Dietary Vitamin B6 Intake and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer

  1. Evropi Theodoratou1,
  2. Susan M. Farrington2,
  3. Albert Tenesa2,
  4. Geraldine McNeill4,
  5. Roseanne Cetnarskyj3,
  6. Rebecca A. Barnetson2,
  7. Mary E. Porteous3,
  8. Malcolm G. Dunlop2 and
  9. Harry Campbell1,2
  1. 1Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh; 2Colon Cancer Genetics Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital; 3South East Scotland Genetic Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom and 4Environmental and Occupational Medicine Department, University of Aberdeen, Liberty Safe Work Research Centre, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  1. Requests for reprints:
    Evropi Theodoratou, Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Vet Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-131-650-3033; Fax: 44-131-650-6909. E-mail: E.Theodoratou{at}sms.ed.ac.uk

Abstract

Vitamin B6, a coenzyme in the folate metabolism pathway, may have anticarcinogenic effects. Laboratory and epidemiologic studies support the hypothesis of its protective effect against colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this large Scottish case-control study, including 2,028 hospital-based cases and 2,722 population-based controls, was to investigate the associations between dietary and supplementary intake of vitamin B6 and CRC. Three logistic regression models adjusted for several confounding factors, including energy, folate, and fiber intake, were applied in the whole sample and after age, sex, cancer site, folate, MTHFR C677T (rs1801133), MTHFR A1298C (rs1801131), MTR A2756G (rs1805087), and MTRR A66G (rs1801394) stratification (analysis on genotypes on 1,001 cases and 1,010 controls ≤55 years old). Moderately strong inverse and dose-dependent associations in the whole sample were found between CRC risk and the intake of dietary and total vitamin B6 in all three models [model III: odds ratio (OR), 0.77; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.61-0.98; P for trend = 0.03; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.07; P for trend = 0.12]. In addition, meta-analyses of published studies showed inverse associations between vitamin B6 and CRC (combined relative risk, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; test for overall effect P = 0.01; combined odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.75; test for overall effect P < 0.00001). Analysis within the stratified subgroups showed similar associations apart from a stronger effect among ≤55-year-old individuals. Evidence from larger cohort and experimental studies is now required to confirm and define the anticarcinogenic actions of vitamin B6 and to explore the mechanisms by which this effect is mediated. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(1):171–82)

Footnotes

  • 5 http://www.foodfrequency.org

  • Grant support: Cancer Research UK Programme grant C348/A3758, Medical Research Council Programme grant G0000657-53203, Scottish Executive Chief Scientist's Office grant K/OPR/2/2/D333, and CORE Centre grant. E. Theodoratou was also supported by a studentship from the Greek State Scholarship Foundation.

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Online (http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/).

    • Accepted November 8, 2007.
    • Received July 11, 2007.
    • Revision received September 17, 2007.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents