CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Renner, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Renner, T.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 9, 373-380, April 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research

Biomonitoring of Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of Nonoccupationally Exposed Persons1

Gerhard Scherer2, Stefanie Frank, Kirsten Riedel, Irmtrud Meger-Kossien and Thomas Renner

Analytisch-biologisches Forschungslabor, D-80336 München, Germany


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Analytical Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a field study with 69 subjects, we investigated the influence of smoking, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), diet, and location of residence on biomarkers for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), including urinary excretion of 1-hydroxypyrene and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) adducts of hemoglobin and albumin. The self-reported smoking status and the extent of ETS exposure were verified by urinary cotinine measurements. ETS exposure was quantified by nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine measurements on personal samplers worn by the nonsmokers over 5 or 7 days before blood and urine samples were collected. Smokers (n = 27), on average, excreted 0.346 µg/24 h 1-hydroxypyrene, whereas the corresponding value for nonsmokers (n = 42) was 0.157 µg/24 h. Average BaP adduct levels with hemoglobin and albumin were 0.105 fmol/mg and 0.042 fmol/mg, respectively, for smokers, and 0.068 fmol/mg and 0.020 fmol/mg, respectively, for nonsmokers. The differences, except for the hemoglobin adducts, were statistically significant. Of the 42 nonsmokers, 19 were classified as passive smokers. There was no significant difference in the PAH biomarkers between nonsmokers exposed to ETS and those not or rarely exposed to ETS.

Total dietary BaP intake, as calculated from questionnaire data, did not correlate with any of the PAH biomarkers (r < 0.1). Subjects living in the suburbs tended to have higher BaP-protein adduct levels than subjects living in the city.

Our findings suggest that diet and smoking are major sources for PAH exposure of persons not occupationally exposed to PAH, whereas the influence of ETS exposure is negligible. The lack of correlation between the dietary PAH intake and the PAH biomarkers may be due to the inaccuracy of the estimate for the dietary PAH intake.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Analytical Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PAHs3 are formed during incomplete combustions and occur ubiquitously in the environment and at various workplaces (1) . Eleven members of the class of PAH (e.g., BaP) are carcinogenic (1) . For nonoccupationally exposed persons, diet, ambient air, tobacco smoke, and coal-tar-containing medications are the main sources of PAH exposure (2) . The daily intake of BaP with the diet is estimated to range from 120-2800 ng/day (2) . Mainstream smoke yields of BaP for filter cigarettes amount to about 10 ng/cigarette (3 , 4) , leading to an intake of about 200 ng/day for a pack-a-day cigarette smoker. BaP intake from ambient air by inhalation and from water is predicted to contribute about 2% and 1%, respectively, to the total daily intake of BaP in nonsmokers (2) . The contribution of ETS exposure is estimated to be <1% (5) .

Biomonitoring is an especially valuable method to provide exposure data on multimedia environmental contaminants such as PAH (6 , 7) . Various urinary PAH metabolites such as 1-OHP, 1-OHP-glucuronide, monohydroxy-phenanthrenes, and BaP (after chemical reduction of the BaP metabolites in urine) have been used as PAH biomarkers in nonoccupationally exposed subjects. The effective dose can be determined by measuring the adducts formed by the ultimate carcinogen of BaP (r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,t-10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene, BPDE) with cellular macromolecules such as DNA and proteins. In addition to numerous biomonitoring studies with workers exposed to PAH (for review see Refs. 7 and 8 ), the effect of smoking, diet, automobile traffic, and ETS on the PAH adduct levels has been investigated using DNA of WBCs. BPDE also forms covalent adducts with albumin (9) and hemoglobin (10) , both of which can be used as surrogate biomarkers for the internal exposure dose to the ultimate carcinogen BPDE (11) . BaP-albumin adduct studies with nonoccupationally exposed subjects have been performed using ELISA (12, 13, 14, 15) , GC-MS (16) , and HPLC with fluorescence detection (17) . Similarly, BaP hemoglobin adducts have been investigated with GC-MS (16 , 18, 19, 20) . Smoking was found to increase the BaP protein adduct levels in most of the studies (12 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 19) . ETS exposure was reported to significantly increase BaP albumin adduct levels in one study (12) , but not in other studies (13 , 21) . Exposure to PAH from ambient air (traffic exhaust) had no, or only a marginal, effect on the BaP adduct levels (18 , 21) . Elevated BaP-hemoglobin adduct levels were found in winter compared with summer (22) .

The purpose of our investigation was to elucidate the influence of smoking, exposure to ETS, and diet on the exposure to PAH in healthy, nonoccupationally exposed subjects. The extent of exposure to PAH was determined by measuring the PAH biomarkers urinary 1-OHP six times per subject and the BaP adducts with albumin and hemoglobin once during the 8-month study period.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Analytical Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects and Study Design.
Sixty-nine subjects (41 men and 28 women), 18–70 years of age (mean ± SD, 35.4 ± 10.5 years), took part in the study, which lasted from March to October 1996. The subjects were selected so that the subgroups of "smokers," "ETS-exposed nonsmokers" (nonsmokers who have a smoking spouse or reported frequent ETS exposure), and "nonsmokers" (subjects who have a nonsmoking spouse and reported to be rarely exposed to ETS) were of about equal size. Ex-smokers who had quit smoking for >1 year were classified as nonsmokers. All subjects were healthy and lived in the city or suburbs of Munich, Germany. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before taking part in the study. The subjects visited the laboratory six times at intervals of 4–8 weeks. At each visit, a blood sample was taken and a 24 h-urine sample was returned. The urine was collected from the day before the visit until the morning of the visit. The subjects completed a protocol on their daily eating, drinking, and tobacco smoke exposure. The smokers recorded the number of cigarettes smoked during each hour. The nonsmokers indicated the times when they were exposed to ETS and were asked to rate the intensity in three grades (1 = low, 2 = medium, and 3 = strong exposure to ETS). This protocol covered the 7 days before each visit and was structured on an hourly basis. The nonsmokers were asked to wear a personal sampler for nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine during the 7 days before the first three visits and during 5 days before the following three visits. All variables, except for the BaP protein adducts, were measured at each visit (six times), and the means were used for evaluation. The BaP adducts were only measured in the samples from the second visit.

Dietary BaP Intake.
On the basis of published data (2 , 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29) , the following BaP concentrations of food products were used for estimating the BaP intake from the reported food consumption data (µg/kg): cereals and bread, 0.2; leafy vegetables, 5.0; root vegetables and fruits, 0.2; meat and sausages, 3.0; fish, 1.0; and dairy products, 0.5.

Biological Samples.
Twenty-four-h urine samples were collected after voiding the first morning urine until the following morning (including the first morning urine). The sample was stored in a cooling box until it was returned to the laboratory. In the laboratory, pH and volume were determined within 2 h, before the sample was divided into several fractions and frozen at -20°C.

Blood samples were drawn into EDTA-tubes and separated by centrifugation (500 x g, 10 min, 10°C) into plasma and erythrocytes. The blood fractions were stored until analysis at -20°C.


   Analytical Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Analytical Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Albumin adducts of BaP.
The method has been described elsewhere (30) . Briefly, an equivalent of 100–200 mg of albumin (corresponding to 2–5 ml of plasma), together with 330 pg of (±)-BaP-r-7,t-8,c-9,c-10-tetrahydrotetrol (BT II-2; NCI Carcinogen Standard Repository, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, MO) as internal standard, was digested overnight with 20 mg of Pronase E (Streptomyces griseus, 7000 units/g; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) to destroy the tertiary structure of the protein. The BaP-related esters were cleaved under vacuum conditions at pH 11 and 80°C for 2 h. After solid phase extraction with C18-cartridges, the sample was applied to an RP18-Alkyl-Diol-Silica enrichment column (RP18-ADS; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) connected to a HPLC system (Model 1050; Hewlett Packard, Waldbronn, Germany). The fraction of the eluate containing the analyte (±)-BaP-r-7,t-8,t-9,c-10-tetrahydrotetrol (BT I-1) and the internal standard BT II-2 was collected, and the methanol was evaporated, diluted with 4 ml of water, and extracted twice with 4 ml of ethyl acetate. (±)-BaP-r-7,t-8,t-9,t-10-tetrahydrotetrol (BT I-2, 220 pg.; NCI Carcinogen Standard Repository, Midwest Research Institute) was added as a second internal standard. After silylation, 10 µl were injected into the GC-MS system (GC 8000 Top and MD 800 from ThermoQuest, Egelsbach, Germany). NICI was applied using methane as a reactant gas. For quantitation of the results, the ion m/z 284 (relative abundance, 46%) was used while the fragment ions at m/z 446.1 and m/z 447.1 (relative abundances, 19% and 18%, respectively) served for confirmation. Adduct concentrations were calculated by a five-point calibration curve in the range of 0.04- 4.0 pg of BT I-1/injection. BT I-1 for calibration was obtained from the NCI Carcinogen Standard Repository (Midwest Research Institute). The LOD for the albumin adducts of BaP was 0.011 fmol/mg, and the recovery rate was 51 ± 26% (n = 69). All 69 samples from the second visit were run in duplicate, with a coefficient of variation of 22%.

Hemoglobin Adducts of BaP.
Washed erythrocytes from 10 ml of blood were lysed with 20 ml of bidestilled water and centrifuged (13,000 x g, 45 min, 4°C). The hemoglobin concentration in the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically (31) . After adding the internal standard (BT II-2) to 200 mg of hemoglobin, the protein was digested with Pronase (16 h, 37°C) to destroy the tertiary structure and the adducts were hydrolyzed (pH 11, 2 h, 80°C). The aqueous hydrolysate was applied to an Extrelut 20-column (1.5 x 23 cm, 80 ml; Merck) and eluted with 40 ml of ethyl acetate. The solvent was removed with a rotary evaporator and finally in a nitrogen stream. The dry residue was dissolved in 1 ml of water/methanol (80:20, v/v) and injected into the HPLC. The further steps were performed as described for the albumin adducts of BaP (see above and Ref. 30 ). The LOD for the hemoglobin adducts of BaP was 0.007 fmol/mg, and the recovery rate was 55 ± 17% (n = 69). All 69 samples from the second visit were run in duplicate, with a coefficient of variation of 30%.

Urinary 1-OHP.
1-OHP was determined according to a published method (32) . Briefly, to 10 ml of urine, 20 ml of 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and 13 µl of ß-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase (Boehringer Mannheim) were added and incubated for 5 h at 37°C in the dark. The solution was applied to a Sepak C18 cartridge (Varian GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and eluted with 2 ml of methanol. After the addition of 2 ml of 20 mM potassium dihydrogenphosphate, 20 µl were injected into the HPLC system (Model 2510 pump system, Model 9090 autosampler, and Model 4270 integrator; Varian GmbH), equipped with a column oven and a fluorescence detector (Model FP-920; Jasco, Groß-Umstadt, Germany). A C18-guard column and a C18-analytical column (4.6 x 250 mm; Symmetry, Waters, Milford, MA) were used. The retention time for 1-OHP was 19.5 min. The calibration curve (10 points) was constructed with spiked urine samples (0.05- 0.5 µg/l). The recovery rate was 94%, and the LOD was 0.01 µg/l. All urine samples (69 subjects x 6 time points - 5 missing samples = 409) were run in duplicate, with a coefficient of variation of 8%.

Cotinine in Plasma.
Cotinine in plasma was determined by a RIA (33 , 34) . The LOD was 1 µg/l. All 409 plasma samples were run in duplicate, with a coefficient of variation of 10%.

Cotinine in Urine.
Cotinine in urine was determined by GC with a nitrogen-selective detector according to a published method (35) . The LOD was 1 µg/l. About 40% of the 409 urine samples were run in duplicate, with a coefficient of variation of 5%.

Thiocyanate in Plasma.
Thiocyanate in plasma was determined photometrically according to a published method (36) . The method was adapted to microtiter plate scale. The difference of the absorbance after adding iron(III)nitrate (formation of a red-colored complex) and after the addition of mercury-(II)nitrate (formation of a colorless complex) was measured at a wavelength of 492 nm.

Nicotine and 3-Ethenylpyridine on Personal Samplers.
Nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine were sampled on passive diffusion samplers (37) worn by the nonsmoking subjects over 5 or 7 days and analyzed as reported (37) . The LOD was 0.01 µg/m3 for both compounds using GC with nitrogen-selective detection.

Statistical Methods.
Differences between the three groups according to smoking status (nonsmokers, passive smokers, smokers) were tested with the Students t test. The associations between the PAH biomarkers (dependent variables) and urinary cotinine or BaP intake with the diet (independent variables) were analyzed by linear regression. All calculations and tests were performed with the SPSS 8.0 software package (SPSS ASC GmbH, Erkrath, Germany).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Analytical Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Characteristics of the Subgroups According to Smoking Status.
Some characteristics of the three subgroups, including demographic data, self-reported duration and extent of exposure to ETS, cigarette consumption, reported dietary intake of BaP, and objective measurements on tobacco smoke exposure are presented in Table 1Citation . Three of the 45 self-reported nonsmokers had consistently (at least at five of the six visits to the laboratory) elevated cotinine levels in plasma (>10 ng/ml) and in urine (>100 µg/24 h). These subjects were all male and reported to be exposed to ETS at home and/or at the workplace. The cotinine levels (mean ± SD, range for the six visits) were: subject 36, 67.5 ± 37.7, 20–120 ng/ml (plasma), 602 ± 367, 50–1073 µg/24 h (urine); subject 62, 63.2 ± 33.5, 1–110 ng/ml (plasma), 252 ± 143, 1–384 µg/24 h (urine); and subject 69, 124.5 ± 119.5, 15–374 ng/ml (plasma), 246 ± 175, 43–594 µg/24 h (urine). Because these cotinine concentrations were compatible with occasional or regular smoking (38, 39, 40) , these subjects were reclassified as smokers. One subject (no. 26) was admitted to the study as a smoker but stopped smoking after the second visit to the laboratory. The subject was classified as smoker, but only the data of the first two visits were included in the evaluation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Some characteristics and self-reported, as well as objectively, measured exposure data of the study groups

 
The estimated average BaP intake with the diet ranged from 0.50–0.60 µg/day and was not significantly different between the various study groups.

Exposure to Tobacco Smoke.
As expected, the biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure (thiocyanate in plasma, cotinine in plasma and urine) are significantly elevated in smokers compared with nonsmokers. The ratio (smokers:all nonsmokers) is about 300 for cotinine in plasma or urine and about 4 for thiocyanate in plasma.

Nonsmokers classified as ETS exposed (passive smokers) reported significantly longer ETS exposure durations (2.43 versus 0.52 h/day) and significantly higher ETS exposure intensities (3.31 versus 0.67) compared with the nonexposed or only marginally ETS-exposed nonsmokers. The personal samplers of the passive smokers showed higher exposure to nicotine (0.730 versus 0.184 µg/m3) and 3-ethenylpyridine (0.121 versus 0.041 µg/m3) than those of the unexposed nonsmokers. Cotinine levels in plasma (1.32 versus 0.71 ng/ml) and urine (12.3 versus 2.3 µg/24 h) were also significantly higher in passive smokers than in unexposed nonsmokers. There was no significant difference in the plasma thiocyanate levels between these two groups (19.6 versus 22.0 µmol/l).

PAH Biomarkers in Relation to Tobacco Smoke Exposure.
In Table 2Citation , the means, SEs, and the ranges of the PAH biomarkers urinary 1-OHP, BaP-hemoglobin adducts, and BaP-albumin adducts for the various study groups are shown. Smokers excreted significantly higher amounts of 1-OHP than nonsmokers (0.346 versus 0.157 µg/24 h). The determination of BaP-hemoglobin adducts revealed one sample (a nonsmoker) that was below the LOD of 0.007 fmol/mg, whereas for the BaP-albumine adduct measurements, 13 samples of the 27 smokers (48.1%) and 29 samples of the 42 nonsmokers (69.0%) were below the LOD of 0.01 fmol/mg. Within the group of nonsmokers, the percentage of undetectable samples for BaP-albumin adducts was 16 of the 23 unexposed nonsmokers (69.6%) and 13 of the 19 passive smokers (68.4%). The means of the BaP-albumin adducts was significantly elevated in smokers compared with nonsmokers (0.042 versus 0.020 fmol/mg), whereas the BaP-hemoglobin adducts tended to be higher in smokers compared with nonsmokers (0.105 versus 0.068 fmol/mg; not significant). No significant differences between passive smokers and unexposed nonsmokers were observed for urinary 1-OHP (0.140 versus 0.171 µg/24 h), BaP-hemoglobin adducts (0.049 versus 0.083 fmol/mg), and BaP-albumin adducts (0.021 versus 0.019 fmol/mg).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Levels of the PAH biomarkers urinary 1-OHP, BaP-hemoglobin adducts, and BaP-albumin adducts in the study groups

 
For smokers, a significant correlation between the urinary excretion of cotinine and 1-OHP in urine (r = 0.76) and the BaP-albumin adduct levels (r = 0.44) was found (Fig. 1Citation ). The correlation between urinary cotinine and the BaP-hemoglobin adduct levels was not significant (r = 0.19). In nonsmokers, urinary cotinine was not correlated to 1-OHP (r = -0.09), BaP-hemoglobin adducts (r = -0.15), and BaP-albumin adducts (r = 0.20; Fig. 2Citation ).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Linear regression between urinary cotinine and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (A), BaP-hemoglobin adducts (B), and BaP-albumin adducts (C) in smokers. The solid line is the regression line, and the broken line is the 95% confidence interval. Levels of significance: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Linear regression between urinary cotinine and urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (A), BaP-hemoglobin adducts (B), and BaP-albumin adducts (C) in nonsmokers. The solid line is the regression line, and the broken line is the 95% confidence interval.

 
PAH Biomarkers in Relation to Dietary BaP Intake.
The estimated BaP intake from the diet of all subjects (n = 69) did not correlate with the urinary 1-OHP excretion (r = 0.06) or the BaP adducts of hemoglobin (r = 0.05) and albumin (r = -0.01). Similarly, nonsignificant correlations were found when the dietary BaP intake was standardized for the body weight or when the nonsmokers (n = 42) and smokers (n = 27) were analyzed separately.

PAH Biomarkers in Relation to Urban or Suburban Residence.
The subjects were classified as "urban" or "suburban" according to the postal code of their home address. Urban residence means that the subject lives in the city of Munich, whereas suburban residence was within a radius of 15–60 km of the city center. In Fig. 3Citation , the PAH biomarkers for all subjects divided into urban and suburban groups are shown. The significant effect of smoking on all three biomarkers is visible. Furthermore, the BaP adduct levels with hemoglobin and albumin tended to be higher in subjects with suburban residences. This effect reached borderline significance (P = 0.056) for BaP-albumin adducts of all subjects. No difference in urinary 1-OHP excretion was observed between subjects residing in the suburb or city (Fig. 3Citation ).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Levels of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (A), BaP-hemoglobin adducts (B), and BaP-albumin adducts (C) for all subjects (n = 69), nonsmokers (n = 42), and smokers (n = 27) classified according to their location of residence (urban or suburban). The bars represent the means, and the whiskers represent the SE of the means. *, P = 0.056.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Analytical Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Except for certain workplaces, exposure to PAH by dietary intake, smoking, breathing of ambient air, and passive smoking are regarded as most relevant for the general population (24) . We determined three PAH biomarkers to quantify the exposure in a longitudinal field study with 69 subjects not occupationally exposed to PAH. In particular, we investigated the role of exposure to tobacco smoke (both active and passive smoking) on the PAH biomarkers. Furthermore, we elucidated the influence of PAH intake with the diet assessed by daily protocols and published PAH contents of major food items. Finally, the influence of the area of residence (urban or suburban) on the overall PAH burden was investigated.

Smoking.
The mainstream smoke of a filter cigarette contains about 10 ng of BaP (3 , 4) . Smoking, on average, 18 cigarettes/day, as the smokers in this study did (Table 1)Citation , would result in a smoking-related BaP intake of 180 ng/day. We found 2-fold increased PAH biomarker levels in smokers compared with nonsmokers (Table 2)Citation . The effect of smoking was significant for urinary 1-OHP (P < 0.001) and BaP-albumin adducts (P < 0.05), but did not reach statistical significance in the case of BaP-hemoglobin adducts (P = 0.12). Furthermore, we observed a significant correlation between the extent of smoking (measured as the urinary excretion of cotinine) and urinary 1-OHP (r = 0.76; P < 0.01) and BaP-albumin adducts (r = 0.44; P < 0.05; Fig. 1Citation ). There was no significant correlation between urinary cotinine and BaP-hemoglobin adducts (r = 0.19, P = 0.35). These findings confirm other reports on the effect of smoking on PAH biomarkers. Van Rooij et al. (5) reported urinary excretion of 1-OHP of 0.09–0.13 µmol/mol creatinine for nonsmokers and 0.24–0.34 µmol/mol creatinine for smokers. These levels are higher than in our study when converted to daily excretion rates, assuming a creatinine excretion of 1.5 g/day (nonsmokers, 0.26–0.38 µg/24 h; smokers, 0.69–0.98 µg/24 h). Van Rooij et al. (5) reported a correlation coefficient between urinary 1-OHP excretion and the average number of cigarettes per day of r = 0.67 (P = 0.001), which is in good agreement with our reported correlation with urinary cotinine (r = 0.76; Fig. 1Citation ) and with daily cigarette consumption (r = 0.59, P < 0.01). In another study (41) , the difference in 1-OHP excretion between occupationally exposed smokers and nonsmokers (foundry workers) was insignificant, whereas the difference in the not occupationally exposed control group was of borderline significance (P = 0.06). Pastorelli et al. (22) reported two times higher levels of urinary 1-OHP in smokers compared with nonsmokers. Sithisarankul et al. (42) reported a concentration of 1-OHP-glucuronide of 1.04 pmol/ml for smokers and 0.55 pmol/ml for nonsmokers (P = 0.001), a ratio similar to that in our study. The correlation with daily cigarette consumption was weaker than in our study (r = 0.34)

Melikian et al. (19) observed significantly higher BaP-hemoglobin adducts in 10 smokers (mean, 2.6; range, 1.2–7.8 fmol/mg) than in 10 nonsmokers (mean, 0.97; range, 0.7–1.3 fmol/mg). It is noteworthy that the BaP adduct levels in our study were at least one order of magnitude lower. In a study with 44 smokers (lung cancer patients), Pastorelli et al. (16) found detectable levels of BaP-hemoglobin adducts (LOD, 0.05 fmol/mg) in only six subjects (13.6%). The median for all 44 samples was 0.025 fmol/mg (half the detection level). In our study, comprising subjects with low to moderate traffic exposure, only one subject had a BaP-hemoglobin level below the detection level of 0.007 fmol/mg (Table 2)Citation . The median was 0.064 fmol/mg for smokers and 0.046 fmol/mg for nonsmokers, comparable with the values reported by Pastorelli et al. (16) . In an earlier study, Pastorelli et al. (18) reported median BaP-hemoglobin adduct levels of <=0.1 fmol/mg and <=0.26 fmol/mg for newspaper vendors with low and extensive traffic exposure, respectively. The difference was not significant. In a recent publication (22) , the same group reported significantly lower adduct levels in summer (mean, 0.031 fmol/mg) than in winter (mean, 0.14 fmol/mg). No effect of smoking and diet was found.

The smokers in our study had significantly elevated BaP-albumin adduct levels compared with the nonsmokers (Table 2)Citation . Thirteen samples (48.1%) from the smokers and 29 samples (69.0%) of the nonsmokers were below the LOD (0.01 fmol/mg). The percentage of undetectable samples for unexposed and ETS-exposed nonsmokers was similar (69.6 and 68.4%, respectively; Table 2Citation ). Elevated BaP-albumin adduct levels in smokers have also been reported in other studies (12 , 15 , 17 , 43) . However, adduct levels in smokers/nonsmokers determined by ELISA were several orders of magnitude higher than in our investigation (Table 2)Citation : 14.2/7.23 fM BaP equivalents/100 µg (15) , 0.80/0.41 fmol/µg (12) , 5.78/4.67 fmol/µg (medians; Ref. 13 ). It can only be assumed that the antibodies used in the ELISA are selective for PAH rather than specific for BaP. Using HPLC with fluorescence detection, Tas et al. (17) found median BaP-albumin adduct levels of 1.62 fmol/mg for smokers and 1.39 fmol/mg for nonsmokers. Also, these levels were almost two orders of magnitude higher than those in our study, suggesting probably an unspecific detection of the BaP-tetrol. In the study of Pastorelli et al. (16) , in which GC-MS-NICI was applied for adduct determination, 24 of 44 smokers (56.8%) had undetectable (LOD, 0.05 fmol/mg) BaP-albumin adduct levels. The median of all 44 samples was 0.11 fmol/mg, which is about 7-fold higher than the median for smokers in our study (0.015 fmol/mg). Part of the discrepancy could be due to more intense smoking in the Italian study group compared with ours.

Passive Smoking.
Indoor air concentrations of BaP in smoking and nonsmoking homes are reported to be 1.0 ng/m3 and 0.4 ng/m3, respectively (44) . In commercial buildings, mean BaP concentrations of 1.07 ng/m3 and 0.39 ng/m3 in smoking and nonsmoking environments, respectively, have been found (45) . Therefore, the additional ETS-related BaP exposure is about 0.6 ng/m3. Assuming a daily ETS exposure duration of about 3 h (Table 2Citation ; Refs. 46 and 47 ), a respiration rate of 1 m3/h would result in a maximum intake of 1.8 ng BaP/day due to passive smoking, which accounts for about 1% of the overall daily BaP intake in nonsmokers. It is, therefore, not surprising that we found no influence of exposure to ETS on any of the three PAH biomarkers (Table 2Citation and Fig. 2Citation ).

The evidence from the BaP adduct measurement is limited due to the fact that for a major part of the samples the adduct levels were at or below the LOD (Table 2)Citation . On the other hand, the 1-OHP measurements, in our view, provide strong evidence because for each subject six independent samples were analyzed and the concentrations were well above the LOD in all samples.

We took great effort to determine the extent of exposure to ETS: (a) nonsmokers were selected either to be not or only marginally exposed to ETS or to be regularly exposed to ETS at home, at work, or in leisure time; (b) the subjects were asked to keep records of their ETS exposure in terms of duration and intensity during 6 weeks; (c) the nonsmokers also wore personal samplers for nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine during the 6 weeks; and (d) cotinine in plasma and urine, suitable biomarkers for ETS exposure (48 , 49) , were measured on six different occasions. No association between plasma thiocyanate and passive smoking was observed (Table 2)Citation . This confirms an earlier report in the literature (50) , suggesting that plasma thiocyanate is not a suitable biomarker for determining exposure to ETS. Friedman et al. (51) found that only about 2% of the variation in serum thiocyanate concentration is explained by passive smoking. There was satisfactory consistency between the other ETS exposure markers, both objectively measured and subjectively reported, except for plasma cotinine. The reason for this is probably the fact that for all nonsmokers the plasma cotinine concentration was at or below the LOD of 1 µg/l for at least one time point. Taken together, we are confident that our assessment of the extent of exposure to ETS is reliable and that there is no measurable effect of real-life passive smoking on urinary 1-OHP or on BaP adduct levels with hemoglobin or albumin.

Diet.
The method of choice for determining the BaP intake from food seems to be the "duplicate meal" approach. Using this method, daily BaP intakes of 123 ng (24) and 176 ng (6) were found. We estimated a mean dietary BaP intake of 500–600 ng/day for the various subgroups in our study (Table 1)Citation , which is clearly higher than the values found with the duplicate meal method but corresponds with some of the reported ranges in the literature (8) . A reason for the large variations of the BaP intake estimates is certainly the heterogenous array of cooking styles and foodstuffs used (24) . With the limitations described above, it is comprehensible that we found no correlation of the estimated BaP intake with the diet and any of the PAH biomarkers.

In general, it can be stated that although diet is recognized as the most important source of PAH exposure for nonoccupationally exposed nonsmokers (5 , 6 , 52) , only weak associations between the estimated PAH intake from the diet and various PAH biomarkers were found. We believe that the inaccuracy of the estimate for the PAH intake is the major reason for this observation.

Ambient Air.
We looked for a possible effect of urban or city residence on the concentrations of the PAH biomarkers. Unexpectedly, we observed a trend for higher BaP adduct levels with hemoglobin and albumin for subjects living in the suburbs, whereas the place of residence had no influence on the urinary excretion of 1-OHP (Fig. 3Citation ). The smoking behavior is not responsible for this result. Presently, we have no reasonable explanation for this finding.

Pastorelli et al. (18) found significantly increased BaP-hemoglobin adducts in traffic-exposed, nonsmoking newspaper vendors compared with their unexposed counterparts (median, 0.3 versus <= 0.1 fmol/mg). In smokers, no influence of exposure to traffic was observed (0.27 versus 0.26 fmol/mg).

Nielsen et al. (21) found elevated BaP-albumin adduct levels in subjects living in rural areas compared with urban areas of Denmark (4.54 versus 3.54 fmol/µg, determined by ELISA). The difference was not significant. Interestingly, significantly higher DNA adduct levels (determined by 32P-postlabeling) in lymphocytes of the urban subjects were observed (21) . Protein and DNA adducts did not correlate in this study. DNA adduct levels in lymphocytes were also found to increase from rural controls to bus drivers working in the dormitory, suburban and center of Copenhagen (53) .

In a study with 130 pregnant women living in urban, suburban, and rural areas of the county of Aarhus, Denmark, Autrup and Vestergaard (43) found about similar levels of BaP-albumin adducts (determined with an ELISA) in subjects from urban and rural parts, whereas subjects living in the suburbs had significantly lower adduct levels. Because the samples were collected in November/December, the authors speculated that differences in domestic heating sources were responsible for these findings.

Conclusion.
In conclusion, our results show that smoking increases the PAH exposure of nonoccuptionally exposed persons by a factor of two, whereas passive smoking does not measurably increase the overall PAH burden. We suggest that diet is, by far, the most important source for PAH intake in nonsmokers, although, probably due to the inaccuracy of the intake estimates, we were not able to find an association between the dietary PAH intakes and the levels of the PAH biomarkers. Our results further indicate that PAH exposure through ambient air might be of some importance. Part of the interindividual variation in the PAH biomarkers is certainly due to the genetic polymorphism in metabolic activation and detoxification pathways (for review see Ref. 54 ). The influence of the genetic polymorphism in this study is presently under investigation in our laboratory. Finally, the levels of the BaP-protein adducts that we measured are partly much lower than those reported by others also using GC-MS-NICI.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 We thank the Forschungsgesellschaft Rauchen und Gesundheit, Hamburg for funding this work. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Analytisch-biologisches Forschungslabor, Goethestrasse 20, 80336 München, Germany. Fax: 49-89-5328039; E-mail: abf{at}compuserve.com Back

3 The abbreviations used are: PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; BaP, benzo(a)pyrene; 1-OHP, 1-hydroxypyrene; BPDE, benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; LOD, limit of detection; GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; NICI, negative ion chemical ionization. Back

Received 9/23/99; revised 12/31/99; accepted 1/17/00.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Analytical Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. IARC . Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds. Part 3, Industrial Exposures in Aluminium Production, Coal Gasification, Coke Production, and Iron and Steel Founding, IARC Lyons, France 1984.
  2. Hattemer-Frey H. A., Travis C. C. Benzo-a-pyrene. Environmental partitioning and human exposure. Toxicol. Ind. Health, 7: 141-157, 1991.[Medline]
  3. Grimmer G., Naujack K. W., Dettbarn G. Gas chromatographic determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aza-arenes, aromatic amines in the particle and vapor phase of mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes. Toxicol. Lett. (Amst.), 35: 117-124, 1987.[Medline]
  4. Hoffmann D., Hoffmann I. The changing cigarette, 1950–1995. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 50: 307-364, 1997.[Medline]
  5. Van Rooij J. G. M., Veeger M. M. S., Bodelier-Bade M. M., Scheepers P. T. J., Jongeneelen F. J. Smoking and dietary intake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as sources of interindividual variability in the baseline excretion of 1-hydroxypyrene in urine. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 66: 55-65, 1994.[Medline]
  6. Buckley T. J., Waldman J. M., Dhara R., Greenberg A., Ouyang Z., Lioy P. J. An assessment of a urinary biomarker for total human environmental exposure to benzo[a]pyrene. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 67: 257-266, 1995.[Medline]
  7. Dor F., Dab W., Empereur-Bissonnet P., Zmirou D. Validity of biomarkers in environmental health studies: the case of PAHs and benzene. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 29: 129-168, 1999.[Medline]
  8. dell’Omo M., Lauwerys R. R. Adducts to macromolecules in the biological monitoring of workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 23: 111-126, 1993.[Medline]
  9. Day B. W., Skipper P. L., Zaia J., Tannenbaum S. R. Benzo[a]pyrene anti-diol epoxide covalently modifies human serum albumin carboxylate side chains and imidazole side chain of histidine(146). J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113: 8505-8509, 1991.
  10. Skipper P. L., Naylor S., Gan L-S., Day B. W., Pastorelli R., Tannenbaum S. R. Origin of tetrahydrotetrols derived from human hemoglobin adducts of benzo(a)pyrene. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2: 280-281, 1989.[Medline]
  11. Skipper P. L., Peng X., Soohoo C. K., Tannenbaum S. R. Protein adducts as biomarkers of human carcinogen exposure. Drug. Metab. Rev., 26: 111-124, 1994.[Medline]
  12. Crawford F. G., Mayer J., Santella R. M., Cooper T. B., Ottman R., Tsai W-Y., Simon-Cereijido G., Wang M., Tang D., Perera F. P. Biomarkers of environmental tobacco smoke in preschool children and their mothers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 86: 1398-1402, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Autrup H., Vestergaard A. B., Okkels H. Transplacental transfer of environmental genotoxins: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-albumin in non-smoking women, and the effect of maternal GSTM1 genotype. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 1305-1309, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Santella R. M., Perera F. P., Young T. L., Zhang Y-J., Chiamprasert S., Tang D., Wang L. W., Beachman A., Lin J-H., DeLeo V. A. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA and protein adducts in coal tar treated patients and controls and their relationship to glutathione S-transferase genotype. Mutat. Res., 334: 117-124, 1995.[Medline]
  15. Sherson D., Sabro P., Sigsgaard T., Johansen F., Autrup H. Biological monitoring of foundry workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic hycrocarbons. Br. J. Ind. Med., 47: 448-453, 1990.[Medline]
  16. Pastorelli R., Guanci M., Cerri A., Negri E., La Vecchia C., Fumagalli F., Mezzetti M., Cappelli R., Panigalli T., Fanelli R., Airoldi L. Impact of inherited polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferase M1, microsomal epoxide hydrolase, cytochrome P450 enzymes on DNA, and blood protein adducts of benzo(a)pyrene-diolepoxide. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 7: 703-709, 1998.[Abstract]
  17. Tas S., Buchet J. P., Lauwerys R. Determinants of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide adducts to albumin in workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 66: 343-348, 1994.[Medline]
  18. Pastorelli R., Restano J., Guanci M., Maramonte M., Magagnotti C., Allevi R., Lauri D., Fanelli R., Airoldi L. Hemoglobin adducts of benzo[a]pyrene diolepoxide in newspaper vendors: association with traffic exhaust. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 2389-2394, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Melikian A. A., Sun P., Pierpont C., Coleman S., Hecht S. S. Gas chromoatographic-mass spectrometric determination of benzo[a]pyrene and chrysene diol epoxide globin adducts in humans. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 6: 833-839, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Day B. W., Taghizadeh K., Skipper P. L., Wishnok J. S., Tannenbaum S. R., Caporaso N. E., Vineis P. Benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-hemoglobin adducts in cohorts of human subjects determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 32: 88 1991.
  21. Nielsen P. S., Okkels H., Sigsgaard T., Kyrtopoulos S., Autrup H. Exposure to urban and rural air pollution: DNA and protein adducts and effect of glutathione-S-transferase genotype on adduct levels. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 68: 170-176, 1996.[Medline]
  22. Pastorelli R., Guanci M., Restano J., Berri A., Micoli G., Minoia C., Alcini D., Carrer P., Negri E., La Vecchia C., Fanelli R., Airoldi L. Seasonal effect of an airborne pyrene, urinary 1-hydroxypyrene, and benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide-hemoglobin adducts in the general population. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 8: 561-565, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dennis M. J., Massey R. C., Cripps G., Venn I., Howarth N., Lee G. Factors affecting the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content of cereals, fats and other food products. Food Addit. Contam., 8: 517-530, 1991.[Medline]
  24. Waldman J. M., Lioy P. J., Greenberg A., Butler J. P. Analysis of human exposure to benzo(a)pyrene via inhalation and food ingestion in the total human environmental exposure study (THEES). J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol., 1: 193-225, 1991.[Medline]
  25. Grimmer G. Polycyclische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe (PAH). 1. Die Bedeutung der PAH als carcinogene Schadstoffklasse (Wirkungsbilanz) Eisenbrand G. Frank H. K. Grimmer G. Hapke H-J. Thier H-P. Weigert G. eds. . Derzeitige Situation und Trends der Belastung der Lebensmittel durch Fremdstoffe, 152-187, Verlag W. Kohlhammer GmbH Heidelberg, Germany 1987.
  26. de Vos R. H., van Dokkkum W., Schouten A., de Jong-Berkhout P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Dutch total diet samples (1984–1986). Food Chem. Toxicol., 28: 263-268, 1990.[Medline]
  27. Lo M. T., Sandi E. Polycyclic aromatic compounds in food Gunther F. A. eds. . Residue Reviews. Residues of Pesticides and Other Contaminants in the Total Environment, 35-87, Springer New York 1978.
  28. Speer K., Horstmann P., Steeg E., Kühn T., Montag A. Zur Analytik von Polycyclen in Gemüseproben. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 191: 442-448, 1990.[Medline]
  29. Lijinsky W. The formation and occurrence of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons associated with food. Mutat. Res., 259: 251-261, 1991.[Medline]
  30. Frank S., Renner T., Ruppert T., Scherer G. Determination of albumin adducts of (+)-anti-benzo[a]pyrene-diol-epoxide using an high-performance liquid chromatographic column switching technique for sample preparation and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the final detection. J. Chromatogr., 713: 331-337, 1998.[Medline]
  31. Drabkin D. L., Austin J. H. Spectrophotometric studies. J. Biol. Chem., 112: 51-65, 1935.[Free Full Text]
  32. Jongeneelen F., Anzion R. B. M. 1-Hydroxypyrene Angerer J. Schaller K. H. eds. . Analyses of Hazardous Substances in Biological Materials, 151-169, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Weinheim, Germany 1990.
  33. Langone J., Gjika H. B., Van Vunakis H. Nicotine and its metabolites: radioimmunoassay for nicotine and cotinine. Biochemistry, 12: 5025-5030, 1973.[Medline]
  34. Haley N. J., Axelrad C. M., Tilton K. A. Validation of self-reported smoking behavior: biochemical analyses of cotinine and thiocyanate. Am. J. Public Health, 73: 1204-1207, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Feyerabend C., Russell M. A. H. A rapid gas-liquid chromatographic method for the determination of cotinine and nicotine in biological fluids. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 42: 450-452, 1990.[Medline]
  36. Degiampietro P., Peheim E., Drew D., Graf H., Colombo J. P. Determination of thiocyanate in plasma and saliva without deproteinization and its validation as a smoking parameter. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem., 25: 711-717, 1987.[Medline]
  37. Ogden M. W., Maiolo K. C. Comparative evaluation of diffusive and active sampling systems for determining airborne nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine. Environ. Sci. Technol., 26: 1226-1234, 1991.
  38. Cummings S. R., Richard R. J. Optimum cutoff points for biochemical validation of smoking status. Am. J. Public Health, 78: 574-575, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Riboli E., Preston-Martin S., Saracci R., Haley N. J., Trichopoulos D., Becher H., Burch J. D., Fontham E. T. H., Gao Y-T., Jindal S. K., Koo L. C., Le Marchand L., Segnan N., Shimizu H., Stanta G., Wu-Williams A. H., Zatonski W. Exposure of nonsmoking women to environmental tobacco smoke: a 10-country collaborative study. Cancer Causes Control, 1: 243-252, 1990.[Medline]
  40. Haufroid V., Lison D. Urinary cotinine as a tobacco-smoke exposure index: a minireview. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 71: 162-168, 1998.[Medline]
  41. Omland O., Sherson D., Hansen A. M., Sigsgaard T., Autrup H., Overgaard E. Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene, a PAH biomarker in foundry workers. Cancer Detect. Prev., 20: 57-62, 1996.[Medline]
  42. Sithisarankul P., Vineis P., Kang D., Rothman N., Caporaso N., Strickland P. Association of 1-hydroxypyrene-glucuronide in human urine with cigarette smoking and broiled or roasted meat consumption. Biomarkers, 2: 217-221, 1997.
  43. Autrup H., Vestergaard A. B. Transplacental transfer of environmental genotoxins-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-albumin in nonsmoking women. Environ. Health Perspect., 104: 625-627, 1996.
  44. Chuang J. C., Mack G. A., Kuhlman M. R., Wilson N. K. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in indoor and outdoor air in an eight-home study. Atmos. Environ., 25: 369-380, 1991.
  45. Guerin M. R., Jenkins R. A., Tomkins B. A. . The Chemistry of Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Composition and Measurement, Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, and Tokyo 1992.
  46. Letzel H. W., Johnson L. C. The extent of passive smoking in the Federal Republic of Germany. Prev. Med., 13: 717-729, 1984.[Medline]
  47. Jenkins P. L., Phillips T. J., Mulberg E. J., Hui S. P. Activity patterns of Californians: use of and proximity to indoor pollutant sources. Atmos. Environ., 26A: 2141-2148, 1992.
  48. Benowitz N. L. Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Epidemiol. Rev., 18: 188-204, 1996.[Free Full Text]
  49. Scherer G., Richter E. Biomonitoring exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS): a critical reappraisal. Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 16: 449-459, 1997.[Medline]
  50. Jarvis M. J. Application of biochemical intake markers to passive smoking measurement and risk estimation. Mutat. Res., 222: 101-110, 1989.[Medline]
  51. Friedman G. D., Petitti D. B., Bawol R. D. Prevalence and correlates of passive smoking. Am. J. Public Health, 73: 401-405, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Lioy P. L., Waldman J. M., Greenberg A., Harkov R., Pietarinen C. The total human environmental exposure study (THEES) to benzo(a)pyrene: comparison of the inhalation and food pathways. Arch. Environ. Health, 43: 304-312, 1988.[Medline]
  53. Nielsen P. S., de Pater N., Okkels H., Autrup H. Environmental air pollution and DNA adducts in Copenhagen bus drivers. Effect of GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes on adduct levels. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 17: 1021-1027, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Wormhoudt L. W., Commandeur J. N. M., Vermeulen N. P. E. Genetic polymorphisms of human N-acetyltransferase, cytochrome P450, glutathione-S-transferase, and epoxide hydrolase enzymes: relevance to xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 29: 59-124, 1999.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Sadikovic, J. Andrews, D. Carter, J. Robinson, and D. I. Rodenhiser
Genome-wide H3K9 Histone Acetylation Profiles Are Altered in Benzopyrene-treated MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4051 - 4060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 MutagenesisHome page
E. Gyorffy, L. Anna, K. Kovacs, P. Rudnai, and B. Schoket
Correlation between biomarkers of human exposure to genotoxins with focus on carcinogen-DNA adducts
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
E. K. Tong and S. A. Glantz
Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, October 16, 2007; 116(16): 1845 - 1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Tuntawiroon, C. Mahidol, P. Navasumrit, H. Autrup, and M. Ruchirawat
Increased health risk in Bangkok children exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from traffic-related sources
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 816 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
G. Maina, M. Manzari, A. Palmas, V. Passini, and F. L. Filon
Risk assessment of occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by means of urinary1-hydroxypyrene
Toxicology and Industrial Health, February 1, 2007; 23(1): 55 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
J. K. Hockings, P. A. Thorne, M. Q. Kemp, S. S. Morgan, O. Selmin, and D. F. Romagnolo
The Ligand Status of the Aromatic Hydrocarbon Receptor Modulates Transcriptional Activation of BRCA-1 Promoter by Estrogen
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2224 - 2232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
M. Culea, O. Cozar, and E. Culea
PAHs in Cigarette Smoke by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Indoor and Built Environment, June 1, 2005; 14(3-4): 283 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W.-Y. Huang, N. Chatterjee, S. Chanock, M. Dean, M. Yeager, R. E. Schoen, L.-F. Hou, S. I. Berndt, S. Yadavalli, C. C. Johnson, et al.
Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Polymorphisms and Risk for Advanced Colorectal Adenoma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 152 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
G Castano-Vinyals, A D'Errico, N Malats, and M Kogevinas
Biomarkers of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from environmental air pollution
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2004; 61(4): e12 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E Siwinska, D Mielzynska, and L Kapka
Association between urinary 1-hydroxypyrene and genotoxic effects in coke oven workers
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2004; 61(3): e10 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Tobacco ControlHome page
S S Hecht
Carcinogen derived biomarkers: applications in studies of human exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke
Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(90001): i48 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Sorensen, H. Autrup, O. Hertel, H. Wallin, L. E. Knudsen, and S. Loft
Personal Exposure to PM2.5 and Biomarkers of DNA Damage
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 191 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 1979 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
S. G. Carmella, M. Chen, P. W. Villalta, J. G. Gurney, D. K. Hatsukami, and S. S. Hecht
Ethylation and methylation of hemoglobin in smokers and non-smokers
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2002; 23(11): 1903 - 1910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Besaratinia, L.M. Maas, E.M.C. Brouwer, E.J.C. Moonen, T.M.C.M. De Kok, G.J. Wesseling, S. Loft, J.C.S. Kleinjans, and F.J. Van Schooten
A molecular dosimetry approach to assess human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in pubs
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2002; 23(7): 1171 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
S. S. Hecht
Human urinary carcinogen metabolites: biomarkers for investigating tobacco and cancer
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2002; 23(6): 907 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page