Conditions Associated with Antibodies Against the Tumor-Associated Antigen MUC1 and Their Relationship to Risk for Ovarian Cancer

  1. Daniel W. Cramer1,
  2. Linda Titus-Ernstoff4,
  3. John R. McKolanis5,
  4. William R. Welch2,
  5. Allison F. Vitonis1,
  6. Ross S. Berkowitz3 and
  7. Olivera J. Finn5
  1. 1Ob-Gyn Epidemiology Center, Departments of 2Pathology (Women's and Perinatal Pathology Division) and 3Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 4Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; and 5Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  1. Requests for reprints:
    Daniel W. Cramer, Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-732-4895; Fax: 617-732-4899. E-mail: dcramer{at}partners.org

Abstract

Many cancers, including ovarian, overexpress epithelial mucin (MUC1) and promote anti-MUC1 antibodies that may correlate with more favorable prognosis. By extension, risk for ovarian cancer might be reduced by preexisting MUC1-specific immunity. We measured anti-MUC1 antibodies in 705 control women, identified events predicting antibodies, and estimated ovarian cancer risk by comparing profiles of events generating antibodies in controls with those in 668 ovarian cancer cases. Factors predicting antibodies included oral contraceptive use, breast mastitis, bone fracture or osteoporosis, pelvic surgeries, nonuse of talc in genital hygiene, and to a lesser extent intrauterine device use and current smoking. There was a significant increase in the likelihood of having anti-MUC1 antibodies from 24.2% in women with 0 or 1 condition, to 51.4% in those with five or more conditions. By the same index of events, the risk for ovarian cancer was inversely associated with number of conditions predisposing to anti-MUC1 antibodies. Compared with having experienced 0 or 1 event, the adjusted risk for ovarian cancer decreased progressively with relative risks (and 95% confidence limits) of 0.69 (0.52-0.92), 0.64 (0.47-0.88), 0.49 (0.34-0.72), and 0.31 (0.16-0.61), respectively for women with two, three, four, and five or more events related to the presence of antibodies (Ptrend < 0.0001.) We conclude that several traditional and new risk factors for ovarian cancer may be explained by their ability to induce MUC1 immunity through exposure of MUC1 to immune recognition in the context of inflammatory or hormonal processes in various MUC1-positive tissues.

Footnotes

  • Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants CA 054419 (D.W. Cramer), CA 86381 (D.W. Cramer), and CA 56103 (O.J. Finn).

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted March 4, 2005.
    • Received January 17, 2005.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents