Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Short Communications

Salivary Soluble CD44: A Potential Molecular Marker for Head and Neck Cancer

Elizabeth J. Franzmann, Erika P. Reategui, Kermit L. Carraway, Kara L. Hamilton, Donald T. Weed and W. Jarrard Goodwin
Elizabeth J. Franzmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika P. Reategui
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kermit L. Carraway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kara L. Hamilton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald T. Weed
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Jarrard Goodwin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0546 Published March 2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a debilitating disease which is cured only 50% of the time. If diagnosed early, survival rates could reach 80%, but there is currently no practical method for early detection. CD44 comprises a family of isoforms that, in certain tumors, are alternatively spliced and overexpressed in tissues and circulation. Here we examine salivary soluble CD44 (solCD44) expression in HNSCC patients and normal controls to determine its potential as a screening tool.

Method: We did a solCD44 ELISA on saliva from 26 HNSCC patients, 10 normal volunteers, conditioned media (CM) of 4 HNSCC cell lines, and 1 CD44-negative cell line (COS-7). Western blot was done on CM from 2 HNSCC cell lines (UMSS11B and FaDu), COS-7, 3 HNSCC, and 2 normal saliva specimens to verify ELISA antibody specificity. SolCD44 levels were significantly elevated in HNSCC patients compared with normal controls (7.85 ng/mL for HNSCC patients and 1.09 ng/mL for normal controls, P < 0.001).

Results: The test detected 79% of mucosally invasive HNSCC using preliminary cutoff points. SolCD44 levels did not vary significantly with tumor size, stage, recurrence, history of radiation treatment, or tobacco and alcohol risk factors. A 65 to 75 kDa band, corresponding to solCD44, was detected in all of the HNSCC cell line CM and saliva whereas normal samples showed a fainter band or were undetectable.

Conclusion: In this preliminary analysis, the salivary solCD44 ELISA seems to effectively detect HNSCC at all stages. Further study is indicated because early detection is clearly important in this disease.

  • Saliva
  • CD44
  • head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for >95% of all head and neck malignancies (1). Unfortunately, the majority of HNSCC patients present with advanced stage disease requiring multimodality therapy (2-5). Even with combinations of intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, cure rates are only 30% for advanced stage disease (2, 5, 6). Those cured often face serious morbidities including speech and swallowing problems, disfigurement, and exorbitant healthcare costs. With nearly 40,000 incident cases per year, this disease poses a serious health concern in the United States (7).

In this report, HNSCC includes squamous cell cancers of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. HNSCC prognosis varies by site with laryngeal cancer patients having the best and hypopharyngeal patients having the worst prognoses (8). HNSCC is classified as stage I-IV based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system (9). Cure is achieved in >80% of stage I patients and >60% of stage II patients. For patients with more advanced disease (stages III and IV), cure is attained in <30% (6).

Because HNSCC is rarely diagnosed in stages I and II, when prognosis is good, early detection through screening is an obvious solution (10). However, screening for head and neck cancer by clinical exam has not proven effective to date (11-14). Efforts are now focusing on molecular approaches to early detection. One candidate molecular marker for HNSCC is CD44. CD44 comprises a family of isoforms expressed in many cell types (15-17). These isoforms arise from alternative splicing of a variable exon region present in CD44 mRNA (18). Some isoforms such as CD44 standard exist in normal cells, whereas others termed CD44 variant isoforms (CD44v), are primarily expressed in tumors (19, 20). CD44 proteins are also released in soluble form (solCD44) via proteases (21) and are detectable in normal circulation (22-28). Circulating levels of solCD44 correlate with metastases in some tumors (25, 26).

Studies on solCD44 have been few and limited to plasma (27, 28). When plasma levels of a specific isoform, solCD44v6, were measured in HNSCC patients and controls, no significant difference was seen (28). Most circulating CD44v6 proteins were derived from normal epithelial compartments, including breast cells, colon cells, and squamous cells (28). To our knowledge, there are no data on total solCD44 isoforms in saliva of patients with HNSCC. We did a preliminary study on saliva from 26 HNSCC patients and 10 normal volunteers to determine if a solCD44 ELISA test can be done on saliva and is effective in detecting HNSCC.

Materials and Methods

Subject Characteristics

Twenty-six HNSCC patients and 10 normal controls were obtained according to the protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board. Control subjects were volunteers from healthcare and research fields. To decrease the potential for false-negatives in our control group, all were nonsmokers for at least 10 years. All subjects completed a written consent prior to enrollment. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. These included four patients who denied history of smoking or drinking. All patients had biopsy proven newly diagnosed or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Saliva Collection

Five milliliters of normal saline was placed in the subject's mouths. Patients were asked to swish for 5 seconds, gargle for 5 seconds, and then spit into a specimen cup. Saliva was placed on ice for transport and stored at −80°C.

Cell Culture

We obtained FaDu (hypopharyngeal carcinoma) and Cos-7 (CD44-negative cell line) from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). MDA-1483 (oral cavity cancer) was a gift from Dr. Mien-Chie Hung, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). UM-SCC-9 (oral tongue SCC) and UM-SCC11B (hypopharynx SCC) were gifts from Dr. T.E. Carey, University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI). FaDu, Cos-7, and MDA-1483 were grown in RPMI medium. UMSCC-9 and UMSCC-11B were grown in DMEM medium. All cell line media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, streptomycin, and penicillin. At ∼60% confluence, cultures were washed and incubated in serum-free media supplemented with insulin, transferrin, and selenium. These conditioned media (CM) were collected at 48 to 72 hours.

Salivary SolCD44 ELISA

We measured levels of solCD44 using an ELISA assay (Bender MedSystems, Vienna, Austria) that recognizes all solCD44 normal and variant isoforms (total solCD44). This assay has been used extensively in serum and other body fluids (24, 26, 28). To our knowledge, it has not been used to study saliva of HNSCC patients. The principles of the test involve a sandwich-type ELISA where a monoclonal anti-solCD44 antibody, adsorbed onto microwells, binds CD44 in the sample. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated monoclonal anti-solCD44 antibody binds the CD44-antibody complex and reacts with a substrate solution to produce a colored product with an absorbance measured quantitatively at 450 nm. Sample concentrations are determined by a standard curve.

Samples were vortexed, centrifuged at 3,000 × g, and the supernatant was used for study. The manufacturer's protocol was followed with slight modifications. The recommended dilution of 1:60 resulted in nondetectable levels of solCD44. Instead, we did the test as directed at full and half concentration for each sample. In an effort to correct for patients' varying hydration status, we normalized the solCD44 levels to protein. We did the protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol using saliva samples at full and half concentration. All samples were done in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis

We performed the solCD44 ELISA on saliva from 26 HNSCC patients, 10 normal controls, 4 HNSCC cell lines, and 1 CD44-negative cell line. Characteristics and solCD44 results for both patients and normal volunteers were entered into a computer database. Statistical analyses were done using programs of the SAS Institute, Inc. (version 8.2). The protein and solCD44 concentrations for each sample were averaged and SD calculated. The triplicate solCD44 levels for each sample were divided by the average protein concentration for that sample. The normalized solCD44 levels were then averaged and SD determined. We compared solCD44 and normalized solCD44 levels between normal volunteers and cancer patients and between specific subgroups of cancer patients based on characteristics such as stage, site, and tumor size. Student's t test was used in most cases as only two groups were compared. ANOVA was used to compare solCD44 levels by site (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx) and size (T0-T4).

Western Blot Analysis

To verify the specificity of the anti-solCD44 antibody used in the ELISA test, we performed Western blot on CM from two HNSCC cell lines (UMSS11B and FaDu), a CD44-negative cell line COS-7, three HNSCC, and two normal saliva specimens. Proteinase inhibitors were added to fresh saliva specimens (normal and tumor). All samples were vortexed, centrifuged, normalized for protein content, and subjected to electrophoresis on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel under reducing conditions. Proteins were transblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Protran, pure nitrocellulose transfer and immobilization membrane, Scheleicher & Schuell BioScience, Inc., Keene, New Hampshire). All washes were done with TTBS (20 nmol/L Tris, 500 nmol/L sodium chloride, 0.1% Tween 20) following standard Western blotting protocol. The membrane was blocked with 5% milk. Anti-solCD44 (anti-CD44s by Bender Medsystems), was incubated with the membrane overnight at a concentration of 1:3,000 with 5% milk in TTBS. The secondary antibody (anti-mouse IgG and biotin conjugate) was applied diluted 1:1,000 with TTBS and incubated 1 hour. The membrane was treated with streptavidin-biotinylated alkaline phosphatase complex (amplified alkaline phosphatase immun-blot assay kit, Bio-Rad) followed by addition of color development solution (AP conjugate substrate kit, Bio-Rad).

Results

ELISA

Mean values for the solCD44 test were 7.85 ng/mL for HNSCC patients and 1.09 ng/mL for normal controls (P < 0.001). Mean values for normalized solCD44 test were 10.76 ng/mg protein for HNSCC patients and 1.80 ng/mg protein for normal controls (P < 0.001). SolCD44 levels did not vary significantly with stage (stages I, II, III versus stage IV; P = 0.96), recurrence (P = 0.52), history of radiation treatment (P = 0.29), tobacco and alcohol risk factors (P = 0.34), site (P = 0.07), or size (P = 0.56). SolCD44 and normalized solCD44 levels for all HNSCC patients and normal volunteers are shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

SolCD44 and normalized solCD44 levels for HNSCC patients and normal controls. Bars, SD. All triplicate levels for SCC25 were higher than the highest standard concentration. Exact values and therefore SD could not be calculated. All solCD44 levels below the lowest standard concentration were considered zero. The triplicate levels for Normal 1 fell below the lowest standard concentration and therefore no SD was calculated.

The mean protein concentration was significantly higher in the tumors than the normal controls (0.97 mg versus 0.61 mg; P = 0.05). This result contradicts results of other studies (29, 30). However, in a study conducted in India (30), staging was not addressed and most of the tumors were located in the buccal mucosa (an uncommon site in the United States), which may obstruct secretions from the parotid duct. Specific proteins (hyaluronidase) are elevated in saliva of tumor patients compared with controls in another study (29). If protein concentrations are higher in HNSCC patients compared with normal controls for reasons other than hydration, normalized solCD44 levels in HNSCC may be falsely lowered. For this reason, we examined both solCD44 concentrations and normalized solCD44 concentrations.

We do not have enough data to determine the appropriate cutoff point for the salivary solCD44 test. To determine the preliminary cutoff point for solCD44, we used the highest observed mean from the normal controls plus its SD (i.e., 1.74 + 0.96 = 2.7). Similarly, to determine the cutoff point for normalized solCD44, we used the highest observed mean from the normal controls plus its SD (i.e., 3.64 + 0.69 = 4.3). HNSCC was considered detected if the saliva specimen had solCD44 >2.7 ng or normalized solCD44 levels >4.3 ng/mg protein. With this assumption, the test detected 77% of all HNSCC samples studied and 79% of invasive HNSCC. By site, the test detected 10 of 11 oral cavity and oropharynx cancers, 9 of 13 hypopharynx and larynx cancers, and 1 of 2 HNSCC without mucosal invasion. Grouped in this manner, solCD44 levels in patients with oral cavity/oropharygeal cancers were significantly higher than patients with laryngeal/hypopharygeal cancers (mean 11.22 ± 3.3 versus 4.97 ± 0.9; P < 0.05). Because a screening test is most useful if it detects early disease, we looked at early disease alone. The test detected 86% of stage I and II cancers and 80% of stage I disease. For analysis of early disease, we did not include the patient with carcinoma in situ (SCC17) because this progresses to invasive HNSCC <50% of the time (31). SolCD44 ELISA tests done on cell lines showed that CD44 was secreted by the HNSCC cells (Fig. 1). This suggests that solCD44 in the saliva is secreted, at least in part, by epithelial cells. The CD44-negative COS-7 cell line did not show any solCD44 as expected.

Western Blot Analysis

Results of Western blot reveal several bands in saliva of HNSCC patients and CM of HNSCC cell lines (Fig. 2). This banding pattern is explained by proteinase-mediated cleavage of CD44 as described by Nakamura et al. (32). In their study, the CD44-negative A375 cell line was transfected with the standard form of CD44. MT1-MMP-mediated cleavage resulted in three heterogeneously glycosylated fragments with bands of 65 to 70, 50 to 60, and 37 to 40 kDa. Our Western blots show bands at 65 and 68 kDa for cell line CM and HNSCC saliva, which is within the range described by Nakamura et al. The HNSCC saliva sample SCC65 shows 40 and 50 kDa bands and all the cell lines show the 50 kDa band, also consistent with the Nakamura et al. findings. HNSCC is known to express multiple CD44 isoforms. The 30 kDa band is likely a result of proteinase-mediated cleavage of additional isoforms rather than problems with antibody specificity. This is further supported by our normal samples and the Cos-7 cell lines, which show no bands or a faint band in the 65 to 70 kDa region (Normal 20).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Western blot analysis of cell line CM (A) and saliva from HNSCC participants and normal controls (B). All the samples from HNSCC cell lines and patients show bands in the 65 to 70 kDa range as expected for the solCD44 standard (21, 32). Additional bands seen at 40 and 50 kDa have also been described (32). Because isoforms other than CD44 standard are present in HNSCC, the 30 kDa band is likely a result of proteinase-mediated cleavage of additional isoforms rather than problems with antibody specificity. This is further supported by our normal samples and the Cos-7 cell lines, which show no bands or a faint band in the 65 to 68 kDa region (Normal 20).

Discussion

The WHO delineates several criteria for effective early disease detection. (a) The disease must be common and associated with serious mortality, (b) treatment as a result of screening must improve prognosis, (c) the potential benefits must outweigh the potential harms and costs of screening, and (d) screening tests must accurately detect early disease (33). Based on our understanding of HNSCC and our preliminary results, we believe that the salivary solCD44 test may be effective for early detection of HNSCC and should be evaluated further.

HNSCC is deadly (only a 50% cure rate on average; ref. 34) and is associated with devastating morbidity due to speech and swallowing problems and disfigurement. HNSCC poses a serious health risk with the incidence of oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx cancers in 15 of 100,000 subjects in the United States (35) and even higher incidence in other parts of the world (36). Approximately 80% of HNSCC is associated with tobacco and alcohol use (4, 6), risk for developing HNSCC is increased as high as 100 times with the heaviest use (11). Clearly, this disease meets the first of the WHO criteria for effective early detection, especially in the tobacco- and alcohol-consuming population.

Currently most HNSCC is diagnosed in stage III or IV when treatment is less effective and cure rates are 30% (2, 5, 6), largely because the only site associated with early symptoms is the larynx (12). It is estimated that if HNSCC were diagnosed in early stages (I and II), cure rates could exceed 80% (10). Furthermore, patients with earlier disease are treated with single modality therapy and have fewer problems with speech, swallowing, breathing, and disfigurement (4, 6). These significant improvements in prognosis meet the second criteria for effective early detection.

A screening test may do more harm than good (and not meet the third WHO criteria) if the detected cancer is indolent and the patient is likely to die of other causes before succumbing to the cancer (37). This conundrum does not apply to invasive HNSCC because it progresses relatively rapidly. However, HNSCC undergoes a premalignant stage similar to cervical cancer that is diagnosed histologically by various grades of dysplasia with severe dysplasia essentially equivalent to carcinoma in situ. Dysplasia progresses to cancer 16% to 36% of the time depending on severity (31). An indispensable screening test would detect only those dysplasias that will progress to invasive HNSCC. In this pilot study, the solCD44 test did not pick up the one patient with carcinoma in situ. To date, that patient has not developed invasive HNSCC after 30 months of follow-up, multiple examinations, and biopsies. Prospective studies on patients with dysplasia would help determine if salivary solCD44 predicts HNSCC progression. An accurate predictor of progression may also improve patient compliance with prevention strategies.

A final criteria for effective early detection is that the test accurately detect early disease. In this pilot study, the salivary solCD44 test detected 79% of HNSCC cases using our preliminary cutoff points. This pilot study included seven patients with stage II or earlier invasive disease. Eighty-six percent of the early disease was identified. The solCD44 test may be more sensitive for oral cavity and oropharyngeal disease than laryngeal and hypoharyngeal disease. The test detected 91% of all oral cavity/oropharyngeal tumors and 69% of all laryngeal/hypopharyngeal tumors. The lower sensitivity observed in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer may be related to sampling error, as cancers located more distally in the upper aerodigestive tract are likely to have less impact on the expectorated saline/saliva mix. Further studies are under way to clarify this issue.

Our preliminary estimates of sensitivity compare favorably with other widely used screening tests such as prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer (sensitivity 60-80%, specificity 90%; ref. 37) and the Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer (sensitivity 30-87%, specificity 86-100%; ref. 38). We are currently conducting a study to enroll more patients with early disease (stages I and II). As we accrue more subjects, we will determine a cutoff point where specificity will likely be <100%, resulting in a sensitivity that may be higher than suggested by our preliminary results.

The effects of tobacco exposure, alcohol consumption, oral health, and other medical conditions are currently under investigation in our laboratory. We suspect that saliva CD44 levels will not vary with smoking status because serum solCD44 does not vary with smoking status (27). Furthermore, 4 out of 26 HNSCC patients denied history of tobacco or alcohol exposure, yet 75% of these patients had significantly elevated solCD44 levels. The one patient who did not have elevated levels had a submucosal recurrence that was not in contact with saliva.

Other groups have contributed significantly to understanding effective early detection of HNSCC. Because oral cavity cancer is the most common site for HNSCC and it is fairly easy to examine, it seems that screening examinations would be beneficial. However, a systematic review concluded there is insufficient evidence to assess the effectiveness of community-based screening programs (39). Another tool, toluidine blue, is fairly sensitive; however, specificity for detecting early disease that progresses to cancer is limited (39). Current research focuses on molecular approaches to early detection. Hu et al. (40) recently reviewed molecular detection approaches for smoking-associated tumors. Several markers have been studied in HNSCC saliva and serum including loss of heterozygosity, microsatellite instability, and promoter hypermethylation in various panels of markers, p53 mutations, and mitochondrial DNA mutations. Lokeshwar's group showed that hyaluronic acid in saliva was elevated in 8, and hyaluronidase elevated in 11 of 11 HNSCC patients (29). As a community-based screening tool, ELISA-based techniques seem most cost-effective because they are more simple and inexpensive to perform than DNA-based techniques at this time (41, 42).

We believe that the salivary solCD44 test holds potential as a screening tool for HNSCC. To establish its worth, several objectives must be met: (a) we need to study a larger number of subjects in a target population at high risk for the disease to determine the appropriate cutoff point for the salivary solCD44 as well as the true sensitivity and specificity; (b) we should assess the ability to identify early, treatable disease; (c) we need to control for possible confounding factors including tobacco, alcohol use, and other medical conditions. We are currently conducting a study designed to meet these objectives. If the salivary solCD44 test is validated, a larger screening trial will be designed.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. John C. Deo for his assistance with this work.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: MO200283 from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute, 1RO3CA107828-01 from the NIH/National Cancer Institute, and the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted November 4, 2004.
    • Received July 19, 2004.
    • Revision received September 21, 2004.

References

  1. ↵
    Muir C, Weiland L. Upper aerodigestive tract cancers. Cancer Suppl 1995;75:147–53.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Lingen M, Sturgis EM, Kies MS. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in nonsmokers: clinical and biologic characteristics and implications for management. Curr Opin Oncol 2001;13:176–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Jefferies S, Eeles R, Goldgar D, et al. The role of genetic factors in predisposition to squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 1999;79:865–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Forastiere A, Koch W, Trotti A, Sidransky D. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1890–1900.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Al-Sarraf M. Treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: historical and critical review. Cancer Control 2002;9:387–99.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Vokes EE, Weichselbaum RR, Lippman SM, Hong WK. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 1993;328:184–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Cancer facts and figures—2004. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2004.
  8. ↵
    Jones AS, Beasley N, Houghton D, Husband DJ. The effects of age on survival and other parameters in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. Clin Otolaryngol 1998;23:51–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1998.
  10. ↵
    O'Hara J, Bradley P. Head and neck cancer: a screening strategy. Clin Otolaryngol 2002;27:133–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Neville BW, Day TA. Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:195–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Dolan RW, Vaughan CW, Fuleihan N. Symptoms in early head and neck cancer: an inadequate indicator. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;119:463–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    National Cancer Institute. Oral cancers: research report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, NIH 1991; NIH publication no. 92-2876.
  14. ↵
    Weinberg MA, Estefan DJ. Assessing oral malignancies. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65:1379–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Brown TA, Bouchard T, St. John T, Wayner E, Carter WG. Human keratinocytes express a new CD44 core protein (CD44E) as a heparin-sulfate intrinsic membrane proteoglycan with additional exons. J Cell Biol 1991;113:207–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Omary MB, Trowbridge IS, Letarte M, Kagnoff MF, Isacke CM. Structural heterogeneity of human Pgp-1 and its relationship with p85. Immunogenetics 1988;27:460–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Trowbridge IS, Lesley J, Schulte R, Hyman R, Trotter J. Biochemical characterization and cellular distribution of a polymorphic, murine cell-surface glycoprotein expressed on lymphoid tissues. Immunogenetics 1982;15:299–312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Screaton GR, Bell MV, Jackson DG, Cornelis FB, Gerth V, Bell JI. Genomic structure of DNA encoding the lymphocyte homing receptor CD44 reveals at least 12 alternatively spliced exons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:12160–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Iida N, Bourguignon LYW. New CD44 splice variants associated with human breast cancers. J Cell Physiol 1995;162:127–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Franzmann EJ, Weed DT, Civantos FJ, Goodwin WJ, Bourguignon LYW. A novel CD44v3 isoform is involved in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:426–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Kajita M, Itoh Y, Chiba T, et al. Membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase cleaves CD44 and promotes cell migration. J Cell Biol 2001;153:893–904.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Naor D, Sionov RV, Ish-Shalom D. CD44: Structure, function, and association with the malignant process. Adv Cancer Res 1997;71:241–319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Guo YJ, Liu G, Wang X, et al. Potential use of soluble CD44 in serum as an indicator of tumor burden and metastasis in patients with gastric or colon cancer. Cancer Res 1994;54:422–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Martin S, Jansen F, Bokelmann J, Kolb H. Soluble CD44 splice variants in metastasizing human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1997;74:443–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Ristamaki R, Joensuu H, Lappalainen K, Teerenhovi L, Jalkanen S. Elevated serum CD44 level is associated with unfavorable outcome in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood 1997;90:4039–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Yamane N, Tsujitani S, Makino M, Maeta M, Kaibara N. Soluble CD44 variant 6 as a prognostic indicator in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncology 1999;56:232–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Scott DA, Stapleton JA, Palmer RM, et al. Plasma concentrations of reputed tumor-associated soluble CD44 isoforms (v5 and v6) in smokers are dose related and decline on smoking cessation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:1211–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Van Hal NL, Van Dongen GA, Ten Brink CB, et al. Evaluation of soluble CD44v6 as a potential serum marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:3534–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Franzmann EJ, Schroeder GL, Goodwin WJ, Weed DT, Fisher P, Lokeshwar VB. Expression of tumor markers hyaluronic acid and hyaluronidase (HYAL1) in head and neck tumors. Int J Cancer 2003;106:438–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Girja K, Sundharam B, Krishnan P, Devi C. Biochemical changes of saliva in tobacco chewers, tobacco smokers, alcohol consumers, leukoplakia and oral cancer patients. IJDR 2002;13:102–7.
  31. ↵
    Scully C, Sudbo J, Speight PM. Progress in determining the malignant potential of oral lesions. J Oral Pathol Med 2003;32:251–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Nakamura H, Suennaga N, Taniwaki K, et al. Constitutive and induced CD44 shedding by ADAM-like proteases and membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase. Cancer Res 2004;64:876–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Etzioni R, Urban N, Ramsey S, et al. The case for early detection. Nature Rev Cancer 2003;3:243–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Goodwin WJ. Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means? Laryngoscope 2000;110:S1–18.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2001, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2001/; 2004.
  36. ↵
    Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 1999;80:827–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    The International Prostate Screening Trial Evaluation Group. Rationale for randomized trials of prostate cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:262–71.
  38. ↵
    Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systemic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Patton L. The effectiveness of community-based visual screening and utility of adjunctive diagnostic aids in the early detection of oral cancer. Oral Oncology 2003;39:708–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Hu YC, Sidransky D, Ahrendt SA. Molecular detection approaches for smoking associated tumors. Oncogene 2002;21:7289–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Reyes CM, Allen BA, Terdiman JP, Wilson LS. Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2002;95:1848–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Ellison L, Cheli CD, Bright S, Veltri RW, Partin AW. Cost-benefit analysis of total, free/total, and complexed prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer screening. Urology 2002;60:42–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 14 (3)
March 2005
Volume 14, Issue 3
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Salivary Soluble CD44: A Potential Molecular Marker for Head and Neck Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Salivary Soluble CD44: A Potential Molecular Marker for Head and Neck Cancer
Elizabeth J. Franzmann, Erika P. Reategui, Kermit L. Carraway, Kara L. Hamilton, Donald T. Weed and W. Jarrard Goodwin
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev March 1 2005 (14) (3) 735-739; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0546

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Salivary Soluble CD44: A Potential Molecular Marker for Head and Neck Cancer
Elizabeth J. Franzmann, Erika P. Reategui, Kermit L. Carraway, Kara L. Hamilton, Donald T. Weed and W. Jarrard Goodwin
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev March 1 2005 (14) (3) 735-739; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0546
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cancer Predisposition Gene Mutations and Pancreatic Cancer
  • Statin Use and Breast Cancer Risk
  • Tamoxifen and Longitudinal Mammographic Density Change
Show more Short Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement