Lack of Prospective Associations between Plasma and Urinary Phytoestrogens and Risk of Prostate or Colorectal Cancer in the European Prospective into Cancer-Norfolk Study
- Heather Ward1,
- Gaelle Chapelais3,
- Gunter G.C. Kuhnle3,
- Robert Luben2,
- Kay-Tee Khaw2 and
- Sheila Bingham1,2,3
- 1MRC Centre for Nutrition and Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, 2European Prospective Investigation of Cancer, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, and 3MRC Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Requests for reprints:
Heather Ward, MRC Centre for Nutrition and Cancer, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Wort's Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1223-470078; Fax: 44-1223-740147. E-mail: heather.ward{at}srl.cam.ac.uk
Abstract
Dietary phytoestrogens are suggested to reduce the risk of prostate and colorectal cancer, but the results of epidemiologic studies have not yielded consistent support for this proposed effect, possibly due to inadequate databases of phytoestrogen levels in foods. Biomarkers of phytoestrogen intakes may provide a clearer insight into the relationship between phytoestrogen exposure and the risk of prostate or colorectal cancer risks. From the European Prospective into Cancer-Norfolk cohort (ages 45-75), serum and urine samples were analyzed for seven phytoestrogens [daidzein, enterodiol, enterolactone, genistein, glycitein, O-desmethylangolensin (O-DMA), and equol] among 193 cases of prostate cancer and 828 controls, and 221 cases of colorectal cancer with 889 controls. Summary variables of total lignans (enterodiol and enterolactone) and total isoflavones (daidzein, genistein, O-DMA, equol, and glycitein) were created and analyzed in conjunction with individual phytoestrogens. Logistic regression analyses revealed that there was no significant association between prostate cancer risk and total serum isoflavones [odds ratio (OR), 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-1.10] or total serum lignans (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04) or between colorectal cancer risk and total serum isoflavones (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08) or total serum lignans (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.12). Similarly, null associations were observed for individual serum phytoestrogens and for all urinary phytoestrogen biomarkers. In conclusion, we have found no evidence to support an inverse association between phytoestrogen exposure and prostate or colorectal cancer risk. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(10):2891–4)
Footnotes
-
Grant support: EPIC-Norfolk is supported by programme grants from Medical Research Council and Cancer Research UK with additional support from the Stroke Association and Research Into Ageing. The World Cancer Research Fund supported the analyses for phytoestrogens in the current study. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review or approval of the article.
-
- Accepted July 21, 2008.
- Received April 14, 2008.
- Revision received July 8, 2008.










