| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Ob-Gyn Epidemiology Center, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology [D. W. C., R. F. L., E. L.], and Pathology [W. R. W.], Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756 [E. R. G., L. T-E.]; and Biochemical Genetics Laboratory, Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90027 [W. G. N.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have completed a large population-based study of ovarian cancer that allows us to address the relationship between galactose consumption/metabolism and ovarian cancer in greater detail. We assessed dairy food consumption and examined RBC activity of the three principal enzymes involved in galactose metabolism including GALK,3 GALT, and GALE to assess whether any of these factors influenced ovarian cancer risk. In addition, we looked at a common polymorphism of the GALT gene, N314D, generally associated with lower GALT activity (12) .
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We identified controls using RDD, in which the sampling unit for an interviewed case comprised the 99 telephone numbers generated from the first five digits of the cases telephone number plus all of the remaining combinations of the last two digits (excluding the cases own number). These numbers were listed in random order and were called to screen households for potential controls who were within 4 years of the cases age. Approximately 5400 calls (excluding those to businesses or nonworking numbers) yielded 10% of households in which the person answering declined to provide a household census and 80% of households in which an age and sex match to the case could not be made or in which a potential match was ineligible by virtue of a prior oophorectomy. In the remaining 10% of households, there was a potentially eligible control; and 72% of these agreed to participate. RDD proved inefficient for identifying controls over age 60 in MA because a substantially greater number of households needed to be screened to obtain an older control. Because of this, we identified older controls in MA by randomly selecting women through the use of lists (townbooks) of all of the residents in towns by name, age, and address according to precinct. We matched older controls to cases by community and age within 4 years based on the townbooks. Of 328 potential controls sampled from townbooks, 21% could not be reached, 18% were ineligible, and 30% declined to participate. The present analysis includes a total of 523 RDD and townbook controls with completed interviews as of May 1997.
We conducted an in-person interview to assess demographic information, menstrual and reproductive history, medical and family history, and personal habits. Exposures were assessed as of a reference date defined as 1 year before the date of diagnosis for the cases and before the date of interview for the controls. Dietary variables were assessed using the Nurses Health Study self-administered food frequency questionnaire (13) . Estimates of galactose consumption were based on consumption of its principal dietary source, lactose (a double sugar composed of galactose and glucose), which itself was assessed from the reported frequency of the use of milk, yogurt, ice cream, and cheeses. We asked women to focus on their typical diet in the 5 years before their reference date. Supplemental information was obtained through the general questionnaire about the use of a limited number of dairy products including milk and yogurt at earlier ages. Food frequency questionnaires were missing in eight cases and two controls.
We also collected a heparinized specimen of blood, which was separated into plasma, red cell, and white cell components and which were then aliquoted and frozen at -70°C. Time between the blood draw and processing was recorded. The washed, frozen red cells were used for the biochemical assessment of GALK, GALT, and GALE activity. RBC kinase activity was measured by quantifying the amount of galactose-1-14C converted to labeled galactose-1-phosphate per hour per gram of hemoglobin (14) . RBC transferase activity was measured by quantifying the amount of gal (U) 14C-1-P converted to labeled UDPgal per hour per gram of hemoglobin. RBC epimerase activity is measured by an indirect fluorometric method that determines the amount of NADH formed from UDPgal after incubation with UDPG dehydrogenase and NAD (15) . Assays were performed in batches of about 3040 subjects including both cases and controls whose status was unknown to the technician.
GALT mutations associated with lower activity, including Q188R and N314D, were examined by means of PCR amplification and enzyme restriction assays. Germ line DNA was amplified with primers specific for exons 6 and 10, and the products were digested with the restriction enzymes AvaII for N314D and HpaII for Q188R, as described by Lin et al. and Reichardt et al. (12 , 16) . The restriction products were electrophoresed in 12% native PAGE in 0.5x tris boric acid EDTA at 1000 v for 45 min, which allowed clear separation of wild-type, heterozygote, and homozygote bands.
We requested and reviewed pathology reports on all of the cases and sought slides for any case in which there was a discrepancy between the histological description and final diagnosis. Only 3.5% of initially identified cases were excluded because of a nonovarian primary cancer, and the majority of these were evident from the pathology reports. We requested slides for 20 cases and confirmed the initial report in 18. After completing the review, the following histological categories were established: (a) serous cancers (including serous cystadenocarcinomas and surface papillary carcinomas); (b) mucinous cancers; (c) endometrioid and clear cell cancers (including mixed mesodermal or mixed epithelial with an endometrioid or clear cell component); and (d) undifferentiated/other cancers. The serous cancers were further subdivided into borderline and invasive grades, but this distinction was not made for the mucinous tumors, in which there is evidence for overlap in grades within mucinous tumor specimens (17) .
Because matching was performed as the most convenient means for
selecting controls comparable to cases in age and geographic locale and
not as the principal means of controlling for confounding, matching was
not preserved in the analysis. We analyzed our data by constructing
frequency counts of cases and controls by study variables and by
calculating crude ORs or by comparing continuous variables between
cases and controls with nonpaired t tests. For the
calculations of risks associated with quartiles of continuous
variables, the control distribution was used as the standard. We then
used unconditional logistic regression to adjust for the matching
variables, age (continuous), and study site (MA, NH), and for variables
strongly linked to ovarian cancer risk such as parity (0,
1), oral
contraceptive use (never or <3 months,
3 months), and family history
of breast or ovarian cancer (no, yes). Tests for linear trends were
performed using the likelihood ratio test with continuous forms of the
variables. All of the analyses were performed using the SAS system (SAS
Institute, Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another potential study limitation is that, although cases are asked about their diet-before-disease, their recall may be influenced by their current diet. Thus, there might be a tendency for cases, who may be recovering from surgery or undergoing chemotherapy, to underreport food consumption. This is, perhaps, illustrated by the lower total protein consumption among the cases in this study. For this reason, cohort studies may be preferable for assessing diet in relation to ovarian cancer. In a recent study (7) , a modest trend for an increasing risk of ovarian cancer with increasing lactose consumption was found (P = 0.12). However, considered in the context of the results reported here and other negative case-control studies (8, 9, 10) , there is only limited support for the proposition that adult lactose consumption has an appreciable influence on ovarian cancer risk. Our study does not address the possibility that dietary patterns earlier in life may be important, which may be suggested by our observation that lactose intolerance beginning before age 20 was protective (P = 0.09). A recent Italian study also reported a protective effect of lactose intolerance based on hydrogen breath tests in cases and controls (18) . Saturated fat consumption, proposed as another key dietary element, was not significantly related to ovarian cancer risk in our current study.
Our current study also did not confirm our previous finding (6) that women with ovarian cancer have lower biochemical activity of a key enzyme involved in galactose metabolism known as galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase (GALT). In our previous study, GALT was measured in heparinized whole blood specimens with a 1- or 2-week delay, whereas, in this study, the blood was first processed, and a frozen red cell pellet was used for the analysis. Average transferase activity was about the same for controls but was about 5% higher for cases compared with the previous study.
Although ovarian cancer cases and controls in the current study did not differ in GALT activity levels, they were found to differ in frequency of possession of a polymorphic variant of GALT known as N314D which is associated with lower GALT activity. Almost 2% of women with all types of ovarian cancer and about 4% of women with endometrioid and clear cell cancers were homozygous for N314D compared with a control frequency of 0.4%. This difference represents a 4-fold increase in risk for all types of ovarian cancer and a 14-fold increase for endometrioid and clear cell types. Because of the rarity of homozygosity for N314D, this finding carries a very low attributable risk (less than 2%) for ovarian cancer overall. However, the association may be of interest because its basis may involve a common condition in women known as endometriosis, which is believed to arise from the growth of endometrial cells contained in menstrual fluid that may spill into the pelvic cavity during menstruation (19) .
Endometrioid and clear cell cancers of the ovary are histologically similar to cancers of the endometrium and frequently occur in the setting of endometriosis (20) . In turn, the risk for ovarian cancer is increased among women with endometriosis (21) . The link between endometriosis and endometrioid and clear cell cancers could underlie the association between N314D and endometrioid and clear cell cancers of the ovary because we have previously described an increased occurrence of N314D not only in women with endometriosis (22) but also in women with the Mullerian anomaly, vaginal agenesis (23) . We speculated that the latter association was due to decreased galactose metabolism in a mother or fetus carrying N314D; this would lead to a higher-than-normal fetal exposure to galactose, which has been shown to affect Mullerian development in animals. Pregnant rodents fed high galactose diets produced female offspring with a reduced number of oocytes and delayed opening of the vagina (24) . If high fetal exposure to galactose is capable of causing failure of the vagina to canalize, it may also cause failure of the cervix to canalize properly; this which would lead to a stenotic opening, which would predispose to retrograde menstruation, a likely cause of endometriosis. The possible connection between N314D and reproductive tract problems such as vaginal agenesis, endometriosis, and ovarian cancer is further strengthened by case reports of ovarian cancers in women with vaginal agenesis (25, 26, 27) , including rare endodermal sinus tumors.
These intriguing observations provide support for the proposition that galactose consumption during adult years may be less important in influencing Mullerian development and ovarian cancer risk than fetal galactose exposure, which may be mediated both by maternal and fetal GALT genotypes and by maternal galactose consumption. Whereas the latter variable would be difficult to estimate, the decreased metabolism of galactose associated with N314D may be expected to cause the greatest fetal exposure to galactose, when both the mother and her fetus carry the allele as would occur in all of the homozygotes and in those heterozygotes with maternal transmission. Another investigator (28) has recently reported a link between N314D and all ovarian cancers, although the excess for women with endometrioid and clear cell types was less apparent than observed in our study. Further study of the link between N314D and ovarian cancer would be worthwhile, including an assessment of whether maternal rather than paternal transmission of N314D carries greater risk.
In addition to our studies of GALT, we measured the biochemical activity of two other enzymes involved in galactose metabolism known as GALK and GALE. Although we found no association between kinase activity and ovarian cancer, GALE activity was significantly lower in cases compared with controls. In terms of the relative importance of GALK and GALE to human disease, cataract development is the principal manifestation of GALK deficiency. This apparently results from an excess of galactose (and its alcohol, galactitol) rather than from the reduction of any downstream metabolites, which can be measured even in GALK-deficient patients, which suggests residual enzyme activity (29) . GALE deficiency may have features similar to GALT deficiency, including newborn feeding problems and retardation (29) . However, GALE deficiency is relatively rare; and it has been postulated that a complete GALE deficiency is incompatible with life (30) . GALE catabolizes the interconversion of UDPgal to UDP-glucose (31) . The biochemical assay for GALE is substantially dependent on the time elapsed between specimen collection and processing; therefore, future epidemiological investigations of epimerase should focus on polymorphisms of the GALE gene or its activation region. Interestingly, the epimerase gene is located on 1p36 (32) near a region frequently shown to have loss of heterozygosity in various neoplasms, including breast, colon, and endodermal sinus tumors (33, 34, 35) . Further study is needed to distinguish whether this coincidence suggests a direct role for epimerase or linkage disequilibrium with tumor suppressor gene(s).
A major limitation of our study is that about 15% of cases could not be interviewed in that they had died or could not be located, and 30% of those remaining could not be interviewed because of physician or patient refusal. Thus, associations with any variables influencing survival or willingness to be interviewed may be subject to a selection bias. In addition, not all of the subjects had the biochemical assays for assessing galactose enzymes inasmuch as these were "phased-in." Our assessment of galactose metabolism was based on red cell specimens drawn after the diagnosis of ovarian cancer and, therefore, may not reflect metabolism before the clinical onset of ovarian cancer. The tests themselves, especially for epimerase activity, may be subject to error based on the length of time between drawing and processing the RBCs for testing. Furthermore, the use of RBCs as the most convenient source for the enzyme may not reflect the expression of activity in more important organs including the liver and ovary. For these reasons, we emphasize that molecular genetic assessment of galactose metabolism may be more valid in future studies.
Despite our inability to confirm an association between adult lactose consumption or GALT activity and ovarian cancer risk, findings indicating a protective effect of lactose intolerance at an early age, and the increased risk with N314D mutations of GALT and lower GALE activity provide some support for an ovarian cancer/galactose connection. We believe that future studies should attempt to address the hypothesis that intrauterine galactose exposure is an important determinant of risk for ovarian cancer.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Supported by R01 Ca54419 from the National
Cancer Institute. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Ob-Gyn Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Womens
Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 732-4895;
Fax: (617) 732-4899; E-mail: DWCramer{at}bics.bwh.harvard.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: GALK, galactokinase;
GALT, galactose-1 phosphate uridyl transferase; GALE, uridine
diphospho-galactose 4'-epimerase; MA, (eastern) Massachusetts; NH, (all
of) New Hampshire; RDD, random digit dialing; OR, odds ratio; CI,
confidence interval; UDPgal, uridine diphosphogalactose; UDPG, uridine
diphosphoglucose; OC, oral contraceptive; BMI, body mass index. ![]()
Received 1/15/99; revised 10/11/99; accepted 11/ 1/99.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Forges, P. Monnier-Barbarino, B. Leheup, and P. Jouvet Pathophysiology of impaired ovarian function in galactosaemia Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 573 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Genkinger, D. J. Hunter, D. Spiegelman, K. E. Anderson, A. Arslan, W. L. Beeson, J. E. Buring, G. E. Fraser, J. L. Freudenheim, R. A. Goldbohm, et al. Dairy products and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 364 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ye, S. Skates, S. C. Mok, N. K. Horick, H. F. Rosenberg, A. Vitonis, D. Edwards, P. Sluss, W. K. Han, R. S. Berkowitz, et al. Proteomic-Based Discovery and Characterization of Glycosylated Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin and COOH-Terminal Osteopontin Fragments for Ovarian Cancer in Urine Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 12(2): 432 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Berkey, H. R. H. Rockett, W. C. Willett, and G. A. Colditz Milk, Dairy Fat, Dietary Calcium, and Weight Gain: A Longitudinal Study of Adolescents Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2005; 159(6): 543 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C Larsson, L. Bergkvist, and A. Wolk Milk and lactose intakes and ovarian cancer risk in the Swedish Mammography Cohort Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1353 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Pan, A.-M. Ugnat, Y. Mao, S. W. Wen, K. C. Johnson, and The Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Resear A Case-Control Study of Diet and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2004; 13(9): 1521 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. A. Fung, H. Risch, J. McLaughlin, B. Rosen, D. Cole, D. Vesprini, and S. A. Narod The N314D Polymorphism of Galactose-1-Phosphate Uridyl Transferase Does Not Modify the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 678 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Goodman, A. H. Wu, K.-H. Tung, K. McDuffie, D. W. Cramer, L. R. Wilkens, K. Terada, J. K. V. Reichardt, and W. G. Ng Association of Galactose-1-Phosphate Uridyltransferase Activity and N314D Genotype with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2002; 156(8): 693 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-H. Shin, M. D. Holmes, S. E. Hankinson, K. Wu, G. A. Colditz, and W. C. Willett Intake of Dairy Products, Calcium, and Vitamin D and Risk of Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, September 4, 2002; 94(17): 1301 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Goodman, A. H. Wu, K.-H. Tung, K. McDuffie, L. N. Kolonel, A. M. Y. Nomura, K. Terada, L. R. Wilkens, S. Murphy, and J. H. Hankin Association of Dairy Products, Lactose, and Calcium with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2002; 156(2): 148 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Kim, S. J. Skates, T. Uede, K.-k. Wong, J. O. Schorge, C. M. Feltmate, R. S. Berkowitz, D. W. Cramer, and S. C. Mok Osteopontin as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer JAMA, April 3, 2002; 287(13): 1671 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |