Serum Creatinine and Prostate Cancer Risk in a Prospective Study

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in American men and the second leading cause of cancer mortality, following lung cancer (1). The only established risk factors for this malignancy are age, family history, race, and some common genetic variants. Studies among prostate cancer patients have shown that serum creatinine is associated with more advanced disease (2, 3) and with decreased survival (3, 4), although this relationship is not supported by some studies (5-8). Serum creatinine could be a marker for homocysteine status and one-carbon metabolism, as synthesis of the former results in removal of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine, creation of homocysteine, and potentially reducing availability of one-carbon groups for DNA methylation, synthesis, and repair (9, 10). We investigated whether baseline serum creatinine concentrations were associated with prostate cancer risk in a prospective cohort study.

Results

Cases had significantly higher prediagnostic serum creatinine concentrations compared with controls (P = 0.004; Table 1), but did not differ from controls with respect to other characteristics, including dietary and serum factors. There was substantial overlap in the case and control distributions for baseline serum creatinine, although as Fig. 1 shows, the case distribution displayed a right shift compared with controls. Among controls, serum creatinine was weakly, though significantly, correlated with serum homocysteine (r = 0.24; P ≤ 0.0001), serum α-tocopherol (r = 0.10; P = 0.04), and serum retinol (r = 0.20; P ≤ 0.0001). In addition, serum creatinine was significantly higher among controls living in an urban compared with a rural area (P = 0.02), among those with no reported history of diabetes (P = 0.04), and among those randomized to receive the trial α-tocopherol supplement (P = 0.005). None of the other factors listed in Table 1 were correlated or associated with creatinine.

Figure 1.

Distribution of baseline serum creatinine values by case/control status.
controls cases

Serum creatinine was associated with a significantly greater risk of prostate cancer (age-adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.12-2.95 for highest versus lowest quartile; P trend = 0.006). Adjustment for confounders strengthened the association (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.33-3.75 for highest versus lowest quartile; P trend = 0.0008). Further adjustment for all potential confounders (Table 2), or for hypertension or BPH during follow-up (data not shown) did not materially alter the risks. When examined on a continuous scale, the risks remained significant (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33 based on one half the interquartile range). These ORs were also not materially affected by hypothesis-based exclusion of specific study subjects, including 21 cases/10 controls with a reported history of diabetes (multivariate-adjusted I OR for highest versus lowest quartile, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.22-3.56), 19 cases/24 controls with a reported history of BPH at baseline (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.33-3.75), 71 cases/28 controls with BPH during follow-up (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.06-4.08), or 47 cases/86 controls with a reported history of hypertension (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.18-4.15). Because of the close relationship between serum creatinine and renal function and disease, we identified and excluded all subjects diagnosed with kidney cancer at any time during follow-up, with no resulting change in the OR for high serum creatinine (multivariate model I OR for the highest quartile, 2.22; 95% CI 1.31-3.75).

To test whether the creatinine-prostate cancer relationship was due to reverse-causality, we first considered whether symptoms related to elevated creatinine could have prompted a physician visit and a resulting diagnosis of prostate cancer which may not have been otherwise detected. Although serum creatinine concentration was nominally higher among the 79% of men whose prostate cancer was found due to symptoms (median, 1.15 mg/dL) compared with men whose prostate cancer was found by chance (1.12 mg/dL), these were not significantly different (P = 0.49). Serum creatinine concentrations also did not differ by stage at diagnosis (median, 1.12 mg/dL versus 1.15 mg/dL for nonadvanced and advanced, respectively; P = 0.81) or by time to diagnosis (age-adjusted mean, 1.13 mg/dL versus 1.15 mg/dL, respectively, for cases diagnosed <5 years and ≥5 years after blood draw, respectively, P = 0.71).

We examined whether the prostate cancer–serum creatinine relationship differed across subgroups defined by age, smoking, protein and alcohol intake, body mass index, height, physical activity, blood pressure, serum α-tocopherol, serum homocysteine, intervention assignment, history of diabetes, hypertension at baseline, history of hypertension, hypertension during follow-up (both incident and prevalent), family history of prostate cancer, history of BPH, stage of disease, and follow-up time. Although none of the interaction terms were statistically significant (all P for interaction >0.05), some interesting qualitative differences were revealed (Table 3). For example, the relationship between serum creatinine and prostate cancer seemed stronger among those who were older, had greater height or body mass index, no history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, higher diastolic blood pressure, lower baseline serum α-tocopherol, and greater protein or alcohol intakes. Risk was elevated in the subgroup of men with no family history of prostate cancer (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.65-6.14 for highest versus lowest quartile), but there were too few men with a family history to run the model in that stratum. Most interesting and striking was the very strong the association among those men not randomized to receive α-tocopherol supplementation during the trial phase of the study (highest quartile OR, 3.36; P trend = 0.0003) compared with those randomized to the α-tocopherol supplementation group (OR, 1.02; P trend = 0.66), with a P value for interaction of 0.06. Consistent with this interaction and as noted earlier, serum creatinine was significantly lower among controls not randomized to receive the trial α-tocopherol supplement compared with those who were supplemented. By contrast, the creatinine association did not materially differ by β-carotene supplementation status, nor by disease stage or follow-up time.

Discussion

Higher baseline serum creatinine concentrations were strongly related to higher risk of prostate cancer in this prospective study. We observed a 2-fold increase in risk among subjects with serum creatinine concentrations >1.19 mg/dL compared with those with serum creatinine ≤1.02 mg/dL. This association seemed to be dose-dependent and was also significant when examined on a continuous scale.

Serum creatinine is a measure of renal function, but it is also influenced by other factors and therefore not a specific or sensitive indicator of renal disease within normal ranges (17-19). In addition to the glomerular filtration rate, for example, creatinine concentrations are influenced by age, sex, muscle mass, and intake and absorption of dietary creatine and creatinine, which are consumed in meat (17, 18). Other reported correlates of serum creatinine include ethnicity, weight, body mass index, lean mass, and upper arm circumference; serum triglycerides and total cholesterol; physical activity; blood pressure; diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease; and use of antihypertensive medication, statins, cimetidine, or diuretics (17-23). Interestingly, serum creatinine was lower among heavy smokers in one cohort study (23). It is also an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and related mortality (23-26).

The median serum creatinine concentrations in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III were 1.11 mg/dL for men ages 40 to 59 years and 1.18 mg/dL for men age ≥60 years (27), which was similar to that reported for men (mean age, 53 years) in the Framingham Heart Study (mean, 1.2 mg/dL; ref. 20). In the Hordaland Health Study in Norway, median serum creatinine was 1.13 mg/dL in men ages 71 to 74 years (23). Several values have been used to define creatininemia, depending partially on the laboratory assay methods, but thresholds are typically in the 1.5 to 2.0 mg/dL range (17, 19, 27). In the current study, only 1% of all subjects had creatinine values >1.5 mg/dL with the rest being within the normal range.

Several clinical investigations have examined serum creatinine as a potential prostate cancer staging and prognostic marker (2-8). For example, creatinine concentrations predicted advanced prostate carcinoma and decreased survival in one study (3) and were elevated in patients presenting with high PSA and locally advanced or metastatic disease, compared with those with low initial PSA (2). Elevated serum creatinine was also associated with reduced survival in a group of men with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (4). In other studies, significant relationships between elevated serum creatinine and disease stage, recurrence, progression, or mortality were attenuated when adjusted for other factors (e.g., age, stage, race, or PSA; refs. 5, 7), or were only marginally significant (6) or not associated (8). Although impaired renal function may explain the association between creatinine levels and poor prognosis among prostate cancer patients, it is unlikely that underlying renal disease explains the prospective associations we observed here.

In a study of Korean men, serum creatinine was positively, though weakly (r = 0.05; P = 0.02), correlated with serum PSA (28), but, in a similar study, was no longer correlated once adjusted for age (29). We did not have serum PSA data for all men in the current study and therefore could not rule out confounding of the serum creatinine association by PSA. However, baseline serum PSA had been measured for 118 cases and 7 controls in our study, and it was not correlated with serum creatinine (r = -0.0007; P = 0.99). It is unclear if, or how, the association between serum creatinine and prostate cancer risk might differ in a population routinely screened through PSA serology.

In the present investigation, as in two previous studies (30, 31), serum creatinine was correlated with serum homocysteine. The synthesis of creatine, which is converted to creatinine in muscle cells, requires a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine, which in turn is converted via adenosylhomocysteine to homocysteine (9). It is therefore conceivable that creatinine could serve as a marker for homocysteine status. However, homocysteine (and other one-carbon biomarkers) was not associated with prostate cancer in this sample (16), and adjustment for homocysteine did not impact the present findings. Creatinine could also be considered a proxy for meat consumption, where lower levels are associated with reduced intake (17), but neither meat nor protein intake was associated with serum creatinine or prostate cancer in our study, and did not confound the risk association.

To assess whether uncontrolled confounding explained our findings, we identified and tested factors known to be associated with serum creatinine for which we had data. Inclusion of homocysteine in the regression model strengthened the association (mulitvariable model I), whereas inclusion of numerous other potential confounding factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) had no additional effect on the risk estimates (multivariable model II), suggesting that uncontrolled confounding is unlikely to explain the association. Elevated creatinine could be due to diabetes, and we only had insulin and glucose measurements for 23 subjects so we cannot rule out this possibility. However, the exclusion of men with reported history of diabetes, as well as acute renal failure, hypertension, or BPH, or any renal cancer diagnoses during follow-up, did not alter our findings. In addition, diabetes has been associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer (32), so any undiagnosed diabetes at baseline would likely attenuate the creatinine-prostate association. To further address the possibility that undiagnosed disease led to elevated baseline serum creatinine, we stratified subjects based on follow-up time and observed no material difference in the association when either the earlier or the later cases were excluded. Moreover, the relationship did not differ among those diagnosed with aggressive compared with nonaggressive disease. However, due to the long period over which prostate cancer develops, it remains conceivable that chronic urinary obstruction due to BPH or undiagnosed prostate cancer led to the elevated baseline serum creatinine.

We identified a number of potential effect modifiers of the serum creatinine–prostate cancer association that may be chance findings, but that should be evaluated in other studies. For example, the association seemed limited to men who were not randomized to receive α-tocopherol supplementation during the trial phase of the ATBC study. Similarly, there was a slightly greater risk with high creatinine among men with lower baseline serum α-tocopherol. Because prostate cancer incidence was reduced by the α-tocopherol supplement in the ATBC trial (14), it could be that the beneficial effect of supplementation overshadowed any risk related to creatinine, such as through α-tocopherol inhibition of protein kinase C activity, with resulting prostate smooth muscle cell relaxation, and reduced symptoms of urinary obstruction (14, 33). Related to this, baseline BPH prevalence in the non–α-tocopherol–supplemented group was greater among cases (9%) than among controls (4%; P = 0.03), compared with 7% prevalence among both cases and controls in the α-tocopherol supplement group; however, removal of subjects with reported BPH (or adjustment for BPH) did not alter the interaction.

The strengths of our study include the prospective design, which minimizes the potential impact of cancer on baseline creatinine concentrations, and our ability to test numerous potential confounding factors. All participants were cigarette smokers, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings; however, smoking dose and duration were not correlated with creatinine concentrations, and did not confound or modify the association. We could not fully examine confounding by, or interaction with, serum PSA, and as our study population was not routinely screened with PSA testing, whether a similar creatinine association exists in screened populations is unknown.

We report herein a strong prospective relationship between higher serum creatinine, within normal ranges, and an increased prostate cancer risk. Additional studies are needed to retest the hypothesis, determine whether the association is evident in nonsmokers and in other racial groups, and explore potential mechanisms, including any interaction with serum PSA.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.