Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Inflammation, Genetic Polymorphisms in Proinflammatory Genes TNF-A, RANTES, and CCR5, and Risk of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Eric J. Duell, Daniel P. Casella, Robert D. Burk, Karl T. Kelsey and Elizabeth A. Holly
Eric J. Duell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel P. Casella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert D. Burk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl T. Kelsey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth A. Holly
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0797 Published April 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in men and women in the U.S. Cytokines and other proinflammatory mediators have been implicated in inflammatory pancreatic diseases including pancreatitis and cancer. We analyzed cytokine gene polymorphisms as risk factors for pancreatic cancer using questionnaire data obtained by in-person interviews and germ line DNA collected in a population-based case-control study of pancreatic cancer (532 cases and 1,701 controls) conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area. We used mass spectrometry and gel-based methods to genotype 308 cases and 964 population-based controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression analysis and included adjustment for age, sex, and smoking. We assessed potential interactions between these polymorphisms, proinflammatory conditions (e.g., pancreatitis, ulcer, and obesity), and smoking as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. There was no overall association between pancreatic cancer risk and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-A −308G/A), regulated upon activation, normally T cell–expressed, and presumably secreted (RANTES −403G/A), and CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5-Δ32) polymorphisms. There was a nearly 7-fold increased relative risk estimate for pancreatic cancer in individuals with a history of pancreatitis (adjusted OR, 6.9; 95% CI, 3.4-14.1). Among patients with pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis was significantly associated with TNF-A −308 GA + AA (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.4) and with RANTES −403 GA + AA (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-5.4). There was evidence for a possible interaction between current active smoking and CCR5-32del. Our results lend support for the hypothesis that proinflammatory gene polymorphisms, in combination with proinflammatory conditions, may influence the development of pancreatic cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev 2006;15(4):726–31)

  • Pancreatic neoplasms
  • inflammation
  • smoking
  • polymorphisms
  • TNF-A
  • RANTES
  • CCR5

Introduction

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in men and women in the U.S. (1). With the exception of cigarette smoking, few environmental risk factors for pancreatic cancer are known (2). Cytokines and other proinflammatory mediators have been implicated in inflammatory pancreatic diseases including pancreatitis and cancer (3). Inflammatory pancreatitis is believed to be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer (4).6 Cytokines, chemokines and their receptors have varied biological functions including inflammatory response, immune-cell trafficking, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Most pancreatic tumors are characterized by intense desmoplasia (5), and there is evidence that proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and their receptors are expressed in pancreatic cells and infiltrating immune cells within inflamed pancreatic tissues (6). A number of studies have implicated these molecules as playing a role in pancreatitis progression and tumor development (3, 6-9).

As a central mediator of inflammation and apoptosis, the cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) may possess both protumor and antitumor activities (10). The chemokine, regulated upon activation, normally T cell–expressed, and presumably secreted (RANTES), and one of its receptors, CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), are believed to play a role in antitumor immunity through immune cell recruitment (11). A number of polymorphisms have been identified in cytokine and chemokine genes. The polymorphisms examined in this study include TNF-A −308 (G/A) in the TNF-α promoter, RANTES −403 (G/A) in the RANTES promoter, and a 32 bp deletion in its receptor CCR5 (Δ32). TNF-A −308A is believed to exhibit increased TNF-A gene transcription (12) and has recently been shown to be genetically linked with transcription at the nearby lymphotoxin-α (LTA) locus (13). RANTES −403A has been associated with increased RANTES transcription and delayed HIV-1 disease progression (14), and the 32 bp deletion in CCR5 results in a frameshift at amino acid 185, protein truncation, and loss of expression on the cell surface (15). Some but not all studies have shown lower HIV-1 viral load and delayed progression to AIDS in CCR5-Δ32 heterozygotes and homozygotes (16, 17).

Because cytokines are released in response to various forms of cellular stress including inflammation and carcinogen exposure(18), we evaluated the main gene effects and potential interactions between genetic polymorphisms in cytokine/chemokine genes and indices of inflammation (history of pancreatitis, ulcer, or diabetes), elevated body mass index (BMI), saturated fat intake, and tobacco smoking in relation to the risk for pancreatic cancer.

Materials and Methods

Study population

A population-based case-control study of pancreatic cancer was conducted in six San Francisco Bay Area counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara) between 1994 and 2005. Cases were identified using rapid case ascertainment by the Northern California Cancer Center (Union City, CA) with a goal to identify patients in the study area within 1 month of diagnosis. Eligible cases were newly diagnosed between 1995 and 1999 with adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas and were between 21 and 85 years old, resided in one of the six Bay Area counties, were alive at the time of the first attempted contact, and could complete an interview in English. A total of 532 eligible cases completed the interview for a 67% response rate. Patient diagnoses were confirmed by participants' physicians and by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results abstracts that included histologic confirmation of disease.

Control participants were identified within the six San Francisco Bay Area counties using random-digit dial, and were frequency-matched to cases in an approximate 3:1 ratio by sex and age. Eligibility criteria were identical for case and control participants except for pancreatic cancer status. Control acquisition for those >65 years was supplemented by random selection from Health Care Finance Administration (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) lists for the six Bay Area counties. A total of 1,701 eligible control participants completed the study interview for a 67% response rate. The main study included individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis (except for pancreatic cancer). Data from the main study showed that a similar proportion of case and control participants reported having had other cancers prior to their diagnosis or interview (14% and 13%, respectively). The analyses for this study are based on 308 cases and 964 controls who gave blood as part of the laboratory portion of the study. Detailed methods on case and control selection and the laboratory portion of the study have been published (19-23). The study interviewers obtained written informed consent from all participants and was approved by the University of California Institutional Review Board.

Exposure assessment

Exposure history including information on history of pancreatitis, stomach or duodenal ulcer, diabetes mellitus, smoking, diet, and anthropometric data were obtained at interview by self-report using structured questionnaires. No proxy interviews were conducted. Race/ethnicity was based on self-report and was broadly defined as Caucasian, Black/African-American, or Asian. Five cases and 15 controls did not fall into any of these three categories and were classified as “other race/ethnicity” for these analyses. Pancreatitis, ulcer, and diabetes were self-reported and considered positive when the respondent replied that the condition was physician-diagnosed. Participants were defined as smokers if they had smoked >100 cigarettes in their lifetime or had smoked pipes or cigars at least once per month for 6 months or more. Participants with passive smoke exposure at home as an adult (women, 32 cases and 95 controls; men, 5 cases and 21 controls) were removed from the referent group of never-smokers. A variable for smoking status was evaluated using the following three categories: (a) never active or passive, (b) former active or passive and/or cigar or pipe use, and (c) current active. BMI (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was based on self-reported usual adult height and weight and categorized based on quartiles of the distribution among the 964 controls (<21.15, 22.15-24.23, 24.24-26.59, and ≥26.60 kg/m2), and according to the WHO definition of normal weight (<25 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30 kg/m2; ref. 24). Daily saturated fat intake (g/d) was assessed using the Harvard food frequency questionnaire (intake prior to the previous year) and was adjusted for total energy intake using the residual method (25). Cut-points for saturated fat intake were based on quartiles of the distribution among the 964 controls who participated in the laboratory portion of the study.

Genotyping methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the QIAmp DNA Blood Mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. TNF-A −308G/A and RANTES −403G/A were genotyped using Masscode (formerly Qiagen Genomics, Inc., Bothell, WA; now BioServe Inc., Laurel, MD; ref. 26). For participants in whom the mass spectrometry method failed to yield a conclusive genotype, missing data were completed using PCR RFLP assays according to Wilson et al. (27) and Hajeer et al. (28). A random sample of the data (3%) for TNF-A −308 and RANTES−403 were repeated using both Masscode and PCR-RFLP and were found to agree for both genotyping methods. CCR5-Δ32 was genotyped according to a gel-based PCR method and primers published by Martinson et al. (29). DNA samples that yielded “no calls” after three attempts at genotyping were reported as missing.

Statistical methods

Tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were conducted by comparing observed with expected genotype frequencies using a χ2 test with 1 df. Expected genotype frequencies were estimated from allele frequencies. Odds ratios (OR; hereafter called risk) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression in SAS (v. 8.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All statistical tests were two-sided. Potential confounders were included in multivariable models if their inclusion changed β variable estimates by >10%. Final multivariable models for cytokine/chemokine polymorphisms, inflammation, and pancreatic cancer included age at interview, sex, and smoking status. Potential confounders that did not change variable estimates by >10% were race or ethnicity, alcohol or coffee consumption, educational level, annual household income, family history of pancreatic cancer, history of diabetes, gallbladder disease, allergy, BMI, and vitamin B12 deficiency. Gene-environment and gene-gene interactions were assessed using stratified models and by evaluating departures from additive effects. We evaluated departures from additive effects between two variables by coding a new variable with a common referent group based on a priori hypotheses (20). The magnitude of an interaction effect was determined by estimating age-adjusted interaction contrast ratios (ICR) with 95% confidence limits using PROC LOGISTIC in SAS (30). We calculated the ICR using the following formula:Mathwhere RR11 is the risk ratio for exposure with a rare allele genotypes, RR10 is the risk ratio for rare allele genotypes among the nonexposed, and RR01 is the risk ratio for exposure with a common genotype. ICRs > 0 imply greater than additive effects (interaction), whereas ICRs = 0 imply additive effects (no interaction), and ICRs < 0 imply less than additive effects (negative interaction). For the present study, we considered ICRs of magnitude one or higher as indicative of an interaction. Confidence limits for ICRs that exclude the null value of zero can be considered statistically significant at α = 0.05.

Results

Main gene

All polymorphisms evaluated in this study were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium within each of the three control groups (Caucasian, African-American, and Asian; all P > 0.15; Table 1 ). The Δ32 deletion allele at the CCR5 locus was not detected in Asian participants, and was extremely rare in African-American participants (only two heterozygous individuals were detected). In African-American and Asian participants, allelic variation for the TNF-A (−308G/A) locus also was rare. In general, rare variants at RANTES and TNF-A loci were inversely associated with pancreatic cancer risk. However, all OR estimates overlapped unity, except at the RANTES locus in Asian participants (Table 1). Main gene OR estimates did not significantly differ when the data were stratified by median age at pancreatic cancer diagnosis or interview (<65.5 versus ≥65.5 years; data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

ORs for TNF-A, RANTES, and CCR5 genotype and pancreatic cancer, San Francisco Bay Area, CA (1995-1999)

Inflammation

Cases were about seven times more likely to have reported a history of pancreatitis than were controls (Table 2 ). ORs for chronic pancreatitis and acute pancreatitis were similar in magnitude. Having a history of ulcer (stomach or duodenal) was not associated with risk for pancreatic cancer in this study (Table 2). Reporting a history of non–insulin-dependent diabetes was only weakly associated with risk for pancreatic cancer (Table 2). Participants who reported that they were current tobacco smokers were at a 2.7-fold increased risk for pancreatic cancer (Table 2). Participants who were in the highest quartile of calorie-adjusted daily saturated fat intake (≥24.8 g/d) were at a nearly 2-fold increased risk for pancreatic cancer (Table 2). Participants in the upper third and fourth quartiles of BMI were at an increased risk for pancreatitic cancer (Table 2). With the exception of pancreatitis, adjusted ORs for all of the factors in Table 2 were similar in magnitude when the data were stratified by median age at pancreatic cancer diagnosis or interview (<65.5 versus ≥65.5 years; data not shown). The adjusted OR for pancreatitis in participants <65.5 years of age was 12 (95% CI, 4.2-35); the adjusted OR for pancreatitis in participants ≥65.5 years of age was 3.6 (95% CI, 1.3-10). ORs for the factors listed in Table 2 were similar in magnitude between the subset of the study with genomic DNA as described in this report (308 cases and 964 controls) and the entire San Francisco Bay Area pancreatic cancer study population (532 cases and 1,701 controls; data not shown; refs. 21, 31).6

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

ORs for indices of inflammation and pancreatic cancer, San Francisco Bay Area, CA (1995-1999)

Gene-pancreatitis interactions in relation to pancreatic cancer

ORs for the joint effect of self-reported history of pancreatitis and chemokine/cytokine gene polymorphisms suggested the possibility of modification of risk for pancreatic cancer, although some cell sizes were small (Table 3 ). Based on these joint ORs with common allele genotypes and no history of pancreatitis in the referent category, the risk of pancreatic cancer subsequent to pancreatitis was higher among individuals with rare allele genotypes in TNF-A (GA + AA) and RANTES (GA + AA), and among individuals with genotypes that included the common undeleted allele in CCR5 (wt/wt; Table 3). The age-adjusted ICR (95% CI) for pancreatitis and TNF-A was 13.6 (−13.8 to 41), 2.8 (−7.3 to 13) for pancreatitis and RANTES, and −6.9 (−17 to 2.9) for pancreatitis and CCR5. All 95% CIs for ICRs were wide and overlapped the null value of zero. Due to the small sample size, we were unable to stratify the data in Table 3 by median age at pancreatic cancer diagnosis or interview.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

ORs for pancreatic cancer and the combined effect of cytokine/chemokine genotype and history of pancreatitis, San Francisco Bay Area, CA (1995-1999)

Association between cytokine polymorphisms and pancreatitis

There were positive associations between having a history of pancreatitis and rare allele–containing genotypes at the TNF-A −308 locus (GA + AA) and the RANTES −403 locus (GA + AA; Table 4 ). The associations were significantly stronger when the analyses were restricted to pancreatic cancer cases only. Adjustment for smoking did not alter the results, so we only present ORs adjusted for age and sex. When the analyses were restricted to pancreatic cancer cases whose age at diagnosis was <65.5 years, the OR for TNF-A (GA + AA) and pancreatitis was 3.2 (95% CI, 1.1-9.5); in cases whose age at diagnosis was 65.5 years or greater, the OR was 3.1 (95% CI, 0.73-13). In pancreatic cancer cases whose age at diagnosis was <65.5 years, the OR for RANTES (GA + AA) and pancreatitis was 1.7 (95% CI, 0.62-4.8); in cases whose age at diagnosis was 65.5 years or greater, the OR was 4.5 (95% CI, 0.92-22).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

ORs for history of pancreatitis and cytokine/chemokine genotype, stratified by pancreatic cancer case status, San Francisco Bay Area, CA (1995-1999)

Stomach or duodenal ulcer, diabetes

There was no evidence for increased or decreased joint ORs for pancreatic cancer and having a positive history of stomach or duodenal ulcer and genotypes in RANTES, CCR5, or TNF-A (data not shown). There was no evidence for interactions between age at first ulcer (<39 versus ≥39 years) and genotypes in RANTES, CCR5, or TNF-A (data not shown). There was no evidence for interactions between having a self-reported history of diabetes and chemokine/cytokine polymorphisms in relation to pancreatic cancer risk (data not shown).

Smoking

The results of joint ORs for smoking status and cytokine/chemokine genotypes in relation to pancreatic cancer risk suggested the possibility of interactions for current active smoking and the CCR5-Δ32 deletion allele (Table 5 ). The age-adjusted ICR (95% CI) for CCR5-Δ32 and smoking was 1.4 (−1.2 to 3.9); −0.9 (−2.2 to 0.47) for TNF-A and smoking; and −0.09 (−1.4 to 1.3) for RANTES and smoking. All 95% CIs for ICRs overlapped the null value of zero.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

ORs for pancreatic cancer and the combined effect of cytokine/chemokine genotype and smoking status, San Francisco Bay Area, CA (1995-1999)

Saturated fat intake and BMI

There was no evidence for interactions between cytokine/chemokine gene polymorphisms and quartiles of calorie-adjusted saturated fat intake (data not shown). Furthermore, joint ORs for BMI categories and chemokine/cytokine polymorphisms revealed no consistent evidence for interactions (data not shown).

Gene × gene interactions

Joint ORs for two-locus interactions (RANTES × CCR5, RANTES × TNF-A, and TNF-A × CCR5) revealed no evidence for interactions between these genes in relation to pancreatic cancer risk (data not shown). Stratification of these ORs by sex revealed no additional patterns in the data (data not shown).

Discussion

In this population-based case-control study, we investigated the association between polymorphisms in the cytokine/chemokine genes TNF-A −308G/A, RANTES −403G/A, CCR5-Δ32, inflammation, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our results suggest that the polymorphisms in TNF-A and RANTES are associated with having a history of pancreatitis, particularly as a possible early manifestation of pancreatic cancer. The same alleles (in TNF-A and RANTES) that were associated with pancreatitis were also associated with having a stronger risk of developing pancreatic cancer, suggesting that these genes are important determinants of pancreatic cancer in the presence of inflammation (pancreatitis). Whether pancreatitis is an independent risk factor or an early manifestation of pancreatic cancer has yet to be resolved. Recent data from our San Francisco Bay Area study show that an increasing number of years between the diagnosis of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is associated with a decreasing trend in ORs for pancreatitic cancer (trend P < 0.0001), suggesting that some pancreatitis is more likely to be an early manifestation of pancreatic cancer.6

TNF-A expression has been associated with the severity of acute pancreatitis (7) and may play a role in tissue remodeling following chronic pancreatitis (8). However, studies of the TNF-A −308 polymorphism and pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer generally have indicated a lack of association (32, 33). Our result may be different in that the association of TNF-A and RANTES with pancreatitis was found mainly among cases of pancreatic cancer. TNF-A −308A has been associated with increased TNF-A transcription, and TNF-α protein has been shown to inhibit the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells (34). Furthermore, TNF-A −308 has been genetically linked with transcription at the LTA locus located upstream from the TNF-A locus (13). LTA shares several biological and structural characteristics with TNF-A and is a potentially important mediator of the inflammatory response (35). Genetic variation at LTA has also been associated with the development of human cancers (36, 37).

Elevated levels of CCR5 and RANTES mRNA have been detected in human chronic pancreatitis tissue samples relative to normal pancreas tissues (6). The majority of the CCR5-positive cells were found to be macrophages (6). Thus, it is likely that cytokines/chemokines are predominantly expressed in the pancreas under conditions of inflammation. There is increasing evidence that chronic inflammatory conditions and persistent cell turnover could contribute to pancreatic cancer development (3, 38, 39). Our results showing a somewhat elevated OR for current active smoking and CCR5-32del genotypes in relation to pancreatic cancer risk suggest that intact CCR5 may offer pancreatic cells some protection from the damaging effects of tobacco smoking, but this result will need to be verified in other study populations.

Due to the limited number of individuals reporting a history of pancreatitis, we cannot rule out the possibility that our positive results were due to chance. However, risk estimates for pancreatic cancer in relation to pancreatitis are similar in the full data set and the subset who have DNA available. Other potential weaknesses in our study include the possible recruitment bias among pancreatic cancer cases associated with the rapidly fatal course for the disease. We cannot rule out the possibility that one or more genes under study are associated with more or less rapid case fatality. Despite this possibility, case refusal rates were quite low at 8% for the main study. As in all case-control studies, recall bias is possible, but less likely than for other common cancers because few risk factors are known.

The study of cytokines and chemokines in cancer development is extremely complex. For example, there are multiple families of chemokines with at least 50 different proteins in humans (40). Furthermore, multiple chemokines may bind the same receptor, or one receptor may react to multiple ligands. For example, RANTES ligand binds to CCR5, CCR1, and CCR3 (41), and CCR5 receptor can interact with RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β (15). Thus, this study represents the start of an evaluation of genetic variation in cytokines and chemokines in relation to inflammation and pancreatic cancer risk. Because invasion through the extracellular matrix is an important step in tumor spread and invasion, cytokines may interact in important ways with matrix metalloproteinases that also display genetic variation. Given the large number of possible interactions (42) and the evidence for cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase gene clusters on chromosomes 5q31 (43) and 11q21-q22 (44), respectively, evaluation of haplotype-related risk may provide additional insight to understanding pancreatic cancer development in humans. In conclusion, our results suggest that genetic variation in cytokine/chemokine genes in combination with proinflammatory conditions may influence the development of pancreatic cancer in humans.

Footnotes

  • ↵6 Holly E.A., Wang F., and Efird J., and Gupta S. Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in a population-based case-control study in the San Francisco Bay Area. Submitted manuscript.

  • Grant support: Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research (E.J. Duell, PI) and by grants CA98889 (E.J. Duell, PI), CA59706 (E.A. Holly, PI), CA108370 (E.A. Holly, PI), and CA89726 (E.A. Holly, PI) from the National Cancer Institute, and in part by the Rombauer Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund (E.A. Holly, PI).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted February 7, 2006.
    • Received October 12, 2005.
    • Revision received January 3, 2006.

References

  1. ↵
    Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:10–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Duell EJ, Bracci PM, Holly EA. Environmental determinants of exocrine pancreatic cancer. In: Pour PM, editor. Toxicology of the pancreas. Boca Raton: CRC Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 395–422.
  3. ↵
    Farrow B, Sugiyama Y, Chen A, et al. Inflammatory mechanisms contributing to pancreatic cancer development. Ann Surg 2004;239:763–9; discussion 769–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Cavallini G, et al. Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Pancreatitis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1433–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Ryu B, Jones J, Hollingsworth MA, Hruban RH, Kern SE. Invasion-specific genes in malignancy: serial analysis of gene expression comparisons of primary and passaged cancers. Cancer Res 2001;61:1833–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Goecke H, Forssmann U, Uguccioni M, et al. Macrophages infiltrating the tissue in chronic pancreatitis express the chemokine receptor CCR5. Surgery 2000;128:806–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Pooran N, Indaram A, Singh P, Bank S. Cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF): early and reliable predictors of severe acute pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;37:263–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Tasaki K, Shintani Y, Saotome T, et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokine-induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) secretion in human pancreatic periacinar myofibroblasts. Pancreatology 2003;3:414–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Mews P, Phillips P, Fahmy R, et al. Pancreatic stellate cells respond to inflammatory cytokines: potential role in chronic pancreatitis. Gut 2002;50:535–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Balkwill F. Tumor necrosis factor or tumor promoting factor? Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2002;13:135–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Mule JJ, Custer M, Averbook B, et al. RANTES secretion by gene-modified tumor cells results in loss of tumorigenicity in vivo: role of immune cell subpopulations. Hum Gene Ther 1996;7:1545–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Wilson AG, Symons JA, McDowell TL, McDevitt HO, Duff GW. Effects of a polymorphism in the human tumor necrosis factor α promoter on transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:3195–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Knight JC, Keating BJ, Rockett KA, Kwiatkowski DP. In vivo characterization of regulatory polymorphisms by allele-specific quantification of RNA polymerase loading. Nat Genet 2003;33:469–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Liu H, Chao D, Nakayama EE, et al. Polymorphism in RANTES chemokine promoter affects HIV-1 disease progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:4581–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Horuk R. Chemokine receptors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2001;12:313–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Michael NL, Chang G, Louie LG, et al. The role of viral phenotype and CCR-5 gene defects in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. Nat Med 1997;3:338–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, et al. Effects of CCR5–32, CCR2–64I, SDF-1 3′A alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: an international meta-analysis of individual-patient data. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:782–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Dranoff G. Cytokines in cancer pathogenesis and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:11–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Duell EJ, Holly EA. Reproductive and menstrual risk factors for pancreatic cancer: a population-based study of San Francisco Bay Area women. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:741–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Duell EJ, Holly EA, Bracci PM, et al. A population-based, case-control study of polymorphisms in carcinogen-metabolizing genes, smoking, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:297–306.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Duell EJ, Holly EA, Bracci PM, Wiencke JK, Kelsey KT. A population-based study of the Arg399Gln polymorphism in X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2002;62:4630–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. Holly EA, Eberle CA, Bracci PM. Prior history of allergies and pancreatic cancer in the San Francisco Bay area. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:432–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Hoppin JA, Tolbert PE, Holly EA, et al. Pancreatic cancer and serum organochlorine levels. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:199–205.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry: report of a WHO Expert Committee; 1995. p. 1–452.
  25. ↵
    Willett W, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am J Epidemiol 1986;124:17–27.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Kokoris M, Dix K, Moynihan K, et al. High-throughput SNP genotyping with the Masscode system. Mol Diagn 2000;5:329–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Wilson AG, di Giovine FS, Blakemore AI, Duff GW. Single base polymorphism in the human tumour necrosis factor α (TNF α) gene detectable by NcoI restriction of PCR product. Hum Mol Genet 1992;1:353.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Hajeer AH, al Sharif F, Ollier WE. A polymorphism at position −403 in the human RANTES promoter. Eur J Immunogenet 1999;26:375–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Martinson JJ, Chapman NH, Rees DC, Liu YT, Clegg JB. Global distribution of the CCR5 gene 32-basepair deletion. Nat Genet 1997;16:100–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Lundberg M, Fredlund P, Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F. A SAS program calculating three measures of interaction with confidence intervals. Epidemiology 1996;7:655–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Eberle CA, Bracci PM, Holly EA. Anthropometric factors and pancreatic cancer in a population-based case-control study in the San Francisco Bay Area. Cancer Causes Control 2005;16:1235–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Powell JJ, Fearon KC, Siriwardena AK, Ross JA. Evidence against a role for polymorphisms at tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene loci in the regulation of disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Surgery 2001;129:633–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    Barber MD, Powell JJ, Lynch SF, et al. Two polymorphisms of the tumour necrosis factor gene do not influence survival in pancreatic cancer. Clin Exp Immunol 1999;117:425–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    McDade TP, Perugini RA, Vittimberga FJ, Jr., Carrigan RC, Callery MP. Salicylates inhibit NF-κB activation and enhance TNF-α-induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. J Surg Res 1999;83:56–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Nedwin GE, Naylor SL, Sakaguchi AY, et al. Human lymphotoxin and tumor necrosis factor genes: structure, homology and chromosomal localization. Nucleic Acids Res 1985;13:6361–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Demeter J, Porzsolt F, Ramisch S, et al. Polymorphism of the tumour necrosis factor-α and lymphotoxin-α genes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 1997;97:107–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Shimura T, Hagihara M, Takebe K, et al. The study of tumor necrosis factor β gene polymorphism in lung cancer patients. Cancer 1994;73:1184–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Esposito I, Menicagli M, Funel N, et al. Inflammatory cells contribute to the generation of an angiogenic phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:630–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Ebrahimi B, Tucker SL, Li D, Abbruzzese JL, Kurzrock R. Cytokines in pancreatic carcinoma: correlation with phenotypic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer 2004;101:2727–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Vicari AP, Caux C. Chemokines in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2002;13:143–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Rossi D, Zlotnik A. The biology of chemokines and their receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 2000;18:217–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    DeClerck YA. Interactions between tumour cells and stromal cells and proteolytic modification of the extracellular matrix by metalloproteinases in cancer. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1258–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Silverberg MS, et al. Genetic variation in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster confers susceptibility to Crohn disease. Nat Genet 2001;29:223–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Pendas AM, Santamaria I, Alvarez MV, Pritchard M, Lopez-Otin C. Fine physical mapping of the human matrix metalloproteinase genes clustered on chromosome 11q22.3. Genomics 1996;37:266–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 15 (4)
April 2006
Volume 15, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inflammation, Genetic Polymorphisms in Proinflammatory Genes TNF-A, RANTES, and CCR5, and Risk of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Inflammation, Genetic Polymorphisms in Proinflammatory Genes TNF-A, RANTES, and CCR5, and Risk of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Eric J. Duell, Daniel P. Casella, Robert D. Burk, Karl T. Kelsey and Elizabeth A. Holly
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev April 1 2006 (15) (4) 726-731; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0797

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inflammation, Genetic Polymorphisms in Proinflammatory Genes TNF-A, RANTES, and CCR5, and Risk of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Eric J. Duell, Daniel P. Casella, Robert D. Burk, Karl T. Kelsey and Elizabeth A. Holly
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev April 1 2006 (15) (4) 726-731; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0797
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Gallstones and Gallbladder Cancer
  • Additive Effects of Aristolochic Acid and Arsenic in UTUC
  • Provider Lifestyle Discussions
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement