Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Null Results in Brief

No Association between Haplotypes of Three Variants (Codon 81, 284, and 762) in Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Gene and Risk of Primary Lung Cancer

Jin Eun Choi, Sun Ha Park, Hyo-Sung Jeon, Kyung Mee Kim, Ga Young Lee, Rang Woon Park, Sin Kam, In-San Kim, Chang Ho Kim, Sang Hoon Jheon, Tae Hoon Jung and Jae Yong Park
Jin Eun Choi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sun Ha Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyo-Sung Jeon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyung Mee Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ga Young Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rang Woon Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sin Kam
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
In-San Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chang Ho Kim
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sang Hoon Jheon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tae Hoon Jung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jae Yong Park
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published September 2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Introduction

DNA repair plays a critical role in protecting the genome from the insults of cancer-causing agents, such as those found in tobacco smoke. Reduced DNA repair capacity can increase the susceptibility to lung cancer (1) . Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes may alter the efficiency of DNA repair, thereby contributing to lung cancer susceptibility.

Base excision repair is a major DNA repair pathway for small base adducts produced by oxidation, methylation, and environmental carcinogens. PARP3 acts as a “sensor of DNA strand breaks,” intermediates of enzymatic repair of base damage during BER. In addition to its role as a nick sensor, it also interacts with the scaffold protein XRCC1 and may in this way accelerate the recruitment of DNA repair proteins to stand interruptions (2) . The PARP gene is located in chromosome lq42, and two pseudogenes have been identified in 13q33-qter and 14 (3) . The association between the PARP pseudogene in chromosome 13 and the risk of lung cancer has been evaluated in several racial groups. The 193-bp deletion polymorphism in the PARP pseudogene has been associated with an increased risk for adenocarcinoma of the lung in Mexican-Americans and African-Americans (4) .

Recently, several candidate polymorphisms in the PARP gene have been deposited in public databases.4 Although the functional effects of these polymorphisms have not yet been elucidated, we hypothesized that some of these variants, particularly their haplotypes, may have an effect on the DNA repair capacity, thereby modulating the susceptibility to lung cancer. To test this hypothesis, a case control study was conducted to evaluate the association between PARP genotypes/haplotypes and the risk of lung cancer. Among the candidate polymorphisms, we have focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions [Asp81Asp, C801T in exon 2; Alal88Thr, G721A in exon 4; Ala284Ala, C1011T in exon 7; His613Glu, C1998G in exon 13; Val762Ala, T2444C in exon 17; and Cys908Thr, G2882A in exon 20; GenBank accession no. NM_001618], because these are most likely to affect the gene function. In the present study, we evaluated the association of the codon 81, 284, and 762 polymorphisms and their haplotypes with lung cancer because the codon 188, 613, and 908 polymorphisms were not detected in a preliminary study consisting of 50 lung cancer cases and 50 healthy controls.

Materials and Methods

The current study was a hospital-based case control study that included 352 lung cancer patients and 352 healthy controls. Detailed descriptions of the methods used for subject enrollment and study population have been published previously (5) . Eligible cases included all patients newly diagnosed with primary lung cancer between January 2000 and December 2000 at Kyungpook National University Hospital (Daegu, Korea). There was no age, sex, or histological or stage restrictions, but patients with a previous history of cancer were excluded. The cases were 168 (47.7%) squamous cell carcinomas, 119 (33.8%) adenocarcinomas, 56 (15.9%) small cell carcinomas, and 9 (2.6%) large cell carcinomas. Controls were randomly selected from a pool of healthy volunteers who visited the general health check-up center at Kyungpook National University Hospital during the same period. The controls were frequency (1:1) matched to the cases based on sex and age (±5 years).

The codon 81, 284, and 762 genotypes were determined using a PCR-RFLP assay. The primers for the codon 81 polymorphism were 5′-TCCTTCTAGTCGCCCATGTT-3′ and 5′-ATGGGCACCATACGCTTGAT-3′, which generate a 311-bp fragment. The primers for the codon 284 polymorphism were 5′-TGCAGATCTTGGACCGAGTAGC(mutated T→C)-3′ and5′-TGCAATCTCAGGGACCTGAAGT-3′, which generate a 274-bp fragment. The primers for the codon 762 polymorphism were 5′-TTTGCTCCTCCAGGCCAAC(mutated G→C)G-3′ and 5′-TGGAAGTTTGGGACCGCTGC-3′, which generate a 210-bp fragment. The PCR reactions were performed in a 20-μl reaction volume containing 200 ng of genomic DNA, 25 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mm each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1 × PCR buffer [10 mm Tris-HCI (pH 8.3) and 50 mm KCl], 1.5 mm MgCl2, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (TAKARA SHUZO Co., Otus, Shiga, Japan). The PCR cycle conditions consisted of an initial denaturation step of 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C for codon 81 and 284 and 20 s at 94°C for codon 762, 20 s at 56°C for codon 81 and 762 and 20 s at 59°C for codon 284, 30 s at 72°C for codon 81 and 284 and 20 s at 72°C for codon 762, and a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. Five microliters of the PCR products were digested overnight with 5 units of BclI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at 50°C for codon 81, 5 units of TaqI (New England Biolabs) at 65°C for codon 284, and 5 units of BstUI (New England Biolabs) at 60°C for codon 762. The digestion products were separated on 6% acrylamide gel. Three possible genotypes were defined for each codon based on distinct band patterns: (a) codon 81: CC (311 bp), CT (311, 182, and 129 bp), and TT (182 and 129 bp); (b) codon 284: CC (274 bp), CT (274, 252, and 22 bp), and TT (252 and 22 bp); and (c) codon 762: TT (210 bp), TC (210, 190, and 20 bp), and CC (190 and 20 bp). As a quality control, the genotyping analysis was repeated twice for all subjects, and selected PCR-amplified DNA samples (n = 2, respectively, for each genotype) were examined by DNA sequencing to confirm the genotyping results.

The ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using an unconditional logistic regression analysis. To analyze the association between the genotypes/haplotypes and risk of lung cancer after stratification into age (median age, ≤61 years/>61 years), sex, smoking status, and cigarette consumption (median pack-years, <40 pack-years/≥40 pack-years), multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. All analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Software for Windows, version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Gary, NC).

Results

The polymorphic allele frequencies for codon 81, 284, and 762 among the controls were 0.443, 0.787, and 0.443, respectively, and in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The polymorphic allele frequencies for codon 81, 284, and 762 among the cases were 0.455, 0.805, and 0.455, respectively, which were not significantly different from those among the controls.

The three polymorphisms were in linkage disequilibrium. Theoretically, although 8 haplotypes are possible, only 3 haplotypes (C-C-T, haplotype A; C-T-T, haplotype B; and T-T-C, haplotype C) were identified in the current study population. No significant deviation was observed in the distribution of the haplotypes between the cases and controls (Table 1)⇓ . When the analyses were stratified by age, sex, smoking status, and pack-years of smoking, no significant association was found between the haplotype and risk of lung cancer. Moreover, the haplotypes exhibited no apparent relationship with any of the histological types of lung cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Analysis of PARP haplotype frequencies, ORs, and 95% CIs for lung cancer by selected variables

Statistical Power

For all lung cancers, this study had 80% power (two-sided test of significance, α = 0.05) to detect an OR > 1.58 (assuming a risk effect) or <0.67 (assuming a protective effect) for carriers of haplotype B and an OR > 1.57 or <0.68 for carriers of haplotype C relative to carriers of haplotype A. For squamous cell carcinomas, this study had 80% power to detect an OR > 1.80 or <0.61 for haplotype B and an OR > 1.78 or <0.63 for haplotype C compared with haplotype A. For adenocarcinomas, this study had 80% power to detect an OR > 1.94 or <0.57 for haplotype B and an OR > 1.96 or <0.59 for haplotype C relative to haplotype A. For small cell carcinomas, this study had 80% power to detect an OR > 2.79 or <0.46 for haplotype B and an OR > 2.57 or <0.51 for haplotype C compared with haplotype A.

Study Limitations

The limitations of the current study are the same as in other case control studies, primarily, a selection and information bias, as described in a previous study by the current authors (5) .

This is the first case control study of PARP polymorphisms in relation to lung cancer. Our results suggest that PARP polymorphisms (codon 81, 284, and 762) or their haplotypes do not significantly affect susceptibility to lung cancer. However, because genetic polymorphisms often vary between ethnic groups (4) , additional studies are needed to clarify the association of PARP polymorphisms with lung cancer in diverse ethnic populations.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 Supported in part by the KOSEF through the Biomolecular Engineering Center at Kyungpook National University.

  • ↵2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Samduk 2 Ga 50, Daegu, 700-412, Korea. Phone: 82-53-420-5536; Fax: 82-53-426-2046; E-mail: jaeyong{at}kyungpook.ac.kr

  • ↵3 The abbreviations used are: PARP, poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

  • ↵4 Internet address: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP.

  • Received May 7, 2003.
  • Accepted June 3, 2003.

References

  1. ↵
    Wei Q., Cheng L., Hong W. K., Spitz M. R. Reduced DNA repair capacity in lung cancer patients. Cancer Res., 56: 4103-4107, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Bernstein C., Bernstein H., Payne C. M., Garewal H. DNA repair/pro-apoptotic dual-role proteins in five major DNA repair pathways: fail-safe protection against carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res., 511: 145-178, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Cherney B. W., McBride O. W., Chen D., Alkhatib H., Bhatia K., Hensley P., Smulson M. E. cDNA sequence, protein structure, chromosomal location of the human gene for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84: 8370-8374, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Gu J., Spitz M. R., Yang F., Wu X. Ethnic differences in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase pseudogene genotype distribution and association with lung cancer risk. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 1465-1469, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Park J. Y., Park S. H., Choi J. E., Lee S. Y., Jeon H-S., Cha S. I., Kim C. H., Park J-H., Kam S., Park R. W., Kim I-S., Jung T. H. Polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene XPA and risk of primary lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 11: 993-997, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 12 (9)
September 2003
Volume 12, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No Association between Haplotypes of Three Variants (Codon 81, 284, and 762) in Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Gene and Risk of Primary Lung Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
No Association between Haplotypes of Three Variants (Codon 81, 284, and 762) in Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Gene and Risk of Primary Lung Cancer
Jin Eun Choi, Sun Ha Park, Hyo-Sung Jeon, Kyung Mee Kim, Ga Young Lee, Rang Woon Park, Sin Kam, In-San Kim, Chang Ho Kim, Sang Hoon Jheon, Tae Hoon Jung and Jae Yong Park
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev September 1 2003 (12) (9) 947-949;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
No Association between Haplotypes of Three Variants (Codon 81, 284, and 762) in Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Gene and Risk of Primary Lung Cancer
Jin Eun Choi, Sun Ha Park, Hyo-Sung Jeon, Kyung Mee Kim, Ga Young Lee, Rang Woon Park, Sin Kam, In-San Kim, Chang Ho Kim, Sang Hoon Jheon, Tae Hoon Jung and Jae Yong Park
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev September 1 2003 (12) (9) 947-949;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Statistical Power
    • Study Limitations
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations of ACEi and ARB with CRC Risk
  • Fusobacterium nucleatum antibody and CRC risk
  • Telomere length and TGCT risk
Show more Null Results in Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement