| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Columbia University, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, New York, New York 10032 [M. D. G., M. B. T.]; Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Pathology, New York, New York 10032 [H. H., S. B.]; New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services, Applied Cancer Epidemiology Program, Trenton, New Jersey 08625 [J. B. S.]; National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [L. A. B.]; Mt. Sinai Medical Center, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, New York, New York 10029 [J. L. B.]; and University of Southern Maine, Department of Applied Medical Sciences, Portland, Maine 04103 [W. D. T.]
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
18 years of age) heterogeneity was apparent (2.39; 95% CI, 1.08–5.30), which was attenuated in a multivariate model (1.99; 95% CI, 0.87–4.54); among cases with estrogen receptor-negative tumors, heterogeneity increased to 5-fold. For other risk factors, there was no marked heterogeneity between + and - tumors for HER-2/neu. In summary, the incidence of breast cancer among younger women in relation to OC use at an early age varied with HER-2/neu status, with the odds ratio for + tumors twice that for - tumors. |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Some investigators have suggested that OCs may be more strongly associated with pathologically distinct subgroups of breast cancer. However, results of previous studies that have examined the association with cases classified by tumor morphology or estrogen receptor status have been inconsistent (4) . Molecular studies indicate that oncogenes, such as HER-2/neu and others, are involved with breast cancer pathogenesis (5) and possibly with tumor initiation (6) . Thus, classification of tumors by oncogene overexpression or amplification may produce etiologically distinct subgroups. This strategy has been used successfully in a study of occupational exposures and ras oncogene activation in acute myeloid leukemia (7) .
One previous study (8) has explored the possible association between OCs and HER-2/neu status. The adjusted OR in relation to use of OCs at age 20 years or younger was significantly increased 7-fold for HER-2/neu-positive breast cancer among young Swedish women, as compared with cases with tumors that lacked oncogene amplification. The study, however, was based on very limited numbers. A consistent association between OCs and HER-2/neu-positive tumors would indicate that either HER-2/neu is the mechanism by which OCs affect breast cancer, or the oncogene is a cofactor that interacts with OCs in producing the disease.
With regard to other risk factors for breast cancer, another study (9) has addressed the possible interaction between reproductive risk factors and alterations in the HER-2/neu oncogene in breast cancer. In this report from the Netherlands (9) , the OR was significantly increased 4-fold for HER-2/neu-positive breast cancer, as compared with controls, in relation to late age at first birth and ever having breastfed; the corresponding ORs for HER-2/neu-negative breast cancer were 2-fold and less than unity, respectively. Thus, classification of breast cancer cases by the presence of a molecular alteration, and thus into etiologically distinct subgroups, may also help to clarify these relationships as well.
We undertook a population-based study to address the hypothesis that the incidence of HER-2/neu-positive tumors is more strongly associated with OC use than is the incidence of HER-2/neu-negative tumors. The study also explored whether HER-2/neu-positive tumors are related to other risk factors for breast cancer.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Study Subjects and Risk Factor Information.
The source of the cases, controls, and the risk factor information is from the New Jersey component of the parent study, which was a multicenter, population-based, case-control study of breast cancer (3)
. A woman was eligible as a case if she was newly diagnosed with in situ or invasive breast cancer between May 1, 1990, and December 31, 1992; was between the ages of 20 to 44 years at diagnosis; and was a resident of a five-county study area in New Jersey (Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Somerset, and Union). Potentially eligible case women were ascertained using rapid reporting; field personnel visited hospitals within the five-county study area (as well as those in adjacent counties) on a monthly basis to review pathology reports to identify eligible cases. Physicians of eligible cases were contacted for approval to contact their patients.
A woman was eligible as a control if she was between the age of 20 to 44 years, was a resident of the same five-county area of central New Jersey as cases during the study period, and had access to a residential telephone. Controls were identified by random digit dialing (10) and frequency matched to the expected distribution of cases by 5-year age group. Physician-approved cases and controls were contacted first by letter and then by telephone to seek permission for the in-person interview. Before each interview, the purpose and content of the study was explained, and the informed consent form was signed.
Interviews were completed with 509 cases (83.4% of eligibles) and 462 controls (76.9%). The in-person interview lasted 
70 min and included ascertainment of OC use (using a reproductive and contraceptive calendar along with pictorial memory aids); menstrual and reproductive histories including pregnancies, lactation, and abortions; lifetime alcohol consumption patterns; adolescent diet; body size and development; physical activity; demographic factors; family history of cancer; and medical history including biopsy-proven benign breast disease and gynecological surgery. After completion of the questionnaire, trained interviewers took anthropometric measures such as skinfold thicknesses, circumference measurements, wrist and elbow width, standing and sitting height, and weight. At the conclusion of the interview, respondents completed a comprehensive self-administered food frequency questionnaire that focused on intake of food items over the past year.
Block Retrieval.
For this project, retrieval was attempted from the appropriate hospital pathology departments for a representative paraffin-embedded tumor tissue block for each case participant. For the present study, blocks were successfully retrieved for 401 (78.8%) of the interviewed cases. As reported previously (11)
, the distribution of known and suspected risk factors for breast cancer did not vary significantly between cases with and without tumor tissue available for immunohistochemistry.
Slide Preparation and Laboratory Analyses.
HER-2/neu overexpression was evaluated in tissue sections by immunohistochemical staining (12
, 13)
using antibodies with high sensitivity for HER-2/neu in paraffin-embedded tissues. The paraffin blocks were used to generate three 5-µm-thick sections on silane-coated slides. The sections were baked at 60°C for 30 min, deparaffinized in xylene, and hydrated in alcohol and water. One of the sections was stained with H&E. Another was immunohistochemically stained with C-neu (Ab-3) mouse monoclonal antibody IgG1 (1:50; Calbiochem, Cambridge MA). The slides were stained using the Ventana ES automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson AZ) and then counterstained using the CAS DNA staining kit, which uses the Feulgen staining (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). The stained DNA was quantified using the CAS200 Image Analyzer. The last of the three sections was used as a negative control for the immunohistochemical staining of C-neu and was prepared in identical fashion except that the section lacked the C-neu primary antibody. In addition, each batch of staining performed had two controls stained in parallel. This includes a CAS control for DNA content consisting of a cell line of known DNA content. A CAS control cell line of known DNA content and overexpressor of C-neu with a known C-neu protein content was also used as a control (Becton Dickinson).
The H&E section corresponding to each block was reviewed by the two study pathologists (HH and SB) to confirm the diagnosis of cancer. The corresponding areas were searched for in the C-neu-stained sections. Areas of cancer showing predominantly membranous red staining were analyzed by the CAS200, provided that the negative control showed minimal background staining. Using the CAS200 Quantitative Image Analyzer (Becton Dickinson), the C-neu protein level was quantitated with the Quantitative Oncogene product program, yielding the average pg protein of C-neu per cell.
Levels above 0.1 pg/cell were considered elevated and positive of overexpression. For additional statistical analyses, we also considered an alternative cutpoint for positivity of 0.2 pg. Because results were not substantially different from those based on a cutpoint of 0.1, only the latter are shown.
Statistical Analyses.
Unordered polytomous logistic regression (14)
was used to calculate the ORs and 95% CIs for HER-2/neu-positive (+) breast cancer and HER-2/neu-negative (-) breast cancer, as compared with the controls, in relation to use of OCs, patterns of OC use, and other factors including age at menarche, age at first birth, parity, lactation, induced abortion, family history of breast cancer, previous breast biopsy, body size, usual alcohol use, race, education, smoking, electric blanket use, physical activity, and caloric intake. The ratio of the ORs (and corresponding CIs; Ref. 15
) was used as an indicator of heterogeneity in risk for tumor-positive versus tumor-negative cancer. Best fitting models were developed from a saturated model including all known and suspected risk factors for breast cancer and then excluding covariates that did not improve the overall fit of the model as measured by the log likelihood ratio test (14)
. Cutoff points for the factors that were assessed as continuous variables were based on the distributions observed among the control subjects, with the exception of OCs and cigarette smoking. For these latter variables, cutoff points were used to be consistent with other previous publications (3
, 16)
of these two controversial topics.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
). Case women with HER-2/neu-negative tumors were more likely than women with HER-2/neu-positive tumors to have ER+ tumors (P = 0.02) and to be diagnosed with in situ disease (P = 0.11). There was little association between HER-2/neu status and progesterone receptor status or race.
|
shows the age-adjusted ORs and corresponding CIs for HER-2/neu+ and HER-2/neu- breast cancer in relation to patterns of OC use. There was little heterogeneity in risk for OC use for 6 months or more by HER-2/neu status (age adjusted ratio of ORs, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.83–2.00). However, among women who started using the pill at age 18 years or earlier, heterogeneity by HER-2/neu status was apparent (2.39; 95% CI, 1.08–5.30). There was little or no heterogeneity of association in relation to duration of OC use, recent use, and recently starting or stopping.
|
also shows the age-adjusted ORs and corresponding CIs for HER-2/neu+ and HER-2/neu- breast cancer in relation to reproductive and other risk factors for breast cancer, including family history of breast cancer, body size, alcohol, or cigarette smoking. There was evidence of heterogeneity by HER-2/neu status among Asian and other women (ratio of the OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.02–7.61); however, the number of Asian and other case and control participants (excluding blacks and whites) in our study was small. There was little or no heterogeneity of effect for other factors examined, including age at first birth (ratio of the OR, 0.96 for each additional year; 95% CI, 0.92–1.01), lactation (ratio of the OR, 0.72 for ever versus never; 95% CI, 0.44–1.15), or the other factors listed in Table 2
.
In Table 3
are the multivariate-adjusted ORs for breast cancer categorized by HER-2/neu status. Table 3
includes a variable for age at first use of OCs along with those variables that contributed to a best fitting model as described in "Materials and Methods." The modest heterogeneity in ORs observed for early pill use was no longer statistically significant in a multivariate model (for age 18 or earlier, the ratio of the ORs, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.87–4.54). As shown in Table 3
, for other established and suspected breast cancer risk factors, our analyses did not reveal marked heterogeneity in risk between positive and negative HER-2/neu tumors.
|
are the multivariate-adjusted ORs and corresponding CIs for HER-2/neu+ and HER-2/neu- breast cancer in relation to patterns of OC use with the breast cancer cases further stratified by the ER status of the tumor. Among case women with ER- tumors, the OR for ever use of OCs was 2.58 (95% CI , 1.31–5.10) among HER-2/neu+ cases and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.49–1.71) among HER-2/neu- cases. The ratio of the ORs for ever use of OCs was significantly elevated (2.81; 95% CI, 1.18–6.67). The heterogeneity was particularly pronounced among women with age at first use before age 18 years (ratio of the OR, 5.37; 95% CI, 1.20–24.01) or after age 22 years (ratio of the OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 1.81–19.36). Little or no heterogeneity, in relation to OC use (Table 4
), was noted among case women with ER+ tumors. When cases were stratified by progesterone receptor status, which is highly correlated to ER status, a similar but attenuated pattern of effect was observed; due to sparse cells, however, modification by ER/PR status combined could not be evaluated. Heterogeneity by stage of disease was not apparent (data not shown). Also, there was little variation in the incidence of HER-2/neu+ and HER-2/neu- breast cancer in relation to other estrogen-related risk factors when cases were stratified by estrogen/progesterone receptor status.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In the study reported here, the OR for breast cancer in relation to OC use before age 18 was elevated among women with HER-2/neu-positive tumors and decreased among women with HER-2/neu-negative tumors. The 2-fold heterogeneity in the ORs was statistically significant in age-adjusted models but not in multivariate-adjusted models. With further stratification by ER status, the ratio of the OR increased to 5-fold among women with tumors that were ER-, which reflects over a 3-fold increase in risk among women with HER-2/neu-positive tumors and a 31% decrease among women with HER-2/neu-negative tumors. There was little or no heterogeneity in relation to other risk factors, including age at first birth.
Interpretation of these results must be considered in light of the limitations and strengths of our study. The study sample was population based, which would decrease the likelihood of ascertainment bias. Also, there was little difference in the distribution of known and suspected risk factors between cases with and without archived tumor tissue available for our laboratory assays (11) . In addition, the structured interview was developed to specifically assess OC use among young women and was administered by trained interviewers using a reproductive calendar to enhance recall (3) .
Drawbacks to consider include the possibility that chance may account for some of the pattern of findings in our study. However, the variable for which our results are strongest is the one for which there is empirical support from previous research. Thus, our data confirm and expand upon an earlier observation of a large increase in breast cancer risk in relation to OC use at an early age and HER-2/neu status that was reported previously by Olsson et al. (8) in 1991. However, we did not corroborate the earlier finding by Treurniet et al. (9) in which a 4-fold increase in risk in relation to age at first birth or breastfeeding was noted among women with HER-2/neu-positive tumors. A third study (19) found no association between HER-2/neu status in women with node-negative breast cancer and four risk factors examined, menstrual status, family history of breast cancer, age at first pregnancy, and number of pregnancies. Generalizability for all of these studies was hindered by a very select group of study subjects. In our study, our larger, population-based sample size permitted a more thorough and generalizable exploration of reproductive factors, as well as other risk factors for breast cancer, in relation to HER-2/neu status.
For a large epidemiological study, assessment of HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry is a more cost-efficient method than assessing amplification or specific mutations. However, use of immunohistochemistry may have resulted in some misclassification of HER-2/neu status, although the correlation between amplification and overexpression is high (5 , 17 , 20) . Olsson et al. (8) determined gene amplification and reported similar findings to those shown here. Also, in our population-based sample of young women <45 years of age, 43.9% of breast cancer cases showed evidence of HER-2/neu overexpression in the archived tumor tissue, which is within the 18–50% range reported by others (6 , 9 , 19 , 21 , 22) .
In a recent large pooled analysis, the risk of breast cancer was found to be modestly elevated in relation to OC use (1) , particularly long-term use, recent use, or use at an early age. However, there appears to be some heterogeneity in risk among certain subgroups, with the magnitude of risk higher among black women or among women with a family history of breast cancer (2 , 3) . Our study, however, had few nonwhite subjects to explore possible heterogeneity in the association between OC use and breast cancer risk stratified by race and with the cases categorized by HER-2/neu status.
Olsson (23) hypothesized that because both early age at first use of OCs and HER-2/neu amplification were associated with a shared tumor biology (larger tumor size, advanced tumor stage, absence of steroid receptors, a higher rate of proliferation, and high tumor grade), it is possible that the exposure and gene amplification were related. In addition, the strong association between patterns of OC use and HER-2/neu positivity among women with ER-negative tumors noted in our study may be biologically plausible. Because antiestrogens lower HER-2/neulevels in ER-tumors (24) , it is plausible that estrogens stimulate HER-2/neu in these tumors. Thus, variation in the distribution of ER status in populations could result in heterogeneous results when examining the relation between OCs and HER-2/neu+ breast cancer. Thus, failure to consider HER-2/neu and ER status could mask any strong, underlying association between OCs and breast cancer risk.
In summary, this study of young women confirms the association first noted by Olsson et al. (8) of a heterogeneity of effect for breast cancer in relation to OCs when cases are stratified by HER-2/neu status. This study is the first to report a significant 3-fold increase in risk associated with oral contraceptive use among young women with tumors that are HER-2/neu positive and ER negative. Further corroboration by others is needed to examine these provocative associations among younger and older women with breast cancer.
|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
1 This research was supported in part by Grant DAMD-94-j-4250 from the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command and Grant 1R21CA S66224 from the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed, at Columbia School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, 622 West 168th Street, PH18, New York, NY 10032.
3 The abbreviations used are: OC, oral contraceptive; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor.
Received 10/ 8/98; revised 2/11/99; accepted 3/ 1/99.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. Dolle, J. R. Daling, E. White, L. A. Brinton, D. R. Doody, P. L. Porter, and K. E. Malone Risk Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Women Under the Age of 45 Years Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2009; 18(4): 1157 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Kahlenborn, F. Modugno, D. M. Potter, and W. B. Severs Oral Contraceptive Use as a Risk Factor for Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2006; 81(10): 1290 - 1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. B. Nichols, A. Trentham-Dietz, R. R. Love, J. M. Hampton, P. T. Hoang Anh, D. C. Allred, S. K. Mohsin, and P. A. Newcomb Differences in Breast Cancer Risk Factors by Tumor Marker Subtypes among Premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 41 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. H. Amin, C. L. Kuhle, and L. A. Fitzpatrick Comprehensive Evaluation of the Older Woman Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2003; 78(9): 1157 - 1185. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. B. Terry, M. D. Gammon, J. B. Schoenberg, L. A. Brinton, N. Arber, and H. Hibshoosh Oral Contraceptive Use and Cyclin D1 Overexpression in Breast Cancer among Young Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2002; 11(10): 1100 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Thompson and C. Ambrosone Chapter 7: Molecular Epidemiology of Genetic Polymorphisms in Estrogen Metabolizing Enzymes in Human Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, July 1, 2000; 2000(27): 125 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.-Y. Huang, B. Newman, R. C. Millikan, K. Conway, B. S. Hulka, M. J. Schell, and E. T. Liu Risk of Breast Cancer According to the Status of HER-2/neu Oncogene Amplification Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2000; 9(1): 65 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |
