/PR+ κ (95% CI)0.62 (0.57-0.67)
        ER+/PR− κ (95% CI)0.30 (0.20-0.40)
        ER−/PR+ κ (95% CI)0.05 (−0.03 to 0.14)
  • Table 2.

    κ Statistics for agreement of ER and PR status from different data sources by study site, tumor characteristics, and cases' demographic characteristics

    ERPROverall ER/PR
    No. of casesκ (95% CI)No. of casesκ (95% CI)No. of casesκ (95% CI)
    Study site
        Detroit2860.68 (0.59-0.76)2610.64 (0.55-0.73)2570.56 (0.48-0.64)
        Los Angeles7620.70 (0.65-0.76)6650.58 (0.52-0.65)6620.55 (0.49-0.60)
        P*0.620.320.71
    Calendar year of diagnosis
        19941430.54 (0.41-0.67)1370.39 (0.24-0.54)1360.35 (0.24-0.46)
        19951790.66 (0.55-0.77)1660.59 (0.47-0.71)1660.52 (0.42-0.62)
        19963250.78 (0.71-0.85)2680.65 (0.56-0.74)2650.62 (0.55-0.70)
        19973020.72 (0.64-0.80)2680.65 (0.56-0.74)2660.60 (0.53-0.68)
        1998990.66 (0.51-0.82)870.67 (0.51-0.83)860.56 (0.42-0.69)
        P*0.020.040.001
    Tumor size (source, SEER), cm
        <24720.64 (0.57-0.72)4080.57 (0.49-0.66)4040.53 (0.46-0.60)
        2-4.94450.75 (0.69-0.81)3960.61 (0.54-0.69)3940.57 (0.51-0.63)
        ≥5880.57 (0.41-0.74)840.53 (0.36-0.70)830.45 (0.31-0.59)
        Diffuse141313
        Unknown292525
        P*0.030.620.26
    Tumor stage (source, SEER)
        Localized disease6150.70 (0.65-0.76)5350.59 (0.52-0.66)5310.56 (0.50-0.61)
        Regional disease (extension to lymph nodes)4090.68 (0.60-0.75)3700.63 (0.55-0.71)3670.54 (0.48-0.61)
        Distant metastases230.82 (0.60-1.00)200.38 (−0.02 to 0.78)200.51 (0.25-0.76)
        Unknown111
        P*0.450.420.91
    Age at diagnosis
        <402000.74 (0.65-0.83)1880.62 (0.51-0.73)1860.59 (0.50-0.68)
        40-441820.63 (0.53-0.74)1680.62 (0.50-0.74)1670.51 (0.42-0.61)
        45-491640.70 (0.59-0.81)1420.66 (0.54-0.79)1410.58 (0.48-0.69)
        50-541870.72 (0.61-0.83)1630.71 (0.60-0.82)1610.62 (0.52-0.72)
        55-591530.70 (0.58-0.82)1290.54 (0.40-0.69)1280.51 (0.39-0.63)
        60-641620.62 (0.48-0.76)1360.36 (0.20-0.53)1360.41 (0.29-0.53)
        P*0.600.020.10
    Race
        White6140.66 (0.60-0.72)5440.60 (0.53-0.67)5420.53 (0.48-0.59)
        African American4340.73 (0.67-0.79)3820.59 (0.52-0.67)3770.56 (0.50-0.63)
        P*0.110.980.51
    • ↵*P value from the κ homogeneity χ2 test of Fleiss.

  • Table 3.

    The association between reproductive factors and invasive breast cancer risk by the source of data on ER and PR status among women ages 35 to 64 y in the Women's CARE Study

    No. of controlsNo. of casesMultivariable adjusted* odds ratio (95% CI)
    ER−/PR−ER+/PR+ER+/PR−ER−/PR+ER−/PR−ER+/PR+ER+/PR−ER−/PR+
    Number of full-term pregnancies*
    ER/PR measured in a centralized pathology laboratory
        Never pregnant1782659108ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
        1315647816111.25 (0.76-2.07)0.85 (0.57-1.27)0.87 (0.38-2.01)0.77 (0.30-1.99)
        257611212019221.28 (0.80-2.04)0.69 (0.48-1.00)0.58 (0.26-1.30)0.87 (0.37-2.03)
        339657801261.00 (0.60-1.67)0.69 (0.47-1.03)0.53 (0.22-1.28)0.35 (0.12-1.05)
        ≥440558711370.99 (0.59-1.68)0.60 (0.39-0.92)0.55 (0.22-1.34)0.44 (0.15-1.31)
        Ptrend0.380.0080.090.05
        Pregnant but no full-term pregnancy1592538430.92 (0.50-1.67)0.74 (0.46-1.19)0.44 (0.13-1.44)0.38 (0.10-1.46)
    ER/PR from SEER registries
        Never pregnant178196888ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
        1315469215161.20 (0.68-2.13)0.85 (0.58-1.24)1.15 (0.47-2.81)1.07 (0.44-2.61)
        25768214930121.23 (0.72-2.10)0.75 (0.53-1.05)1.23 (0.54-2.76)0.47 (0.19-1.19)
        33965685951.29 (0.74-2.28)0.64 (0.44-0.94)0.49 (0.18-1.32)0.31 (0.10-0.99)
        ≥440547761881.04 (0.57-1.87)0.57 (0.38-0.85)0.89 (0.36-2.20)0.53 (0.18-1.54)
        Ptrend0.980.0020.200.02
        Pregnant but no full-term pregnancy1591643830.77 (0.38-1.57)0.71 (0.45-1.11)1.30 (0.47-3.61)0.38 (0.10-1.47)
    ER/PR status consistently ascertained by both sources
        Never pregnant1781654——ReferenceReference——
        13153869——1.19 (0.64-2.23)0.83 (0.55-1.26)——
        257678106——1.40 (0.79-2.49)0.69 (0.47-1.01)——
        33964869——1.33 (0.72-2.44)0.67 (0.45-1.02)——
        ≥44054462——1.15 (0.61-2.17)0.59 (0.38-0.92)——
        Ptrend0.750.01——
        Pregnant but no full-term pregnancy15916320.94 (0.45-1.96)0.67 (0.41-1.11)——
    Age at first full-term pregnancy,† y
    ER/PR measured in a centralized laboratory
        ≤1958696872210ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
        20-2461810113417161.06 (0.77-1.46)1.38 (1.01-1.89)0.60 (0.31-1.19)1.47 (0.64-3.38)
        25-29282538515151.19 (0.79-1.80)1.90 (1.29-2.78)1.15 (0.53-2.51) 2.80 (1.12-7.02)
        ≥302064143651.25 (0.76-2.05)1.26 (0.77-2.06)0.58 (0.20-1.72)1.14 (0.32-4.03)
        Ptrend0.310.050.630.29
    ER/PR from SEER registries
        ≤1958681992411ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
        20-246188015521121.01 (0.71-1.43)1.39 (1.03-1.87)0.71 (0.37-1.35)0.98 (0.41-2.35)
        25-2928245991681.26 (0.81-1.97)1.82 (1.27-2.61)1.28 (0.60-2.72)1.38 (0.49-3.92)
        ≥30206254911101.02 (0.57-1.82)1.14 (0.72-1.81)1.37 (0.56-3.37)1.94 (0.63-5.93)
        Ptrend0.610.110.350.20
    ER/PR status consistently ascertained by both sources
        ≤195867477——ReferenceReference——
        20-2461873122——1.04 (0.72-1.51)1.47 (1.06-2.05)——
        25-292823873——1.22 (0.76-1.96)1.83 (1.22-2.75)——
        ≥302062334——1.10 (0.60-2.00)1.09 (0.64-1.85)——
        Ptrend0.570.18——
    Duration of breastfeeding,† mo
    ER/PR measured in a centralized laboratory
        Never7151351523225ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
        <12033752930.99 (0.66-1.48)1.11 (0.77-1.60)0.98 (0.45-2.13)0.37 (0.11-1.28)
        1-633655659100.79 (0.55-1.13)0.75 (0.54-1.06)0.51 (0.23-1.12)0.58 (0.26-1.28)
        7-233044462860.70 (0.47-1.03)0.79 (0.55-1.12)0.52 (0.23-1.20)0.40 (0.15-1.05)
        ≥241342018220.77 (0.45-1.32)0.55 (0.31-0.96)0.32 (0.07-1.43)0.31 (0.07-1.47)
        Ptrend0.050.020.020.03
    ER/PR from SEER registries
        Never7151111733921ReferenceReferenceReference
        <12032960750.93 (0.59-1.45)1.16 (0.82-1.64)0.60 (0.26-1.38)0.76 (0.28-2.10)
        1-633640791370.70 (0.47-1.06)0.80 (0.58-1.10)0.61 (0.31-1.19)0.55 (0.22-1.37)
        7-233043470970.64 (0.41-0.98)0.78 (0.56-1.10)0.50 (0.23-1.08)0.65 (0.26-1.67)
        ≥241341720410.74 (0.41-1.34)0.55 (0.32-0.93)0.56 (0.19-1.68)0.24 (0.03-1.89)
        Ptrend0.030.010.050.10
    ER/PR status consistently ascertained by both sources
        Never71596130——ReferenceReference——
        <12032946——1.08 (0.68-1.70)1.15 (0.78-1.70)——
        1-63363760——0.79 (0.52-1.20)0.84 (0.59-1.19)——
        7-233043154——0.69 (0.44-1.09)0.83 (0.57-1.20)——
        ≥241341516——0.77 (0.41-1.42)0.58 (0.32-1.05)——
        Ptrend0.090.06——
    • ↵*Adjusted for categorical variables of age, race, family history of breast cancer, age at menarche, education and study site.

    • ↵†Additionally adjusted for number of full-term-pregnancies and mutually adjusted for age at first full-term pregnancy and duration of breastfeeding.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 18 (8)
August 2009
Volume 18, Issue 8
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Breast Cancer Receptor Status: Do Results from a Centralized Pathology Laboratory Agree with SEER Registry Reports?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Breast Cancer Receptor Status: Do Results from a Centralized Pathology Laboratory Agree with SEER Registry Reports?
Huiyan Ma, Yaping Wang, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Linda Weiss, Ronald T. Burkman, Michael S. Simon, Kathleen E. Malone, Brian L. Strom, Giske Ursin, Polly A. Marchbanks, Jill A. McDonald, Robert Spirtas, Michael F. Press and Leslie Bernstein
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev August 1 2009 (18) (8) 2214-2220; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0301

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Breast Cancer Receptor Status: Do Results from a Centralized Pathology Laboratory Agree with SEER Registry Reports?
Huiyan Ma, Yaping Wang, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Linda Weiss, Ronald T. Burkman, Michael S. Simon, Kathleen E. Malone, Brian L. Strom, Giske Ursin, Polly A. Marchbanks, Jill A. McDonald, Robert Spirtas, Michael F. Press and Leslie Bernstein
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev August 1 2009 (18) (8) 2214-2220; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0301
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early-Life Risk Factors for Breast Cancer
  • Sugary Drink Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk
  • HPV Testing in Self-samples and Urine
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement