Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Letters to the Editor

Effect of Soy Protein on Testosterone Levels

Susan Goodin, Weichung J. Shih, Michael Gallo, Joseph Aisner and Robert S. DiPaola
Susan Goodin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weichung J. Shih
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Gallo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Aisner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. DiPaola
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2768 Published December 2007
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In Response: We appreciate the comments by the authors as they highlight important points for the relationship between soy and testosterone that may direct future studies. They have suggested that the 19% decrease in mean serum testosterone levels reported in our study (1) may have been largely due to the change in one subject (SP#2) and suggested that we reanalyze our data excluding this subject's values, as our data are not consistent with their unpublished meta-analysis. Although we cannot comment on an unpublished meta-analysis and its strengths or limitations, we remind the authors that in general it is not within good statistical principles to selectively delete any legitimate data. As stated in our article, testosterone and luteinizing hormone values were analyzed with the use of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which minimizes the influence of any particular subject on inference. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test is a nonparametric method, robust to outliers, and it does not delete any legitimate observation. Additionally, as stated in our article, we calculated percent change, not absolute change. Therefore, the highest initial value would not create the largest drop. In fact, the high denominator actually makes the percent change smaller for the same drop. Finally, the data we have been requested to delete do not represent the largest percent change. It was the 4th out of a total of 12 patients. Therefore, although we understand the author's question about an outcome that differs from their meta-analysis, we would like to point out that, as stated in our article, different soy preparations may behave differently in their selectivity for the estrogen receptor and small studies such as ours, and those with heterogeneous soy products included in a meta-analysis, require larger definitive studies to confirm activity.

We also agree that clarification of the correct values for baseline testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels reported in the article is important. Although the conclusion, the statistically significant reduction in testosterone of 19 ± 22% from baseline to day 28, and Figs. 1 and 2 (depicting data for each patient) are correct, the mean testosterone and luteinizing hormone at baseline should be clarified correctly in the text. The baseline values were calculated with the average of days −7 and 0, as this is a common practice to use more observations before treatment to decrease variation. The mean testosterone at baseline was 491 ± 240 ng/dL (range, 276-1,181 ng/dL). At day 14 of therapy (not at the start of therapy), the testosterone was 411 ± 175.82 ng/dL (range, 198-872 ng/dL). Similarly, the mean luteinizing hormone at baseline was 4.79 ± 1.9 mIU/mL (range, 1.8-8.35 mIU/mL), whereas at day 14 (not at the start of therapy), the luteinizing hormone was 5.2 ± 2.36 mIU/mL (range, 2.5-11.1 mIU/mL).

Finally, as stated in our article, we chose a commonly used soy protein supplement that was widely available. We did not evaluate isoflavone content, as a correlation between the content and effects on testosterone has not been consistent (2-5). Instead, we assessed the effect of this product on estrogen receptor-α and estrogen receptor-β in an in vitro assay. Given that it is currently unclear which, if any, specific phytoestrogen could be responsible for activity in vivo, we also suggest that such assays be included in studies of soy in the future because of the power of this assay to detect the effect of many different estrogen compounds. Our studies also emphasize the need for efforts to standardize the variable soy preparations available, a problem with many dietary supplements, and estrogen receptor assays may contribute greatly. Given the common use of soy products in the general population, we encourage additional larger definitive studies with well-characterized products and hope that our data will help guide such future efforts.

References

  1. ↵
    Goodin S, Shen F, Shih WJ, et al. Clinical and biological activity of soy protein powder supplementation in healthy male volunteers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:829–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Dillingham BL, McVeigh BL, Lampe JW, Duncan AM. Soy protein isolates of varying isoflavone content exert minor effects on serum reproductive hormones in healthy young men. J Nutr 2005;135:584–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. Gardner-Thorpe D, O'Hagen C, Young I, Lewis SJ. Dietary supplements of soya flour lower serum testosterone concentrations and improve markers of oxidative stress in men. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:100–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Habito RC, Montalto J, Leslie E, Ball MJ. Effects of replacing meat with soyabean in the diet on sex hormone concentrations in healthy adult males. Br J Nutr 2000;84:557–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Nagata C, Takatsuka N, Shimizu H, Hayashi H, Akamatsu T, Murase K. Effect of soymilk consumption on serum estrogen and androgen concentrations in Japanese men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:179–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 16 (12)
December 2007
Volume 16, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Soy Protein on Testosterone Levels
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effect of Soy Protein on Testosterone Levels
Susan Goodin, Weichung J. Shih, Michael Gallo, Joseph Aisner and Robert S. DiPaola
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev December 1 2007 (16) (12) 2796; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2768

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effect of Soy Protein on Testosterone Levels
Susan Goodin, Weichung J. Shih, Michael Gallo, Joseph Aisner and Robert S. DiPaola
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev December 1 2007 (16) (12) 2796; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2768
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Copy Number Variation and Ovarian Cancer Risk—Letter
  • Genome-wide Analysis of Common Copy Number Variation and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk—Response
  • Shift Work, Chronotype, and Cancer Risk—Response
Show more Letters to the Editor
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement