Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Prevention and Early Detection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • CEBP Focus Archive
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • Highly Cited Collection
      • Prevention and Early Detection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Research Articles

Frequency of TP53 Mutations in Relation to Arg72Pro Genotypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Helge Lind, Per Olaf Ekstrøm, David Ryberg, Vidar Skaug, Tove Andreassen, Lodve Stangeland, Aage Haugen and Shanbeh Zienolddiny
Helge Lind
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Olaf Ekstrøm
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Ryberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vidar Skaug
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tove Andreassen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lodve Stangeland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aage Haugen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shanbeh Zienolddiny
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0153 Published October 2007
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Mutations in the TP53 gene are important events during human lung carcinogenesis. The TP53 gene harbors several polymorphisms, and functional studies have shown that the Arg72Pro polymorphism alters both wild-type and mutant p53 protein activity. Thus, we hypothesized that certain Arg72Pro genotypes may influence the frequency and pattern of somatic mutations in TP53. We therefore examined the status of the Arg72Pro polymorphism and TP53 mutations in 260 non–small-cell lung cancer cases. Here we report a significant trend toward lower frequency of TP53 mutations with increasing number of Pro72 alleles (P = 0.02). Overall, Pro72 allele carriers had significantly lower frequency of TP53 mutations compared with Arg72 homozygotes (P = 0.02). In addition, carriage of the Pro72 variant was related to a lower frequency of mutations affecting the hotspot codon 273. Mutations at codon 273 accounted for 10.6% of the mutations in Arg72 homozygotes and 1.7% of the mutations in Pro72 allele carriers. Our results suggest that the genotype of the Arg72Pro polymorphism may modulate the frequency of TP53 mutations in non–small-cell lung cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(10):2077–81)

  • Polymorphism
  • mutation
  • hotspot
  • NSCLC

Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide (1). Cigarette smoke is known to be the most important risk factor, but environmental and occupational exposures are also related to lung cancer. In addition, genetic variation results in gene-environment interactions and modulation of lung cancer risk (2).

p53 is a tumor suppressor and is activated to prevent carcinogenic effects of cellular stress such as DNA damage. On activation, p53 induces apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, or DNA repair (3, 4). The importance of this protein is underlined by the fact that the TP53 gene is mutated in more than half of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors and mutation of the gene is considered to be an early event in lung carcinogenesis (5, 6).

Several polymorphisms in the TP53 gene have been reported (7). The most studied single-nucleotide polymorphism, located in exon 4 of the gene, results in an amino acid change from arginine (Arg) to proline (Pro) at codon 72 (8). The Arg72Pro polymorphism is located in the proline-rich region, which has been shown to be important for the apoptotic functions of p53 protein (9). The Arg72 variant has been shown to better induce apoptosis and to repress cellular transformation (10, 11). The Pro72 variant, in turn, induces a higher level of G1 arrest than Arg72 (12). Recently, it was shown that the Pro72 variant induces transcription of DNA repair genes, and Pro72-expressing cells had higher DNA repair capacity than the corresponding Arg72 cells (13). A negative regulator of p53, iASSP preferentially inhibits the Pro72 variant. In contrast, the Arg72 variant escapes this negative regulation and thus has greater apoptotic potential leading to better response to chemotherapy and longer survival (14, 15). Given that the Pro72 is a weaker apoptotic inducer, an association between this variant and lung cancer risk would seem plausible. However, although the Arg72Pro polymorphism has been intensively studied, the results have not been conclusive (16, 17).

Unlike other known tumor suppressor genes, the somatic mutations found in TP53 are primarily missense mutations leading to single amino acid substitutions (18). Most mutations lead to loss of wild-type activity such as induction of apoptosis. However, the selection of missense mutations in tumors suggests that mutated p53 itself may have specific tumorigenic functions. Several studies have shown that expression of mutated p53 may interfere with wild-type p53 functions in a dominant negative fashion. Mutated p53 is able to form tetramers with wild-type protein thereby reducing transactivation capability of the complex (19). The effect has been suggested to be promoter dependent (20). Another function of mutated p53 is the ability to interfere with transactivation by p73 (21).

The question arises whether polymorphisms in the TP53 gene leading to altered wild-type functions could also lead to altered functions of mutated p53. Marin et al. (22) showed that the Arg72 variant of mutated p53 bound and inhibited p73 and induced apoptosis to a greater extent than the Pro72 variant. Furthermore, it was shown that Arg72-expressing mutants had poor response to chemotherapeutic drugs and, ultimately, clinical drug resistance (23). The response to anticancer drugs varied depending on the Arg72Pro alleles for some mutational hotspots and drug treatments (24). The frequency and distribution of TP53 mutations found in tumors could vary according to Arg72Pro genotypes. Studies have suggested that the Arg72 allele is preferentially retained and mutated whereas the Pro72 allele is lost in different tumors (25, 26).

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Arg72Pro variants and occurrence of somatic mutations in TP53 in NSCLC. Here we report that the Pro72 allele is associated with lower frequency of TP53 mutations. In addition, the distribution of hotspot mutations, especially at codon 273, varied according to the Arg72Pro genotype.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

The study consisted of 260 NSCLC patients treated by surgery at university hospitals in Bergen and Oslo in the period between 1986 and 2001. Patients were selected consecutively whenever practically feasible. Tumor histology was confirmed by an experienced pathologist and only NSCLC cases were included in the study. Subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the study and to allow their biological samples to be genetically analyzed. All cases were Caucasians of Norwegian origin. The Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics approved the study.

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from blood samples or histologically normal lung tissue according to standard protocols. The histologically normal lung tissue was cut from the resected lobe at a minimum distance of 2 to 3 cm from the border of the tumor. Absence of tumor tissue was confirmed by microscopic examination by a pathologist. Genotyping of the TP53 Arg72Pro single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs1042522) was carried out using a 5′nuclease TaqMan assay. Approximately 10 ng of genomic DNA was amplified in a 5-μL reaction mixture containing 4.5 pmol of each primer (5′-CCAGATGAAGCTCCCAGAATGC and 5′-TGGGAAGGGACAGAAGATGACA) and 1.0 pmol of each allele-specific MGB-probe (5′-VIC-TGCTCCCCCCGTGGC and 5′-FAM-CTCCCCGCGTGGC) in 1× TaqMan Universal PCR mastermix. After initial denaturation and enzyme activation at 95°C for 10 min, the reaction mixture was subjected to 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 50°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min. The reactions were done on an ABI 7900HT sequence detection system. Equal numbers of cases and controls were run simultaneously, and negative controls containing water instead of DNA were included in every run. Genotypes were determined in the SDS 2.2 software (Applied Biosystems). Approximately 10% of the samples were regenotyped by PCR amplification, restriction cutting by BstU1, and agarose gel analysis. There was a complete concordance between the two methods.

TP53 Mutation Analysis

Samples of tumor tissue were frozen at −80°C immediately after the operation. Tumor tissue of at least 80% purity was selected by examination of frozen sections of the samples. DNA was extracted from the tissue using standard proteinase K digestion followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Tumor DNA was screened either by single-strand conformational polymorphism or denaturating capillary electrophoresis as previously described, covering exons 4 to 9 of the TP53 gene (27-29). Exons showing aberrant band migration were sequenced either by direct sequencing using BigDye chemistry (Applied Biosystems) or by the use of an arrayed primer extension platform (APEX; ref. 30). Primers and conditions used in PCR reactions and sequencing are available on request.

Statistical Analysis

Calculations of associated odds ratios were done by unconditional logistic regression adjusted for parameters such as sex, age, and smoking, where appropriate, with SPSS ver. 14 (SPSS, Inc.). Trend tests were done with the Cochrane-Armitage test in StatExact 4.0 (Cytel Software Corp.). Pearson χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare proportions.

Results

Patients and TP53 Mutations

To study the relationship between germ-line polymorphisms and somatic mutations in the TP53 gene, we genotyped the Arg72Pro polymorphism in normal DNA from 260 NSCLC cases. Corresponding tumor DNA was screened and sequenced for TP53 mutations in exons 4 to 9. Characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1 .

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of NSCLC patients

Mutations in TP53 were detected in 146 of the 260 (56.2%) NSCLC cases. Missense substitutions accounted for 92 (63.0%) of the mutations. In addition, we observed 19 (13.0%) nonsense, 21 (14.4%) insertions/deletions, 11 (7.5%) splice-site, and 3 (2.1%) silent mutations. The full set of observed mutations is available in Supplementary Table S1.

Relationship between TP53 Genotypes and Mutations

A statistically significant trend toward lower frequency of TP53 mutations with increasing number of Pro72 alleles was observed (Ptrend = 0.02; Table 2 ). Combined, carriers of the Pro72 allele had significantly lower burden of TP53 mutations compared with Arg72 homozygotes (48.8% versus 63.0%, P = 0.02) resulting in a reduced odds ratio for harboring TP53 mutations of 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.89).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

TP53 mutation frequency and genotypes in NSCLC patients

The distribution of hotspot mutations was different between the Pro72 allele carriers and the Arg72 homozygotes (Fig. 1 ). The most striking difference was seen in mutations affecting codon 273. Overall, this codon was the most frequently mutated codon among the NSCLC cases, accounting for 6.9% (10 of 146) of the mutations. However, nine of these mutations were found among Arg72 homozygous cases, whereas only one mutation in codon 273 was observed in Pro72 carriers (Fig. 1). This difference was statistically significant (10.6% versus 1.7%; P = 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Similar results were obtained when restricting the analysis to missense mutations (15.7% versus 2.5%; P = 0.07, Fisher's exact test).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Frequency of mutations affecting TP53 hotspot codons among NSCLC cases.

Discussion

In the present study, TP53 mutations were significantly less frequent among patients carrying the Pro72 variant of the gene compared with the Arg72 homozygotes. Functional studies have pointed out that the Arg72 variant is a more efficient inducer of apoptosis and thereby a better repressor of cellular transformation (10, 11). Thus, a selective pressure toward inactivation of the Arg72 variant of p53 by mutation seems to be likely. This is consistent with the findings of Langerød et al. (31), which showed preferentially mutation of the Arg72 allele in Arg72/Pro72 heterozygote breast cancer patients. Similar results have been obtained in several cancers, and studies on Arg72/Pro72 heterozygotes have indicated that the Arg72 allele is preferentially mutated whereas the Pro72 allele is lost (25, 26, 32).

It is currently an ongoing discussion whether the Arg72Pro polymorphism also modulates the frequency of TP53 mutations in lung cancer. In a study consisting primarily of NSCLC cases, Mechanic et al. (33) reported a higher frequency of TP53 mutations associated with the Pro72 allele. However, their results may have been influenced by the low sensitivity of mutation detection due the use of archival pathologic samples, resulting in an observed mutation frequency of only 25%. The study also included African American subjects, which are known to have a higher frequency of the Pro72 allele (34). Szymanowska et al. (35) recently reported that Pro72 allele carriers from Poland had higher frequency of TP53 mutations. However, their findings did not reach statistical significance and they actually reported that the Pro72 homozygotes had lower frequency of TP53 mutations than the Arg72 homozygotes. Recently, Hu et al. (36) reported a higher frequency of TP53 mutations associated with the Pro72 allele in a study consisting of Caucasian (n = 142) and African American (n = 38) NSCLC patients. The frequency of the Pro72 allele was significantly higher among the African American subjects, as also reported by others (34). Combined with a higher frequency of TP53 mutations among the African American subjects, this may have influenced the results. Nelson et al. (37) reported that the Arg72 allele was preferentially mutated in NSCLC but did not show any differences between constitutional genotypes of the Arg72Pro polymorphism.

Given the functional importance of the Arg72Pro polymorphism on both wild-type and mutant p53 activity, it could be hypothesized that certain genotypes could influence the selection of specific mutants. Mutation in one of the alleles in an Arg72/Arg72 homozygote leaves the cell with one intact wild-type Arg72 allele. Thus, in these cells, mutations having dominant negative effects toward the remaining Arg72 allele would have an advantage. In contrast, mutation of the Arg72 allele in Arg72/Pro72 heterozygote or the Pro72 allele in Pro72 homozygotes leaves the cells with a weaker Pro72 allele. In these cells, other tumorigenic functions such as inactivation of the p73 could play a more important role in the selection. This may explain why the Arg72 allele is preferentially mutated among Arg72/Pro72 heterozygotes and that the effect is more pronounced in recessive mutants (22, 38). Our study did not allow for determination of the dominant negative effects of the observed mutations. The IARC TP53 mutation database4 contains functional information on many mutations (39). However, these functional data are based on several publications obtained with different methods and with variable results.

When comparing the frequency of mutations affecting known hotspot codons in lung cancer, we observed differences between Arg72 homozygotes and Pro72 allele carriers. Whereas the hotspots in total accounted for 31.8% of the mutations in Arg72 homozygotes and 28.3% in Pro72 carriers, the distributions were different. Especially mutations in codon 273 were more often found among Arg72 homozygotes than among carriers of the Pro72 variant. Mutations in codon 273 are the most frequent TP53 alteration found in lung cancer. However, among Pro72 allele carriers this codon was only mutated in 1.7% of the cases. It is interesting to note that in the study of Langerød et al. (31), 10 of 63 (15.8%) mutations in Arg72 homozygotes affected codon 273, whereas only 2 of 31 (6.5%) Pro72 allele carriers had mutation in this codon. In addition, the two codon 273 mutations found among Pro72 allele carriers resided on Arg72 alleles. However, due to the small number of cases, the observed difference in frequency of codon 273 mutations may arise as a result of variation due to chance and needs to be confirmed in a larger study. It is tempting to speculate whether the Arg/Pro status of the codon 72 influences the functional properties of mutations at codon 273. Most of the functional studies have explored the mutations without knowledge of the polymorphic status at codon 72. Therefore, the effect of the different alleles on dominant negative functions remains unknown. Mutations of codon 273, such as Arg273His, do not change the conformation of the protein and thus do not bind to p73 (22, 40).

In addition to the Arg72Pro single-nucleotide polymorphism, the TP53 gene contains several polymorphisms. Therefore, assessing additional polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium may give a more complete view of the variation in the TP53 gene. In a recent study, Mechanic et al. (41) showed that although the Pro72 allele was associated with lung cancer in African Americans, only one of the Pro72-containing haplotypes showed an association. Thus, the Arg72Pro single-nucleotide polymorphism alone may offer a limited insight into the relationship between genetic variation in the TP53 gene and disease phenotypes.

In summary, our results showed a relationship between the number of variant alleles of the Arg72Pro polymorphism and reduced frequency of somatic mutations in the TP53 gene in NSCLC. Carefully designed studies comparing the various characteristics of the mutations harboring either Arg72 or Pro72 variants, as well as other single-nucleotide polymorphisms, are needed to fully understand the relationship between germ-line polymorphisms and somatic mutations in the TP53 gene.

Acknowledgments

We thank Erik B. Eide and Eldrid U. Due for excellent laboratory assistance and the collaboration of Dr. Anne Naalsund (National University Hospital, Oslo, Norway) in the recruitment of patients.

Footnotes

  • ↵4 http://www-p53.iarc.fr/.

  • Grant support: Norwegian Research Council, Norwegian Cancer Society, and a doctoral fellowship from the Norwegian Cancer Society (H. Lind).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Online (http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/).

    • Accepted July 10, 2007.
    • Received February 16, 2007.
    • Revision received April 27, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74–108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Shields PG, Harris CC. Cancer risk and low-penetrance susceptibility genes in gene-environment interactions. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2309–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 2000;408:307–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Sengupta S, Harris CC. p53: traffic cop at the crossroads of DNA repair and recombination. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:44–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Takahashi T, Nau MM, Chiba I, et al. p53: a frequent target for genetic abnormalities in lung cancer. Science 1989;246:491–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Sozzi G, Miozzo M, Donghi R, et al. Deletions of 17p and p53 mutations in preneoplastic lesions of the lung. Cancer Res 1992;52:6079–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Pietsch EC, Humbey O, Murphy ME. Polymorphisms in the p53 pathway. Oncogene 2006;25:1602–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Matlashewski GJ, Tuck S, Pim D, et al. Primary structure polymorphism at amino acid residue 72 of human p53. Mol Cell Biol 1987;7:961–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Venot C, Maratrat M, Dureuil C, et al. The requirement for the p53 proline-rich functional domain for mediation of apoptosis is correlated with specific PIG3 gene transactivation and with transcriptional repression. EMBO J 1998;17:4668–79.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. ↵
    Thomas M, Kalita A, Labrecque S, et al. Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:1092–100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Dumont P, Leu JI, Della PA III, George DL, Murphy M. The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet 2003;33:357–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Pim D, Banks L. p53 polymorphic variants at codon 72 exert different effects on cell cycle progression. Int J Cancer 2004;108:196–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Siddique M, Sabapathy K. Trp53-dependent DNA-repair is affected by the codon 72 polymorphism. Oncogene 2006;25:3489–500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Bergamaschi D, Samuels Y, Sullivan A, et al. iASPP preferentially binds p53 proline-rich region and modulates apoptotic function of codon 72-polymorphic p53. Nat Genet 2006;38:1133–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Sullivan A, Syed N, Gasco M, et al. Polymorphism in wild-type p53 modulates response to chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene 2004;23:3328–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Matakidou A, Eisen T, Houlston RS. TP53 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mutagenesis 2003;18:377–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Hung RJ, Boffetta P, Canzian F, et al. Sequence variants in cell cycle control pathway, X-ray exposure, and lung cancer risk: a multicenter case-control study in central Europe. Cancer Res 2006;66:8280–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Hussain SP, Harris CC. Molecular epidemiology of human cancer: contribution of mutation spectra studies of tumor suppressor genes. Cancer Res 1998;58:4023–37.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Willis A, Jung EJ, Wakefield T, Chen X. Mutant p53 exerts a dominant negative effect by preventing wild-type p53 from binding to the promoter of its target genes. Oncogene 2004;23:2330–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Monti P, Campomenosi P, Ciribilli Y, et al. Tumour p53 mutations exhibit promoter selective dominance over wild type p53. Oncogene 2002;21:1641–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Di Como CJ, Gaiddon C, Prives C. p73 function is inhibited by tumor-derived p53 mutants in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:1438–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Marin MC, Jost CA, Brooks LA, et al. A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour. Nat Genet 2000;25:47–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Bergamaschi D, Gasco M, Hiller L, et al. p53 polymorphism influences response in cancer chemotherapy via modulation of p73-dependent apoptosis. Cancer Cell 2003;3:387–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Vikhanskaya F, Siddique MM, Kei LM, Broggini M, Sabapathy K. Evaluation of the combined effect of p53 codon 72 polymorphism and hotspot mutations in response to anticancer drugs. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:4348–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Hsieh LL, Huang TH, Chen IH, et al. p53 polymorphisms associated with mutations in and loss of heterozygosity of the p53 gene in male oral squamous cell carcinomas in Taiwan. Br J Cancer 2005;92:30–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Peters B, et al. Selective loss of codon 72 proline p53 and frequent mutational inactivation of the retained arginine allele in colorectal cancer. Neoplasia 2004;6:529–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Skaug V, Ryberg D, Kure EH, et al. p53 mutations in defined structural and functional domains are related to poor clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:1031–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. Bjørheim J, Minarik M, Gaudernack G, Ekstrøm PO. Evaluation of denaturing conditions in analysis of DNA variants applied to multi-capillary electrophoresis instruments. J Sep Sci 2003;26:1163–8.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Kristensen AT, Bjørheim J, Ekstrøm PO. Detection of mutations in exon 8 of TP53 by temperature gradient 96-capillary array electrophoresis. Biotechniques 2002;33:650–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Kringen P, Bergamaschi A, Due EU, et al. Evaluation of arrayed primer extension for TP53 mutation detection in breast and ovarian carcinomas. Biotechniques 2005;39:755–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Langerød A, Bukholm IR, Bregard A, et al. The TP53 codon 72 polymorphism may affect the function of TP53 mutations in breast carcinomas but not in colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1684–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Furihata M, Takeuchi T, Matsumoto M, et al. p53 mutation arising in Arg72 allele in the tumorigenesis and development of carcinoma of the urinary tract. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1192–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Mechanic LE, Marrogi AJ, Welsh JA, et al. Polymorphisms in XPD and TP53 and mutation in human lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:597–604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Wu X, Zhao H, Amos CI, et al. p53 genotypes and haplotypes associated with lung cancer susceptibility and ethnicity. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:681–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Szymanowska A, Jassem E, Dziadziuszko R, et al. Increased risk of non-small cell lung cancer and frequency of somatic TP53 gene mutations in Pro72 carriers of TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism. Lung Cancer 2006;52:9–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Hu Y, McDermott MP, Ahrendt SA. The p53 codon 72 proline allele is associated with p53 gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2502–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Nelson HH, Wilkojmen M, Marsit CJ, Kelsey KT. TP53 mutation, allelism and survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:1770–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Tada M, Furuuchi K, Kaneda M, et al. Inactivate the remaining p53 allele or the alternate p73? Preferential selection of the Arg72 polymorphism in cancers with recessive p53 mutants but not transdominant mutants. Carcinogenesis 2001;22:515–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Olivier M, Eeles R, Hollstein M, et al. The IARC TP53 database: new online mutation analysis and recommendations to users. Hum Mutat 2002;19:607–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Zambetti GP, Levine AJ. A comparison of the biological activities of wild-type and mutant p53. FASEB J 1993;7:855–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  41. ↵
    Mechanic LE, Bowman ED, Welsh JA, et al. Common genetic variation in TP53 is associated with lung cancer risk and prognosis in African Americans and somatic mutations in lung tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:214–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention: 16 (10)
October 2007
Volume 16, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Frequency of TP53 Mutations in Relation to Arg72Pro Genotypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
Citation Tools
Frequency of TP53 Mutations in Relation to Arg72Pro Genotypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Helge Lind, Per Olaf Ekstrøm, David Ryberg, Vidar Skaug, Tove Andreassen, Lodve Stangeland, Aage Haugen and Shanbeh Zienolddiny
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 2007 (16) (10) 2077-2081; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0153

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Frequency of TP53 Mutations in Relation to Arg72Pro Genotypes in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Helge Lind, Per Olaf Ekstrøm, David Ryberg, Vidar Skaug, Tove Andreassen, Lodve Stangeland, Aage Haugen and Shanbeh Zienolddiny
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev October 1 2007 (16) (10) 2077-2081; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0153
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Particulate Matter, Ozone, and Cancer Risk
  • Metrics Evaluating Impact of Continued Research
  • Decision Support and Navigation for CRC Screening in Hispanics
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
eISSN: 1538-7755
ISSN: 1055-9965

Advertisement