
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 9, 977-979, September 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Consumer Perception of Risk Associated with Filters Contaminated with Glass Fibers
K. Michael Cummings1,
Janice L. Hastrup,
Tracy Swedrock,
Andrew Hyland,
Jeanne Perla and
John L. Pauly
Departments of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology, & Biostatistics [K. M. C., T. S., A. H., J. P.] and Immunology [J. L. P.], Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, and Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14263 [J. L. H.]
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The filters in Eclipse, a new cigarette-like smoking article marketed by
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, are contaminated with glass fibers,
fragments, and particles. Reported herein are the results of a study in
which consumers were questioned about their opinions as to whether
exposure to glass fibers in such a filter poses an added health risk
beyond that from smoking and whether the manufacturer has an obligation
to inform consumers about the glass contamination problem. The study
queried 137 adults who were interviewed while waiting at a Division of
Motor Vehicles office in Erie County, New York in 1997. All but one
person expressed the view that the presence of glass fibers on the
filters poses an added health risk beyond that associated with exposure
to tobacco smoke alone. Nearly all expressed the position that the
cigarette manufacturer has a duty to inform the public about the
potential for glass exposure.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
In June 1996,
RJR2
began selling Eclipse, a cigarette-like smoking article that delivers
nicotine to the consumer primarily by heating instead of burning
tobacco (1)
. Pauly et al. (2)
have
recently reported that the filters in Eclipse are contaminated with
glass fibers, fragments, and particles. The observed glass fibers and
particles on the Eclipse filter tip arise from two glass fiber
insulating mats that surround a carbon fuel rod located at the lit end
of the cigarette. The glass contamination of the filter tips of Eclipse
appears to be the result of the shattering of these glass insulating
mats during the manufacturing process. The shattered glass fragments
are externally translocated to the surface of the cigarette wrapping
paper and to the cut surface of the cellulose acetate filter tip.
Examination of the cut filter surface with a stereo zoom microscope and
scanning electron microscope showed that the filter contained nonbound
glass fibers and glass particles (1)
. Because many of the
glass fragments observed on the surface of the filter tips were of a
respirable size, Pauly et al. (2)
have
recommended that RJR be required to inform Eclipse smokers of their
potential exposure to glass material.
We have found no mention of the use of glass material or the potential
for glass contamination of the filter tip in newspaper advertisements
for Eclipse, in the Eclipse promotional video tape, or in the leaflet
accompanying the pack of Eclipse. The leaflet that accompanies each
pack of Eclipse instructs the smoker to "take an extra puff and a
longer draw while holding a flame to the carbon tip." The
recommendation to puff vigorously on Eclipse may increase the chances
that glass fibers, particles, and fragments contaminating the filter
tip would be discharged into the smokers mouth and air passages
during smoking (1)
. Thus, it is likely that Eclipse
smokers are unaware of their exposure to glass.
This study reports the results of a survey in which current, former,
and never smokers were asked about their beliefs as to whether exposure
to glass fibers in a new cigarette-like smoking article
(i.e., Eclipse) poses an additional health risk to smokers
beyond that associated with exposure to tobacco smoke alone and whether
the manufacturer has an obligation to inform consumers about the risk
of exposure to glass in the product.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
The study population consisted of 137 adults, 18 years of age and
older, who volunteered to be interviewed while waiting in line at a
Division of Motor Vehicles office in Erie County, New York on three
different days in July, August, and September, 1997. Of the 137
individuals interviewed, 53 were current smokers, 24 were former
smokers, and 60 identified themselves as never smokers (see Table 1
for definitions). Table 1
provides a summary of the characteristics of
survey participants. The brief (
10 min) survey was administered by a
trained research assistant who asked a series of about 20 questions
designed to measure beliefs about the safety and benefits of cigarette
filters. Respondents were asked why cigarette companies put filters on
cigarettes, if they believe a filter makes a cigarette safer, and
whether or not they had ever heard of research on filter material
getting into the lungs. Responses to questions about the risks and
benefits of conventional cellulose acetate filters can be found
elsewhere.3
Two of the questions in the survey were on the subject of glass
contamination of filters on a "new cigarette." These questions were
as follows:
(a) A new kind of cigarette has been designed which produces
very little smoke. The cigarette contains glass fibers, which are not
mentioned in the advertising. If these fibers are inhaled into the
lungs or eaten, would you consider this an additional health risk
beyond the exposure to tobacco itself?
(b) If the glass filter fibers on the filter become loose,
and the cigarette companies are aware of this, do you think they have
an obligation to let people know about this?
 |
Results
|
|---|
As shown in Table 2
, all but one person stated that eaten or inhaled glass fibers pose an
added health risk to smokers beyond that associated with exposure to
tobacco smoke alone. All but two persons responded that if the glass
fibers become loose, the cigarette manufacturer should be obligated to
inform consumers of this potential hazard.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Human health risks associated with inhaled glass fibers and
particles have been the subject of recent scientific debate
(3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
. A 1994 review article on the association of
fibrous glass and cancer concluded that fibrous glass materials are
carcinogenic and that, on a fiber per fiber basis, glass fibers may be
as potent or more potent than asbestos (3)
. In response to
our study on the glass contamination of Eclipse filters, Dr. J. E.
Swauger, a scientist at RJR, has argued that the glass fibers used in
Eclipse are too large to be drawn into the human lung and therefore do
not pose a health risk to the smoker (8
, 9)
. We disagree
with this conclusion for two reasons. First, in inhalation studies on
rats, Hesterberg et al. (10)
have shown that
large numbers of glass fibers can be recovered from the lungs several
years after exposure. Rats exposed to fibrous glass for 12 months
showed "bronchiolization" of proximal alveolar ducts and the
formation of microgranulomas. Secondly, we and others have observed
glass fibers in the residue of chemically digested human lung tissues
that are comparable in size to those of the glass fibers used in
Eclipse (11
, 12)
. Thus, we think it is reasonable to
assume that glass fibers and particles contaminating the Eclipse filter
tip could be inhaled into the human lung, which, after all, is
significantly larger than the respiratory tract of a rat.
We are not the only ones to have expressed health concerns regarding
the use of glass fibers in Eclipse. Schuller International, Inc.,
currently known as Johns Mansville Inc., sued RJR in 1995 to bar them
from further use of Schullers glass fibers in Eclipse
(13)
. We are not aware of any medical or scientific
evidence that would enable RJR to ensure that the glass fibers and
particles that contaminate the Eclipse filters are not inhaled and do
not pose a health risk to the smoker.
Because RJR has been reluctant to inform consumers about the glass
contamination of Eclipse filters, we felt that it was relevant to see
how consumers might perceive the risk associated with glass exposure
while smoking. Not surprisingly, the data in this study demonstrate
that consumers are likely to perceive information about the presence of
glass fibers on the filters of Eclipse as an added health risk beyond
that associated with exposure to tobacco smoke. A 1988 Philip Morris
study found that smokers had a strong negative reaction to RJRs
Premier cigarette when the use of "fiberglass" in the product was
revealed (14)
. While the subjects included in this
study were not selected to be representative of the population at
large, the consistency of responses across different age, gender, and
smoking status groups strongly suggests that the findings from this
survey would be reflective of the views of most consumers. However, it
is possible that perceptions about the risk of glass contamination
reported in this study would have differed had subjects been informed
about other features of Eclipse (e.g., different smoke
chemistry, lower biological activity, and so forth) compared with
conventional cigarettes. Future studies should determine how
consumers beliefs about Eclipse or other similar products
(e.g., Accord) might vary depending on the amount and type
of information divulged about each product.
We believe that tobacco companies, like other consumer product
manufacturers, have an obligation to fully inform their consumers about
the risks and benefits of their products, regardless of what the
business consequences might be. RJR recently announced that Eclipse
will be test marketed in the Dallas/Fort Worth area and will be
available through direct mail and internet sales. The press
announcement for the new test market informed consumers that scientific
studies showed that Eclipse "... may present smokers with less
risk of cancer, chronic bronchitis and possibly emphysema, when
compared to other cigarettes" (15)
. However, the press
announcement made no mention of the glass contamination of Eclipse
filters. When questioned about the potential health concerns associated
with glass exposure from Eclipse, RJR spokespersons have stated that
there is no health risk (16
, 17)
.
This study demonstrates that consumers consider information about
possible glass contamination of the Eclipse filter to be relevant to
their decision to use the product. We believe that consumers should be
informed of all aspects of Eclipse, especially because RJR has not
undertaken any long-term human health studies to evaluate the health
consequences of using Eclipse (17)
. In particular, we
think that RJR should immediately inform current and past users of
Eclipse and Eclipse-like products (i.e., Premier) about
their likely exposure to glass material while using these products.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Cancer Prevention, Epidemiology, &
Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets,
Buffalo, NY 14263. E-mail: Michael.Cummings{at}Roswellpark.org 
2 The abbreviation used is: RJR, R. J. Reynolds
Tobacco Company. 
3 J. L. Hastrup, K. M. Cummings,
T. Swedrock, A. Hyland, and J. L. Pauly. Consumer knowledge and
beliefs about the safety of cigarette filters, unpublished manuscript,
available on request from Michael Cummings (E-mail: Michael.Cummings{at}Roswellpark.org.) 
Received 2/21/00;
revised 6/21/00;
accepted 6/26/00.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Pauly J. L., Streck R. J., Cummings K. M. U. S. patents shed light on Eclipse and future cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 4: 261-265, 1995.
-
Pauly J. L., Lee H. J., Hurley E. L., Cummings K. M., Lesses J. D., Streck R. J. Glass fiber contamination of cigarette filters: an additional health risk to the smoker?. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 7: 967-979, 1998.[Abstract]
-
Infante P. F., Schuman L. D., Dement J., Huff J. Fibrous glass and cancer. Am. J. Ind. Med., 26: 559-584, 1994.[Medline]
-
Weiss W. Epidemiology of fibrous glass and lung cancer. Am. J. Ind. Med., 30: 105-108, 1996.[Medline]
-
McConnell E. E. Commentary on "Fibrous Glass and Lung Cancer. " Am. J. Ind. Med., 30: 109-110, 1996.[Medline]
-
Hesterberg T. W., Chase G. R. Commentary on "Fibrous Glass and Lung Cancer. " Am. J. Ind. Med., 30: 111-112, 1996.[Medline]
-
Infante P. F., Schuman L. D., Huff J. Fibrous glass insulation and cancer: response and rebuttal. Am. J. Ind. Med., 30: 113-120, 1996.
-
Swauger, J. E. Letter to the editor re: J. L. Pauly et al., Glass Fiber Contamination of Cigarette Filters: An Additional Health Risk to the Smoker? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 8: 835836, 1999.
-
Swauger, J. E. Letter to the editor re: D. Holzman, Safe Cigarette Alternatives? Industry Critics Say "Not Yet." J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92: 1892, 1999.
-
Hesterberg T. W., Miller W. C., McConnell E. E., Chevalier J., Hadley J. G., Bernstein D. M., Thevenaz P., Anderson R. Chronic inhalation toxicity of size separated glass fibers in Fisher 344 rats. Fundam. Appl. Toxoicol., 20: 464-476, 1993.
-
Pauly J. L., Green C. E., Bush P. J., Cheney R. T., Goffman D., Streck R. J. Inhaled glass fibers discovered in human lung tissue. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 40: 567 1999.
-
Gibbs, A. R., Wagner, J. C., and Churg, A. Diseases due to synthetic fibers. In: Pathology of Occupational Lung Disease, 2nd ed., pp. 393402. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1998.
-
Schuller International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (Plaintiff) versus R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a New Jersey Corporation (Defendant). United States District Court for the District of Colorado, Case Number 95-S-535, March 6, 1995.
-
State of Connecticut versus Tobacco Companies. Philip Morris, U. S. A., Richmond, VA, Interoffice correspondence. To: Ms. Jan Jones. From: Page Callahan/Consumer Research Group. Subject: Premier - Concepts and Product Reactions. (Appendix B), Document No. CV96007214S, July 1, 1988.
-
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Reynolds Tobaccos Risk Reduction Methodology Demonstrates Eclipse Cigarette May Present Less Risk. April 18, 2000.
-
McKay M. Safe Cigarettes? WBFO Radio (88.7 FM). News Interview of S. Moskowitz (R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company) and John Pauly and K. M. Cummings (Roswell Park Cancer Institute). Buffalo, New York: National Public Radio broadcast, November 12, 1998.
-
Christa J. Blankenship, et al. versus Philip Morris, Inc., et al. Deposition of David E. Townsend, May 3, 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Swauger, K. M. Cummings, J. L. Hastrup, R. J. Streck, A. Hyland, and J. L. Pauly
Correspondence re: Cummings et al., Consumer Perception of Risk Associated with Filters Contaminated with Glass Fibers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 9: 977-979, 2000
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
April 1, 2001;
10(4):
416 - 418.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|