Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Progress and Priorities
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Disparities Collection
      • Editors' Picks
      • "Best of" Collection
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Informing Public Health Policy
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Markers of Insulin Resistance and Colorectal Cancer Mortality

Maurizio Trevisan, Jian Liu, Paola Muti, Giovanni Misciagna, Alessandro Menotti and Federica Fucci
Maurizio Trevisan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jian Liu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paola Muti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giovanni Misciagna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Menotti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Federica Fucci
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published September 2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A link between insulin metabolism and colorectal cancer has been hypothesized, supported by a series of potential physiological mechanisms, and confirmed by a number of reports in experimental animals. However, the evidence in humans is limited and mostly indirect.

The aim of the present report is to analyze whether individuals with a cluster of metabolic abnormalities associated with abnormalities in insulin metabolism experience higher mortality for colorectal cancer than those without this cluster of metabolic abnormalities.

A total of 21,311 men and 15,991 women 20–69 years of age were followed-up for an average of 7 years as part of the Risk Factors and Life Expectancy Project, a pooling of a number of epidemiological studies conducted in Italy.

Our analyses indicate that participants with high levels of blood glucose and a cluster of metabolic abnormalities linked to insulin resistance experienced a significant increased risk of colorectal cancer mortality compared with participants without the cluster. For the presence of the cluster of metabolic abnormalities, the calculated hazard ratios and 95% CIs were 2.96 (1.05–8.31) for men, 2.71 (0.59–12.50) for women, and 2.99 (1.27–7.01) when both sexes were combined. These associations were independent from the potential confounding effect of age, drinking of alcoholic beverages, and smoking.

Our findings are supportive of the hypotheses that glucose metabolism hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and metabolic abnormalities associated with it may play a significant role in the etiology of colorectal cancer.

Introduction

Hyperinsulinemic insulin resistance has been hypothesized to play a role in colorectal cancer etiology (1, 2, 3) . Insulin is a powerful mitogenic agent (4) , which is able to stimulate cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis (5) . However, despite strong evidence from experimental studies (6 , 7) , the epidemiological and clinical evidence linking insulin and markers of insulin metabolism to colon cancer is very limited and comes mostly from retrospective studies (8, 9, 10, 11) . The present analyses were carried out to evaluate (using a longitudinal study design) the hypotheses that the cluster of metabolic abnormalities associated with alteration in insulin production and sensitivity is a significant risk factor for colorectal cancer mortality.

Materials and Methods

The Risk Factors and Life Expectancy Project represents the pooling of nine different large-scale epidemiological studies conducted in Italy between 1978 and 1987 (12) . A total of 62,285 men and women, 20–69 years of age, were included in the original project. All of the studies were conducted under leadership and supervision from the Laboratory of Epidemiology of the Istituto Superiore di Sanita′ and used methods agreed on and standardized by the laboratory. However, not all of the studies measured the same variables. Details on the study are given elsewhere (12) .

In six studies (four population-based and two occupational-based), information was gathered on the factors composing Syndrome X, a cluster of metabolic abnormalities associated to insulin resistance (i.e., serum triglycerides, HDL2 cholesterol, glucose, and blood pressure), and covariates of interest for the present analysis. The population-based studies were all multicenter and recruited from the general population using either electoral rolls (these rolls in Italy include all of the citizens 18 years of age and older) or the local population registry offices. The two occupational studies were single-center studies (13 , 14) , whereas the four population based studies were all multicenter studies with the number of centers ranging from 4 to 16 (15, 16, 17, 18) . Some characteristics of the individual studies are reported in the “Appendix.” Participation rates in the different studies ranged between 53 and 76.5%. Blood samples were collected after 12 h of fasting. Serum total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by several automated enzymatic methods. However, all of the laboratories were under the quality control procedures of the WHO Lipid Reference Center in Prague. Serum HDL cholesterol was measured after precipitation with phosphotungstic acid or with heparin or dextran sulfane in different studies; however, comparability among centers was guaranteed by centralized quality control as for total cholesterol. Blood glucose was measured by several automated enzymatic methods, but all of the laboratories were under quality control and standardization of a central laboratory.

Blood pressure was measured according to a standardized protocol by trained observers (13) . Systolic and diastolic (fifth phase) levels were recorded. The average of two consecutive measurements (1 min apart) are reported.

Weight and height were measured with participants wearing light clothing, without shoes, according to the procedures described by the WHO manual (19) .

The mortality data were collected during an average follow-up period of 7 years (range, 4–12) during which 2.1% of subjects were lost to follow-up. Information on vital status, time, and cause of death in the deceased was collected locally at each center by trained staff. For each individual, a search was conducted through the local Registry Office or in the Emigration Office. For deaths, the cause or causes of death were derived from the official death certificates. Coding of causes of death were performed centrally by a single nosologist using the ICD-9. In cases of multiple causes of death, a hierarchical preference was adopted, with priority given to accidents, cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke in rank order with other causes reported in the same order as on the death certificate. No validation of death certificates was performed. For the present analysis, causes of death are grouped as follows: (a) all cause mortality, ICD-9 codes 140–329; and (b) colorectal cancer, ICD-9 codes 153 and 154.

Population for Analysis.

In six of the nine studies, information was collected on the variables of interest for the present study for a total of 24,108 men and 19,751 women 20–69 years of age. After exclusion of participants with missing information for any of the variables considered in the analyses, we had a total of 37,302 (21,311 men and 15,991 women) with complete information who are the focus of this report. It should be noted that when participants with complete information were compared with those excluded from the present analysis because of missing variables, there were no substantial differences noted.

Statistical Analyses.

For the mortality analyses, hazard ratios as an indication of relative risks were computed using individuals with no metabolic abnormalities as a reference category. Survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard model (20) was our primary mode of analysis and allowed adjustment for age, smoking, and alcohol consumption using participants with no abnormalities as a reference category. The assumption of proportionality of the hazards was tested and found not to be violated.

Definition of Insulin Resistance Syndrome.

For the purpose of this analysis, insulin resistance syndrome is defined as having “abnormal” levels of serum total triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure. These markers represent the original factors (alteration in glucose metabolism, increased serum triglycerides, low HDL, hypertension) identified by Reaven (21) as important components of the insulin resistance syndrome. In addition, we have shown recently that this cluster of factors was associated with a significant increase in coronary heart disease mortality in the same cohorts (22) . The presence of abnormal values was defined, except for high blood pressure, based on distribution cutpoints (i.e., values in the highest 25% of the study and sex-specific distribution for glucose and triglycerides and the lowest 25% of the sex-specific distribution for HDL cholesterol or being on medication for diabetes and hyperlipidemia). These distribution-based cutpoints were used because when clinical cutpoints (based on expert and panel recommendations) were used, the prevalence of insulin resistance syndrome was very limited (22) . The distribution based cutpoints is appropriate because of the established lack of threshold in the relationship between these markers and mortality/morbidity risk. For hypertension, a cutpoint of systolic pressure ≥140 or a diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg or being on antihypertensive treatment was used. For the other variables, to control for the possible confounding effect of differences in laboratory measurements across studies, the population cutpoints were based on each specific study distribution.

The cutpoints of HDL cholesterol triglycerides are glucose for each specific study as seen in Table 1⇓ .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

The cutpoints of HDL cholesterol triglycerides and glucose for each specific study

Results

Table 2⇓ summarizes the baseline characteristics of the study participants according to whether or not they were alive or died of colorectal cancer or other cancers at the end of the follow-up period.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Characteristics of participants according to vital status and causes of death at follow-up (x ± SD)

Table 3⇓ summarizes the result of the Cox proportional hazard model for death from colorectal cancer when the variables comprising the insulin resistance syndrome are analyzed individually. For the purpose of these analyses, variables are dichotomized based on cutpoints described previously. The models include age, alcohol, and smoking as potential covariates. Of all of the individual variables, only glucose is significantly associated with increased risk of death from colorectal cancer. Similar results are reported when the variables are used as continuous variables (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Proportional hazard model for individual metabolic abnormalities comparing insulin resistance syndrome and colorectal cancer (hazard ratios and 95% CI)

The result of the survival analysis for the cluster of metabolic abnormalities and mortality from colorectal cancer is reported in Table 4⇓ . In the two sexes separately and in both sexes combined, the presence of the cluster of metabolic abnormalities is associated with an almost 3-fold increase in risk of death from colon cancer; this association reaches statistical significance in men and in both sexes combined. To control for the potential effect of individual studies, we compared the prevalence of insulin resistance syndrome between cases and controls in each individual study and conducted a matched analysis with matching for age, sex, and study. The findings of these analyses confirmed the results presented in Table 4⇓ . (Data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Proportional hazard model for insulin resistance syndrome and colorectal cancer mortality (hazard ratios and 95% CI)

Discussion

Our findings from a large population-based study suggest that glucose and metabolic abnormalities associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer mortality in both men and women.

A possible link between insulin metabolism and colorectal cancer has been hypothesized (2) , and it is supported by experimental studies (5, 6, 7) . The epidemiological evidence is mostly indirect, coming from studies linking overweight and obesity (an important determinant of hyperinsulinemia and/or insulin resistance) to both colorectal carcinoma and adenomas (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30) and studies linking single factors influenced by insulin metabolism (i.e., serum triglycerides and plasma glucose/diabetes) to colon cancer (31, 32, 33, 34) . To date, however, only a few retrospective studies have been presented linking insulin to colorectal cancer (8, 9, 10, 11) . In our study, whereas we have no direct measurement of insulin, we have attempted to characterize individuals based on a cluster of markers that has been associated to hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, i.e., high blood pressure, low levels of HDL, high levels of triglycerides, and blood glucose (21 , 35) . These abnormalities have been found to be clustered in individuals with increased plasma insulin and/or increased insulin resistance (36) . This cluster of metabolic abnormalities has received much attention as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Insulin may increase the risk of colorectal cancer through a number of mechanisms. Insulin has been shown to affect growth of normal and neoplastic colonic epithelial cells and to have mitogenic action in vitro (5 , 6) , and in experimental animals (7) these actions can take place either directly or indirectly through IGF-1 (37 , 38) . Colon cancer cells have been shown to have both insulin and IGF-1 receptors (5 , 39 , 40) . Insulin, in addition to regulating IGF action through the effect on the availability of IGF-1 binding proteins, may bind to IGF-1 receptors (2 , 41) . Hyperglycemia, a feature of insulin resistance, may affect colorectal cancer risk through an inhibition of colonic motility (42) .

Finally, it is possible that metabolic abnormalities secondary to hyperinsulinemia and/or insulin resistance (i.e., triglycerides and glucose) may act as a powerful source of energy for cancer cell growth (43) .

When the individual components of the cluster are analyzed separately, their association with colorectal mortality is inconsistent with only glucose and hypertension, showing consistent findings across gender. The reason for this inconsistency is not apparent. It could be argued that glucose may be the only component of the cluster driving the observed association; however, the hazard ratios for high glucose are clearly lower than those for the presence of the full cluster, indicating that the presence of the other abnormalities has an additive effect on the risk. Glucose may have a stronger role because it may more closely reflect the underlining pathophysiological mechanisms (i.e., insulin resistance) and because, as indicated previously, it may have a direct effect on cancer growth by providing cancerous cells with a source of energy (43) . The lack of consistency of the findings for triglycerides (themselves a potential source of energy for cancerous cells) could be the results of their high intra-individual and intra-assay variability.

The present findings together with our previous report from the same population indicating a significant association between this cluster of metabolic abnormalities and cardiovascular disease (22) confirm that insulin resistance and the associated abnormalities may be important risk factors for a number of chronic conditions.

Our findings are most likely an underestimation of the role of insulin in the etiology of colorectal cancer, because it is likely that there are numerous individuals in the population who have various degrees of hyperinsulinemia and/or insulin resistance who do not necessarily present abnormalities in all four of the components of this cluster. Another limitation of our study includes the relatively short follow-up time and our subsequent inability to eliminate early events from the analysis to avoid possible biases attributable to the effect of incipient or underdiagnosed disease on the markers of insulin resistance. The wide CIs of our risk estimates are the result of the limited number of events available for analysis, particularly in women, and are indicative of the instability of our estimates. Finally, the reliance on death certificates and subsequent potential misclassification of causes of death is another important limitation of our study. However, it should be pointed out that this type of error should result in an underestimation of the effect of this cluster of metabolic abnormalities on colorectal cancer mortality risk. The longitudinal design and the population-based nature of the study represent a clear strength of our study and a clear advantage over previous studies published on this topic.

In conclusion, our study indicates that variables associated with increased insulin and/or insulin resistance are associated with a significant increase of risk of death from colorectal cancer. High insulin and insulin resistance are common features of industrialized societies characterized by a large prevalence of overweight and obesity, diet rich in energy intake, and a lifestyle characterized by low calorie expenditure. Evidence is continuing to mount linking this metabolic pattern not only to cardiovascular disease but to other major chronic conditions like cancer and diabetes. Public health efforts aimed at reducing lifestyle patterns and dietary habits associated with this imbalance on insulin metabolism may have profound health benefits on a number of diseases that represent major causes of mortality and morbidity in our societies.

Appendix I

Information of individual studies comprising the risk factors and life expectancy project are seen in ⇓ .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Appendix Table 1

Information of individual studies comprising the risk factors and life expectancy project

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 To whom requests for reprints should addressed, at Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 270 Farber Hall, Buffalo, New York 14214. Phone: (716) 829-2975, extension 632; Fax: (716) 829-2979; Email: trevisan{at}buffalo.edu

  • ↵2 The abbreviations used are: HDL, high-density lipoprotein; ICD-9, International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; CI, confidence interval.

  • Received December 1, 1999.
  • Revision received September 1, 2001.
  • Accepted June 11, 2001.

References

  1. ↵
    McKeown-Eyssen G. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk?. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 3: 687-695, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  2. ↵
    Giovannucci E. Insulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control, 6: 164-179, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Yam D. Insulin-cancer relationships. Possible dietary implication. Med. Hypotheses, 38: 111-117, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bruce W. R., Corpet D. E. The colonic protein fermentation and insulin resistance hypotheses for colon cancer etiology: experimental tests using precursor lesions. Eur. J. Cancer Prev., 5(Suppl. 2): 41-47, 1996.
  5. ↵
    Wong M., Holdaway I. M. Insulin binding by normal and neoplastic colon tissue. Int. J. Cancer, 35: 335-411, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Mountjoy K. G., Finlay G. J., Holdaway I. M. Abnormal insulin-receptor down regulation and dissociation of down-regulation from insulin biological action in cultured human tumor cells. Cancer Res., 47: 6500-6504, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Tran T. T., Medline A., Bruce W. R. Insulin promotion of colon tumors in rats. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 5: 1013-1015, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. ↵
    Copeland G. P., Leinster S. J., Davis J. C., Hipkin L. J. Insulin resistance in patients with colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 74: 1031-1036, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Yam D., Fink A., Mashiah A., Ben-Hur E. Hyperinsulinemia in colon, stomach and breast cancer patients. Cancer Lett., 104: 129-132, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    McKeown-Eyssen G. E., the Toronto Polyp Prevention Group. Insulin resistance and the risk of colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 5: 235 1996.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Kaaks R., Toniolo P., Akhmedkhanou A., Lukanova A., Biessy C., Dechaud H., Rinaldi S., Zelenivch-Jachquotte A., Shore R. E., Riboli E., Riboli E. Serum C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF binding proteins, and colorectal cancer risk in women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92: 1592-1600, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    The RIFLE research group. Presentation of RIFLE project risk factors and life expectancy. Eur. J. Epidemiol., 9: 459-476, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Menditto A., Morisi G., Alimonti A., Caroli S., Petrucci F., Spagnolo A., Menotti A. (NFR Study Group) Association of serum copper and zinc with serum electrolytes and with selected risk factors for cardiovascular disease in men aged 55–75 years. J. Trace Elements Electrolytes Health Dis., 7: 251-253, 1993.
  14. ↵
    Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelitiasis (GREPCO). Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Am. J. Epidemiol., 119: 796-805, 1984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Angelico F., Del Ben M., Giampaoli S., Menotti A., Ricci G., Savocci P., Spitoni M., Volpe R., Urbinati G. C. High prevalence of obesity in a rural community of central Italy: the ‘Di. S. Co.’ Project. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract., 10(Suppl. 1): S5-S9, 1990.
  16. ↵
    Research Group ATS-RF2. Distribution of some risk factors for atherosclerosis in nine Italian population samples. Am. J. Epidemiol., 113: 338-346, 1981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Research Group ATS-RF2-OB42 of the Italian National Research Council. Time trends of some cardiovascular risk factors in Italy. Results from the nine communities study. Am. J. Epidemiol., 126: 95-103, 1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Capocaccia, L., Ricci, G., Angelico, G., Angelico, M., Attili, A. F., and Lalloni, F. (MICOL Group) (eds.). Prevalence of Gall-Bladder Disease in 18 Italian Population Samples. First Results from the MICOL Study: Recent Advances in the Epidemiology and Prevention of Gall-bladder Disease pp. 37–44. Lancaster, United Kingdom: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
  19. ↵
    Rose G. Blackburn H. eds. . Cardiovascular Survey Methods, : WHO Geneva 1968.
  20. ↵
    Collett D. eds. . Modeling Survival Data in Medical Research, : Chapman & Hall London 1994.
  21. ↵
    Reaven G. M. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes, 37: 1595-1607, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Trevisan M., Liu J., Bahsas Bahsas F., Menotti A., for the Risk Factor, and Life Expectancy Research Group. Syndrome X, and mortality. A population based study. Am. J. Epidemiol., 148: 958-966, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Bayerdorffer E., Mannes G. A., Ochsenkuhn T., Kopcke W., Wiebecke B., Paumgartner G. Increased risk of “high-risk” colorectal adenomas in overweight men. Gastroenterology, 104: 137-144, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Lew E. A., Garfinkel L. Variations in mortality by weight among 750000 men and women. J. Chronic Dis., 32: 563-576, 1979.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Nomura A., Heilbrun L. K., Stemmermann G. N. Body mass index as predictor of cancer in men. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 74: 319-323, 1985.
  26. ↵
    Waaler H. T. Height, weight and mortality: The Norwegian experience. Acta. Med. Scand. Suppl., 679: 1-56, 1984.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Harris T., Cook E., Garrison R., Higgins M., Kannel W., Goldman L. Body mass index and mortality among nonsmoking older persons. JAMA, 259: 1520-1524, 1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Feinleib M. Epidemiology of obesity in relation to health hazards. Ann. Intern. Med., 103: 1019-1024, 1985.
  29. ↵
    Garrison R. J., Castelli W. P. Weight and thirty-year mortality of men in the Framingham Study. Ann. Intern. Med., 103: 1006-1009, 1985.
  30. ↵
    Manson J. A., Stampfer M. J., Hennekens C. H., Willett W. C. Body weight and longevity. JAMA, 257: 353-358, 1987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Mannes G. A., Maier A., Thieme C., Wiebecke B., Paumgartner G. Relation between the frequency of colorectal adenoma and the serum cholesterol level. N. Engl. J. Med., 315: 1634-1638, 1986.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Weiderpass E., Gridley G., Nyren D., Ekbom A., Persson I., Adami H. O. Diabetes mellitus and risk of large bowel cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 89: 660-667, 1997.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Wideroff L., Gridley G., Mellemkjaer L., Chow W. H., Linet M., Keehn S., Borch-Johnsen K., Olsen J. H. Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of patients hospitalized with diabetes mellitus in Denmark. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 89: 1360-1365, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Will J. C., Galuska D. A., Vinicor F., Calle E. E. Colorectal cancer: another complication of diabetes mellitus?. Am. J. Epidemiol., 147: 816-825, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    DeFronzo R. A., Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care, 14: 173-194, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Mykkanen L., Haffner S. M., Ronnemaa T., Bergman R. N., Laakso M. Low insulin sensitivity is associated with clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Am. J. Epidemiol., 146: 315-321, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Macaulay V. M. Insulin-like growth factors and cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 65: 311-320, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Soos M. A., Whittaker J., Lammers R., Ullrich A., Siddle K. Receptors for insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I can form hybrid dimers. Characterization of hybrid receptors in transfected cells. Biochem. J., 270: 383-390, 1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Adenis A., Peyrat J. P., Hecquet B., Delobelle A., Depadt G., Quandalle P., Bonneterre J., Demaille A. Type I insulin-like growth factor receptors in human colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer, 31: 50-55, 1995.
  40. ↵
    Rubin R., Baserga R. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor: its role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumorigenicity. Lab. Investig., 73: 311-331, 1995.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Flier J. S., Usher P., Moses A. C. Monoclonal antibody to the type I insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) receptor blocks IGF-I receptor-mediated DNA synthesis: clarification of the mitogenic mechanisms of IGF-I and insulin in skin fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 664-668, 1986.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Sims M. A., Hasler W. L., Chey W. D., Kim M. S., Owyang C. Hyperglycemia inhibits mechanoreceptor-mediated gastrocolonic responses, and colonic peristaltic reflexes in healthy humans. Gastroenterology, 108: 350-359, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Moller D. E., Flier J. S. Insulin resistance-mechanisms, syndromes, and implications. N. Engl. J. Med., 325: 938-948, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
September 2001
Volume 10, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Markers of Insulin Resistance and Colorectal Cancer Mortality
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Markers of Insulin Resistance and Colorectal Cancer Mortality
Maurizio Trevisan, Jian Liu, Paola Muti, Giovanni Misciagna, Alessandro Menotti and Federica Fucci
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev September 1 2001 (10) (9) 937-941;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Markers of Insulin Resistance and Colorectal Cancer Mortality
Maurizio Trevisan, Jian Liu, Paola Muti, Giovanni Misciagna, Alessandro Menotti and Federica Fucci
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev September 1 2001 (10) (9) 937-941;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix I
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Gallstones and Gallbladder Cancer
  • Additive Effects of Aristolochic Acid and Arsenic in UTUC
  • Provider Lifestyle Discussions
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement