Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Prognostic Significance of Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Variants on Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy

Shu-Pin Huang, Li-Chia Huang, Wen-Chien Ting, Lu-Min Chen, Ta-Yuan Chang, Te-Ling Lu, Yu-Hsuan Lan, Chia-Chu Liu, Wen-Hui Yang, Hong-Zin Lee, Chi-Jeng Hsieh and Bo-Ying Bao
Shu-Pin Huang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li-Chia Huang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wen-Chien Ting
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lu-Min Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ta-Yuan Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Te-Ling Lu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu-Hsuan Lan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chia-Chu Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wen-Hui Yang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong-Zin Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chi-Jeng Hsieh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo-Ying Bao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0665 Published November 2009
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recent genomewide association studies have identified several prostate cancer susceptibility variants. However, the association between these variants and biochemical failure in prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy has not been determined. We systematically evaluated 20 prostate cancer–associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a cohort of 320 localized prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy. Each single-nucleotide polymorphism found to be associated with the recurrence of prostate-specific antigen was further analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model. Three prostate cancer susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs1447295 at 8q24, rs7920517 and rs10993994 at 10q11) were associated with prostate-specific antigen recurrence (P < 0.02). Of these, rs7920517 and rs10993994, which were in strong linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.91), also showed significant associations with poor prostate-specific antigen–free survival following radical prostatectomy (log-rank test; P < 0.01). The associations remained significant in our multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis after adjusting for other clinicopathologic risk covariates (P < 0.01). In conclusion, loci associated with risk for prostate cancer, such as rs7920517 and rs10993994, might also be used to predict the recurrence of prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(11):3068–74)

Keywords
  • prostate cancer
  • radical prostatectomy
  • single-nucleotide polymorphism
  • prostate-specific antigen recurrence
  • genomewide association studies

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among American men (1). However, its etiology remains poorly understood. Incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer vary substantially worldwide, suggesting the importance of environmental/lifestyle risk factors and perhaps their combination with genetic variants across racial/ethnic populations. Recently, several genomewide association studies have identified several genetic variants as being associated with risk for prostate cancer in men of European ancestry (2-9). Although these novel risk variants have been replicated in several study populations, little is known about the associations of these risk variants with non-European populations and with clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer.

Patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer are commonly treated with radical prostatectomy. Of these patients, 15% to 46% experience recurrence of disease as detected by a relapse in prostate-specific antigen (10). Although several clinicopathologic indicators, such as prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin status, are currently used to predict outcome following curative intended radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer (11), there is a need to find new biomarkers to improve the prediction of disease recurrence and selection of appropriate adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients.

DNA-based genetic biomarkers have certain advantages over clinicopathologic indicators in that they can be done preoperatively, can be conducted easily, and can be interpreted more objectively without individual bias. Despite some recent conducted studies showed a trend of prostate cancer susceptibility variants observed more frequently in prostate cancer patients with early age at diagnosis, higher Gleason score, or more aggressive disease (12-14), the prognostic roles of these risk variants on disease progression remain undetermined. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the prostate cancer susceptibility variants and recurrence of prostate-specific antigen in clinically localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.

Materials and Methods

Patient Recruitment and Data Collection

The study population was expanded from our hospital-based prostate cancer case-control study that has previously been described (15-19). Briefly, patients with diagnosed and pathologically confirmed prostate cancer were actively recruited from three medical centers in Taiwan: Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, and National Taiwan University Hospital. Patients in this cohort were diagnosed with prostate biopsy for elevated prostate-specific antigen levels or abnormal digital rectal examination during evaluation for benign prostatic hyperplasia–related lower urinary tract symptoms. Serum prostate-specific antigen levels and demographic information were available for all patients. A subset of clinically localized prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy was followed prospectively to investigate the potential role of genetic variants in the progression of prostate cancer (defined by the recurrence of prostate-specific antigen). Prostate-specific antigen recurrence was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen measurements of >0.2 ng/mL at an interval of >3 mo (20), and the prostate-specific antigen level of >0.2 ng/mL at the first follow-up was considered the date of recurrence. No prostate-specific antigen recurrence was defined as prostate-specific antigen persistently <0.2 ng/mL during the postoperative follow-up period. For more precise analysis, the effect of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy, patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy or radiotherapy, and those without sufficient follow-up time were excluded, thus leaving 320 cases into final analysis.

Disease stage was determined by pathologic findings, pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, and radionucleotide bone scans, according to the criteria outlined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification system (AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 5th edition, 1997). Pathologic grade was recorded as Gleason scores and classified into two groups, one with Gleason scores 2 to 7 and the other with Gleason scores 8 to 10, according to previous risk assessment models for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy (17, 21). Pathology analyses were done on the whole specimens with step sections (2-3 mm), and the positive surgical margin was defined as tumor cells present at the inked margin. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Selection and Genotyping

We selected 20 single-nucleotide polymorphisms that were implicated in several genomewide association studies (2-9). They were highly significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms at 2q15 (rs721048; ref. 8), 3p12 (rs2660753; ref. 7), 6q25 (rs9364554; ref. 7), 7p15 (rs10486567; ref. 9), 7q21 (rs6465657; ref. 7), 8q24 (rs16901979, rs6983267, rs1447295, and 4242382; refs. 2, 4, 6, 9), 9q33 (rs1571801; ref. 3), 10q11 (rs7920517 and rs10993994; ref. 7), 10q26 (rs4962416; ref. 9), 11q13 (rs7931342; ref. 7), 17q12 (rs4430796; ref. 5), 17q24 (rs1859962; ref. 5), 19q13 (rs266849 and rs2735839; ref. 7), and Xp11 (rs5945572 and rs5945619; refs. 7, 8).

Genotyping was done using Sequenom iPLEX matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry technology at the National Genotyping Center, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. Briefly, primers for locus-specific PCR and allele-specific extension were designed by MassARRAY AssayDesign 3.0 software (Sequenom). The sample DNAs were amplified by primers flanking the targeted sequence, followed by dephosphorylation and allele-specific primer extension. The extension products were purified, loaded into a 384-format SpectroChip, and subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The resulting data were analyzed by the Sequenom MassARRAY TYPER software. Quality control included genotyping of 39 blind duplicate samples, revealing a 99.1% agreement on genotyping calls across all single-nucleotide polymorphisms we assayed. Each of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the autosomal chromosomes was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.05).

Statistical Analysis

The association between demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics with recurrence of prostate-specific antigen was assessed by Student's t test or χ2 test. Logistic regression analyses were done to compute odds ratios and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for estimating the associations of individual single-nucleotide polymorphism alleles, as well as genotypes to the risk for prostate-specific antigen recurrence, while adjusting for age (age-adjusted odds ratio). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the influence of genotypes in the prostate-specific antigen–free survival interval, and significance was determined using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the interdependency of genotypes and the risk parameters, such as age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin, were carried out using Cox proportional hazards regression. A two-sided P of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Because we were testing 20 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, false-discovery rates (q values) were calculated to determine the degree to which the tests for association were prone to false positives (22). q values were estimated using R q value package.11

Results

As can be seen in Table 1, which summarizes the demographic characteristics of our study population, prostate-specific antigen recurred in 113 (35.3%) of 320 prostate cancer patients who had received radical prostatectomy during the mean and median follow-up of 38.5 and 30.8 months (range, 1-96 months), respectively. All clinicopathologic features were significantly associated with the recurrence of prostate-specific antigen (P < 0.001), except for age (P = 0.821) and body mass index (P = 0.568).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of prostate cancer patients who received radical prostatectomy

Allele and genotype analyses for the associations of 20 prostate cancer susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy are shown in Table 2. We found the allelic frequency of rs1447295 at 8q24, rs7920517, and rs10993994 at 10q11 in patients with recurring prostate-specific antigen to be significantly different from those without recurrence. The rare alleles of these three single-nucleotide polymorphisms were associated with increased risk for prostate-specific antigen recurrence [age-adjusted odds ratios of 1.59 (95% CI, 1.08-2.35) for rs1447295, 1.59 (95% CI, 1.14-2.21) for rs7920517, and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.19-2.31) for rs10993994], and all had a q value < 0.127. In addition, the rare homozygous genotype carriers of these three single-nucleotide polymorphisms were also found to be at greater relative risk for prostate-specific antigen recurrence than in common homozygous carriers [age-adjusted odds ratios of 3.50 (95% CI, 1.10-11.2) for rs1447295, 2.50 (95% CI, 1.27-4.89) for rs7920517, and 2.71 (95% CI, 1.39-5.29) for rs10993994], and all had a q value < 0.170.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Association between 20 prostate cancer risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms and prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy

The associations between genotypes of these three single-nucleotide polymorphisms and time to disease recurrence were presented in Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test revealed a significant association between rs7920517 and rs10993994 genotypes and prostate-specific antigen–free survival. The median estimated cumulative survivals were significantly lower in rare homozygous carriers than in those common homozygous carriers (32 versus >96 months, P = 0.005, and q = 0.097 for rs7920517; 29 versus >96 months, P = 0.002, and q = 0.076 for rs10993994), showing an earlier recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy, stratified by genotypes at rs1447295 (A); rs7920517 (B); and rs10993994 (C).

To confirm the predictive effects of rs1447295, rs7920517, and rs10993994 on prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy, various clinicopathologic parameters, including age at diagnosis, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin, were evaluated together with each of these three single-nucleotide polymorphisms, using Cox proportional hazards analysis (Table 3). Our univariate analyses found that high preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score 8 to 10, advanced pathologic stage, positive surgical margin, and rare homozygous genotypes of rs7920517 and rs10993994 significantly influenced post–radical prostatectomy prostate-specific antigen–free survival time. After adjusting for all clinicopathologic risk factors in the multivariate analyses, the rare homozygous genotypes of rs1447295, rs7920517, and rs10993994 were further identified as independent prognostic factors for the recurrence of prostate-specific antigen in patients receiving radical prostatectomy (P < 0.01).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards analysis of factors associated with prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Discussion

Biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen recurrence) is an important indicator of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy, and many prostate-specific antigen recurrent patients are prone to develop metastatic lesions accompanied by increased risk for mortality (21). Therefore, finding new biomarkers that could predict the recurrence of prostate-specific antigen may make it possible to detect disease recurrence earlier, select treatment strategies, and possibly uncover the underlying mechanism behind the recurrence of the disease. In our investigation on the relationship between 20 single-nucleotide polymorphisms recently highlighted by several genomewide association studies and prostate-specific antigen recurrence, we found that rs7920517 and rs10993994, which were in strong linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.91), at 10q11 showed significant association with poor prostate-specific antigen–free survival in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and in multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis after considering other clinicopathologic risk covariates (Fig. 1 and Table 3). To the best of our knowledge, this study may be the first report of an association between the 10q11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Recently, rs10993994, located at 57 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the β-microseminoprotein (MSMB) gene, has been associated with the risk for prostate cancer in two independent genomewide association studies (7, 9). The MSMB gene encodes prostatic secretory protein 94, which is synthesized by prostate epithelial cells and then secreted into the seminal fluid and blood (23). Prostatic secretory protein 94 and prostate-specific antigen, two of the most abundant proteins secreted from the prostate, are thought to be possible markers for prostate cancer (24). More recently, prostatic secretory protein 94 has been found to circulate in blood with low–(free prostatic secretory protein 94) and high (bound to prostatic secretory protein 94– binding protein)–molecular weight forms (25). In the prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy, the bound/free prostatic secretory protein 94 ratio was positively associated with the risk for recurrence after adjusting for prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and margin status (26). Furthermore, MSMB is thought to be a tumor suppressor (27) possibly capable of impeding prostate cancer growth, promoting apoptosis, inhibiting the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase implicated in tumor metastasis, and decreasing vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated vascularization.

In addition to the previous genomewide association studies association results, the prostate cancer risk allele T of rs10993994 has been reported to greatly reduce the tumor suppressor MSMB promoter activity in the follow-up functional analyses (28-30). Replacing the T allele with the C allele destroys the binding site of cAMP response element binding protein, and the mean mRNA expression level of MSMB with the T allele is significantly lower than that with the C allele (30). These findings suggest that rs10993994 is functionally important and might partially account for the observed association with prostate cancer susceptibility. In contrast, we estimate that men with two rare allele C at rs10993994 are 2.5 times more likely to experience disease recurrence than those with no rare alleles in our study population (Tables 2 and 3). Our findings are not consistent with the notion that C alleles protect against prostate cancer. There are several possible explanations for this inconsistency. First, prostate cancer susceptibility loci have not been confirmed in multiple populations, including people of Han Chinese origin. If rs10993994 is a prostate cancer risk single-nucleotide polymorphism in men of Han Chinese ancestry, it is possible that this risk single-nucleotide polymorphism might also influence other genes besides MSMB and account for the disparate effects. The rs10993994 is also located at 23 kb upstream of an interesting prostate cancer candidate gene, nuclear receptor coactivator 4, providing another biological relevance for this genetic association. Nuclear receptor coactivator 4, also known as the androgen receptor coactivator ARA70, is an androgen receptor–associated protein and enhances the transcriptional activity of androgen receptor in human prostate cancer cells in a ligand-dependent manner (31). ARA70-induced androgen receptor transactivation could result in the decreased apoptosis, increased cell proliferation, promoted cell invasion, and facilitated tumor progression in prostate cancer cells (32, 33). Thus, genetic variation at rs10993994 might influence oncogene and tumor suppressor in a context-dependent manner. If rs10993994 is not a prostate cancer risk single-nucleotide polymorphism in men of Han Chinese ancestry, it is possible that Han Chinese and European men do in fact share a true prostate cancer risk variant at 10q11. However, the true prostate cancer risk variant is in the strong linkage disequilibrium with rs10993994 in European men but not in Han Chinese. Fine mapping of 10q11 has suggested a recombination hotspot immediately telomeric of the rs10993994 (29), indicating the possibility of the separation of disease risk and recurrence risk loci. Second, results on associations of rs10993994 with clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer were inconsistent. Although some studies have found a higher frequency of the prostate cancer risk allele T in patients with more aggressive prostate cancer (9, 34), others have not (14, 35). Third, rs10993994 has not been significantly associated with other clinicopathologic characteristics of prostate cancer, such as age at diagnosis, Gleason score, pathologic stage, or prostate cancer–specific survival (13, 14, 34-36). Finally, although it has been suggested that MSMB/prostatic secretory protein 94 is a tumor suppressor, increased intratumoral expression of prostatic secretory protein 94 also seems to be associated with worse survival outcomes (37, 38). Therefore, further investigation is needed to determine the role of rs10993994, MSMB/prostatic secretory protein 94, and ARA70 in the etiology of prostate cancer.

The rare allele A of rs1447295 at 8q24, also the reported risk allele, is associated with a significantly increased risk for prostate-specific antigen recurrence in logistic regression and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models (Tables 2 and 3). However, this result should be consider with caution because our study only had a limited number of rs1447295 rare homozygous carriers (n = 14). Chromosome 8q24 has been found to contain several single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with risk for prostate (2), colorectal (39), breast (40), ovarian (41), and bladder (42) cancers, but no genes have been identified in the region of interest to date. Therefore, further fine mapping of 8q24 in multiethnic samples might help in the identification of the strongest markers in each population and possibly add to our understanding of the contribution of 8q24 single-nucleotide polymorphisms to prostate cancer progression.

In conclusion, systematically evaluating 20 recently highlighted prostate cancer susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms, we provided the first evidence for the association of these variants and recurrence of the disease. However, this study is limited by sample size in analyses of outcomes and in subset analyses. In addition, our homogeneous Chinese Han population may make our findings less generalizable to other ethnic groups. Thus, further functional analyses and large independent studies in other ethnic populations are required to validate the relevance of the observed associations to the progression of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the National Genotyping Center of National Research Program for Genomic Medicine, National Science Council, Taiwan, for their technical support.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: National Science Council grants NSC-96-2321-B-039-005-MY2 and NSC-96-2314-B-037-012-MY3, and China Medical University grant CMU97-183.

  • ↵11http://genomics.princeton.edu/storeylab/qvalue/

    • Received July 3, 2009.
    • Revision received August 28, 2009.
    • Accepted September 8, 2009.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Crawford ED
    . Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urology 2003;62:3–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Amundadottir LT,
    2. Sulem P,
    3. Gudmundsson J,
    4. et al
    . A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations. Nat Genet 2006;38:652–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Duggan D,
    2. Zheng SL,
    3. Knowlton M,
    4. et al
    . Two genome-wide association studies of aggressive prostate cancer implicate putative prostate tumor suppressor gene DAB2IP. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1836–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Gudmundsson J,
    2. Sulem P,
    3. Manolescu A,
    4. et al
    . Genome-wide association study identifies a second prostate cancer susceptibility variant at 8q24. Nat Genet 2007;39:631–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Gudmundsson J,
    2. Sulem P,
    3. Steinthorsdottir V,
    4. et al
    . Two variants on chromosome 17 confer prostate cancer risk, and the one in TCF2 protects against type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 2007;39:977–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Yeager M,
    2. Orr N,
    3. Hayes RB,
    4. et al
    . Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet 2007;39:645–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Eeles RA,
    2. Kote-Jarai Z,
    3. Giles GG,
    4. et al
    . Multiple newly identified loci associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. Nat Genet 2008;40:316–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gudmundsson J,
    2. Sulem P,
    3. Rafnar T,
    4. et al
    . Common sequence variants on 2p15 and Xp11.22 confer susceptibility to prostate cancer. Nat Genet 2008;40:281–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Thomas G,
    2. Jacobs KB,
    3. Yeager M,
    4. et al
    . Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer. Nat Genet 2008;40:310–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Han M,
    2. Partin AW,
    3. Pound CR,
    4. Epstein JI,
    5. Walsh PC
    . Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:555–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Humphrey PA
    . Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate. Mod Pathol 2004;17:292–306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Levin AM,
    2. Machiela MJ,
    3. Zuhlke KA,
    4. Ray AM,
    5. Cooney KA,
    6. Douglas JA
    . Chromosome 17q12 variants contribute to risk of early-onset prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2008;68:6492–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Wiklund FE,
    2. Adami HO,
    3. Zheng SL,
    4. et al
    . Established prostate cancer susceptibility variants are not associated with disease outcome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1659–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Isaacs SD,
    3. Sun J,
    4. et al
    . Association of prostate cancer risk variants with clinicopathologic characteristics of the disease. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5819–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Huang SP,
    2. Chou YH,
    3. Chang WS,
    4. et al
    . Androgen receptor gene polymorphism and prostate cancer in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2003;102:680–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Huang SP,
    2. Chou YH,
    3. Wayne Chang WS,
    4. et al
    . Association between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in a Taiwanese population. Cancer Lett 2004;207:69–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Huang SP,
    2. Huang CY,
    3. Wang JS,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic significance of p53 and X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 polymorphisms on prostate-specific antigen recurrence in prostate cancer post radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:6632–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Huang SP,
    2. Huang CY,
    3. Wu WJ,
    4. et al
    . Association of vitamin D receptor FokI polymorphism with prostate cancer risk, clinicopathological features and recurrence of prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. Int J Cancer 2006;119:1902–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Huang SP,
    2. Wu WJ,
    3. Chang WS,
    4. et al
    . p53 Codon 72 and p21 codon 31 polymorphisms in prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:2217–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Freedland SJ,
    2. Sutter ME,
    3. Dorey F,
    4. Aronson WJ
    . Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen. Urology 2003;61:365–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Freedland SJ,
    2. Humphreys EB,
    3. Mangold LA,
    4. et al
    . Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2005;294:433–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Storey JD,
    2. Tibshirani R
    . Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:9440–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Mbikay M,
    2. Nolet S,
    3. Fournier S,
    4. et al
    . Molecular cloning and sequence of the cDNA for a 94-amino-acid seminal plasma protein secreted by the human prostate. DNA 1987;6:23–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Maeda N,
    2. Kamada M,
    3. Daitoh T,
    4. et al
    . Immunoglobulin binding factor: a new tumor marker for prostatic tumors. Prostate 1994;24:125–30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Reeves JR,
    2. Xuan JW,
    3. Arfanis K,
    4. et al
    . Identification, purification and characterization of a novel human blood protein with binding affinity for prostate secretory protein of 94 amino acids. Biochem J 2005;385:105–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Reeves JR,
    2. Dulude H,
    3. Panchal C,
    4. Daigneault L,
    5. Ramnani DM
    . Prognostic value of prostate secretory protein of 94 amino acids and its binding protein after radical prostatectomy. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:6018–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Beke L,
    2. Nuytten M,
    3. Van Eynde A,
    4. Beullens M,
    5. Bollen M
    . The gene encoding the prostatic tumor suppressor PSP94 is a target for repression by the Polycomb group protein EZH2. Oncogene 2007;26:4590–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Buckland PR,
    2. Hoogendoorn B,
    3. Coleman SL,
    4. Guy CA,
    5. Smith SK,
    6. O'Donovan MC
    . Strong bias in the location of functional promoter polymorphisms. Hum Mutat 2005;26:214–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Chang BL,
    2. Cramer SD,
    3. Wiklund F,
    4. et al
    . Fine mapping association study and functional analysis implicate a SNP in MSMB at 10q11 as a causal variant for prostate cancer risk. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18:1368–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Lou H,
    2. Yeager M,
    3. Li H,
    4. et al
    . Fine mapping and functional analysis of a common variant in MSMB on chromosome 10q11.2 associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:7933–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Yeh S,
    2. Chang C
    . Cloning and characterization of a specific coactivator, ARA70, for the androgen receptor in human prostate cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:5517–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Niu Y,
    2. Yeh S,
    3. Miyamoto H,
    4. et al
    . Tissue prostate-specific antigen facilitates refractory prostate tumor progression via enhancing ARA70-regulated androgen receptor transactivation. Cancer Res 2008;68:7110–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Peng Y,
    2. Li CX,
    3. Chen F,
    4. et al
    . Stimulation of prostate cancer cellular proliferation and invasion by the androgen receptor co-activator ARA70. Am J Pathol 2008;172:225–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kader AK,
    2. Sun J,
    3. Isaacs SD,
    4. et al
    . Individual and cumulative effect of prostate cancer risk-associated variants on clinicopathologic variables in 5,895 prostate cancer patients. Prostate 2009.
  33. ↵
    1. Waters KM,
    2. Le Marchand L,
    3. Kolonel LN,
    4. et al
    . Generalizability of associations from prostate cancer genome-wide association studies in multiple populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1285–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Kote-Jarai Z,
    2. Easton DF,
    3. Stanford JL,
    4. et al
    . Multiple novel prostate cancer predisposition loci confirmed by an international study: the PRACTICAL Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:2052–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Girvan AR,
    2. Chang P,
    3. van Huizen I,
    4. et al
    . Increased intratumoral expression of prostate secretory protein of 94 amino acids predicts for worse disease recurrence and progression after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. Urology 2005;65:719–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Sakai H,
    2. Tsurusaki T,
    3. Kanda S,
    4. Koji T,
    5. Xuan JW,
    6. Saito Y
    . Prognostic significance of β-microseminoprotein mRNA expression in prostate cancer. Prostate 1999;38:278–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Tomlinson I,
    2. Webb E,
    3. Carvajal-Carmona L,
    4. et al
    . A genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer at 8q24.21. Nat Genet 2007;39:984–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Easton DF,
    2. Pooley KA,
    3. Dunning AM,
    4. et al
    . Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 2007;447:1087–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Ghoussaini M,
    2. Song H,
    3. Koessler T,
    4. et al
    . Multiple loci with different cancer specificities within the 8q24 gene desert. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100:962–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Kiemeney LA,
    2. Thorlacius S,
    3. Sulem P,
    4. et al
    . Sequence variant on 8q24 confers susceptibility to urinary bladder cancer. Nat Genet 2008;40:1307–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 18 (11)
November 2009
Volume 18, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Variants on Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Variants on Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
Shu-Pin Huang, Li-Chia Huang, Wen-Chien Ting, Lu-Min Chen, Ta-Yuan Chang, Te-Ling Lu, Yu-Hsuan Lan, Chia-Chu Liu, Wen-Hui Yang, Hong-Zin Lee, Chi-Jeng Hsieh and Bo-Ying Bao
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev November 1 2009 (18) (11) 3068-3074; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0665

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prognostic Significance of Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Variants on Prostate-Specific Antigen Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
Shu-Pin Huang, Li-Chia Huang, Wen-Chien Ting, Lu-Min Chen, Ta-Yuan Chang, Te-Ling Lu, Yu-Hsuan Lan, Chia-Chu Liu, Wen-Hui Yang, Hong-Zin Lee, Chi-Jeng Hsieh and Bo-Ying Bao
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev November 1 2009 (18) (11) 3068-3074; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0665
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Gallstones and Gallbladder Cancer
  • Additive Effects of Aristolochic Acid and Arsenic in UTUC
  • Provider Lifestyle Discussions
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement