Evaluation of RNA Markers for Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia in Exfoliated Cervical Cells
- Martin Steinau1,
- Mangalathu S. Rajeevan1,
- Daisy R. Lee1,
- Mack T. Ruffin3,
- Ira R. Horowitz2,
- Lisa C. Flowers2,
- Talaat Tadros2,
- George Birdsong2,
- Mujtaba Husain4,
- David C. Kmak4,
- Garry M. Longton5,
- Suzanne D. Vernon1 and
- Elizabeth R. Unger1
- 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 2Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; 3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 4Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and 5Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Requests for reprints:
Martin Steinau, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Disease, Viral Exanthems and Herpesvirus Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS G-41, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: 404-639-0561; Fax: 404-630-3540. E-mail: MSteinau{at}cdc.gov
Abstract
Numerous molecular biomarkers have been suggested for early detection of cervical cancer, but their usefulness in routinely collected exfoliated cells remains uncertain. We used quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to evaluate expression of 40 candidate genes as markers for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in exfoliated cervical cells collected at the time of colposcopy. Samples from the 93 women with CIN3 or cancer were compared with those from 186 women without disease matched (1:2) for age, race, and high-risk human papillomavirus status. Normalized threshold cycles (Ct) for each gene were analyzed by receiver operating characteristics to determine their diagnostic performance in a split sample validation approach. Six markers were confirmed by an area under the curve >0.6 in both sample sets: claudin 1 (0.75), minichromosome maintenance deficient 5 (0.71) and 7 (0.64), cell division cycle 6 homologue (0.71), antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (0.66), and SHC SH2-domain binding protein 1 (0.61). The sensitivity for individual markers was relatively low and a combination of five genes to a panel resulted in 60% sensitivity with 76% specificity, not positively increasing this performance. Although the results did not indicate superiority of RNA markers for cervical cancer screening, their performance in detecting disease in women referred for colposcopy suggests that the genes and pathways they highlight could be useful in alternative detection formats or in combination with other screening indicators. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(2):295–301)
- cervical neoplasia
- biomarker
- qRT-PCR
- transcription
- Gynecological cancers: cervical
- Premalignant lesions
- Predictive assays for carcinogenicity
- Functional genomics
Footnotes
-
Grant support: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network, Interagency Agreement Y1-CN-0101-01 and Y1-CN-5005-01.
-
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
-
Note: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency.
-
- Accepted November 21, 2006.
- Received July 7, 2006.
- Revision received September 29, 2006.










