CEBP Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chao, A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chao, A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, C.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 9, 539-544, June 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research

Patient and Tumor Characteristics of Colon Cancers with Microsatellite Instability: A Population-based Study1

Ann Chao2, Frank Gilliland, Cheryl Willman, Nancy Joste, I-Ming Chen, Noell Stone, Jennifer Ruschulte, David Viswanatha, Paul Duncan, Richard Ming, Richard Hoffman, Elliott Foucar and Charles Key

New Mexico Tumor Registry [A. C., N. S., C. K.], Center for Molecular and Cellular Diagnostics [C. W., I-M. C., J. R., D. V.], and Department of Pathology [N. J.], University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131; Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033 [F. G.]; Saint Joseph Healthcare Systems [P. D.], Lovelace Medical Center [R. M.], Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center [R. H.], and Presbyterian Healthcare Services [E. F.], Albuquerque, New Mexico 87125


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Molecular screening for microsatellite instability (MSI) in colon cancers has been proposed to identify individuals with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. To date, most reports of MSI in colorectal cancer have been based on studies of clinical case series or high-risk families. We examined the proportion of incident colon cancers in the general population that exhibit MSI by patient and tumor characteristics. We interviewed 201 colon cancer cases ascertained by the New Mexico Tumor Registry in the metropolitan Albuquerque area for demographic information, lifestyle factors, medical history, and family cancer history. Paired normal and tumor tissue specimens were obtained for each case. Three microsatellite markers were used; instability was defined as observed alteration at two or more loci. Overall, 37 of 201 (18%) colon cancers exhibited instability. MSI was more common among cases >70 years (26%) and most common among cases >80 years (38%). MSI was significantly associated with tumors in the proximal colon and with later stage and poor differentiation among cases >70 years. MSI was not associated with a history of polyps. Family history of colorectal cancer was associated with MSI only among cases <50 years. When all factors were analyzed jointly in a regression model, proximal subsite and poor differentiation remained significantly associated with MSI. One patient, whose tumor exhibited MSI, fulfilled the Amsterdam Criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Our study provides a population-based estimate of MSI in colon tumors and a representative estimate of the proportion of colorectal cancer patients in the general population who consent to be interviewed for family cancer history and to have biological samples analyzed.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cancer cause of death in the United States (1) . Since 1993, an enormous amount of knowledge has emerged about the genetic basis of HNPCC,3 the most common form of familial colon cancer (2 , 3) . Several laboratories showed that the majority of HNPCC tumors exhibited a mutator phenotype, MSI, characterized by small deletions or expansions in the length of microsatellites—short, tandemly repeated DNA sequences that occur randomly throughout the genome (4, 5, 6, 7) . MSI in HNPCC was subsequently found to arise from germline mutations in at least four human MMR genes (8, 9, 10, 11) .

HNPCC tumors usually occur in patients in their mid-forties, show predominance in the proximal colon, are of mucinous histology and poor differentiation, and are more likely to be synchronous and metachronous in the colon and extracolonic sites (12, 13, 14) . Prior to the identification of MSI and MMR gene mutations, HNPCC (also known as Lynch Syndromes I and II) was defined clinically by family history of colorectal and other cancers. The Amsterdam Criteria were developed in 1991 to standardize the definition of HNPCC (15) , although they have been deemed overly restrictive, and other criteria have been developed, including the modified Amsterdam Criteria and the Bethesda Guidelines (16) .

MSI also has been observed in sporadic, or nonfamilial, colorectal cancers, with prevalence estimates ranging from 9 to 20% (13, 14 , 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) . MSI in sporadic colorectal cancers can arise from mutations in MMR (or other) genes or hypermethylation of the promotor region of the hMLH1 gene (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28) . Sporadic MSI tumors are generally larger in size, are of mucinous histology and poor differentiation, predominantly occur in the proximal colon, and are less likely to arise from adenomas or show aneuploidy and p53 mutations (13 , 29, 30, 31, 32, 33) .

Most reports of MSI in colon cancers to date have been based on studies of clinical case series, high-risk families, or referral patient populations. Population-based estimates of MSI in colorectal cancers are needed to apply knowledge on the genetic basis of colorectal cancers to the general population for primary and secondary prevention. Screening for MSI has been proposed for all early onset colorectal cancers and for cases exhibiting a family history of colorectal or extracolonic cancers, to identify those with germline mutations in MMR genes (22 , 34) . Such screening for family cancer history and MSI would necessitate patient consent to interview and biological sample collection and testing. We report here a cancer registry-based study of the proportion of incident colon cancer cases in the general population that exhibit MSI, among persons who consented to be interviewed for family cancer history and to have biological samples tested.


   Patients and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Subjects.
Colon cancer cases were diagnosed from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 1997, among residents of the two-county metropolitan Albuquerque area. Cases were ascertained by the New Mexico Tumor Registry, a population-based cancer registry established in 1969 and a member of the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program since 1973. The study included histologically confirmed carcinomas of all histology defined by primary site codes C18.0 to C18.9 according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (35) . Eligible cases included English-speaking subjects of all racial/ethnic groups and all ages residing in the two-county area, subjects ages 50 years and younger living throughout the state of New Mexico, and subjects diagnosed in one of the participating study hospitals in Albuquerque. Six Hispanic patients were excluded because of the English language requirement. Proximal colon included subsites from the cecum to the splenic flexure; cases with unspecified primary subsite code were excluded from subsite-specific analyses. Rectal cases with primary site codes C19.9 and C20.9 were excluded from analyses.

A total of 365 eligible colon cancer cases were ascertained during the study period in the metropolitan Albuquerque area and were invited to participate in the study after their physicians were notified of the study. Upon informed consent, patients were interviewed by trained interviewers to obtain information on demographics, lifestyle factors [including physical activity and diet (food frequency method)], medical history, and family cancer history among first- and second-degree relatives using a structured questionnaire. Interviewers also were trained by a certified genetic counselor to construct a family tree, or pedigree, with each patient. Because testing for MSI was done in a research rather than diagnostic setting, test results were not divulged to subjects. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of all five major hospitals serving the Albuquerque community and by the Human Research Review Committee of the University of New Mexico.

Of the 365 cases, 228 (63%) were successfully interviewed, 40 (11%) were deceased, 45 (12%) declined to be interviewed, and 52 (14%) either had moved and could not be contacted, were hospitalized at the time of contact, or were not recommended to be interviewed by their physician. Of the 228 interviewed cases, 201 could be tested for MSI. Of the 27 cases that could not be tested, 13 cases did not have a tissue sample available for retrieval, 10 cases had insufficient tumor or normal tissue, and 4 cases had failed PCR amplification. Table 1Citation presents the distribution of cases by patient and tumor characteristics, separately among the 201 study participants who were interviewed and had a valid MSI test result and 164 nonparticipants who either were not interviewed or did not have a valid MSI test result. Study participants were significantly younger in age and diagnosed at an earlier stage than nonparticipants.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Distribution of colon cancer patients by age at diagnosis, gender, and tumor characteristics, New Mexico Tumor Registry, 1996–1997

 
We report here completed analysis on 201 colon cancer cases, consisting of 106 men and 95 women. Racial/ethnic distribution of colon cancer cases in our study population resembles that of the population distribution of colon cancer cases reported in the state of New Mexico (69% non-Hispanic white and 31% nonwhite, including Hispanic, African American, American Indian, and Asian). Twenty % of cases in our study population were younger than 50 years, 42% of cases were 50–70 years old, and 38% of cases were 71 years old or older at diagnosis.

Specimen Analysis.
Paired normal and tumor remnant tissue specimens from colectomy were obtained for each case within 24 h after surgery. When fresh tissue sample was not available for a case, a paraffin-embedded block tissue specimen was obtained via the New Mexico Tumor Registry tissue acquisition system. Upon morphology review by the study pathologist (N. J.), genomic DNA was microdissected, then isolated using the QIAamp tissue kit (Qiagen, Inc., Santa Clarita, CA). PCR was performed on each pair of normal and tumor tissue, using three fluorescently labeled primers on a GeneAmp 9600 (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Norwalk, CT). The three PCR products were then pooled and analyzed for allele sizing and quantitation using a laser-induced fluorescence capillary electrophoresis system on the ABI 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA).

Three repeat sequence microsatellite markers of single polyadenine track were used (BAT25, 5'-TCGCCTCCAAGAATGTAAGT-3' and 3'-TCTGAATTTTAACTATGGCTC-5'; BAT26, 5'-TGACTACTTTTGACTTCAGCC-3' and 3'-AACCATTCAACATTTTTAACCC-5'; and BAT40, 5'-ACAACCCTGCTTTTGTTCCT-3' and 3'-GTAGAGCAAGACCACCTTG-5') to identify high-frequency (or true) MSI tumors. This set of three markers was chosen based on their high sensitivity and consistency in detecting high-frequency MSI in our study sample and in other studies (36, 37, 38, 39, 40) . In particular, BAT26 has been shown to be a highly sensitive marker for MSI (36) . We did not distinguish low-frequency MSI from stable tumors. The decision to use the three-marker set was based on available knowledge at the time our laboratory began specimen analysis in 1996–1997, prior to the establishment of the five-marker consensus panel by the National Cancer Institute Workshop (39) . MSI was defined as expansion or reduction in tumor allelic tract length compared to paired normal DNA in at least two of three loci. This approach was validated by analysis of a subsample of 69 cases using a battery of 10 microsatellite markers (D8S254, NM23, D18S35, P53-Di, D5S346, P53-Pen, D2S123, D1S2883, D3S1611, and D7S501), with MSI defined as observed alterations in four or more markers. Results showed 100% agreement with those obtained using three markers in determining MSI status, with the three-marker set correctly identifying all high-frequency MSI tumors.

Statistical Analysis.
Statistical analyses focused on comparing the proportion of colon tumors exhibiting MSI to those not exhibiting MSI, using the {chi}2 or Fisher’s exact test statistic (two-sided P < 0.05). We estimated the OR and 95% CI for MSI comparing patient and tumor characteristics. Age- and multivariate-adjusted ORs (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression modeling with MSI as the outcome of interest. Statistical interaction was evaluated using the likelihood ratio test (at P < 0.05) comparing model goodness of fit with and without interaction terms between age group and each covariate (41) . All statistical analyses were conducted using the software package SAS (42) .


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Overall, 37 (18%) of the 201 colon cancer cases exhibited MSI in at least two of three loci (Table 2)Citation . Although the mean age at diagnosis of cases exhibiting MSI (66 years) was not statistically different from that of cases not exhibiting MSI (64 years), a substantial difference was observed in the proportion of cases with MSI when stratified by age group. The proportion of MSI was higher among cases less than age 45 years and among those older than age 70 years. The highest proportion of MSI was observed among cases over 80 years of age (38%), with an OR of 5.2 (95% CI, 1.7–15.9) compared to cases ages 50–70 years. MSI was inversely associated with a personal history of polyps (age-adjusted OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2–0.8). Patient characteristics positively associated with MSI included being female, white, and reporting family history of colorectal cancer; these associations were not statistically significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Univariate and age-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for MSI in colon cancer by patient characteristics, New Mexico Tumor Registry, 1996–1997

 
Tumor characteristics associated with MSI are presented in Table 3Citation . Tumors in the proximal colon were significantly more likely to exhibit MSI than those in the distal colon (33% compared to 4%; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.001), as were tumors of mucinous histology (39% compared to 15% in nonmucinous carcinomas; {chi}2, P = 0.011) and those poorly differentiated (50% compared to 12% in tumors of well to moderate differentiation; {chi}2, P < 0.001). Later stage of disease at diagnosis was weakly associated with MSI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3 Univariate and age-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for MSI in colon cancer by tumor characteristics, New Mexico Tumor Registry, 1996–1997

 
When stratified by age at diagnosis (<50 years, 50–70 years, and >70 years), the relationship between MSI and sex, family history of colorectal cancer, tumor grade, and stage appeared limited to certain age groups (Table 4)Citation . MSI was associated with family history of colorectal cancer and tumors of mucinous histology only among cases <50 years old, whereas the increased proportion of MSI in female cases was observed primarily among cases >70 years old. MSI was more common in proximal colon cancers at all ages. Poor tumor differentiation was associated with MSI in cases >50 years old; this was the only factor that showed significant interaction with age. We did not have adequate statistical power to evaluate an age interaction with other variables, such as family history of colorectal cancer and colon subsite.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4 ORs and 95% CIs for MSI in colon cancer by patient and tumor characteristics, by patient age at diagnosis, New Mexico Tumor Registry, 1996–1997

 
When the above factors were examined simultaneously in a logistic regression model (Table 5)Citation , MSI was significantly associated with tumor being in the proximal colon and poor differentiation. Family history of colorectal cancer was no longer associated with MSI after accounting for age and tumor characteristics. Only 1 patient of 201 (0.5%) in the study sample fulfilled the strict Amsterdam Criteria for HNPCC. This 58-year-old patient was diagnosed with an invasive adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon, and the patient’s tumor sample revealed instability at all three microsatellite loci.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5 Univariate and multivariate-adjusted ORs and 95% CIs from logistic regression modeling of patient and tumor characteristics associated with microsatellite instability in colon cancer, New Mexico Tumor Registry, 1996–1997

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Our findings from a cancer registry-based study of MSI in incident colon cancers show that 18% of cases in this population-based sample exhibited MSI. Instability was more common among female cases and non-Hispanic whites and highest among cases diagnosed after age 70 years. The majority of MSI tumors in our study originated in the proximal colon and was poorly differentiated. Other than predominance in the proximal colon and lack of previous polyps in all age groups, substantial differences in the profile of cases with MSI were observed by age in our data. When patient age and tumor characteristics were accounted for, family history of colorectal cancer was no longer associated with MSI.

The most striking finding of our study was the J-shaped age distribution of colon cancers with MSI. Previous studies have in general described colon cancer cases with MSI by family history and by mean age at disease diagnosis (3 , 13 , 17 , 29) . Two European studies have reported mean age at diagnosis in MSI cases to be 68–69 years, nearly identical to that in cases without MSI (13 , 22) . A Japanese study found the mean age at diagnosis in cases with MSI to be 73 years, statistically different from the mean age of 61 years in cases without MSI (19) . These studies did not show in which age groups MSI was more common. Similar to our data, Samowitz et al. (18) found highest proportions of MSI in the youngest and oldest age groups, although they excluded cases older than age 79 years, the group with the highest MSI proportion in our study. Our observation of a higher proportion of MSI in older female cases has not been reported by other studies. This association may be due, in part, to the fact that the proportion of incident proximal colon cancers among female cases increases with age in our study population (43) .

The overall proportion of colon cancers with MSI in our sample falls within the 9–20% range reported previously (13 , 14 , 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) . The 18% observed in our sample of interviewed cases was somewhat higher than the 12% reported from Finland (22) but similar to the 16.4% reported from the United Kingdom (21) , 16.5% from Norway (13) , and 16.5% from Utah (18) . Most of these studies were hospital-based and examined nonfamilial colorectal cancers. Possible explanations for the varying estimates have thus far focused on the type and number of microsatellite markers used in different studies (37 , 44 , 45) . However, differences in study population also may account for part of the difference. Our study of colon cancers may have yielded a slightly higher proportion of MSI tumors compared to other studies that included colon and rectal cancers. The Utah study was the only published study that stated inclusion of colon cancers only (18) .

Besides differences in study populations, another possible explanation for the different proportions of MSI reported is the set of case selection criteria used by each study. It has been suggested that colon cancer patients with MSI, like HNPCC patients, tend to have better prognosis and increased survival despite the fact that MSI tumors generally show characteristics associated with poor prognosis (7 , 13 , 21 , 46, 47, 48) . Thus, studies that include only interviewed cases may find a higher proportion with MSI than studies that test all available tissue samples. Indeed, previous studies that have reported higher proportions of MSI (16–20%) have in general indicated testing tissue sample from interviewed cases (13 , 14 , 18 , 19) . Studies that tested available tissue without indicating patient contact (20) and studies that obtained patient information from medical records or other sources (22 , 29) tended to report lower proportions of MSI (9%–13%). The observed 18% in our sample may be higher than what would have been observed had we tested samples from all cases diagnosed during the study period regardless of interviewing status.

Our study sample under-represents American Indian cases, in whom a Navajo HNPCC kindred has been identified (49) . We also have not yet determined the proportion of cases with germline mutations in MMR genes responsible for HNPCC. Based on the observation that MSI is associated with family history of colorectal cancer in the youngest cases, we postulate that some of these may represent familial cases. As other studies relying on self-reported family history of cancer, potential misclassification of this variable may partly account for the lack of association between MSI and family history among older cases. Inaccuracies in recall of family history, especially beyond first-degree relatives, may account for the observation that only one patient in our study population fulfilled the strict Amsterdam Criteria for HNPCC. However, this low proportion is consistent with the 0.3% reported in a population-based study in the United Kingdom using the Amsterdam Criteria to classify HNPCC (50) .

As genetic testing for colorectal cancer susceptibility becomes integrated into clinical practice (51) , screening for MSI, in combination with other patient and tumor characteristics, has been proposed for the identification of candidates to undergo testing for germline mutations in MMR genes (22 , 34) . Although the identification of individuals and families at high risk is important for the design and implementation of efficacious primary and secondary disease prevention strategies, the cost effectiveness and the legal and ethical implications of genetic screening, diagnosis, and counseling in clinical practice have yet to be determined in population-based samples. The 18% observed in our study, among cases consenting to be interviewed, represents a realistic estimate of what would be observed in a screening study requiring patient contact to obtain informed consent, family cancer history, and biological samples.

In summary, our study reports on patient and tumor characteristics of colon cancers that exhibit MSI from a population-based sample. The increasing proportion of MSI observed with age in our study highlights the importance of environmental as well as genetic factors in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis via the MMR pathway (52) . Population-based studies with larger samples are needed to obtain stable estimates of MSI in colon cancers in the general population and to examine the interaction between the MSI phenotype, specific gene mutations or epigenetic changes, and modifiable lifestyle factors. Such studies will have important public health implications for primary disease prevention or the delay of disease onset among high-risk individuals. Unveiling the genetic basis of HNPCC has advanced knowledge not only for familial colorectal cancers but also for a better understanding of the nonfamilial cases that represent the majority of the burden of this common cancer in the general population.


   Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the New Mexico Tumor Registry staff and the study nurses and laboratory personnel of the University of New Mexico Hospital, Lovelace Health Systems, St. Joseph Healthcare System, Presbyterian Healthcare Services, and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We are grateful to Drs. Michael J. Thun and Marc Bulterys and to anonymous reviewers for their review and comments.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Special Study Contract N01-CN-05228. A. C. is supported by the American Cancer Society and by National Cancer Institute Grant K07-CA75062. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Epidemiology and Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, 1599 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-4251. Phone: (404) 327-6460; Fax: (404) 327-6450; E-mail: achao{at}cancer.org Back

3 The abbreviations used are: MSI, microsatellite instability; HNPCC, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MMR, mismatch repair. Back

Received 10/ 7/99; revised 3/22/00; accepted 4/11/00.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Landis S. H., Murray T., Bolden S., Wingo P. A. , Cancer Statistics. Ca. Cancer J. Clin., 49: 8-31, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Marra G., Boland C. R. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: the syndrome, the genes, and historical perspectives. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 87: 1114-1125, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Boland C. R. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer Vogelstein B. Kinzler K. W. eds. . The Genetic Basis of Cancer, : 333-326, McGraw-Hill New York 1998.
  4. Loeb L. A. Microsatellite instability: marker of a mutator phenotype in cancer. Cancer Res., 54: 5059-5063, 1994.[Free Full Text]
  5. Ionov Y., Peinado M. A., Malkhosyan S., Shibata D., Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature (Lond.), 363: 558-561, 1993.[Medline]
  6. Aaltonen L. A., Peltomäki P., Leach F. S., Sistonen P., Pylkkänen L., Mecklin J. P., Järvinen H., Powell S. M., Jen J., Hamilton S. R., Petersen G. M., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., de la Chapelle A. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science (Washington DC), 260: 812-816, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Thibodeau S. N., Bren G., Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon. Science (Washington DC), 260: 816-819, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fishel R., Lescoe M. K., Rao M. R. S., Copeland N. G., Jenkins N. A., Garber J., Kane M., Kolodner R. The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell, 75: 1027-1038, 1993.[Medline]
  9. Leach F. S., Nicolaides N. C., Papadopoulos N., Liu B., Jen J., Pearson R. Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell, 75: 1215-1225, 1993.[Medline]
  10. Peltomäki P., Vasen H. F. A., International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: database and results of a collaborative study. Gastroenterology, 113: 1146-1158, 1997.[Medline]
  11. Liu B., Parsons R., Papadopoulos N., Nicolaides N. C., Lynch H. T., Watson P., Jass J. R., Dunlop M., Wyllie A., Peltomäki P., de la Chapelle A., Hamilton S. R., Vogelstein B., Kinzler K. W. Analysis of mismatch repair genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. Nat. Med., 2: 169-174, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Lynch H. T., Smyrk T., Lynch J. F. Overview of natural history, pathology, molecular genetics and management of HNPCC (Lynch Syndrome). Int. J. Cancer, 69: 38-43, 1996.[Medline]
  13. Lothe R. A., Peltomäki P., Meling G. I., Aaltonen L. A., Nyström-Lahti M., Pylkkänen L., Heimdal K., Andersen T. I., Møller P., Rognum R. O., Fosså S. D., Haldorsen T., Langmark F., Brøgger A., de la Chapelle A., Børresen A. L. Genomic instability in colorectal cancer: relationship to clinicopathological variables and family history. Cancer Res., 53: 5849-5852, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Aaltonen L. A., Peltomäki P., Jukka-Pekka M., Järvinen H., Jass J. R., Green J. S., Lynch H. T., Watson P., Tallqvist G., Juhola M., Sistonen P., Hamilton S. R., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., de la Chapelle A. Replication error in benign and malignant tumors from hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Res., 54: 1645-1648, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Vasen H. F. A., Mecklin J. P., Khan P. M., Lynch H. T. The international collaborative group on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis. Colon Rectum, 34: 424-425, 1991.[Medline]
  16. Rodriguez-Bigas M. A., Boland C. R., Hamilton S. R., Henson D. E., Jass J. R., Khan P. M., Lynch H., Perucho M., Smyrk T., Sobin L., Srivastava S. A National Cancer Institute workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda Guidelines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 89: 1758-1762, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  17. Arzimanoglou I. I., Gilbert F., Barber H. R. K. Microsatellite instability in human solid tumors. Cancer (Phila.), 82: 1808-1820, 1998.[Medline]
  18. Samowitz W. S., Slattery M. L., Kerber R. A. Microsatellite instability in human colonic cancer is not a useful clinical indicator of familial colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology, 109: 1765-1771, 1995.[Medline]
  19. Ishimaru G., Adachi J., Shiseki M., Yamaguchi N., Muto T., Yokota J. Microsatellite instability in primary and metastatic colorectal cancers. Int. J. Cancer, 64: 153-157, 1995.[Medline]
  20. Yagci T., Göksel S., Dogan Ö., Ozturk M., Yurdusev N. Genomic instability in colorectal cancers in Turkey. Int. J. Cancer, 68: 91-294, 1996.
  21. Bubb V. J., Curtis L. J., Cunningham C., Dunlop M. G., Carothers A. D., Morris R. G., White S., Bird C. C., Wyllie A. H. Microsatellite instability and the role of hMSH2 in sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncogene, 12: 2641-2649, 1996.[Medline]
  22. Aaltonen L. A., Salovaara R., Kristo P., Canzian F., Hemminki A., Peltomäki P., Chadwick R. B., Kaariainen H., Eskelinen M., Jarvinen H., Mecklin J. P., de la Chapelle A., Percesepe A., Ahtola H., Harkonen N., Kulkunen R., Kangas E., Ojala S., Tulikoura J., Valkamo E. Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 338: 1481-1487, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Liu B., Nicolaides N. C., Markowitz S., Willson J. K. V., Parsons R. E., Jen J., Papadopolous N., Peltomäki P., de la Chapelle A., Hamilton S. R., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Mismatch repair gene defects in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Nat. Genet., 9: 48-55, 1995.[Medline]
  24. Eshleman J. R., Markowitz S. D. Mismatch repair defects in human carcinogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet., 5: 1489-1494, 1996.[Abstract]
  25. Senba S., Konishi F., Okamoto T., Kashiwagi H., Kanazawa K., Miyaki M., Konishi M., Tsukamoto T. Clinicopathologic and genetic features of nonfamilial colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors. Cancer (Phila.), 82: 279-285, 1998.[Medline]
  26. Thibodeau S. N., French A. J., Cunningham J. M., Tester D., Burgart L. J., Roche P. C., McDonnell S. K., Schaid D. J., Vockley C. W., Michels V. V., Farr G. H., O’Connell M. J. Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: different mutator phenotypes and the principal involvement of hMLH1. Cancer Res., 58: 1713-1718, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Cunningham J. M., Christensen E. R., Tester D. J., Kim C. Y., Roche P. C., Burgart L. J., Thibodeau S. N. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Cancer Res., 58: 3455-3460, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Herman J. G., Umar A., Polyak K., Graff J. R., Ahuja N., Issa J. P. J., Markowitz S., Willson J. K. V., Hamilton S. R., Kinzler K. W., Kane M. F., Kolodner R. D., Vogelstein B., Kunkel T. A., Baylin S. B. Incidence and functional consequences of hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation in colorectal carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 6870-6875, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kim H., Jen J., Vogelstein B., Hamilton S. R. Clinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences. Am. J. Pathol., 145: 1-8, 1994.[Medline]
  30. Kahlenberg M. S., Stoler D. L., Basik M., Petrelli N. J., Rodriguez-Bigas M., Anderson G. R. p53 tumor suppressor gene status and the degree of genomic instability in sporadic colorectal cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 88: 1665-1670, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rosio M., Reato G., Francia di Celle P., Fizzotti M., Rossini F. P., Foa R. Microsatellite instability is associated with the histologic features of the tumor in nonfamilial colorectal cancer. Cancer Res., 56: 5470-5474, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Forster S., Sattler H. P., Hack M., Romanakis K., Rohde V., Seitz G., Wullich B. Microsatellite instability in sporadic carcinomas of the proximal colon: association with diploid DNA content, negative protein expression of p53, and distinct histomorphologic features. Surgery, 123: 13-18, 1998.[Medline]
  33. Olschwang S., Hemelin R., Laurent-Puig P., Thuille B., de Rycke Y., Li Y. J., Muzeau F., Girodet J., Salmon R. J., Thomas G. Alternative genetic pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 12122-12127, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bocker T., Ruschoff J., Fishel R. Molecular diagnostics of cancer predisposition: hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma and mismatch repair defects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1423: 1-10, 1999.
  35. WHO . International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, WHO Geneva, Switzerland 1977.
  36. Hoang J. M., Cottu P. H., Thuille B., Salmon R. J., Thomas G., Hamelin R. BAT-26, an indicator of the replication error phenotype in colorectal cancers and cell lines. Cancer Res., 57: 300-303, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Dietmaier W., Wallinger S., Bocker T., Kullmann F., Fishel R., Rüschoff J. Diagnostic microsatellite instability: definition and correlation with mismatch repair protein expression. Cancer Res., 57: 4749-4756, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zhou X. P., Hoang J-M., Cottu P. H., Thomas G., Hamelin R. Allelic profiles of mononucleotide repeat microsatellites in control individuals and in colorectal tumors with and without replication errors. Oncogene, 15: 1713-1718, 1997.[Medline]
  39. Boland C. R., Thibodeau S. N., Hamilton S. R., Sidransky D., Eshleman J. R., Burt R. W., Meltzer S. J., Rodriguez-Bigas M. A., Fodde R., Ranzani G. N., Srivastava S. A National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 5248-5257, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Perucho M Correspondence re. C. R. Boland et al., "A National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.". Cancer Res., 58: 5248–5257, 1998, 59: 249-253, 1999.
  41. Breslow N. E., Day N. E. . Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume I. The Analysis of Case Control Studies, 32: IARC Publications No. Lyon 1980.
  42. SAS . SAS Language and Procedures, Version 6.04, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC 1990.
  43. Chao A., Gilliland F. D., Hunt W. C., Bulterys M., Becker T. M., Key C. R. Increasing incidence of colon and rectal cancer among Hispanics and American Indians in New Mexico (United States), 1969–1994. Cancer Causes Control, 9: 137-144, 1998.[Medline]
  44. Lothe R. A. Microsatellite instability in human solid tumors. Mol. Med. Today, 3: 61-68, 1997.[Medline]
  45. Bocker T., Diermann J., Friedl W., Gebert J., Holinski-Feder E., Karner-Hanusch K., von Knebel-Doeberitz M., Doelble K., Moeslein G., Schackert H. K., Wirtz H. C., Fishel R., Rüschoff J. Microsatellite instability analysis: a multicenter study for reliability and quality control. Cancer Res., 57: 4739-4743, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Houlston R. S., Tomlinson I. P. M. Genetic prognostic markers in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. Mol. Pathol., 50: 281-288, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Lukish J. R., Muro K., DeNobile J., Katz R., Williams J., Cruess D. F., Drucker W., Kirsch I., Hamilton S. R. Prognostic significance of DNA replication errors in young patients with colorectal cancer. Ann. Surgery, 227: 51-56, 1998.[Medline]
  48. Watson P., Lin K. M., Rodriguez-Bigas M. A., Smyrk T., Lemon S., Shashidharan M., Franklin B., Karr B., Thorson A., Lynch H. T. Colorectal carcinoma survival among hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma family members. Cancer (Phila.), 83: 259-266, 1998.[Medline]
  49. Lynch H. T., Drouhard T. L., Schuelke G. S., Biscone K. A., Lynch J. F., Dane B. S. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in a Navajo Indian family. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 15: 209-213, 1985.[Medline]
  50. Evans D. G., Walsh S., Jeacock J., Robinson C., Hadfield L., Davies D. R., Kingston R. Incidence of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in a population-based study of 1137 consecutive cases of colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg., 84: 1281-1285, 1997.[Medline]
  51. Syngal S., Fox E. A., Li C., Dovidio M., Eng C., Kolodner R. D., Garber J. E. Interpretation of genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: implications for clinical predisposition testing. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 282: 247-253, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Potter J. D. Colorectal cancer: molecules and populations. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 916-32, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
V. M. Chia, P. A. Newcomb, J. Bigler, L. M. Morimoto, S. N. Thibodeau, and J. D. Potter
Risk of Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancer Is Associated Jointly with Smoking and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6877 - 6883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. A. Wark, M. P. Weijenberg, P. van 't Veer, G. van Wijhe, M. Luchtenborg, G. N.P. van Muijen, A. F.P.M. de Goeij, R. A. Goldbohm, and P. A. van den Brandt
Fruits, Vegetables, and hMLH1 Protein-Deficient and -Proficient Colon Cancer: The Netherlands Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1619 - 1625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Umar, C. R. Boland, J. P. Terdiman, S. Syngal, A. d. l. Chapelle, J. Ruschoff, R. Fishel, N. M. Lindor, L. J. Burgart, R. Hamelin, et al.
Revised Bethesda Guidelines for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (Lynch Syndrome) and Microsatellite Instability
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 18, 2004; 96(4): 261 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Woodson, E. Lanza, J. A. Tangrea, P. S. Albert, M. Slattery, J. Pinsky, B. Caan, E. Paskett, F. Iber, J. W. Kikendall, et al.
Hormone Replacement Therapy and Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence Among Women in the Polyp Prevention Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 5, 2001; 93(23): 1799 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Hinoi, M. Tani, P. C. Lucas, K. Caca, R. L. Dunn, E. Macri¶, M. Loda¶, H. D. Appelman, K. R. Cho, and E. R. Fearon
Loss of CDX2 Expression and Microsatellite Instability Are Prominent Features of Large Cell Minimally Differentiated Carcinomas of the Colon
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2001; 159(6): 2239 - 2248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
A. Percesepe, F. Borghi, M. Menigatti, L. Losi, M. Foroni, C. Di Gregorio, G. Rossi, M. Pedroni, E. Sala, F. Vaccina, et al.
Molecular Screening for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective, Population-Based Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2001; 19(19): 3944 - 3950.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
A. H. Wu, D. Shibata, M. C. Yu, M.-Y. Lai, and R. K. Ross
Dietary heterocyclic amines and microsatellite instability in colon adenocarcinomas
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2001; 22(10): 1681 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Z. Xiong, A. H. Wu, C. M. Bender, J.-L. Tsao, C. Blake, D. Shibata, P. A. Jones, M. C. Yu, R. K. Ross, and P. W. Laird
Mismatch Repair Deficiency and CpG Island Hypermethylation in Sporadic Colon Adenocarcinomas
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2001; 10(7): 799 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. Atkin and J. P. Martin
Stool DNA-Based Colorectal Cancer Detection: Finding the Needle in the Haystack
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 6, 2001; 93(11): 798 - 799.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chao, A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chao, A.
Right arrow Articles by Key, C.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online