
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 9, 395-401, April 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
E2F-1: A Proliferative Marker of Breast Neoplasia1
Shi Yu Zhang,
Shao Chen Liu,
Luma F. Al-Saleem,
Dana Holloran,
James Babb,
Xu Guo and
Andres J. P. Klein-Szanto2
Department of Pathology [S. Y. Z., S. C. L., L. F. A-S., D. H., X. G., A. J. P. K-S.] and Division of Population Science [J. B.], Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
E2F-1 is the best known ultimate transcription factor in the
cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase/retinoblastoma gene pathway and
is probably involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Because
E2F-1 can be detected in paraffin sections using immunohistochemical
techniques, it could be a useful tumor/proliferation marker. We studied
the expression of this gene product in 130 breast tissue specimens from
100 patients and compared it with the expression of Mib-1, the widely
used prognostic/proliferative marker, to assess E2F-1 as a new marker
of neoplastic proliferation. The percentage of E2F-1-positive cells
increased from 1.9% in the normal breast (NB) to 6.3% in ductal
carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to 15.3% in invasive ductal
carcinomas (IDC). In addition, higher-grade tumors as well as
advanced-stage disease correlated with higher expression of E2F-1. A
similar tendency of Mib-1 expression was observed. There was a positive
correlation between the E2F-1 and Mib-1 indices. In an in
vitro experiment, we found that a similar difference in the
expression of E2F-1 existed between a nontumorigenic breast cell line
and two widely used breast carcinoma cell lines. The breast carcinoma
cell lines T-47D and MCF-7 had more E2F-1-positive cells than the
nontumorigenic cell line MCF-10F by immunohistochemistry and Western
blot analysis. Because E2F-1 expression was significantly higher in IDC
and DCIS than in NB, this study indicates that deregulation of E2F-1
may be involved in the development of breast IDC. In addition, E2F-1
expression could also be involved in tumor progression because the
increased E2F-1 index correlated with the known prognostic predictors
of breast cancer, such as histological grade, stage, metastasis status,
estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and Mib-1 expression. Thus,
E2F-1 is a promising candidate to become a new prognostic/predictive
marker of breast cancer.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Several prognostic indicators have been used in recent years to
improve and refine the traditional and powerful morphology-based tumor
diagnosis parameters. Among the markers that can be detected by
immunohistochemistry, those that are cell proliferation-related have
been frequently investigated. A large number of publications on
neoplasms of different organs, including the breast, have shown that
the expression of proliferation-related antigens, such as
PCNA3
and Ki-67 (Mib-1), shows a good correlation with other significant
biomarkers, such as ploidy, and with prognosis (1, 2, 3)
.
Nevertheless, some contradictory findings and technical pitfalls in the
use of PCNA and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry have mitigated the initial
interest in these two markers.
With the recent explosion of knowledge in the field of cell cycle, a
large number of genes that intervene in its regulation have been
identified and characterized. Mammalian cell proliferation is a very
complex process controlled by the so-called cell cycle machinery.
Multiple components, such as cyclins, Cdks, CDKIs, Rbs,
E2Fs, and so forth, are implicated in the transitions from one cell
cycle phase to another. For example, D-type cyclins bind and activate
Cdk4/Cdk6, which phosphorylate the Rb product pRb, and CDKIs
such as p21 and p16 can inhibit the function of Cdks. As a result of
phosphorylation of pRb, E2F is released from pRb-E2F complex. The free
E2F is an active transcription factor that promotes the transcription
of the genes required for DNA synthesis and drives cells from
G1 into S phase (4, 5, 6)
.
Several of the gene products of these CCRGs can be detected
immunohistochemically and have been successfully used in the study of
breast neoplasms (7, 8)
. Several investigators have
employed promising CCRG products as putative tumor and proliferation
markers, cyclin D1 being the most widely studied (8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
.
Because E2F-1 is the best-known ultimate transcription factor activated
in the Cyclin-Cdk-Rb pathway, and antibodies against the
gene product are useful in its immunohistochemical detection, it is an
ideal candidate to be a new tumor/proliferation marker in pathology
studies.
E2F-1 was the first cloned and is the better characterized
member of this gene family (13, 14)
. In vitro
experiments showed that E2F-1 binding activity and mRNA level fluctuate
through the cell cycle, peaking at the G1-S phase boundary.
Overexpression of E2F-1 can drive quiescent cells into S phase and
induce G1 arrested cells into S phase, even in the absence
of Cdk activity (14, 15)
. Several lines of evidence
indicate that E2F-1 is involved in neoplastic development. For example,
overexpression of E2F-1 was shown to induce neoplastic transformation
in cultured fibroblasts (16
, 17)
. In addition,
amplification of the E2F-1 gene was found in an
erythroleukemia cell line (18)
, 4% of gastric carcinomas,
and 25% of colorectal carcinomas (19)
. Furthermore,
increased expression of E2F-1 mRNA was observed in 40% of gastric
carcinomas and in 60% of colorectal adenocarcinomas (19)
.
A recent study showed that loss of E2F-1 reduced the frequency of
pituitary and thyroid tumors in Rb1(+/-) mice (20)
.
Recently, an immunohistochemistry study has demonstrated that E2F-1 is
overexpressed in some non-Hodgkins lymphomas (21)
. In
contrast, E2F-1 gene transfection induced apoptosis in some
cell lines (22
, 23) and E2F-1 knockout mice
developed a variety of tumors (24)
. A recent study of
E2F-1 in the bladder cancer showed that patients with lower E2F-1
protein expression had an adverse outcome (25)
. These
findings suggest that E2F-1 could function as either an
oncogene or a tumor suppressor gene, depending on tissue type and
experimental conditions.
Abnormalities of the cyclin/Cdk/Rb pathway are very common
in breast carcinomas. Among the most frequent changes, we should point
out amplification and overexpression of cyclin D1, overexpression of
cyclin E, and decrease or absent expression of Rb, p16, and
p27 (for reviews, see Refs. 26
27
). It was calculated that one or more
of these alterations could be seen in up to 90% of breast carcinomas
(26)
. To our knowledge, there is no information in the
literature regarding the expression of E2F-1 in primary breast
carcinomas. Thus, with the availability of a specific anti-E2F-1
monoclonal antibody, we studied the expression of this CCRG product in
130 specimens, including NB, DCIS, and IDC of different grades and
stages and compared with the expression of Mib-1, the known
prognostic/proliferative marker, to investigate the feasibility of its
use as a tumor/proliferation marker in these neoplasms.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
One hundred formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded IDCs from 1995
through 1997 were retrieved from the Department of Pathology, Fox Chase
Cancer Center. The patients ranged in age from 30 through 85 years with
a mean age of 58.5. In addition, 15 specimens of NB tissue and 15 DCIS
found in other blocks of the same patients were included in this study.
The diagnosis, histological grade, and stage were classified according
to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system
(28)
. The status of ER and PR of all IDCs were
available from the Department of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center.
The main clinicopathological information of the cases is presented in
Table 1
. Follow-up time of these patients ranged from 20 to 36 months
from diagnosis. Cell lines used in this study were the mammary
epithelial cell line MCF-10F and breast carcinoma cell lines T-47D and
MCF-7. The cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum.
Immunohistochemistry.
Five-µm sections were cut from representative blocks from each case.
The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated with graded
ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed in 1 mM EDTA
(E2F-1) or 0.1 M sodium citrate (Mib-1) for two sets of 5
minutes each, followed by 3% H2O2 and normal
horse serum treatment for 30 min at room temperature, respectively.
Then the sections were incubated with antihuman E2F-1 monoclonal
antibody sc-251 (1:100 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA) or anti-Mib-1 monoclonal antibody (1:100 dilution,
Immunotech, Westbrook, ME) at room temperature for 1 h. The sc-251
antibody is mouse monoclonal IgG2a raised against an epitope of E2F-1
between amino acids 342 and 386. It is specific for this transcription
factor as described and characterized by Helin et al.
(29)
. Mib-1 is a mouse monoclonal IgG1 that specifically
recognizes the Ki-67 nuclear protein. It was raised against a
recombinant human peptide corresponding to a 1002-bp Ki-67 cDNA
fragment (30)
. Reactions were visualized with a
biotinylated antimouse ABC kit (Vestastain Vector Laboratories Inc.,
Burlingame, CA) and chromogen 3,3'-diaminobenzidine and were
counterstained with hematoxylin. E2F-1 transgenic mouse tumors (a kind
gift from Dr. D. Johnson, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center, Smithville, TX) were used as positive control for E2F-1
staining. Normal mouse IgG sc-2025 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.)
replaced the primary antibody as negative control.
To determine the E2F-1 and Mib-1 expression, the average stained region
as near as possible to the central portion of the section was selected.
More than 500 cells were counted at x400 with light microscopy. Only a
nuclear stain was counted as positive. E2F-1 and Mib-1 expression index
was calculated as the number of positive cells divided by the sum of
positive and negative cells, respectively.
Twenty thousand cells from each cell line were seeded in chamber slides
(Nunc Inc. Naperville, IL) with the medium and cells were allowed to
grow to subconfluency. The cells were fixed in cold 70% ethanol at
4°C for 15 min. Then immunostaining was performed on the cells with
the E2F-1 antibody as described above.
Western Blot Analysis of Cell Lines.
Western analysis was performed as described previously
(31)
. In brief, cell lines MCF-10F, T-47D, and MCF-7 were
harvested with trypsin when they were subconfluent and were washed
twice with cold PBS. The cells were lysed in lysis buffer [50
mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40,
50 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3HO4,
1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmetylsulfonyl
fluoride, 25 µg/ml leupeptin, 25 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml
trypsin inhibitor] for 30 min on ice. The cell lysates were clarified
by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm (13,793 x g) for 5
min. The protein concentration of the supernatants was determined
spectrophotometrically at 750 nm (Beckman DU-7 spectrophotometer,
Beckman, Irvine, CA) with the Bio-Rad DC assay kit (Bio-Rad Labs,
Hercules, CA) as suggested by the manufacturer. Eighty µg of total
protein from each sample were subjected to 8% Tris-glycine gel
electrophoresis, as suggested by the manufacturer (Novex, San Diego,
CA) and were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham,
Arlington Heights, IL). Then the membrane was immunoblotted with the
E2F-1 antibody mentioned above. Antihuman actin monoclonal antibody
(sc-8432, 1:200 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as the
loading control. Immunodetection was performed with an ECL kit
(Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL). The E2F-1 bands in the exposed
films were normalized with the actin bands and were evaluated
densitometrically (NIH Image 1.61 software, NIH, Bethesda, MD).
Statistical Analysis.
Differences in immunohistochemical expression across patient groups,
defined by age (
50 versus >50 years), histological grade,
clinical stage, and lymph node, ER, or PR status, were assessed using
the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Pearson product-moment and Spearman rank
correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between
the E2F-1 and MIB-1 indices. The NB, DCIs, and IDC tissue blocks were
compared using a matched-pairs Wilcoxon signed-ranks test or a
Mann-Whitney test, depending, respectively, on whether or not the
tissue blocks being compared were obtained from the same patient.
Logistic regression was implemented to determine whether MIB-1 and/or
E2F-1 expression was a significant predictor of histological grade,
clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, or ER and PR status. The
association between MIB-1 and E2F-1 expression and the time to
recurrence, metastasis, or disease-related death was evaluated using
both the log-rank and the generalized Wilcoxon test.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Immunohistochemistry and Western Analysis of the Breast Cell Lines.
In the first stage of our analysis of E2F-1 expression in breast
epithelial cells, we studied three cell lines of different biological
characteristics. The MCF-10 cell line, an immortalized but
nontumorigenic cell line, exhibited relatively low expression of E2F-1.
This was seen both when the percentage of positive cells (E2F-1
index) was counted (8.3%) as well as when the intensity of
nuclear immunoreaction was evaluated. As can be seen in Fig. 1
, the tumorigenic carcinoma-derived cell line T-47D (Fig. 1B
)
exhibits intense immunostaining in a larger number of cells than the
MCF-10F cell line (Fig. 1A
). The former cell line also
exhibited a much higher E2F-1 index of 35.7%. MCF-7, another
tumorigenic cell line derived from breast cancer, exhibited similar
staining characteristics (data not shown), and its E2F-1 index was
34.8%. Western blot analysis confirmed that the MCF-10 cells expressed
less E2F-1 protein than the breast cancer-derived cell lines (Fig. 2
).

View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. A few nontumorigenic MCF-10F cells showed moderate nuclear immunostain,
whereas most cells were not stained (A). The
breast carcinoma-derived T-47D exhibited numerous intensely stained
cells (B). Normal ductal epithelium showed very few E2F-1
positive cells (C). The number of positive cells increased
in DCIS (D) as well as in low histological grade IDCs
(E). Further increase in the percentage of positively
stained cells was seen in high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas
(F). Mib-1 immunohistochemistry showed similar staining
patterns as the E2F-1 immunostain in both low-grade (G) and
high-grade (H) breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry of
E2F-1 and Mib-1 counterstained with hematoxylin. x450
(AB); x110 (C); x220 (DH).
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Western blot analysis of nontumorigenic MCF-10F cells as well as breast
carcinoma-derived T-47D and MCF-7 cells. The T-47D and MCF-7 breast
carcinoma cell lines expressed 3.8 and 2.4 times, respectively, more
E2F-1 protein than the nontumorigenic cell line. The E2F-1 bands in the
exposed film were normalized with their respective actin bands and were
evaluated densitometrically with the NIH Image 1.61 software (NIH,
Bethesda, MD).
|
|
Immunohistochemistry and Quantitative Analysis of Breast Tissues.
One hundred thirty samples from 100 patients were analyzed for
immunohistochemical expression of E2F-1 and Mib-1. These samples
included 100 IDCs, 15 DCIS, and 15 histologically NB tissue blocks. All
of the samples of IDC, DCIS, and NB showed positive staining for E2F-1
and Mib-1. The E2F-1 immunoreaction was localized to the nuclei, with a
few cases exhibiting light cytoplasmic staining. The great majority of
positive nuclei in the three different types of tissues had intense or
moderately intense nuclear staining. The percentage of positively
stained cells (E2F-1 index) varied both within and between the
different tissue types. Nevertheless, there was a gradual increase in
E2F-1 index from normal tissue to DCIS and to IDC. Overall, the
mean E2F-1 index was 1.9% for NB, 6.3% for DCIS, and 15.3% for IDC
(Table 1
; Fig. 1, CF
). Expression of E2F-1 in IDC and in DCIS was
significantly higher than in NB (P < 0.0002). In
addition, the expression of E2F-1 in IDC was significantly higher than
in DCIS (P < 0.001; Table 1
). A similar significant
increase in staining pattern was observed using the Mib-1 antibody: the
mean Mib-1 index was 1.9% for NB, 8.2% for DCIS, and 21.1% for IDC
(Table 1
; Fig. 1, G and H
). In general, the Mib-1
index was slightly higher than the E2F-1 index. In particular, among
IDC samples, Mib-1 expression was higher than E2F-1 expression in 79
out of 100 tissue samples and had a significantly higher median
(16.6%) than E2F-1 (median, 13.0%; P < 0.0001). As
evidenced in Fig. 3
, there was a strong, statistically significant (P <
0.001), positive correlation between the E2F-1 and Mib-1 indices in the
IDC tissue blocks (the Pearson product-moment and Spearman rank
correlation coefficients were 0.78 and 0.82, respectively).
Table 2
summarizes the comparisons and statistical data. IDC patients 50 years
old or younger had higher average E2F-1 and Mib-1 expression than did
patients older than 50. IDCs with higher histological grade (Fig. 1, F and H
) had significantly higher E2F-1 and Mib-1
expression than lower-grade carcinomas (Fig. 1, E and G
). Similarly, higher clinical stages had increased
expression of both markers when compared with low stage (Table 2)
. IDCs
with lymph node metastases had significantly higher immunohistochemical
expression than IDCs without lymph node metastases whereas expression
was significantly lower among IDC patients with positive ER or PR
status than among patients with negative status (Table 2)
.
Logistic regression was implemented to determine whether Mib-1
and/or E2F-1 expression was a significant predictor of histological
grade, clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, or ER and PR status. The
results showed that E2F-1 was a statistically significant predictor of
each and every factor, whereas Mib-1 was not a significant predictor of
either lymph node metastasis or PR status. Overall, Mib-1 was found to
be the most efficient single predictor of histological grade and ER
status, and E2F-1 was the best predictor of each of the three remaining
factors.
Using both the log-rank and the generalized Wilcoxon tests, E2F-1 and
Mib-1 were each observed to be significantly associated (P,
<0.03) with the time to recurrence, metastasis, or disease-related
death. Specifically, the time to the first adverse event tended to
decrease as the expression of either marker increased. However, after
adjusting for patient differences with respect to age, histological
grade, clinical stage, and lymph node, ER, or PR status, neither marker
was observed to be a significant independent predictor of time
to untoward event.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
IDC is a very common human breast neoplasm, accounting for
7080% of all breast malignancies. The use of several markers such as
ploidy, ER, PR, c-erbB-2, p53, and proliferation indicators have been
accepted as useful prognostic and predictive factors (8
, 32)
. Among the proliferation markers detectable in
situ by immunohistochemical procedures, PCNA, Ki-67, and Mib-1
have been frequently used in breast cancer (33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40)
. The
Ki-67 monoclonal antibody detects a nonhistone protein of unknown
function that is present in all of the phases of cell cycle except
G0 and very early G1. Its positivity correlates
with other parameters of cell proliferation, such as thymidine-labeling
index, S-phase fraction, and mitotic count (37)
. It also
correlates well with other prognostic factors, such as histological
grade and hormone status (32
, 35)
. However a disadvantage
of the Ki-67 antibody is that it is reactive only in frozen sections. A
newer antibody, Mib-1, which reacts with an antigenic epitope of Ki-67,
is active on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Several studies
have shown that Mib-1 can be used as a prognostic/proliferative marker
in breast cancer (32
, 41, 42)
.
PCNA is also a nonhistone nuclear antigen that is a cofactor for
DNA polymerase delta. PCNA increases during G1
phase, reaches maximal value in S phase, and decreases in
G2-M phase. Expression of PCNA in breast cancer has been
correlated with thymidine-labeling index and weakly with S-phase
fraction (37
, 40)
. A relationship with histological grade
and prognosis of breast cancer is controversial (43, 44)
.
Immunohistochemistry of cyclin D1, one of the positive regulators of
cell cycle, was considered as a potential prognostic/tumor marker in
breast cancer (7
, 8)
. Overexpression of cyclin D1 was
observed in more than 50% of breast carcinomas (10
, 11)
.
Higher-grade tumors exhibited a more intense nuclear stain than the
low-grade tumors (11)
. Overexpression of cyclin D1 was
positively correlated with ER (12)
and negatively
correlated with histological grade and mitotic activity
(45)
. Some studies could not find a relationship between
cyclin D1 and prognosis (46, 47)
. Interestingly, some
investigators found that overexpression of cyclin D1 is associated with
a better prognosis (48)
. There is lack of agreement as to
the prognostic/predictive significance of the markers mentioned above
in breast cancer. Thus, there is a need for reliable markers.
Because E2F-1 is an important downstream regulator in the
cyclin-Cdk-Rb pathway of cell cycle, and its deregulation
seems to be implicated in tumor development, E2F-1 could be useful as a
prognostic marker. In the present study, we used a new E2F-1 monoclonal
antibody to detect this important CCRG product in a series of breast
IDCs and compared with Mib-1 index. Because we found a gradual increase
of E2F-1 expression from normal to outright malignancy, these two sets
of data based on in vivo and in vitro evaluation
suggest that overexpression of E2F-1 may be involved in the development
of breast cancer of ductal origin.
Furthermore, E2F-1 and Mib-1 indices increased with IDC histological
grade and clinical stage. The histological grade, combining the aspects
of tubular formation, nuclear atypia, and mitotic count, is accepted as
a prognostic indicator of breast cancer. Higher histologic grade of
breast cancer has poorer prognosis. The clinical stage is also an
important prognostic indicator for breast cancer. The higher the stage,
the poorer the prognosis (3
, 33, 34
, 49) . The ability of
regional lymph node status to predict the outcome of breast cancer is
well known. The breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph
nodes have a poorer disease-free and overall-survival rate after 510
years of follow-up compared with the patients without metastases
(3
, 33, 34
, 49) . The primary tumors with lymph node
metastasis had higher E2F-1 and Mib-1 expression than those without
lymph node metastasis.
An inverse relationship between E2F-1 and Mib-1 expression and patient
age was observed. This may reflect the fact that breast cancer in
younger patients often progresses more rapidly.
An inverse relationship was also observed between E2F-1 expression and
ER- and PR-positive tumors, respectively. Previous studies showed that
a negative correlation between ER/PR status and different proliferation
indices (including thymidine-labeling index, S-phase fraction,
PCNA, and Ki-67/Mib-1) existed in breast cancer (3
, 34
, 37
, 39)
. The breast cancer patients with ER- and/or PR-positive
tumors have better prognosis or respond better to hormone therapy
(3
, 33, 34)
. Supporting its potential role as a tumor
marker, we have found parallel tendencies in the Mib-1 index and a
strong positive correlation between the E2F-1 and Mib-1 indices.
The present study showed a similar pattern of immunostaining for E2F-1
and Mib-1. E2F-1 index and Mib-1 index had similar correlation with
multiple clinicopathological parameters such as age, histological
grade, clinical stage, lymph node status, and status of ER and PR.
Furthermore, statistical analysis established a positive correlation
between E2F-1 and the Mib-1 index. Taken together, these
associations between E2F-1 and indicators of poor prognosis suggest
that high E2F-1 expression in IDC is itself a possible predictive
factor.
Our study suggests that deregulation of E2F-1 may be involved in the
development of breast IDC, because E2F-1 expression was significantly
higher in IDC and DCIS than in NB. Furthermore, E2F-1 expression could
also be involved in tumor progression because the increased E2F-1 was a
sensitive predictor of clinical stage and lymph node metastasis status.
Statistical analysis of our results showed that E2F-1 correlated quite
well with Mib-1 indices. With a few exceptions, E2F-1 did not improve
our capacity to prognosticate outcome. The association between each
marker and untoward event (i.e., death, metastasis, and
local recurrence) could be explained, to a significant degree, by the
relationship of each to grade, stage, and so forth. Once these factors
are accounted for, neither marker significantly improved our ability to
predict a poor prognosis. Nevertheless, it has to be emphasized that,
at this time, our survival observation period is in most cases between
20 and 30 months. It is possible that an improvement in prognostication
will be established once our observation period reaches the more
significant period of 5 years. Taken together, E2F-1 seems to be at
least as useful as Mib-1 as a biomarker of breast lesion proliferation
and as a prognostic marker, and it has the advantage over the latter in
that it is a well-known cell cycle regulating protein. The Mib-1
antigen, Ki-67, is very popular as a marker of cell proliferation, but
its role in the cell cycle is unknown. Thus, E2F-1, a gene product
backed by a solid molecular rationale, is a promising candidate to
become a new prognostic/predictive marker of breast cancer.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by NIH Grants CA-06927 and
CA-71539 and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Pathology, Fox Chase Cancer Center,
Philadelphia, PA 19111. Phone: (215) 728-3154; Fax: (215) 728-2899;
E-mail: AJ_Klein-Szanto{at}fccc.edu 
3 The abbreviations used are: PCNA, proliferating
cell nuclear antigen; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; Rb,
retinoblastoma gene; pRb, retinoblastoma protein; NB, normal breast;
DCIS, ductal carcinoma(s) in situ; IDC, invasive ductal
carcinoma; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; CDKI, Cdk
inhibitor; CCRG, cell cycle regulating gene. 
Received 8/10/99;
revised 12/ 7/99;
accepted 1/17/00.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Wilkinson E. J., Hendricks J. B. Role of the pathologist in biomarker studies. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl., 23: 10-18, 1995.[Medline]
-
Schwartz G. F., Schwarting R., Rabindranauth P., Finfel G. C. Clinical applications of serum and tissue markers in malignant disease: breast cancer as the paradigm. Clin. Chem., 39: 2404-2412, 1993.[Abstract]
-
Ravdin P. M. Prognostic factors in breast cancer Bonadonna G. Hortobagyi G. N. Gianni A. M. eds. . Textbook of Breast CancerA Clinical Guide to Therapy, : 35-63, Martin Dunitz Ltd London 1997.
-
Weinberg R. A. The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell, 81: 323-330, 1995.[Medline]
-
Bartek J., Bartkova J., Lukas J. The retinoblastoma protein pathway and the restriction point. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 8: 805-814, 1996.[Medline]
-
Sherr C. J. Cancer cell cycles. Science (Washington DC), 274: 1672-1677, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Landberg G., Roos G. The cell cycle in breast cancer. APMIS, 105: 575-589, 1997.[Medline]
-
Dutta A., Chandra R., Leiter L. M., Lester S. Cyclins as markers of tumor proliferation: immunohistochemical studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 5386-5390, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weinstat-Saslow D., Merino M. J., Manrow R. E., Lawrence J. A., Bluth R. F., Wittenbel K. D., Simpson J. F., Page D. L., Steeg P. S. Overexpression of cyclin D mRNA distinguishes invasive and in situ breast carcinomas from non-malignant lesions. Nat. Med., 1: 1257-1260, 1995.[Medline]
-
Oyama T., Kashiwabara K., Yoshimoto K., Arnold A., Koerner F. Frequent overexpression of cyclin D1 oncogene in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Res., 58: 2876-2880, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhang S. Y., Camano J., Cooper F., Guo X., Klein-Szanto A. J. P. Immunohistochemistry of cyclin D1 in human breast cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 102: 695-698, 1994.[Medline]
-
Barnes D. M. Cyclin D1 in mammary carcinoma. J. Pathol., 181: 267-269, 1997.[Medline]
-
Slansky J. E., Farnham P. J. Introduction to E2F family: protein structure and gene regulation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 208: 1-30, 1996.[Medline]
-
Johnson D. G., Schwarz J. K., Cress W. D., Nevins J. R. Expression of transcription factor E2F-1 induces quiescent cells to enter S phase. Nature (Lond.), 365: 349-352, 1993.[Medline]
-
Degregori J., Leone G., Ohtani K., Miron A., Nevins J. R. E2F1 accumulation bypasses a G1 arrest resulting from the inhibition of G1 cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Genes Dev., 9: 2873-2887, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Singh P., Wong S. H., Hong W. Overexpression of E2F-1 in rat embryo fibroblasts leads to neoplastic transformation. EMBO J., 13: 3329-3338, 1994.[Medline]
-
Johnson D. G., Cress W. D., Jakoi L., Nevins J. R. Oncogenic capacity of the E2F1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 12823-12827, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saito M., Helin K., Valentine M. B., Griffith B. B., Willman C. L., Harlow E. Amplification of the E2F-1 transcription gene in the HEL erythroleukemia cell line. Genomics, 25: 130-138, 1995.[Medline]
-
Suzuki T., Yasui W., Yokozaki H., Naka K., Ishikawa T., Tahara E. Expression of the E2F family in human gastrointestinal carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer, 81: 535-538, 1999.[Medline]
-
Yamasaki L., Bronson R., Williams B. O., Dyson N. J., Harlow E., Jacks T. Loss of E2F-1 reduced tumorigenesis and extends the lifespan of Rb1(+/-) mice. Nat. Genet., 18: 360-364, 1998.[Medline]
-
Lai R., Medeiros L. J., Coupland R., McCourty A., Brynes R. K. Immunohistochemical detection of E2F-1 in non-Hodgkins lymphomas: a survey of 124 cases. Mod. Pathol., 11: 457-463, 1998.[Medline]
-
Qin X. Q., Livingston D. M., Kaelin W. G., Adams P. D. Deregulated transcription factor E2F-1 expression leads to S-phase and p53-mediated apoptosis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 10918-10922, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hunt K. K., Deng J., Liu T. J., Wilson-Heiner M., Swisher S. G., Clayman G., Hung M. C. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of the transcription factor E2F-1 induces apoptosis in human breast and ovarian-carcinoma cell lines and does not require p53.. Cancer Res., 57: 4722-4726, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yamasaki L., Jack T., Bronson R., Goillot E., Harlow E., Dyson N. J. Tumor induction and tissue atrophy in mice lacking E2F-1. Cell, 85: 539-548, 1996.
-
Rabbani F., Richon V. M., Orlow I., Lu M. L., Drobnjak M., Dudas M., Charytonowicz M., Dalbagni G., Cordon-Cardo C. Prognostic significance of transcription factor E2F-1 in bladder cancer: genotypic and phenotypic characterization. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 874-881, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nielsen N. H., Loden M., Cajander J., Emdin S. O., Landberg G. G1-S transition defects occur in most breast cancers and predict outcome. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 56: 105-112, 1999.[Medline]
-
Fernandez P. L., Jares P., Rey M. J., Campo E., Cardesa A. Cell cycle regulators and their abnormalities in breast cancer. Mol. Pathol., 51: 305-309, 1998.[Abstract]
-
American Joint Committee on Cancer Breast. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Ed. 5 171-178, Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia 1997.
-
Helin K., Wu C., Fattaey A. R., Lees J. A., Dynlacht B., Ngwu C., Harlow E. Heterodimerization of the transcription factor E2F-1 and DP-1 leads to cooperative trans-activation. Genes Dev., 7: 1850-1861, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gerdes J., Li L., Schluer C., Duchrow M., Wohlenberg C., Gerlach C., Stahmer I., Kloth S., Brandt E., Flad H. D. Immunobiochemical and molecular biologic characterization of the cell proliferation-associated nuclear antigen that is defined by monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Am. J. Pathol., 138: 867-873, 1991.[Abstract]
-
Zhang S. Y., Liu S. C., Goodrow T., Morris R., Klein-Szanto A. J. P. Increased expression of G1 cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases during tumor progression of chemically induced mouse skin neoplasms. Mol. Carcinog., 18: 142-152, 1997.[Medline]
-
Allred D. C., Harvey J. M., Berardo M., Clark G. M. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod. Pathol., 11: 155-168, 1998.[Medline]
-
Page D. L., Jensen R. A., Simpson J. F. Premalignant and malignant disease of the breast: the role of the pathologist. Mod. Pathol., 11: 120-128, 1998.[Medline]
-
Kollias J., Elston C. W., Ellis I. O., Robertson J. F. R., Blamey R. W. Early-onset breast cancer: histopathological and prognostic considerations. Br. J. Cancer, 75: 1318-1323, 1997.[Medline]
-
Linden M. D., Torres F. X., Kubus J., Zarbo L. J. Clinical application of morphologic and immunohistochemical assessments of cell proliferation. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 10: 565-573, 1992.
-
Leonardi E., Girlando S., Serio G. PCNA and Ki-67 expression in breast carcinoma: correlation with clinical and biological variables. J. Clin. Pathol., 45: 416-419, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Keshgegian A. A., Anaan A. Proliferation markers in breast carcinoma: mitotic figure count, S-phase fraction, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Ki-67 and Mib-1. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 104: 42-49, 1995.[Medline]
-
Gee J. M. W., Douglas-Jones A., Hepburn P., Sharma A. K., McClelland R. A., Ellis I. O., Nicholson R. I. A cautionary note regarding the application of Ki-67 antibodies to paraffin-embedded breast cancers. J. Pathol., 177: 285-293, 1995.[Medline]
-
Querzoli P., Albonico G., Ferretti S., Rinaldi R., Magri E., Indelli M., Nenci I. Mib-1 proliferative activity in invasive breast cancer measured by image analysis. J. Clin. Pathol., 49: 926-930, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ellis P. A., Makris A., Burton S. A., Titley J., Ormerod M. G., Salter J., Powles T. J., Smith I. E., Dowsett M. Comparison of Mib-1 proliferation index with S-phase fraction in human breast carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer, 73: 640-643, 1996.[Medline]
-
Jansen R. L., Hupperets P. S., Arends J. W., Joosten-Achjanie S. R., Volovics A., Schouten H. C., Hillen H. F. Mib-1 labelling index is an independent prognostic marker in primary breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 73: 640-645, 1998.
-
Thor A. D., Liu S., Moore D. H., II, Edgerton S. M. Comparison of mitotic index in vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling, and Mib-1 assay to quantitate proliferation in breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 17: 470-477, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haerslev T., Jacobsen G. K., Zedeler K. Correlation of growth fraction by Ki-67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemistry with histopathological parameters and prognosis in primary breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 37: 101-113, 1996.[Medline]
-
van Dierendonck J. H., Wijsman J. H., Keijzer R., van de Velde C. J. H., Cornelisse C. J. Cell-cycle-related staining patterns of anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen monoclonal antibodies: comparison with BrdU labeling and Ki-67 staining. Am. J. Pathol., 138: 1165-1172, 1991.[Abstract]
-
van Diest P. J., Michalides R. J., Jannink I., van der Valk P., Peterse H. L., de Jong J. S., Meijer C. J. L. M., Baak J. P. A. Cyclin D1 expression in invasive breast cancer: correlations and prognostic value. Am. J. Pathol., 150: 705-711, 1997.[Abstract]
-
McIntosh G. G., Anderson J. J., Milton I. Determination of the prognostic value of cyclin D1 overexpression in breast cancer. Oncogene, 11: 885-891, 1995.[Medline]
-
Michalides R., Hageman P., van Tinteren H. A clinicopathological study on overexpression of cyclin D1 and p53 in a series of 248 patients with operable breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 73: 728-734, 1996.[Medline]
-
Gillette C., Smith P., Gregory W., Richards M., Millis R., Peters G., Barnes D. Cyclin D1 and prognosis in human breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 69: 92-99, 1996.[Medline]
-
Kinne D. M. Staging and follow-up of breast cancer patients. Cancer (Phila.), 67: 1196-1198, 1991.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Molina-Privado, M. Rodriguez-Martinez, P. Rebollo, D. Martin-Perez, M.-J. Artiga, J. Menarguez, E. K. Flemington, M. A. Piris, and M. R. Campanero
E2F1 Expression Is Deregulated and Plays an Oncogenic Role in Sporadic Burkitt's Lymphoma
Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2009;
69(9):
4052 - 4058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-l. Huang, D. Liu, J. Nakano, H. Yokomise, M. Ueno, K. Kadota, and H. Wada
E2F1 Overexpression Correlates with Thymidylate Synthase and Survivin Gene Expressions and Tumor Proliferation in Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2007;
13(23):
6938 - 6946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. X. Zou, A. S. Revenko, L. B. Li, A. T. Gemo, and H.-W. Chen
ANCCA, an estrogen-regulated AAA+ ATPase coactivator for ER{alpha}, is required for coregulator occupancy and chromatin modification
PNAS,
November 13, 2007;
104(46):
18067 - 18072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Stender, J. Frasor, B. Komm, K. C. N. Chang, W. L. Kraus, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen
Estrogen-Regulated Gene Networks in Human Breast Cancer Cells: Involvement of E2F1 in the Regulation of Cell Proliferation
Mol. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 2007;
21(9):
2112 - 2123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Verlinden, I. Vanden Bempt, G. Eelen, M. Drijkoningen, I. Verlinden, K. Marchal, C. De Wolf-Peeters, M.-R. Christiaens, L. Michiels, R. Bouillon, et al.
The E2F-Regulated Gene Chk1 Is Highly Expressed in Triple-Negative Estrogen Receptor /Progesterone Receptor /HER-2 Breast Carcinomas
Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2007;
67(14):
6574 - 6581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Davis, K. J. Wojno, S. Daignault, M. D. Hofer, R. Kuefer, M. A. Rubin, and M. L. Day
Elevated E2F1 Inhibits Transcription of the Androgen Receptor in Metastatic Hormone-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2006;
66(24):
11897 - 11906.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-O. Yoon, S. Shin, and A. M. Mercurio
Ras Stimulation of E2F Activity and a Consequent E2F Regulation of Integrin {alpha}6{beta}4 Promote the Invasion of Breast Carcinoma Cells.
Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2006;
66(12):
6288 - 6295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Louie, A. S. Revenko, J. X. Zou, J. Yao, and H.-W. Chen
Direct Control of Cell Cycle Gene Expression by Proto-Oncogene Product ACTR, and Its Autoregulation Underlies Its Transforming Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 15, 2006;
26(10):
3810 - 3823.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhao, J. Tan, L. Zhuang, X. Jiang, E. T. Liu, and Q. Yu
Inhibitors of histone deacetylases target the Rb-E2F1 pathway for apoptosis induction through activation of proapoptotic protein Bim
PNAS,
November 1, 2005;
102(44):
16090 - 16095.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Yamazaki, M Hasegawa, I Ohoka, K Hanami, A Asoh, T Nagao, I Sugano, and Y Ishida
Increased E2F-1 expression via tumour cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis are correlated with adverse prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus
J. Clin. Pathol.,
September 1, 2005;
58(9):
904 - 910.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. N. Davis, M. T. McCabe, S. W. Hayward, J. M. Park, and M. L. Day
Disruption of Rb/E2F Pathway Results in Increased Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression and Activity in Prostate Epithelial Cells
Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2005;
65(9):
3633 - 3642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Louie, J. X. Zou, A. Rabinovich, and H.-W. Chen
ACTR/AIB1 Functions as an E2F1 Coactivator To Promote Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Antiestrogen Resistance
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2004;
24(12):
5157 - 5171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Bourdeau, J. Deschenes, R. Metivier, Y. Nagai, D. Nguyen, N. Bretschneider, F. Gannon, J. H. White, and S. Mader
Genome-Wide Identification of High-Affinity Estrogen Response Elements in Human and Mouse
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2004;
18(6):
1411 - 1427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Kwong, T. V. Nguyen, R. J. Bova, J. G. Kench, I. E. Cole, E. A. Musgrove, S. M. Henshall, and R. L. Sutherland
Overexpression of E2F-1 Is Associated with Increased Disease-free Survival in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anterior Tongue
Clin. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2003;
9(10):
3705 - 3711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ryo, Y.-C. Liou, K. P. Lu, and G. Wulf
Prolyl isomerase Pin1: a catalyst for oncogenesis and a potential therapeutic target in cancer
J. Cell Sci.,
March 1, 2003;
116(5):
773 - 783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ryo, Y.-C. Liou, G. Wulf, M. Nakamura, S. W. Lee, and K. P. Lu
PIN1 Is an E2F Target Gene Essential for Neu/Ras-Induced Transformation of Mammary Epithelial Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 1, 2002;
22(15):
5281 - 5295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y. Zhang, S. C. Liu, D. G. Johnson, and A. J. P. Klein-Szanto
E2F-1 Gene Transfer Enhances Invasiveness of Human Head and Neck Carcinoma Cell Lines
Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2000;
60(21):
5972 - 5976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|