Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Short Communications

MTHFR Polymorphisms and Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Matthew F. Rudd, Gabrielle S. Sellick, Ruth Allinson, Estella Matutes, Daniel Catovsky and Richard S. Houlston
Matthew F. Rudd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabrielle S. Sellick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth Allinson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Estella Matutes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Catovsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard S. Houlston
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published December 2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Folate availability is critical for DNA integrity, required for the transfer of methyl groups in the biosynthesis of thymidilate. Reduction of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate, a donor for methylating dUMP to dTMP in DNA synthesis, to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, the primary methyl donor for methionine synthesis, is catalyzed by 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR). The MTHFR polymorphisms C677T and A1298C have been shown in some studies to alter the risk of a range of different malignancies. We evaluated the role of the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) risk by genotyping 832 patients and 886 healthy controls. The odds ratio of CLL associated with 677CT and 677TT genotypes were 1.02 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.83-1.24] and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.66-1.24), respectively. The odds ratio of CLL associated with 1298AC and 1298CC genotypes were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.79-1.18) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.62-1.24), respectively. This data indicate that the MTHFR polymorphisms C677T and A1298C do not significantly contribute to an inherited genetic susceptibility to CLL.

  • chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • MTHFR
  • polymorphism

Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of leukemia accounting for around 30% of all cases. Inherited predisposition to CLL is now recognized, with epidemiologic studies showing 3- to 7-fold elevations of risk in first-degree relatives of CLL cases (1, 2). To date, no gene, which when mutated, has been shown to unambiguously confer susceptibility to the disease (2). Whereas part of the familial risk could be due to high-penetrance mutations in as yet unidentified genes, a polygenic mechanism provides a plausible alternative explanation. Alleles conferring relative risks of ∼2.0 will rarely cause multiple-case families and are difficult or impossible to identify through linkage (3). The search for low-penetrance alleles has therefore centered on association studies based on comparing the frequency of polymorphic genotypes in cases and controls.

Folate metabolism plays an important role in carcinogenesis due to its involvement in DNA methylation and nucleotide synthesis. DNA methylation is essential for gene regulation (4) and cellular differentiation (5). Aberrant genomic DNA methylation, particularly hypomethylation, is associated with the genesis of various cancers (6, 7). Central to cellular DNA methylation is the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), which catalyses the irreversible conversion of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. Reduced MTHFR activity has an inhibitory effect on the 5-methyltetrahydrofolate pathway, leading to increased 5-methylenetetrahydrofolate, which if not reduced results in the transfer of a methyl group converting dUMP to dTMP, required for DNA synthesis. Uracil, a normal RNA base, can become misincorporated into the DNA when methylation of dUMP to dTMP is deficient (8), and it has been proposed that defects in uracil excision repair results in DNA double-strand breaks and other anomalies which have carcinogenic effects (9, 10).

The MTHFR polymorphism C677T (Ala222Val) affects the activity and thermolability of the expressed protein, with heterozygotes having ∼60% of wild-type activity and homozygous variants having ∼30% of wild-type activity (11-13). A second MTHFR polymorphism, A1298C (Glu429Ala), has also been reported in some but not all studies, to affect MTHFR activity, with homozygous individuals having ∼60% of wild-type MTHFR activity (12, 13).

Although not universal, some studies have shown that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms affect the risk of a number of malignancies including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (refs. 9, 14, 15). To determine whether the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of MTHFR are associated with risk of CLL, we undertook a large case-control study of 832 CLL patients and 886 controls. We included a high proportion of familial cases, thereby enriching for individuals with an inherited genetic risk, empowering the detection of an association (16).

Materials and Methods

Patients

Eight hundred and thirty-two patients with adult CLL (577 males, 255 females; mean age at diagnosis 61 years; range 21-94; SD ± 12) referred to the Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust were studied. One hundred and nineteen of the cases (76 males, 43 females; mean age at diagnosis 59 years; range 26-93; SD ± 12) had one or more first-degree relatives affected with CLL. Eight hundred and eighty-six healthy individuals were recruited as part of either the National Cancer Research Network Trial (1999-2002), the Royal Marsden Hospital Trust/Institute of Cancer Research Family History and DNA Registry (1999-2004), or the National Study of Colorectal Cancer Genetics Trial (2004), all established within the United Kingdom. Controls (523 males, 363 females; mean age 60 years; range 21-91; SD ± 12) were the spouses of patients with nonhematologic malignancies and were selected to closely match the age and sex of the cases. None of the controls had a personal history of CLL or other malignancy. All cases and controls were British Caucasians, and there were no obvious differences in the demography of cases and controls in terms of place of residence within the United Kingdom. Samples were obtained with informed consent and ethical review board approval in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Detection of MTHFR C677T and A1298C Genotypes

MTHFR C677T and A1298C genotypes were generated using Taqman technology implemented on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT sequence detection system. PCR reactions for detection of the C677T polymorphism contained 6.25 μL ABI Taqman PCR Master Mix, 0.16 μL ABI SNP assay-by-design master mix containing 900 mol/L forward primer (5′-gCACTTgAAggAgAAggTgTCT-3′), 900 nmol/L reverse primer (5′-CCTCAAAgAAAAgCTgCgTgATg-3′), 200 nmol/L VIC-labeled MGB probe (5′-gCgggAgCCgATTTCAT[NFQ]-3′) and 200 nmol/L FAM-labeled MGB probe (5′-gCgggAgTCgATTTCAT[NFQ]-3′), 4 μL (10 ng) of template DNA, and double-distilled water to a final volume of 12.5 μL. PCR reactions for detection of the A1298C polymorphism contained 6.25 μL ABI Taqman PCR Master Mix, 0.16 μL ABI SNP assay-by-design master mix containing 900 nmol/L of primers (5′-ggAggAgCTgCTgAAgATgTg-3′) and (5′-TggTTCTCCCgAgAggTAAAgA-3′), 200 nmol/L VIC-labeled MGB probe (5′-ACCAgTgAAgAAAgTgT[NFQ]-3′) and 200 nmol/L FAM-labeled MGB probe (5′-CAgTgAAgCAAgTgT[NFQ]-3′), and DNA and water as above. All amplifications consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (92°C/15 s) and extension (60°C/1 min).

Statistical Analyses

The relationship between MTHFR genotypes and risk of CLL was assessed by means of the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) calculated using both conditional and unconditional logistic regression (adjusting for age and sex). Because both models yielded very similar results, only those for conditional logistic regression are presented. A test for trend (Ptrend) in increasing CLL risk by having more than one putative high-risk allele or genotype was evaluated by means of the χ2 test. To test for population stratification, the distribution of genotypes in controls was tested for a departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. An unequal distribution of haplotype frequencies between cases and controls was tested for by means of the χ2 statistic 2(lnL1−lnL0), where L1 is the likelihood of cases and controls analyzed together and L0 the sum of the individual likelihoods. All computations were undertaken using the statistical software package STATA version 7.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Power calculations were undertaken using the method published by Fleiss et al. (17) as implemented in the statistical program POWER version 1.30 (Epicenter Software, http://icarus2.hsc.usc.edu/epicenter). P = 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all analyses.

Results and Discussion

The observed frequencies in the controls for both polymorphisms of MTHFR were in accordance with Hardy-Weinberg laws of equilibrium, providing no evidence of population stratification within the data set. The frequency of the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms in the general population has been recently reported in a meta-analysis of 16 studies providing data on 5,389 individuals (18). The frequencies of both polymorphisms detected in our study are in close agreement with this report. Specifically, the frequencies in our study (and in the meta-analysis) are CC/AA, 12% (15%); CC/AC 22% (22%); CC/CC, 10% (8.5%); CT/AA, 22% (22%); CT/AC, 22% (20%); CT/CC, 0% (0.25%); TT/AA, 12% (11%); TT/AC, 0% (0.46%); and TT/CC, 0% (0.03%). As was the case with the meta-analysis (18), no individuals with the MTHFR 677TT/1298AC, 677CT/1298CC, and 677TT/1298CC genotypes were identified.

Based on the number of cases and controls analyzed and the population frequencies of the rare alleles of each polymorphism, our study has 90% power to show an OR of 0.7 associated with each variant stipulating a P = 0.05.

Table 1 details the ORs of CLL and associated 95% CIs associated with each genotype. Adjustment for age and sex made no significant difference to findings hence only unadjusted ORs are presented. Individually, there is no evidence that either polymorphism affects the risk of CLL. Odds ratios for possession of the MTHFR 677T and 1298C alleles were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.84-1.12) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.10), respectively. Restricting the analysis to familial cases provided, no evidence of a relationship between MTHFR polymorphisms and risk of CLL [ORs for possession of 677T and 1298C alleles were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.89-1.56) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.64-1.17), respectively].

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Association between MTHFR C677T and A1298C genotypes and chronic lymphocytic leukemia risk

There was evidence of significant linkage disequilibrium between the two polymorphisms (P < 0.001). In both cases and controls, we observed that subjects homozygous for either of the MTHFR mutations always possessed the wild-type genotype at the alternate site. For both MTHFR polymorphisms C677T and A1298C, the wild-type amino acid residues Ala222 and Glu429 are evolutionarily conserved between human and mouse sequences, with Ala222Val and Glu429Ala substitutions representing moderately conservative and moderately radical changes, respectively (19). This suggests that each polymorphism is likely to have an independent effect on MTHFR function, consistent with in vitro measurements of MTHFR-specific activity associated with specific genotypes (13, 20).

The joint effects of the two polymorphisms on the risk of CLL are also shown in Table 1. ORs of CLL associated with possession of rare alleles of MTHFR polymorphisms were consistently less than 1.0 but were not statistically significant. Overall, the distribution of haplotypes was not significantly different between cases and controls (P = 0.97). The OR of CLL associated with possession of at least one allelic variant compared with the wild-type 677CC/1298AA genotype is 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63-1.10) for all individuals included in the study and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.65-2.30) when only familial cases are analyzed.

Variation in MTHFR has been implicated in a range of cancer types, including acute leukemias (9, 15). There is some evidence that hypomethylation is a feature of CLL (21) and may contribute to the disease etiology. Furthermore, deletion breakpoints in CLL have been reported to colocalize at specific sites within chromosome 11q where folate-sensitive CCG repeats are located (22). Although our findings provide no statistically significant evidence that MTHFR plays a role in development of CLL, we cannot entirely exclude a small effect in risk of CLL associated with MTHFR variants. Moreover, as there is evidence of a gene-environment effect with respect to folate metabolism and cancer risk (23, 24), it is possible that polymorphisms of MTHFR may mediate CLL risk in the context of a low-folate diet. Unfortunately, we do not know the folate status of individuals in this study to permit this possibility to be examined.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients and their clinicians for their participation in this study.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: Leukemia Research Fund and Cancer Research United Kingdom grants.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: M.F. Rudd and G.S. Sellick contributed equally to this work.

    • Accepted August 3, 2004.
    • Received January 9, 2004.
    • Revision received June 8, 2004.

References

  1. ↵
    Goldin LR, Hemminki K. Familial risk of lymphoproliferative tumors in families of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the Swedish family-cancer database. Leuk Lymphoma 2003; 44:5.
  2. ↵
    Houlston RS, Sellick G, Yuille M, et al. Causation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: insights from familial disease. Leuk Res 2003;27:871–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996;273:1516–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Jones PA, Takai D. The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science 2001;293:1068–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Razin A, Riggs AD. DNA methylation and gene function. Science 1980;210:604–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Jones PA. DNA methylation and cancer. Cancer Res 1986;46:461–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Ehrlich M. DNA methylation in cancer: too much, but also too little. Oncogene 2002;21:5400–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Blount BC, Mack MM, Wehr CM, et al. Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:3290–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Skibola CF, Smith MT, Kane E, et al. Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 199;96:12810–5.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Dianov GL, Timchenko TV, Sinitsina OI, et al. Repair of uracil residues closely spaced on the opposite strands of plasmid DNA results in double-strand break and deletion formation. Mol Gen Genet 1991;225:448–52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 1995;10:11–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Robien K, Ulrich CM. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and leukemia risk: a HuGE minireview. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:571–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    van der Put NM, Gabreels F, Stevens EM, et al. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: an additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:1044–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Chen J, Giovannucci E, Kelsey K, et al. A methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1996;56:4862–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Wiemels JL, Smith RN, Taylor GM, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and risk of molecularly defined subtypes of childhood acute leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:4004–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Peto J, Houlston RS. Genetics and the common cancers. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:S88–96.
  17. ↵
    Fleiss JL, Tytun A, Ury HK. A simple approximation for calculating samples sizes for comparing independent proportions. Biometrics 1980;36:343–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    Ogino S, Wilson RB. Genotype and haplotype distributions of MTHFR677C>T and 1298A>C single nucleotide polymorphisms: a meta-analysis. J Hum Genet 2003;48:1–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 1974;185:862–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Lievers KJ, Boers GH, Verhoef P, et al. A second common variant in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and its relationship to MTHFR enzyme activity, homocysteine, and cardiovascular disease risk. J Mol Med 2001;79:522–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Wahlfors J, Hiltunen H, Heinonen K, et al. Genomic hypomethylation in human chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 1992;80:2074–80.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Auer RL, Jones C, Mullenbach RA, et al. Role for CCG-trinucleotide repeats in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 2001;97:509–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Botto LD, Yang Q. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:862–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Fallon UB. Commentary: colon cancer, folate and genetic status. Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:67–70.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 13 (12)
December 2004
Volume 13, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MTHFR Polymorphisms and Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MTHFR Polymorphisms and Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Matthew F. Rudd, Gabrielle S. Sellick, Ruth Allinson, Estella Matutes, Daniel Catovsky and Richard S. Houlston
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev December 1 2004 (13) (12) 2268-2270;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MTHFR Polymorphisms and Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Matthew F. Rudd, Gabrielle S. Sellick, Ruth Allinson, Estella Matutes, Daniel Catovsky and Richard S. Houlston
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev December 1 2004 (13) (12) 2268-2270;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cancer Predisposition Gene Mutations and Pancreatic Cancer
  • Statin Use and Breast Cancer Risk
  • Tamoxifen and Longitudinal Mammographic Density Change
Show more Short Communications
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement