A Systematic Review Of Genetic Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk1

  1. Alison M. Dunning2,
  2. Catherine S. Healey2,
  3. Paul D. P. Pharoah2,, 3,
  4. M. Dawn Teare2,
  5. Bruce A. J. Ponder and
  6. Douglas F. Easton
  1. Cancer Research Campaign Human Cancer Genetics Group, University Department of Oncology [A. M. D., C. S. H., P. D. P. P., B. A. J. P.], and Cancer Research Campaign Genetic Epidemiology Group, University Department of Community Medicine [M. D. T., D. F. E.], Strangeways Research Laboratories, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom

    Abstract

    Studies investigating the relationship between common genetic variants and cancer risk are being reported with rapidly increasing frequency. We have identified 46 published case-control studies that have examined the effect of common alleles of 18 different genes on breast cancer risk. Of these, 12 report statistically significant associations, none of which were reported by more than one study. However, many of the studies were small: 10 of the 46 had 80% power or greater to detect a rare allele homozygote relative risk <2.5. We therefore combined the results of individual studies to obtain more precise estimates of risk. Statistically significant differences in genotype frequencies were found in three case-control comparisons of unselected cases. These were for CYP19 (TTTA)n polymorphism [(TTTA)10 carrier odds ratio (OR) = 2.33; P = 0.002], the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism (Val carrier OR = 1.60; P = 0.02), and the TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism (Pro carrier OR = 1.27; P = 0.03). In addition, the GSTM1 gene deletion was found to be significantly associated with postmenopausal breast cancer (null homozygote OR = 1.33; P = 0.04). There was also some evidence that homozygotes for the PR PROGINS allele are protected against breast cancer, although this result was of borderline statistical significance. For polymorphisms in BRCA1, COMT, CYP17, CYP1A1, NAT1, and NAT2, the best estimate of risk either from the individual studies or the meta-analyses was sufficiently precise to exclude a relative risk of 1.5 or greater. For the polymorphisms in EDH17B2, ER, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, GSTT1, HSP70, and TNFα, the risk estimates, although nonsignificant, were insufficiently precise to exclude a moderate risk (>1.5). Precise estimation of the risks associated with these and other as yet untested genes, as well as investigation of more complex risks arising from gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, will require much larger studies.

    Footnotes

    • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • 1 This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign (CRC). B. A. J. P. is a Gibb Fellow of the Cancer Research Campaign.

    • 2 These authors contributed equally to this study.

    • 3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at CRC Human Cancer Genetics Group, University Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratories, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.

    • 4 The abbreviations used are: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; OR, odds ratio; COMT, catechol-O-methyltransferase; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; NAT, N-acetyl transferase; UTR, untranslated region.

      • Accepted July 12, 1999.
      • Received December 3, 1998.
      • Revision received June 22, 1999.
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents