Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Assessment of Interactions between PAH Exposure and Genetic Polymorphisms on PAH-DNA Adducts in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian Mothers and Newborns

Shuang Wang, Stephen Chanock, Deliang Tang, Zhigang Li, Wieslaw Jedrychowski and Frederica P. Perera
Shuang Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Chanock
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deliang Tang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhigang Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wieslaw Jedrychowski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederica P. Perera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0695 Published February 2008
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are widespread pollutants commonly found in air, food, and drinking water. Benzo[a]pyrene is a well-studied representative PAH found in air from fossil fuel combustion and a transplacental carcinogen experimentally. PAHs bind covalently to DNA to form DNA adducts, an indicator of DNA damage, and an informative biomarker of potential cancer risk. Associations between PAH-DNA adduct levels and both cancer risk and developmental deficits have been seen in previous experimental and epidemiologic studies. Several genes have been shown to play an important role in the metabolic activation or detoxification of PAHs, including the cytochrome P450 genes CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 and the glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes GSTM1, and GSTT2. Genetic variation in these genes could influence susceptibility to adverse effects of PAHs in polluted air. Here, we have explored interactions between prenatal PAH exposure and 17 polymorphisms in these genes (rs2198843, rs1456432, rs4646903, rs4646421, rs2606345, rs7495708, rs2472299, rs162549, rs1056837, rs1056836, rs162560, rs10012, rs2617266, rs2719, rs1622002, rs140194, and gene deletion GSTM1-02) and haplotypes on PAH-DNA adducts in cord blood of 547 newborns and in maternal blood of 806 mothers from three different self-described ethnic groups: African Americans, Dominicans, and Caucasians. PAHs were measured by personal air monitoring of mothers during pregnancy. Significant interactions (p < 0.05) were observed between certain genetic polymorphisms and CYP1A1 haplotype and PAHs in mothers and their newborns in the three ethnic groups. However, with our limited sample size, the current findings are suggestive only, warranting further study. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(2):405–13)

  • polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
  • environmental tobacco smoke
  • mothers
  • newborns
  • adducts

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are widespread pollutants commonly found in air, food, and drinking water (1). Airborne PAHs (outdoor or indoor) mainly result from combustion of fossil fuels, tobacco, and other organic materials. Generally, emissions from motor vehicles, electricity generation, and residential heating are the major source of PAHs in outdoor urban air, whereas environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is a major indoor source (2, 3). Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) is a well-studied representative PAH found in environmental mixtures, including air pollution (4). B[a]P is a well-known human carcinogen and has been found to be a transplacental carcinogen in experimental bioassays and produces tumors in the liver, lung, lymphatic tissues, and nervous system of the offspring (5-7).

PAHs bind covalently to DNA to form DNA adducts. As an indicator of DNA damage, carcinogen-DNA adducts represent a critical step in the carcinogenic pathways and thus can be considered an informative biomarker of cancer risk. Associations between PAH-DNA adduct levels and cancer risks have been reported in both experimental and epidemiologic research (8-14). PAH-DNA adducts have also been implicated in neurodevelopmental deficits in children with exposure. Both experimental and epidemiologic studies have shown that fetal levels of PAH-DNA adducts were generally higher than expected, per estimated transplacental dose of PAHs, suggesting increased susceptibility to deleterious outcomes (15-19). The adverse outcomes linked previously to PAH exposure or PAH-DNA adducts in the cohorts under study in the present report include disorders in fetal growth and child development, childhood asthma, and cancer (20-25).

CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 (26, 27) have been shown to play important roles in the metabolic activation of PAHs, whereas PAH detoxification is partially affected by the glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes GSTM1, and GSTT2. Figure 1 displays a diagram that shows the mechanistic relationship between the genes and the formation of the adducts. There are conflicting data on the contribution of genetic variants in these genes and susceptibility to lung cancer partly due to underpowered studies (13-19, 26-32). Still, common genetic polymorphisms in these genes could affect individual susceptibility to adverse effects of environmental air pollution. Previous studies have not explored possible gene-environment interactions in mothers and their newborns in underrepresented groups, such as African Americans and Dominicans. The purpose of this study was to explore gene-environment interactions by assessing the association of DNA adducts with airborne PAH exposure levels among mothers and their newborns in three different ethnic groups with different genotypes (common genetic variants in CYP1A1, CYP1B1, GSTM1, and GSTT2). Only when no gene-environment interaction was observed did we examine possible main effects of genotypes on DNA adducts.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Diagram of the mechanistic relationship between the genes and formation of the adducts.

Materials and Methods

Study Populations

Subjects were chosen from two independent, parallel studies. One currently is being conducted in New York City (NYC) and the details on the study design have been published previously (20). Study subjects included nonsmoking African American and Dominican women residing in Washington Heights, Central Harlem, NYC, and the South Bronx, who were recruited through the obstetrical services of New York Presbyterian Hospital, Harlem Hospital, or satellite clinics between February 1998 and February 2003. Ethnicity was self-identified. The institutional review board of New York Presbyterian Medical Center approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The second cohort study is being conducted in Krakow, Poland, a region known to have higher levels of air pollution than NYC presumably due to coal burning and vehicle emission (21). Details on study design for the Krakow cohort have been published previously (21). Nonsmoking, pregnant women residing in the Srodmiescie and the Krowodrza-Nowa Huta areas were recruited between November 2000 and March 2003 (21). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of the Jagiellonian University.

In both cohorts, pregnant women were eligible if they were not currently smoking, registered at prenatal health care clinics, had lived at the present address for at least a year before the initial interview, were ages ≥18 years, had no history of illicit drug use, pregnancy-related diabetes, or hypertension, and had a valid estimate of gestational age. During the second or third trimesters pregnancy, the women carried a backpack containing a portable personal exposure air monitor during the day and kept it near the bed at night during a consecutive 48-h period for PAH measurements (20, 21).

Subjects included in the present analysis are mothers with genotype data (n = 160 African Americans, n = 265 Dominicans, and n = 381 Polish Caucasians) and their newborns with genotype data (n = 99 African Americans, n = 154 Dominicans, and n = 294 Polish Caucasians; Table 1 ). The subset did not differ significantly from the total population with respect to selected demographic and exposure characteristics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Exposure, biomarker, and demographic characteristics of the study population with mother and/or newborn genotypes [n (mean ± SD)]

Maternal blood (30-35 mL) was collected within 1 day postpartum, and umbilical cord blood (30-60 mL) was collected at delivery (33). B[a]P-DNA adducts were analyzed in all maternal and umbilical cord blood samples with sufficient DNA quantities. B[a]P is widely used as a representative PAH because concentrations of individual PAHs in the urban setting are highly correlated (33). B[a]P-DNA adducts can serve as a proxy for PAH-DNA adducts (34). B[a]P-DNA adducts in extracted WBC DNA were analyzed using the high-performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence method of Alexandrov et al. (35), which detects B[a]P tetraols. The method has a coefficient of variation of 12% and a lower limit of detection of 0.25 adducts per 108 nucleotides. As in prior analyses, samples below the limit of detection were assigned a value midway between the limit of detection and zero (0.125 adducts per 108 nucleotides).

Selection of Polymorphisms for Genotyping

Sixteen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) from CYP1A1, CYP1B1, and GSTT2 were selected from the SNP500Cancer resource (36). For the first two genes, haplotype-tagging SNPs were selected based on the genomic analysis of these genes (7 in CYP1A1 and 6 in CYP1B1) by the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (37) using the approach of Stram et al. (38). Three SNPs were chosen from GSTT2, which cover less than 50% of the common genetic variation in this gene. A real-time TaqMan assay for homozygous or heterozygous deletions of GSTM1 was done (39).

For quality-control assessment, results on individual genetic markers with genotyping rates of <75% were removed (including 3 African American mothers, 25 African American newborns, 1 Dominican mother, 56 Dominican newborns, 14 Polish Caucasian mothers, and 82 Polish Caucasian newborns). All tested genetic variants had minor allele (defined as the less common allele in the cohort) frequencies greater than 0.05. A goodness-of-fit test to test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium indicated that there were no significant deviations in each population.

Interaction between Genetic Markers and PAHs on DNA Adducts

As described previously (33), the eight PAH air concentration measures: benz[a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo[b]fluroanthene, benzo[k]fluroanthene, B[a]P, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, disbenz[a,h]anthracene, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene (40-42) were significantly correlated; thus, a composite PAH variable was computed. This summed measure was dichotomized at the median (2.45 ng/m3 for NYC African Americans, 2.3 ng/m3 for NYC Dominicans, and 16.89 ng/m3 for Polish Caucasians) to obtain a binary PAH exposure, defined as PAH high or PAH low. We first assessed genetic marker × PAH interactions on PAH-DNA adducts. The adduct data were logarithmic transformed to be consistent with the previous studies and to better normalize the distribution. We used multiple linear regression models:Math

Although ETS was not significantly associated with DNA adducts, it was included in the model as a potential confounder. Other covariates, such as maternal age, dietary PAH, and maternal BMI, were not significantly associated with DNA adducts at the significance level of P ≤ 0.05 and were not included in the model. For genetic markers that did not show significant interactions (P ≤ 0.05), main effects of genotype on adducts were examined, also with multiple linear regression models:Math

Because the study was limited by the small sample size, we did not routinely correct for multiple comparisons given the fact we tested many interaction effects. Therefore, the findings are suggestive only.

Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis

We analyzed linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns and haplotype structures of CYP1A1, CYP1B1, and GSTT2 genes using software Haploview (ref. 43, http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/) in African Americans, Dominicans, and Caucasians, respectively. Pairwise LD between any two genetic markers was measured by standardized LD coefficient D′ and visualized through Haploview. Haplotype blocks were defined based on the method of Gabriel et al. (44), where a pair of genetic markers is defined to be in “strong LD” if the one-sided upper 95% confidence bound on D′ is 0.98 and the lower bound is above 0.7. Haplotype frequencies of defined haplotype blocks were estimated also using Haploview.

Interaction between Haplotypes and PAHs on DNA Adducts

Because haplotypes composed of genetic markers (with or without function) can sometimes provide greater power for detection of effect than the analysis of single-genetic marker, we examined haplotypes in CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 (45). As haplotype phase is usually unknown, inferring the most likely pair of haplotypes and then treating them as if they could be directly observed would result in information loss and biased confidence intervals for variable estimates (46). To account for unphased haplotypes, we modeled the probabilities of the possible haplotype pairs per subject using the generalized linear model. The haplotype analyses adjusted for environmental covariates were conducted with the R package haplo.stats (47). We first assessed haplotype × PAH interactions on logarithm-transformed PAH-DNA adduct levels; when no interaction was observed, we tested main effects of haplotypes.

Results

Descriptive Analysis

Table 1 provides demographic and exposure characteristics of mothers and their newborns. There were no significant differences between the subset analyzed in this study and the total population with respect to the selected demographic and exposure characteristics. Maternal and newborn PAH-DNA adducts and prenatal PAH exposure were not significantly different between African Americans and Dominicans. Polish Caucasians had more than 10-fold higher PAH exposure than NYC African Americans and Dominicans, consistent with the higher levels of air pollution in Poland (20). Figure 2 displays scatter plots to show the correlations between the DNA adduct levels of the mothers and their newborns in three ethnic groups separately. Significant correlations were observed in all three ethnic groups. The correlations between the maternal or newborn DNA adduct levels and the continuous PAH exposure levels are significant in Caucasians (correlation = 0.205 between the newborn DNA adducts and the continuous PAH with P < 0.001 and correlation = 0.116 between the maternal DNA adducts and the continuous PAH with P = 0.030) but not in African Americans and Dominicans, which is consistent with the previous studies.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Scatter plots that show the correlations between maternal and newborn DNA adducts in the three ethnic groups and the corresponding P values.

The genotype frequency distributions of the tested common genetic variants are summarized for African Americans, Dominicans, and Caucasians for mothers and newborns separately (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).4 Note that, for some genetic markers, different ethnic groups have different minor alleles. Supplementary Table S2 shows that the genotype frequency distributions of most genetic markers differ significantly between the three ethnic groups.

Interaction between Genetic Markers and PAHs on DNA Adducts

Assuming a dominant genetic model (minor allele considered as the risk allele) and with a 1 df association test, we identified several significant interactions between maternal genetic markers and PAHs on maternal PAH-DNA adducts, interactions between maternal genetic markers and PAHs on newborn PAH-DNA adducts. No interaction was observed between newborn genetic markers and PAHs on newborn PAH-DNA adducts in the three populations separately (Table 2 ).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Significant genetic marker × PAH interactions on PAH-DNA adducts

In African Americans, significant interactions between maternal genotypes of CYP1B1-06 (rs4646903) and GSTT2-01 (rs1622002) and PAHs were observed on maternal PAH-DNA adducts. The interaction effect between GSTT2-01 and PAHs is plotted in Fig. 3A for illustration purposes. It shows that maternal adducts are lower in mothers with genotypes AA/AG at GSTT2-01 than in mothers with wild-type homozygote GG within the high PAH exposure group, but adducts are higher within the low PAH exposure group (interaction coefficient β = −0.44; P = 0.01; n = 127).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A. Interaction effect between maternal GSTT2-01 and PAHs on maternal DNA adducts in African Americans (AA). More specifically, for African Americans, maternal adducts are lower in mothers with genotypes AA/AG at GSTT2-01 within the high PAH exposure group but are higher within the low PAH exposure group (interaction coefficient β = −0.44, P = 0.01; n = 127). B. Interaction effect between maternal CYP1B1-03 and PAHs on maternal DNA adducts in Dominicans. More specifically, for Dominicans, maternal adducts are lower in mothers with genotypes TT/TC at CYP1B1-03 within the high PAH exposure group but are higher within the low PAH exposure group (interaction coefficient β = −0.30, P = 0.04, n = 165). C. Interaction effect between newborn CYP1A1-14 and PAHs on newborn DNA adducts in Caucasians (C). More specifically, for Caucasians, newborn adducts are higher in newborns whose mothers have genotypes CC/CT at CYP1A1-14 within the high PAH exposure group but are lower within the low PAH exposure group (interaction coefficient β = 0.29, P = 0.020, n = 288).

In Dominicans, a significant interaction was observed between maternal genotype CYP1B1-03 (rs2617266) and PAHs (interaction coefficient β = −0.30; P = 0.04; n = 165) on maternal PAH-DNA adducts (Fig. 3B). Maternal adducts were lower in mothers with genotypes TT/TC at CYP1B1-03 than in mothers with homozygous wild-type CC within the high PAH exposure group but were higher within the low PAH exposure group.

More genetic marker × PAH interactions were observed in Caucasians. Interestingly, among Caucasians, [CYP1A1-14 (rs2606345), was observed in both mother and newborn to interact with PAHs on newborn PAH-DNA adducts and in the same direction. The interaction effect between newborn CYP1A1-14 and PAHs (interaction coefficient β = 0.29; P = 0.020; n = 288) on newborn adducts is displayed in Fig. 3C. The newborn adducts were higher in newborns with genotypes GG/GT at CYP1A1-14 than newborns with homozygous wild-type TT within the high PAH exposure group but were lower within the low PAH exposure group. Moreover, among Caucasians, maternal CYP1A1-83 and another maternal SNPs of CYP1B1 gene [CYP1B1-74 (rs162560)] were observed to interact with PAHs on maternal PAH-DNA adducts. No genetic markers × PAH interaction remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons among three populations.

Table 3 displays main effects for those genetic markers that did not show genetic marker × PAH interactions. In African Americans, mothers with genotypes +/+ or +/− at genetic marker GSTM1-02 have significantly higher PAH-DNA adducts than mothers with genotypes −/−. African American newborns whose mothers had genotypes TT/TA at CYP1B1-66 or genotypes AA/AG at CYP1B1-74 had significantly higher newborn PAH-DNA adducts, whereas Dominicans newborns whose mothers had genotypes TT/TA at CYP1B1-66 or genotypes AA/AG at CYP1B1-74 had significantly lower PAH-DNA adducts. In Caucasians, newborns with genotypes CC/CT at CYP1A1-06 or genotypes TT/TC at CYP1A1-15 had significantly higher newborn PAH-DNA adducts.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Significant main effects of genetic markers on PAH-DNA adducts

LD Analysis

Pairwise LD analysis shows that the same haplotype block with six CYP1A1 SNPs was defined in the three populations for CYP1A1 gene (Supplementary Fig. S1). Similar LD patterns were observed in mothers and newborns in the three populations. The estimated haplotype frequencies of the defined haplotype block of the CYP1A1 gene for mothers and newborns in each population are displayed in Table 4 . The LD structure of the CYP1B1 gene differed substantially between Caucasians and African Americans and Dominicans but this is not surprising because of the differences in population genetic histories of the different groups and the selection bias of choosing SNPs based on the Caucasians in Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (37). Pairwise LD analysis suggests that four CYP1B1 SNPs [CYP1B1-66 (rs162549), CYP1B1-06 (rs1056837), CYP1B1-05 (rs1056836), and CYP1B1-74 (rs162560)] could form one haplotype block (D′ > 0.9) in African Americans, whereas three CYP1B1 SNPs (CYP1B1-06, CYP1B1-05, and CYP1B1-74) could form one haplotype block in Dominicans. Two CYP1B1 SNPs [CYP1B1-04 (rs10012) and CYP1B1-03 (rs2617266)] formed another haplotype block in both African Americans and Dominicans. Among Caucasians, all six CYP1B1 SNPs defined one haplotype block (Supplementary Fig. S2). The estimated haplotype frequencies of each defined haplotype block of the CYP1B1 gene are displayed in Table 5 . No strong haplotype block was defined for the GSTT2 gene (Supplementary Fig. S3) in any population.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Haplotype frequencies of CYP1A1 gene within each population

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Haplotype frequencies of CYP1B1 gene within each population

Interaction between Haplotypes and PAHs on DNA Adducts

A significant interaction between maternal haplotypes of the defined haplotype block of the CYP1A1 gene and PAHs on newborn PAH-DNA adducts was observed in Caucasians (P = 0.03). More specifically, for Caucasians, newborns whose mothers had haplotype CGTCGG had higher PAH-DNA adducts than those whose mothers had the most common haplotype GATCTA within the high PAH exposure group, but newborns whose mothers had haplotype CGTCGG had lower PAH-DNA adducts than whose mothers had the most common haplotype GATCTA within the low PAH exposure group. A significant main effect of maternal haplotype on maternal PAH-DNA adducts was observed in Dominicans (P = 0.02). Dominican mothers with haplotype CGTTGG had higher PAH-DNA adducts than Dominican mothers with the most common haplotype GATCTA. Based on the regression model described above (47), among Dominican mothers with high PAH exposure level and mean ETS level, those that had haplotype CGTTGG had an average DNA adduct level of 0.203, whereas those with the common haplotype GATCTA had an average DNA adduct level of 0.160 (P = 0.02). A significant main effect of newborn haplotype on newborn PAH-DNA adducts was observed in Caucasians (P = 0.03). Caucasian newborns with haplotype CGTCGG had lower PAH-DNA adducts than Caucasians newborns with the most common haplotype GATCTA.

Discussion

Our findings are notable because it appears that PAH-DNA adduct formation could be modulated by common genetic variants in key genes, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, GSTT2, and GSTM1. Interaction effects between genetic markers and PAH were observed in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian mothers and their newborns, but more interaction effects were observed in Caucasians than in African Americans and Dominicans (Table 2). In Fig. 3, we graphically presented some of the interactions observed in the respective ethnic groups. In African Americans, maternal adducts were lower in mothers with genotypes AA/AG at GSTT2-01 than in mothers with homozygous wild-type GG within the high PAH exposure group but were higher within the low PAH exposure group. In Dominicans, maternal adducts were lower in mothers with genotypes TT/TC at CYP1B1-03 than in mothers with homozygous wild-type CC within the high PAH exposure group but were higher within the low PAH exposure group. In Caucasians, newborn adducts were higher in newborns whose mothers have genotypes CC/CT at CYP1A1-14 than in newborns with homozygous wild-type TT within the high PAH exposure group but were lower within the low PAH exposure group. A haplotype by PAH interaction effect PAH × CYP1A1 haplotype was also observed but in Caucasians only. Although genetic polymorphisms were detected to interact with PAHs on PAH-DNA adducts in the three ethnic groups, with the limited sample sizes, we consider the current findings as suggestive only and warranting further study.

Interactions between PAHs and genetic polymorphisms in CYP1A1 were observed only in Caucasians. This may be due to the much larger sample size and the much higher PAH exposure levels in the Caucasian group. Among Caucasians, maternal CYP1A1-14 significantly interacted with PAH exposure on both maternal and newborn adducts and maternal CYP1A1-83 significantly interacted with PAHs on maternal DNA adducts. These observations suggest that the CYP1A1 gene may be an important effect modifier in Caucasians. Whether a similar conclusion can be drawn in other ethnic groups needs to be investigated by independent studies with bigger sample sizes. We note that the CYP genotypes would in theory be less predictive for the adduct levels than the enzyme levels measured in the blood. However, we did not obtain data on enzyme levels. We also note that in several cases different interaction effects were observed on maternal DNA adducts and newborn DNA adducts when the same genetic markers were investigated. This may be due to the fact that the mothers and babies have different genotypes. Moreover, the enzyme systems responsible for metabolism, detoxification, and DNA repair are immature in the fetus so that one might not expect to see the same effect of the genotype in mothers and newborns. More research efforts are needed to examine these relationships.

Main effects of the genetic polymorphisms on PAH-DNA adducts were also observed. One noticeable finding is the protective effect of GSTM1-02 deletion in African Americans, which is contradictory to some reports that GSTM1-02 deletion increases cancer risk (48). More research effort is needed to replicate this finding in African Americans. A strength of the study is the ability to explore gene-environment interaction using haplotype-tagging genetic markers, adducts, and environmental monitoring. However, it is possible that the effects we observed in this pilot study could be due to other variants that were untested but are in strong LD with the tested variants or, alternatively, chance. Moreover, because of the difference in population genetic histories of the different groups and the selection bias of choosing SNPs based on the Caucasians in Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (37), further work is required to confirm these findings in replication studies and, if replicated, fine mapping to determine variants that could be causally defined by corroborative laboratory analyses.

Our results are also notable because we interrogated common genetic variants in candidate genes in three distinct populations and observed different underlying genetic structures. For instance, the frequencies of the genetic polymorphisms among Caucasians are significantly different from those in African Americans and Dominicans. LD analysis also shows that heterogeneity in LD structures among the three ethnic groups is present, especially for CYP1B1 gene. Although the haplotype structure is similar in the three ethnic groups for CYP1A1 gene, the haplotype frequencies are different. Thus, in looking at genetic main effects or gene-environment interactions, researchers should be aware of the heterogeneity between ethnic groups and try to perform studies within relatively homogeneous populations to avoid spurious associations from population stratification (49). In conclusion, further studies in distinct populations will not only help to identify loci in different LD structures that are associated with gene-environment interactions but also to highlight possible variants that could confer increased risk according to population structure.

Footnotes

  • ↵4 Supplementary materials for this article are available at Cancer Epidemiology, Biomakers & Prevention Online (http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Grant support: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grants P01 009600, R01 ES08977, R01 ES111158, R01 ES012468, and ES09089; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency grants R827027 and R8260901; Herbert Irving Cancer Center; Core grant 5P30 CA 13696-23; Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation; and New York Community Trust.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted December 5, 2007.
    • Received July 31, 2007.
    • Revision received November 14, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    IARC. Polynuclear aromatic compounds. Part l. Chemical, environmental, and experimental data. IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Lyon (France): IARC; 1983. p. 1–453.
  2. ↵
    Donnenfeld AE, Pulkkinen A, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ, Haddow JE. Simultaneous fetal and maternal cotinine levels in pregnant women smokers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:781–2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Lewtas J. Human exposure to complex mixtures of air pollutants. Toxicol Lett 1994;72:163–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    De Raat WK, Kooijman SA, Gielen JW. Concentrations of polycyclic hydrocarbons in airborne particles in The Netherlands and their correlation with mutagenicity. Sci Total Environ 1987;66:95–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bulay OM, Wattenberg LW. Carcinogenic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbocarcinogens administrated to mice during pregnancy on the progeny. J Natl Cancer Inst 1971;46:397–402.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. Rice JM, Ward JM. Age dependence of susceptibility to carcinogenesis in the nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1982;381:274–89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Vesselinovitch SC, Kyriazis AP, Mihailovich N, Rao KV. Conditions modifying development of tumors in mice at various sites by benzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res 1975;35:2948–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Bartsch H, Hietanen E. The role of individual susceptibility in cancer burden related to environmental exposure. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104 Suppl 3:569–77.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. Poirier MC, Beland FA. DNA adduct measurements and tumor incidence during chronic carcinogen exposure in animal models: implications for DNA adduct-based human cancer risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol 1992;5:749–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. Stowers SJ, Anderson MW. Formation and persistence of benzo[a]pyrene metabolite-DNA adducts. Environ Health Perspect 1985;62:31–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. Rybicki BA, Rundle A, Savera AT, Sankey SS, Tang D. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2004;64:8854–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. Tang D, Santella RM, Blackwood A, et al. A molecular epidemiological case control study of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995;4:341–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    Tang D, Cho S, Rundle A, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair enzyme XPD are associated with increased levels of PAH-DNA adducts in a case-control study of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;75:159–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Veglia F, Matullo G, Vineis P. Bulky DNA adducts and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:157–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Lu LJ, Disher RM, Reddy MV, Randerath K. 32P-postlabeling assay in mice of transplacental DNA damage induced by the environmental carcinogens safrole, 4-aminobiphenyl and benzo(a)pyrene. Cancer Res 1986;46:3046–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. Lu LJ, Wang MY. Modulation of benzo(a)pyrene-induced covalent DNA modification in adult and fetal mouse tissues by gestation stage. Carcinogenesis 1990;11:1367–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. Wang MY, Lu LJ. Differential effect of gestation stage on benzo(a)pyrene-induced micronucleus formation and/or covalent DNA modifications in mice. Cancer Res 1990;50:2146–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. Whyatt RM, Jedrychowski W, Hemminki K, et al. Biomarkers of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA damage and cigarette smoke exposures in paired maternal and newborn blood samples as a measure of differential susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:581–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Perera FP, Tang D, Whyatt RM, Lederman SA, Jedrychowski W. DNA damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons measured by benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in mothers and newborns from northern Manhattan, the World Trade Center area, Poland, and China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:709–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Perera FP, Rauh V, Tsai WY, et al. Effects of transplacental exposure to environmental pollutants on birth outcomes in a multiethnic population. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:201–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Choi H, Jedrychowski W, Spengler J, et al. International studies of prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect 2006;114:1744–50.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. Perera FP, Tang D, Rauh V, et al. Relationships among polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, proximity to the World Trade Center, and effects on fetal growth. Environ Health Perspect 2005;115:1062–7.
    OpenUrl
  23. Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, et al. Effect of prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among inner-city children. Environ Health Perspect 2005;114:1287–92.
    OpenUrl
  24. Miller RL, Garfinkel R, Horton M, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, environmental tobacco smoke, and respiratory symptoms in an inner-city birth cohort. Chest 2004;126:1071–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Bocskay KA, Tang D, Orjuela MA, Liu X, Warburton DP, Perera FP. Chromosomal aberrations in cord blood are associated with prenatal exposure to carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:506–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Kawajiri K, Nakachi K, Imai K, Hayashi S, Watanabe J. Individual differences in lung cancer susceptibility in relation to polymorphisms of P-450IA1 gene and cigarette dose. Princess Takamatsu Symp 1990;21:55–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Bennett WP, Alavanja MCR, Blomeke B, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke, genetic susceptibility, and risk of lung cancer in never-smoking women. J Int Cancer Inst 1999;91:2009–14.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. McWilliams JE, Sanderson BJ, Harris EL, Richert-Boe KE, Henner WD. Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) deficiency and lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1995;4:589–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  29. Ketterer B, Harris JM, Talaska G, et al. The human glutathione S-transferase supergene family, its polymorphism, and its effects on susceptibility to lung cancer. Environ Health Perspect 1992;98:87–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. Kihara M, Noda K. Risk of smoking for squamous and small cell carcinomas of the lung modulated by combinations of CYP1A1 and GSTM1 gene polymorphisms in a Japanese population. Carcinogenesis 1995;16:2331–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. Nakachi K, Imai K, Hayashi S, Watanabe J, Kawajiri K. Genetic susceptibility to squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in relation to cigarette smoking dose. Cancer Res 1991;51:5177–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Saarikoski ST, Voho A, Reinikainen M, et al. Combined effect of polymorphic GST genes on individual susceptibility to lung cancer. Int J Cancer 1998;77:516–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Perera FP, Tang D, Tu YT, et al. Biomarkers in maternal and newborn blood indicate heightened fetal susceptibility to procarcinogenic DNA damage. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112:1133–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Lederman SA, Rauh V, Weiss L, et al. The effects of the World Trade Center event on birth outcomes among term deliveries at three lower Manhattan hospitals. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112:1772–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Alexandrov K, Rojas M, Geneste O, et al. An improved fluorometric assay for dosimetry of benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide-DNA adducts in smokers’ lung: comparisons with total bulky adducts and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity. Cancer Res 1992;52:6248–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Packer BR, Yeager M, Burdett L, et al. marker500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation, assay development, and frequency analysis for genetic variation in candidate genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:617–21.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Hunter DJ, Riboli E, Haiman CA, et al. A candidate gene approach to searching for low-penetrance breast and prostate cancer genes. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:977–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Stram DO, Haiman CA, Hirschhorn JN, et al. Choosing haplotype-tagging markers based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the multiethnic cohort study. Hum Hered 2003;55:27–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Moore LE, Huang WY, Chatterjee N, et al. GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and risk of advanced colorectal adenoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:1823–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Camann DE, Harding HJ, Clothier JM, Kuchibhatla RV, Bond AE. Dermal and in-home exposure of the farm family to agricultural pesticides. In: Measurement of toxic and related air pollutants: proceedings of an international symposium. Research Triangle Park (NC): Air & Waste Management Association; 1995. p. 548–54.
  41. Geno PW, Camann DE, Villalobos K, Lewis RG. Analytical methods for assessing the exposure of farmers and their families to pesticides. In: Measurement of toxic and related air pollutants: proceedings of the 1993 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International Specialty Conference. Research Triangle Park (NC): Air & Waste Management Association; 1993. p. 698–705.
  42. ↵
    Majumdar TK, Camann DE, Geno PW. Analytical method for the screening of pesticides and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from house dust: proceedings of the 1993 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International Specialty Conference. Research Triangle Park (NC): Air & Waste Management Association; 1993. p. 685–90.
  43. ↵
    Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005;21:263–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 2002;296:2225–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Akey J, Xiong M. Haplotypes vs. single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain? Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:291–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Morris AP, Whittaker JC, Balding DJ. Little loss of information due to unknown phase for fine scales linkage mapping with single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74:945–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Schaid DJ. Evaluating associations of haplotypes with traits. Genet Epidemiol 2004;27:348–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    García-Closas M, Malats N, Silverman D, et al. NAT2 slow acetylation and GSTM1 null genotypes increase bladder cancer risk: results from the Spanish Bladder Cancer Study and meta-analyses. Lancet 2005;366:649–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Lander ES, Schork NJ. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 1994;265:2037–48.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 17 (2)
February 2008
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Interactions between PAH Exposure and Genetic Polymorphisms on PAH-DNA Adducts in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian Mothers and Newborns
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Interactions between PAH Exposure and Genetic Polymorphisms on PAH-DNA Adducts in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian Mothers and Newborns
Shuang Wang, Stephen Chanock, Deliang Tang, Zhigang Li, Wieslaw Jedrychowski and Frederica P. Perera
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev February 1 2008 (17) (2) 405-413; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0695

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of Interactions between PAH Exposure and Genetic Polymorphisms on PAH-DNA Adducts in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian Mothers and Newborns
Shuang Wang, Stephen Chanock, Deliang Tang, Zhigang Li, Wieslaw Jedrychowski and Frederica P. Perera
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev February 1 2008 (17) (2) 405-413; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0695
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Urinary Melatonin in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk
  • Endometrial Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Cross-Cancer GWAS
  • Risk Factors of Subsequent CNS Tumor after Pediatric Cancer
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement