Fine-Mapping and Family-Based Association Analyses of Prostate Cancer Risk Variants at Xp11

  1. Lingyi Lu1,2,
  2. Jielin Sun1,3,
  3. Sarah D. Isaacs4,
  4. Kathleen E. Wiley4,
  5. Shelly Smith1,3,
  6. Kristen Pruett1,3,
  7. Yi Zhu1,3,
  8. Zheng Zhang1,3,
  9. Fredrik Wiklund5,
  10. Henrik Grönberg5,
  11. Patrick C. Walsh4,
  12. Bao-Li Chang1,3,
  13. S. Lilly Zheng1,3,
  14. William B. Isaacs4 and
  15. Jianfeng Xu1,3
  1. 1Center for Cancer Genomics, 2Department of Biostatistical Sciences, 3Center for Human Genomics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; 4Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and 5Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  1. Requests for reprints:
    William B. Isaacs, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Marburg 115, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287. Phone: 410-955-2518; Fax: 410-955-0833. E-mail: wisaacs{at}jhmi.edu

Abstract

Two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP; rs5945572 and rs5945619) at Xp11 were recently implicated in two genome-wide association studies of prostate cancer. Using a family-based association test for these two SNPs in 168 families with prostate cancer, we showed in this study that the risk alleles of the two reported SNPs were overtransmitted to the affected offspring (P= 0.009 for rs5945372 and P = 0.03 for rs5945619), which suggested that the observed association in case-control studies were not driven by potential population stratification. We also did a fine-mapping study in the ∼800 kb region at Xp11 between two independent case-control studies, including 1,527 cases and 482 controls from Johns Hopkins Hospital and 1,172 cases and 1,157 controls from the Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovarian Cancer screening trial. The strongest association was found with SNPs in the haplotype block in which the two initial reported SNPs were located, although many SNPs in the ∼140 kb region were highly significant in the combined allelic tests (P = 10−5 to 10−6). The second strongest association was observed with SNPs in the ∼286 kb region at another haplotype block (P = 10−4 to 10−5), ∼94 kb centromeric to the first region. The significance of SNPs in the second region decreased considerably after adjusting for SNPs at the first region, although P values remained at <0.05. Additional studies are warranted to test independent prostate cancer associations at these two regions. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(7):2132–6)

Footnotes

  • 6 http://cgems.cancer.gov/data/

  • Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants CA129684, CA106523, and CA95052 (J. Xu); CA112517 and CA58236 (W.B. Isaacs), and Department of Defense grant PC051264 (J. Xu).

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention Online (http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/).

    • Accepted April 23, 2009.
    • Received January 7, 2009.
    • Revision received March 27, 2009.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents