
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Letters to the Editor |
Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Health, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 [L. R. K., W. G. S., J. S. W., P. L. S., S. R. T.], and Kenneth Norris, Jr., Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033 [M. C. Y., R. K. R., B. E. H.]
In two studies of HAA2 exposure in humans (1 , 2) , we expressed urinary HAA levels in units of creatinine due to the fact that 8 h urine samples were being analyzed. In his letter, Dr. W. Pfau takes issue with this approach, arguing that individual creatinine values are influenced by recent meat consumption. He presents a hypothetical example of two individuals with similar levels of HAA exposure: one (subject A) with relatively low intake of heavily cooked meat; and (b) the other (subject B) with a higher intake of lightly browned meat. Our method of adjustment would create a spurious difference in HAA excretion level between the two subjects in that subject B will show a lower HAA value than subject A.
We have reanalyzed the data sets in the studies cited above using the
actual values of urinary HAA excretion (i.e., without
creatinine adjustment; all units in pg/ml). Our results show that among
whites and Asian Americans, PhIP values, with or without adjustment,
are quite similar; in whites, the unadjusted mean is 1.14, whereas the
adjusted mean is 1.18. In Asian Americans, the unadjusted mean is 3.12,
whereas the adjusted mean is 3.33. This is not the case in the African
Americans; the unadjusted mean is 28% higher than the adjusted mean
(4.29 versus 3.36). The same holds true for MeIQx; the
unadjusted mean in African Americans is 34% higher than the adjusted
mean (5.07 versus 3.78). Based on unadjusted means, African
Americans clearly possess the highest levels of HAAs, with intermediate
and lowest values in Asian Americans and whites, respectively. These
data of the unadjusted HAA means among the three groups are given in
Table 1
. Our results show that with or without adjustment, HAA values are
statistically different across the three racial/ethnic groups.
|
With or without adjustment, there is no association between urinary PhIP level and intake frequencies of various meats (Table 4 in Ref. 2 ). Also, with or without adjustment, there are no associations between urinary PhIP level and NAT2 phenotype, cigarette smoking, and intake of selected types of vegetables. Without adjustment, the association between MeIQx excretion and intake frequencies of various meats is in accord with the earlier study (Table 2 in Ref. 1 ), showing a relatively higher MeIQx exposure in frequent consumers of pork (including bacon), a lower MeIQx exposure in frequent consumers of pork (including bacon), and a lower MeIQx exposure in frequent consumers of chicken.
Footnotes
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Division of Bioengineering and Environmental Health,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 56-731A, Cambridge, MA
02139-4307. ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: HAA, heterocyclic
amine; PhIP,
2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazol[4,5-b]pyridine; MeIQx,
2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline. ![]()
Received 1/11/00; accepted 1/21/00.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |