Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Viral Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Persistence following Loop Electrical Excision Procedure Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or 3

Aimée R. Kreimer, Hormuzd A. Katki, Mark Schiffman, Cosette M. Wheeler and Philip E. Castle
Aimée R. Kreimer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hormuzd A. Katki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Schiffman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cosette M. Wheeler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip E. Castle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0710 Published January 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schema of the continuation ratio model used to simultaneously investigate HPV persistence and reappearance after LEEP.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Overall HPV persistence at the visit following LEEP, stratified by HPV carcinogenicity and phylogenetic species. Carcinogenic HPV types include HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68. All other HPV types were considered to be either possibly or not associated with cancer (noncarcinogenic). HPV types were grouped into the following species: α9/α11(HPV 16, 31, 33, 35, 52, 58, 67, and 73), α7 (HPV18, 39, 45, 59, 68, and 70), α3 (HPV 61, 62, 72, 81, 83, 84, and 89), α5/α6 (HPV51, 53, 56, 66, and 82), and α1/α8/α10/α13 (HPV 6, 11, 40, 42, 54, and 55).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    HPV infections present before LEEP, persistent after LEEP, cleared after LEEP, and reappeared during the follow-up period, by HPV genotype, carcinogenicity, and phylogenetic species

    Present before LEEP, nPersistent after LEEP, n (%)Cleared* after LEEP, nReappeared during follow-up, n (%)
    Overall HPV infection1,130231 (20.4)82064 (7.8)
    Carcinogenic HPV839149 (17.8)63043 (6.8)
    Noncarcinogenic HPV29182 (28.2)19021 (11.1)
    α9/α11†567100 (17.6)42832 (7.5)
        1626358 (22.1)19511 (5.6)
        31749 (12.2)563 (5.4)
        33453 (6.7)382 (5.3)
        35383 (7.9)314 (12.9)
        527512 (16.0)578 (14.0)
        584411 (25.0)283 (10.7)
        67121 (8.3)100 (0)
        73163 (18.8)131 (7.7)
        P0.0520.4
    α719535 (17.9)14610 (6.8)
        18577 (12.3)463 (6.5)
        39404 (10.0)331 (3.0)
        45308 (26.7)192 (10.5)
        59297 (24.1)200 (0)
        68245 (20.8)173 (17.6)
        70154 (26.7)111 (9.1)
        P0.20.3
    α311547 (40.9)6214 (22.6)
        61187 (38.9)105 (50.0)
        622112 (57.1)71 (14.3)
        7283 (37.5)52 (40.0)
        8184 (50.0)40 (0)
        83229 (40.9)132 (15.4)
        84186 (33.3)112 (18.2)
        89206 (30.0)122 (16.7)
        P0.70.4
    α5/α616927 (16.0)1304 (3.1)
        516311 (17.5)471 (2.1)
        53295 (17.2)221 (4.5)
        56337 (21.2)240 (0)
        66244 (16.7)192 (10.5)
        82200 (0)180 (0)
        P0.20.4
    α1/α8/α10/α138422 (26.2)544 (7.4)
        6121 (8.3)80 (0)
        1160 (0)50 (0)
        4060 (0)60 (0)
        42166 (37.5)81 (12.5)
        54309 (30.0)193 (15.8)
        55146 (42.9)80 (0)
        P0.10.8
    • NOTE: HPV types considered carcinogenic are in bold. P represents P value for the χ2 test for heterogeneity.

    • ↵* Restricted to HPV infections in women with at least two study visits following the LEEP to assess reappearance (n = 79 infections excluded).

    • ↵† Only HPV73 is in the α11 species; the majority of this category represents HPV types in the α9 species.

  • Table 2.

    Predictors of post-LEEP HPV persistence

    Persisted after LEEP, n = 231Cleared after LEEP, n = 899OR* (95% CI)
    HPV species
        α9/α11100 (17.6)467 (82.4)1.0
        α735 (17.9)160 (82.1)1.0 (0.7-1.6)
        α347 (40.9)68 (59.1)3.3 (2.1-5.0)
        α5/α627 (16.0)142 (84.0)0.8 (0.5-1.3)
        α1/α8/α10/α1322 (26.2)62 (73.8)1.6 (0.9-2.7)
    Infection status at LEEP
        Single24 (14.3)144 (85.7)1.0
        Coinfected with other types207 (21.5)755 (78.5)1.6 (1.0-2.6)
        Adjusted for species†1.4 (0.9-2.3)
    No. CIN2+ blocks cut from the LEEP specimen‡
        0-189 (16.4)453 (83.6)1.0
        2 or more142 (24.2)446 (75.6)1.7 (1.2-2.3)
        Adjusted for species†1.7 (1.2-2.3)
    Diagnosis of the LEEP specimen
        <CIN251 (17.0)249 (83.0)1.0
        CIN2+180 (21.7)650 (78.3)1.4 (1.0-2.0)
        Adjusted for species†1.5 (1.0-2.3)
    • ↵* The odds of persistence versus clearance are based on generalized estimating equations, as described in Materials and Methods.

    • ↵† ORs were adjusted for species because that was the strongest predictor of HPV persistence after LEEP.

    • ↵‡ Used to approximate extent of disease at LEEP.

  • Table 3.

    Simultaneous evaluation of HPV persistence and reappearance using continuation ratio models

    Persistence ORReappearance ORP*
    HPV species
        α9/α11Referent category
        α71.61.00.4
        α33.23.50.8
        α5/α61.00.40.2
        α1/α8/α10/α131.00.90.8
    • ↵* P value tests the hypothesis that each of the persistence ORs is not significantly different compared with the reappearance OR. Because all P values are >0.05, it seems that the odds for persistence and reappearance are similar within each of the categories of phylogenetic species.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 16 (1)
January 2007
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Viral Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Persistence following Loop Electrical Excision Procedure Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or 3
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Viral Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Persistence following Loop Electrical Excision Procedure Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or 3
Aimée R. Kreimer, Hormuzd A. Katki, Mark Schiffman, Cosette M. Wheeler and Philip E. Castle
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev January 1 2007 (16) (1) 11-16; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0710

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Viral Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Persistence following Loop Electrical Excision Procedure Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 or 3
Aimée R. Kreimer, Hormuzd A. Katki, Mark Schiffman, Cosette M. Wheeler and Philip E. Castle
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev January 1 2007 (16) (1) 11-16; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0710
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix A. Affiliations of The ALTS Group
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Gallstones and Gallbladder Cancer
  • Additive Effects of Aristolochic Acid and Arsenic in UTUC
  • Provider Lifestyle Discussions
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement