Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Chinese “Herbal” Cigarettes Are as Carcinogenic and Addictive as Regular Cigarettes

Quan Gan, Jie Yang, Gonghuan Yang, Maciej Goniewicz, Neal L. Benowitz and Stanton A. Glantz
Quan Gan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gonghuan Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maciej Goniewicz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neal L. Benowitz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanton A. Glantz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0620 Published December 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    There is no significant difference in the levels of cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (normalized by creatinine to account for differences in urine concentration) between herbal smokers and regular smokers.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    There is no significant difference in PAHs between herbal smokers and regular smokers.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    There is no significant difference in NNAL between herbal smokers and regular smokers.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Scatter plots of cotinine versus total NNAL (rs = 0.535, P < 0.001) and total PAHs (rs = 0.668, P < 0.001) show that higher levels of cotinine are associated with higher levels of carcinogens.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Demographic characteristics of the subjects

    Smokers of herbal cigarettesSmokers of regular cigarettesP
    Sample size, n135143
    Age (y), median (IQR)48 (38-56)48 (39-54)0.567*
    Cigarettes per day on average
        Median (IQR)20 (15-20)20 (15-20)0.962*
    Education, n (%)
        Junior high school and below70 (52)77 (54)
        Secondary technical school41 (30)42 (29)
        Junior college20 (15)18 (12)
        College and above4 (3)6 (4)0.621†
    Employment status, n (%)
        Employed81 (60)94 (66)
        Unemployed54 (40)49 (34)0.979†
    Monthly income (yuan), n (%)
        <50019 (14)30 (21)
        500-99940 (30)41 (29)
        1,000-1,99958 (43)52 (36)
        2,000-4,99917 (12)18 (12)
        ≥5,0001 (1)2 (1)0.567†
    Change in daily consumption after switching from regular cigarettes (14-15 mg) to herbal cigarettes, %
        Increased daily consumption47—
        Decreased daily consumption30—
        No change in daily consumption23—
    Cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine, median (IQR)
        Sample size134142
        Cotinine (μg/mg creatinine)12.8 (5.57-22.2)14.3 (8.00-23.7)0.169*
        Cotinine (ng/mL)1,142 (476-2,175)1,538 (666-2,463)0.047*
        trans-3′-Hydroxycotinine (μg/mg creatinine)33.0 (9.88-61.4)41.1 (15.6-65.7)0.146*
        trans-3′-Hydroxycotinine (ng/mL)2,799 (732-6,346)3,732 (1,518-7,230)0.058*
    Total PAHs and total NNAL, median (IQR)
        Sample size4449
        Total PAHs (pmol/mg creatinine)172 (87.1-245)159 (126-225)0.554*
        Total NNAL (pmol/mg creatinine)0.454 (0.256-0.862)0.410 (0.291-0.649)0.171*
    • ↵*Based on Mann-Whitney signed rank test.

    • ↵†Based on χ2 test.

  • Table 2.

    Reasons for herbal cigarette smokers to switch from regular cigarettes (14-15 mg tar) to current herbal brands

    Ranking of reasonsSpecific reasonsResponse, n (%)
    1Better taste50 (47)
    2Health concerns26 (24)
    3Convenience of purchase22 (21)
    4Support for local product and business15 (15)
    5Price10 (9)
    6No fake cigarettes of current brand4 (4)

    NOTE: Of 135 subjects who smoked herbal cigarettes, 106 answered this multiple-choice question. Percentages do not add up to 100% because respondents were allowed to report more than one reason.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 18 (12)
December 2009
Volume 18, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chinese “Herbal” Cigarettes Are as Carcinogenic and Addictive as Regular Cigarettes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chinese “Herbal” Cigarettes Are as Carcinogenic and Addictive as Regular Cigarettes
Quan Gan, Jie Yang, Gonghuan Yang, Maciej Goniewicz, Neal L. Benowitz and Stanton A. Glantz
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev December 1 2009 (18) (12) 3497-3501; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0620

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Chinese “Herbal” Cigarettes Are as Carcinogenic and Addictive as Regular Cigarettes
Quan Gan, Jie Yang, Gonghuan Yang, Maciej Goniewicz, Neal L. Benowitz and Stanton A. Glantz
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev December 1 2009 (18) (12) 3497-3501; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0620
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Estimated Effects of Multi-Cancer Screening
  • Gene–Environment Interaction Portfolio Analysis
  • Risk Prediction for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement