| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033-0800 [J.-M. Y., M. C. Y., M. C., R. K. R.]; Shanghai Institute of Digestive Diseases, Shanghai 200001, Peoples Republic of China [W.-W. X.]; and Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, Peoples Republic of China [Y.-T. G.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(a) the specific antibodies to H. pylori were assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) developed in Southern England, using H. pylori strains obtained from local patients (9) . That English-based ELISA has been validated in several western populations with varying rates of sensitivity and specificity. Rates of sensitivity and specificity among tested subjects in Northern Ireland were 88 and 72%, respectively (10) . The corresponding rates among the populations of Rochester, Minnesota; Copenhagen, Denmark; and Victoria, Australia were 93 and 96%, 74 and 71%, and 86 and 65%, respectively (11, 12, 13) . There is no information on the validity of this English-based assay in a Chinese population. Given that strains of H. pylori may vary in different populations, it is possible that the English-based assay is suboptimal (or even inappropriate) for detecting infection in a Chinese population; and
(b) the cohort had been followed for a relatively short period of time (an average of 2.4 years between blood collection and the diagnosis of gastric cancer; Ref. 8 ). There is evidence that with the development of advanced gastric disease, the H. pylori bacterium can be cleared from the stomach, resulting in seroconversion (from positive to negative for H. pylori antibodies; Ref. 14 ). Therefore, gastric cancer patients (but not control subjects) may have been misclassified as seronegative, even though they were infected in the past. In the presence of such differential misclassification, estimates of the association between H. pylori seropositivity and gastric cancer would have been biased downwards.
In the present study, we used a recently developed and validated assay that was based on patient materials collected locally to assess H. pylori seropositivity. Follow-up of the cohort is now extended to an average of 5.2 years postenrollment. This report presents our latest findings on the H. pylori-gastric cancer association within the Shanghai Male Cohort.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By March 1998, 195 incident cases of gastric cancer were identified among the cohort members. For each of the cases, three cancer-free controls matched to the index cases by age (within 2 years), month and year of sample collection, and neighborhood of residence at recruitment were selected from the cohort (8) . The first 85 of these cases and 255 of their matched controls were tested for serum H. pylori antibodies using the English-based assay (8) . Serum samples on 7 gastric cancer cases and an additional 16 control subjects not matched to these 7 cancer cases were depleted after the English-based serological testing. Therefore, 188 cases and 548 controls were included in the present study. Seventy-eight of these patients and 218 of their matched controls were included in the comparison of H. pylori positivity rates derived from the English-based versus the Shanghai-based ELISA.
Laboratory Tests.
Blood samples from all of the cohort subjects were processed shortly after collection and stored at -20°C and -70°C until analysis. Serum samples in the present study were taken from the -20°C aliquots and had been thawed, once when they were used to test for the presence of H. pylori antibodies using the English-based assay (8)
. Serum samples (which were blinded with respect to case/control status and other characteristics of the individual subjects) were sent on dry ice to the Shanghai Institute of Digestive Diseases for H. pylori antibody testing using an enhanced version of ELISA developed by Pan et al. (16
, 17) . All of the serum samples from a given case-control matched set were tested in the same batch, which routinely contained two positive and two negative control sera for quality assurance. Duplicate measurements were made on 332 (45%) of the 736 tested samples; the remaining 404 samples were measured only once to conserve serum samples for other biomarker measurements. Only seven (2%) samples yielded inconsistent duplicate results. A third measurement was made on each of these seven specimens and the majority finding was recorded (two were antibody-positive, and five were antibody-negative). We also submitted two independent serum samples on 10% of study subjects (n = 74) to further assure high laboratory quality. Results were consistent for 72 of these subjects. The two subjects with inconsistent results were tested a third time, and the majority finding was recorded for each (one was antibody-negative, and the other was antibody-positive).
The ELISA method of Pan et al. (17) is briefly described as follows. A bacterial suspension from each of 15 H. pylori strains obtained locally was sonicated, pooled, and used as a group antigen. The optimal antigen concentration was 10 µg/ml as determined by checkerboard titrations. Testing serum samples were diluted to 1:200. The absorbance was read at 490 nm on a spectrophotometer (Denatach Minireader II) after stopping the reaction with 50 ml of 1 M sulfuric acid. A serum sample was considered positive when the ratio of its absorbance to that of the standard negative sera was greater than 1.7.
The Pan et al. ELISA method (17) was validated among Shanghai residents. Two hundred twenty-five patients with various gastrointestinal symptoms were recruited. Gastric biopsies and serum samples were collected from all of the study subjects. Culture and smear of biopsied materials showed that 171 subjects were infected with H. pylori. One hundred sixty-one of the 171 infected patients were seropositive (sensitivity rate, 94%), and 47 of the 54 uninfected subjects were seronegative (specificity rate, 87%; Ref. 16 ).
The assay used in the present study was an enhanced version of the ELISA described above (17) . An additional 15 strains of H. pylori obtained from local patients were added to the antigen pool (thus, 30 strains in total). To validate this enhanced version of the ELISA, a separate group of 152 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were recruited. One hundred nineteen (78%) patients were men; their mean age was 44 years (range, 2262 years). Gastric biopsies and serum samples were collected from all of the study subjects. Culture and smear of biopsied materials showed that 117 subjects were infected with H. pylori. One hundred sixteen of the 117 infected patients were seropositive (sensitivity rate, 99%), and 33 of the 35 uninfected subjects were seronegative (specificity rate, 94%).
Statistical Analysis.
Data were analyzed by standard matched-pair methods (18)
. The association between H. pylori infection and gastric cancer was measured by OR3
with 95% CI. We also examined this association by subsite of gastric cancer and by time interval between blood sample collection and diagnosis of gastric cancer. Conditional logistic regression models were used to examine H. pylori-gastric cancer association with or without adjustment for other potential confounders. The current set of possible confounding variables was identical to the one used in the analysis of our first study (8)
and included the level of education (primary school or less, middle school, college or higher), cigarette smoking (ever versus never), alcohol consumption (weekly versus less frequently), history of peptic ulcer (yes versus no), blood group (O, A, B, or AB type), and consumption of dark leafy vegetables (tertiles), cured meats (tertiles) and pickled vegetables (ever versus never). Results from "unadjusted" and "adjusted" analyses were remarkably similar. The unadjusted results are presented in this report.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were 78 patients with gastric cancer and 218 control subjects who had H. pylori serological results from both the English-based and the Shanghai-based assays. Table 1
compares these results. Forty (98%) of the 41 gastric cancer patients who were antibody-positive according to the English assay tested positive by the Shanghai assay. On the other hand, 27 (73%) of the 37 gastric cancer patients who were antibody-negative according to the English assay tested positive by the Shanghai assay. Similar findings were seen in control subjects. Almost all (98%) of the positive control subjects and a substantial proportion (68%) of the negative control subjects by the English assay were seropositive in the present study.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using data from three nested case-control studies to examine the H. pylori-gastric cancer association according to time interval between blood collection and cancer diagnosis, Forman et al. reported that the OR for gastric cancer was 2.1 among subjects with less than 5 years of follow-up, 2.3 in those with 59 years of follow-up, 4.4 in those with 1014 years of follow-up, and 8.7 in those with 15 or more years of follow-up (19) . As previously reported (8) , we find no clear increase in risk (OR, 1.1) among subjects with less than 5 years of follow-up. The observed OR of 3.7 among those with 5 or more years (ranging from 5 to 12 years) of follow-up is compatible with the Forman et al.s results (19) .
The present study clearly indicates that the English-based assay is suboptimal in identifying H. pylori-infected individuals among Shanghai Chinese. Although it had few false-positive readings relative to the Shanghai-based assay, the English-based assay exhibited a substantial rate of false negatives. These differences are likely due to strain-specific differences in H. pylori bacteria inhabiting the British versus the Chinese population. A study in Thailand has shown that a locally derived ELISA is more sensitive and specific in identifying H. pylori-infected individuals than a United States-based assay, although the discrepancy is not as dramatic as that observed in the present study between the English- and the Shanghai-based assay. Whereas the Thai-based assay had sensitivity and specificity rates of 98% and 76%, respectively, the corresponding figures for the United States-based assay were 86% and 66%, respectively (20) .
There is sparse information on H. pylori seropositivity rates in Chinese populations based on locally derived and validated ELISAs. In a rural county in Shandong, China, where gastric cancer mortality in men is about 70 per 100,000 person-years (21) , Zhang et al. (22) reported an H. pylori seropositivity prevalence rate of 68% in healthy men, ages 3564 years, using an assay derived from local strains; no information was given regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. It is unclear whether the difference in rates of H. pylori infection between Shanghai and Shangdong men is real or due to possibly lower sensitivity of the Shangdong assay.
Several epidemiological studies have found a statistically significant association of H. pylori seropositivity with noncardia cancer but not with cardia cancer (3, 4, 5) . In the present study, there is no evidence of a differential risk between cardia and noncardia cancer in relation to H. pylori seropositivity.
In summary, the present data demonstrate a significant, positive association between H. pylori seropositivity and gastric cancer in Shanghai, China, a relatively high-risk population, that was observed only among subjects with at least 5 years of follow-up. The positive association remains unchanged after adjustment for potential confounding factors.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This study was supported by NIH Grants R01 CA43092, R35 CA53890, and P30 ES07048. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Preventive Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, M/S # 44, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90033-0800. Phone: (323) 865-0825; Fax: (323) 865-0136;E-mail: jyuan{at}hsc.usc.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ![]()
Received 11/25/98; revised 4/12/99; accepted 5/24/99.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Sasazuki, M. Inoue, M. Iwasaki, T. Otani, S. Yamamoto, S. Ikeda, T. Hanaoka, S. Tsugane, and for the Japan Public Health Center Study Group Effect of Helicobacter pylori Infection Combined with CagA and Pepsinogen Status on Gastric Cancer Development among Japanese Men and Women: A Nested Case-Control Study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1341 - 1347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okuda, T. Sugiyama, K. Fukunaga, M. Kondou, E. Miyashiro, and T. Nakazawa A Strain-Specific Antigen in Japanese Helicobacter pylori Recognized in Sera of Japanese Children Clin. Vaccine Immunol., November 1, 2005; 12(11): 1280 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Yuan, R. K. Ross, Y.-T. Gao, Y.-H. Qu, X.-D. Chu, and M. C. Yu Prediagnostic Levels of Serum Micronutrients in Relation to Risk of Gastric Cancer in Shanghai, China Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2004; 13(11): 1772 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Marchildon, T. Sugiyama, Y. Fukada, J. S. Peacock, M. Asaka, T. Shimoyama, and D. Y. Graham Evaluation of the Effects of Strain-Specific Antigen Variation on the Accuracy of Serologic Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2003; 41(4): 1480 - 1485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Helicobacter and Cancer Collaborative Group Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori: a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts Gut, September 1, 2001; 49(3): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Limburg, Y.-L. Qiao, S. D. Mark, G.-Q. Wang, G. I. Perez-Perez, M. J. Blaser, Y.-P. Wu, X.-N. Zou, Z.-W. Dong, P. R. Taylor, et al. Helicobacter pylori Seropositivity and Subsite-Specific Gastric Cancer Risks in Linxian, China J Natl Cancer Inst, February 7, 2001; 93(3): 226 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-c. You, L. Zhang, M. H. Gail, Y.-s. Chang, W.-d. Liu, J.-l. Ma, J.-y. Li, M.-l. Jin, Y.-r. Hu, C.-s. Yang, et al. Gastric Dysplasia and Gastric Cancer: Helicobacter pylori, Serum Vitamin C, and Other Risk Factors J Natl Cancer Inst, October 4, 2000; 92(19): 1607 - 1612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |