Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Somatic BRAF-V600E Mutations in Familial Colorectal Cancer

Jana Vandrovcova, Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinsson, Lars Påhlman and Annika Lindblom
Jana Vandrovcova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Påhlman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annika Lindblom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0359 Published November 2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The BRAF gene is mutated in 4% to 12% of unselected colorectal cancers, particularly those with high microsatellite instability and in premalignant lesions, such as serrated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. However, it has been shown that activating BRAF mutations are almost never found in tumors from hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. To evaluate the role of oncogenic BRAF mutations in non-hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer/non-familial adenomatous polyposis familial colorectal cancer, we did a mutation screening of the most common BRAF mutation, the V600E mutation, in 194 colorectal tumors from patients with a positive family history of the disease. The BRAF-V600E mutation was identified in 100% (8 of 8) of microsatellite-unstable tumors and in 9.7% (18 of 186) of microsatellite-stable tumors. Interestingly, families with extracolonic tumors showed a much higher mutation frequency (17.5%) compared with families with colonic cancer only (3.5%; P = 0.009). In addition, we studied colonoscopic results from 448 family members who had been under colonoscopic surveillance for several years. Subjects from families where the V600E mutation was identified had less adenomas compared with those from families where no BRAF mutation had been found (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-64.6). These findings indicate that adenomas might be less important in the cancer development in the group of families with BRAF-V600E mutations and indirectly support a previous hypothesis that tumors might develop through the hyperplastic polyp-serrated adenoma pathway. In conclusion, our results suggest that BRAF-V600E mutations are mainly involved in colorectal cancer families characterized by an increased risk of other common malignancies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;66(23):2270–3)

  • BRAF
  • familial colorectal cancer
  • adenoma
  • hyperplastic polyp
  • extracolonic

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is a multistep disease, and mutations in several genes are needed for colorectal cancer progression. Mutations in the KRAS gene, a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, are involved in colorectal carcinoma development. Recently, the BRAF gene, another member of this pathway, is mutated in colorectal tumors (1, 2). This gene codes for a cytoplasmic serine-threonine kinase of the Raf family. Oncogenic mutations in BRAF have been shown to destroy the kinase domain, which results in a constitutive activation of the mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase and nuclear factor-κB signaling pathways. This domain contains a hotspot at a nucleotide position 1,796 where a T>A transversion causes an amino acid change of glutamate to valine at residue 600. This V600E mutation is frequent and accounts for up to 90% of all BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer (2, 3). Activating BRAF mutations have been identified in 4% to 12% of unselected colorectal tumors in all Dukes' stages (2, 4-8) as well as in premalignant lesions, such as adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and serrated adenomas (5, 6), and also in aberrant crypt foci, the earliest stages of colorectal cancer development (9). There is a strong association between BRAF mutations and deficient mismatch repair characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI; refs. 2, 3, 5). BRAF mutations are found in 30% to 75% of MSI-positive tumors (3, 5, 7), in contrast to KRAS mutations that are more prevalent in MSI-negative tumors. In fact, KRAS and BRAF mutations have been suggested to be mutually exclusive, indicating their similar role in colorectal carcinogenesis (2, 4, 7). MSI in sporadic tumors is mainly associated with an epigenetic inactivation of the mismatch repair gene hMLH1, and a strong association has been found in BRAF-mutated tumors with methylation of hMLH1 (3, 4, 7, 10). In contrast, MSI tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) associated with germ-line mismatch repair gene mutations rarely show BRAF mutations (3, 7, 8, 11). Because the BRAF pathway is not involved in HNPCC, the question is whether this pathway is prevalent only in sporadic colorectal cancer or if there is also a familial equivalent. In a study by Domingo et al. (11), no BRAF mutations were found. However, only a limited number of MSI-negative familial tumors were used in this study. To further elucidate the role of the V600E mutation in familial colorectal cancer, we did a mutation screening for this mutation in 202 tumors from 194 families with familial non-HNPCC/familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) colorectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cases and Tumor Samples

Patients with a suggested familial predisposition to colorectal cancer because of a family history or an early age of onset of colorectal cancer were enrolled through the Cancer Family Clinic at the Karolinska Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). In total, 202 tumor samples from 194 non-HNPCC/non-FAP families were included in the study. Of these, 53 families had at least three first- or second-degree relatives with colorectal cancer, 98 families had at least two first- or second-degree relatives, 16 families had two cases of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, 1 family was diagnosed as a cancer family with many cancer cases, including 1 individual with colorectal cancer, 25 individuals were single cases of early onset colorectal cancer, and finally 1 case had several cancer diagnoses, including colorectal cancer. A cancer family history was available from all families. Colorectal cancer diagnoses were verified through medical records or death certificates. Other cancer diagnoses were not always verified, and therefore, age of onset was not available for all cases. FAP was excluded by colonoscopic examination, and HNPCC was excluded by the current clinical screening protocol for HNPCC. This protocol includes MSI test, immunohistochemistry on selected tumors in the family, and screening of the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, or hPMS2 in (a) cases fulfilling Amsterdam criteria (12), (b) cases with MSI-positive tumors, and (c) cases with MSI-negative tumors if any person had colorectal cancer at an age before 50 years. Mutation screening of mismatch repair genes used sequencing and multiplex ligation–dependent probe amplification. The study was undertaken in accordance with the Swedish legislation of ethical permission (2003:460) and according to the decision in the Stockholm regional ethical committee (Dnr:2005/566-31/1). All members at increased risk were counseled and offered regular colonoscopies. Based on family history, families were divided in two groups: in one group only cancers of colorectum were seen, whereas in the other group extracolonic tumors among first- or second-degree relatives were also identified. The tumor spectrum is described in Table 1 . In addition, 179 sporadic unselected colorectal tumors were studied. Tumor samples were collected from patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in the Uppsala and Falun counties in Sweden between January 1988 and November 1992. No family history was available for these cases. Tumors were meticulously dissected and fresh frozen, and tumor genomic DNA was isolated from tumor tissue using standard protocols. MSI test was done as described (13, 14) or by using the MSI Multiplex System kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Microsatellites were separated on an ABI 310 DNA sequencer, and data were analyzed using the GeneScan 3.1 software program (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). MSI-high tumors were considered as MSI positive, whereas MSI-stable and MSI-low tumors were considered as MSI negative (15). In addition, colonoscopic data from 448 members under surveillance from the investigated families were used to determine phenotypic differences between families with and without the BRAF-V600E mutation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of extracolonic cancers found in colorectal cancer families

Mutation Screening

Analysis of exon 15 of the BRAF gene was done by direct sequencing. Primer sequences and PCR conditions were based on those described previously (2). Briefly, 25 to 50 ng of genomic DNA were amplified using AmpliTaq Gold Polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems) and a universal Touchdown PCR protocol. PCR product was cleaned using ExoSAP-IT (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Sequencing reactions were done on an ABI Prism 3700 Automatic sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems) using the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Statistical Analysis

The differences in the number of colorectal polyps (hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas) and adenomas between families with a detected BRAF mutation and families without any detected mutation were tested. The numbers of variables, adenomas and polyps, were categorized into three classes: 0, 1-2, and >2. The Pearson χ2 was used to compare differences in frequencies of polyps and adenomas between the two groups. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. To evaluate the relationship between the BRAF-V600E mutation and each class of variables, a logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Odds ratios were adjusted for age.

Results

The Frequency of BRAF-V600E in Familial and Sporadic Colorectal Cancer

In the present study, we determined the frequency of the BRAF-V600E mutation in 202 colorectal tumors from 194 colorectal cancer families and in 179 sporadic colorectal cancer tumors. Overall, the BRAF-V600E mutation was detected in 13.4% (26 of 194) of tumors of patients with a positive family history of the disease and in 10.1% (18 of 179) of sporadic tumors (not significant, P < 0.4, Pearson χ2 test). Among familial cases, all MSI tumors (8 of 8) were V600E positive, whereas the V600E mutation was identified in 42.9% (9 of 21) of sporadic MSI tumors. In the group of MSI-negative tumors, the V600E mutation was detected in 9.7% (18 of 186) and 5.7% (9 of 158) of familial and sporadic tumors, respectively. In both groups of familial and sporadic tumors, the difference between MSI-positive and MSI-negative groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001, Pearson χ2 test). In addition, the frequency of the V600E mutation varied among familial cases depending on the presence of extracolonic tumors in the families. A significantly higher frequency of the BRAF-V600E mutation (17.5%) was identified in families afflicted with colonic and extracolonic tumors compared with families where only colonic tumors were seen (3.5%; P = 0.009, Pearson χ2 test; Table 2 ). In seven families, more than one colorectal tumor were studied, and in two of these families, tumors showed discordant MSI status. In family 237, one tumor was MSI positive and one was MSI negative and both were BRAF mutation positive. In family 409, two tumors were MSI and BRAF positive and a third tumor was MSI and BRAF negative. Among the remaining five families, tumors were MSI negative and all except one were BRAF-V600E negative.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

BRAF-V600E mutations in 194 familial colorectal tumors

Adenomas and Polyps in Family Members under Colonoscopic Surveillance

To determine phenotypic differences between families with and without a BRAF-V600E mutation, we studied colonoscopic data from 448 individuals from 194 colorectal families under surveillance (Table 3 ). Based on the presence of the V600E mutation in at least one colorectal tumor from each family, 78 patients belonged to families where BRAF mutations were found and 370 were from families without detectable BRAF mutations. Each patient was categorized based on the number of precursor lesions into the following classes: with 0, 1-2, or >2 adenomas or polyps associated with the “serrated pathway” (hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas). Adenomas were found in 126 patients (range, 1-13 adenomas), whereas hyperplastic polyps or serrated adenomas were identified in 153 patients (range, 1 to >30 polyps). Overall, risk individuals in families with BRAF mutations seemed to have a lower number of adenomas (not significant, P < 0.07, Pearson χ2 test). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age was used to compare the proportion of subjects within the different classes of precursor lesions among families with and without a BRAF mutation. Families with BRAF mutations had significantly fewer family members with more than two adenomas (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-64.5). There was no statistically significant difference about the number of hyperplastic polyps/serrated adenomas between the two groups of families.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

The frequency of polyps and adenomas in risk individuals under surveillance

Discussion

In our study of familial colorectal cancer, the BRAF-V600E mutation was identified in 13.4% of all tumors, which is slightly more than in sporadic tumors, 10.1% in our study, and in unselected colorectal cancers reported previously (4-12%; refs. 2-8). The overall higher frequency of the BRAF-V600E mutation in the group of familial colorectal cancer cases suggests a role of the BRAF gene in the development of familial colorectal tumors. Moreover, the significantly higher incidence of BRAF mutations seen among families afflicted with extracolonic cancers (17.5%) compared with families afflicted only with colon cancer (3.5%) suggests the existence of a new familial syndrome characterized by a high incidence of common malignancies and frequent BRAF mutations in colorectal cancers.

Genetic predisposition plays an important role in tumor development in up to one third of all colorectal cancer cases, and several syndromes, such as HNPCC and FAP, have been described. However, these syndromes account for <5% of all colorectal cancer cases. Thus, in most of the families with a pedigree suggesting a genetic predisposition, the cause of the disease remains to be elucidated. Recently, an inherited colorectal cancer syndrome associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and somatic BRAF mutations was suggested in families showing a discordant MSI status and a high frequency of hyperplastic polyps (16). The association between BRAF mutations and a family history of colorectal cancer was further supported by a second study (17). However, in this study, a positive correlation was found only for MSI-negative tumors. In our study, BRAF-V600E mutations were identified in both MSI-positive and MSI-negative familial colorectal tumors with a higher incidence among MSI-positive tumors. In this group, all eight tumors were found to harbor the BRAF-V600E mutation. Because somatic BRAF mutations are rarely, if ever, found in HNPCC tumors, these findings confirm that these tumors constitute non-HNPCC cases (3, 7, 8, 11). In three of these families, additional tumors were tested and found to be MSI negative. These results further exclude HNPCC in these families and support the findings published by Young et al. (16), indicating the existence of a colorectal cancer syndrome associated with somatic BRAF mutations and a variable MSI status. We studied only one tumor from most families, and therefore, there is a possibility of undetected families with MSI variable phenotype and BRAF mutations. In this study, we also found evidence of an increased risk of extracolonic tumors among families with BRAF mutations. The extracolonic spectrum included the most common tumors seen in general population, such as breast, gastric, prostate, pancreatic, endometrial, bladder, gall bladder, kidney, cervix, brain, and lung cancers as well as sarcoma, melanoma, and leukemia (Table 1). When studying the types of extracolonic cancers separately, all of them showed a higher frequency of BRAF mutations compared with the group with colorectal cancer only.

The well-established adenoma-carcinoma sequence, typical for the majority of colorectal cancers, outlines the high risk of developing carcinomas in adenomas. Recently, a different carcinogenic pathway was suggested where polyps can progress over the so-called “serrated pathway” from hyperplastic polyps, over serrated adenomas or mixed polyps into MSI-positive tumors (18-22). To look for phenotypical differences about precursor lesions in families with this syndrome associated with BRAF mutations, we compared the frequency of polyps and adenomas in 448 individuals under surveillance from the 194 colorectal cancer families included in the BRAF mutation screening study. Overall, there was a trend among subjects from families with BRAF mutations to have fewer adenomas. A statistically significant difference was obtained for individuals with many adenomas, suggesting that among families with BRAF mutations there are fewer members with many adenomas. This finding is consistent with the idea that the major risk factor for disease in the BRAF families might be less dependent on the prevalence of adenomas and indirectly supports a previously suggested hypothesis of an alternative pathway of colorectal cancer development (19-22). To rule out that the differences in numbers of polyps were associated with a difference in the cancer risk, we compared the group with the highest risk (those with at least three relatives with colorectal cancer) to the group with a lower risk (those with only two close relatives with colorectal cancer). In our study, no difference in the numbers of hyperplastic polyps/serrated adenomas between the groups of families was seen. However, we have previously studied larger numbers of subjects under surveillance and found that subjects in non-HNPCC families develop more adenomas and hyperplastic polyps than subjects from HNPCC families and controls (23). Moreover, those in the lower-risk group had even more polyps than those in the high-risk group (23). Thus, there is no simple relation between the number of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps and a cancer risk. The cancer risk in any risk individual is likely to be related to the number of polyps, as well as to the types of polyps, but is also dependent on the predisposing genetic risk factors. As long as those risk factors are unknown (or empirical), it is impossible to know the risk of cancer in any separate polyp in an individual.

In conclusion, our study is the first report describing the frequency of the BRAF-V600E mutation in familial non-HNPCC colorectal cancer. BRAF mutations were identified with a higher frequency than in unselected colorectal cancers and were strongly associated with MSI. Our results also support the existence of a familial syndrome associated with a variable MSI status and BRAF mutation-positive colorectal tumors as proposed by Young et al. (16). Moreover, our study suggests that in this syndrome there is also an increased risk of the most common extracolonic tumors. Finally, our results indicate that colorectal tumors in this syndrome develop through a pathway less dependent of adenomas as precursor lesions.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted August 17, 2006.
    • Received May 3, 2006.
    • Revision received August 11, 2006.

References

  1. ↵
    Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002;417:949–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, et al. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature 2002;418:934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Wang L, Cunningham JM, Winters JL, et al. BRAF mutations in colon cancer are not likely attributable to defective DNA mismatch repair. Cancer Res 2003;63:5209–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Nagasaka T, Sasamoto H, Notohara K, et al. Colorectal cancer with mutation in BRAF, KRAS, and wild-type with respect to both oncogenes showing different patterns of DNA methylation. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4584–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Kambara T, Simms LA, Whitehall VL, et al. BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum. Gut 2004;53:1137–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Yuen ST, Davies H, Chan TL, et al. Similarity of the phenotypic patterns associated with BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Res 2002;62:6451–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Deng G, Bell I, Crawley S, et al. BRAF mutation is frequently present in sporadic colorectal cancer with methylated hMLH1, but not in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:191–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Miyaki M, Iijima T, Yamaguchi T, et al. Both BRAF and KRAS mutations are rare in colorectal carcinomas from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett 2004;211:105–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Beach R, Chan AO, Wu TT, et al. BRAF mutations in aberrant crypt foci and hyperplastic polyposis. Am J Pathol 2005;166:1069–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Konishi K, Yamochi T, Makino R, et al. Molecular differences between sporadic serrated and conventional colorectal adenomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3082–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Domingo E, Niessen RC, Oliveira C, et al. BRAF-V600E is not involved in the colorectal tumorigenesis of HNPCC in patients with functional MLH1 and MSH2 genes. Oncogene 2005;24:3995–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Vasen HF, Watson P, Mecklin JP, Lynch HT. New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1453–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Liu T, Wahlberg S, Burek E, et al. Microsatellite instability as a predictor of a mutation in a DNA mismatch repair gene in familial colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;27:17–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Salahshor S, Kressner U, Fischer H, et al. Microsatellite instability in sporadic colorectal cancer is not an independent prognostic factor. Br J Cancer 1999;81:190–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:5248–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Young J, Barker MA, Simms LA, et al. Evidence for BRAF mutation and variable levels of microsatellite instability in a syndrome of familial colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;3:254–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J, et al. Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers. Cancer Res 2005;65:6063–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Iino H, Jass JR, Simms LA, et al. DNA microsatellite instability in hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenomas, and mixed polyps: a mild mutator pathway for colorectal cancer? J Clin Pathol 1999;52:5–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. ↵
    Jass JR, Iino H, Ruszkiewicz A, et al. Neoplastic progression occurs through mutator pathways in hyperplastic polyposis of the colorectum. Gut 2000;47:43–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. Torlakovic E, Snover DC. Serrated adenomatous polyposis in humans. Gastroenterology 1996;110:748–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. Rashid A, Houlihan PS, Booker S, et al. Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of hyperplastic polyposis. Gastroenterology 2000;119:323–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Makinen MJ, George SM, Jernvall P, et al. Colorectal carcinoma associated with serrated adenoma—prevalence, histological features, and prognosis. J Pathol 2001;193:286–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Liljegren A, Lindblom A, Rotstein S, et al. Prevalence and incidence of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas in familial colorectal cancer: correlation between the two types of colon polyps. Gut 2003;52:1140–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 15 (11)
November 2006
Volume 15, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Somatic BRAF-V600E Mutations in Familial Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Somatic BRAF-V600E Mutations in Familial Colorectal Cancer
Jana Vandrovcova, Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinsson, Lars Påhlman and Annika Lindblom
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev November 1 2006 (15) (11) 2270-2273; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0359

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Somatic BRAF-V600E Mutations in Familial Colorectal Cancer
Jana Vandrovcova, Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinsson, Lars Påhlman and Annika Lindblom
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev November 1 2006 (15) (11) 2270-2273; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0359
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Urinary Melatonin in Relation to Breast Cancer Risk
  • Endometrial Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Cross-Cancer GWAS
  • Risk Factors of Subsequent CNS Tumor after Pediatric Cancer
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement