| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
National Institute of Occupational Health, DK 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark [L. E. K., M. O. G., H. S-J.]; Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland [H. N., H. J.]; Institute of Environmental Medicine, DK 8000 Århus, Denmark [P. S. N., H. O., H. A.]; and Clinic of Occupational Medicine, Hillerød Hospital, DK 3400 Denmark [E. R.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some occupational groups, such as professional drivers working in urban areas, are exposed to a high level of ambient air pollution (2) . An increased risk of several types of cancer, including that of the lungs and bladder, was observed among men working in urban, suburban, and interurban passenger transport and in trucking freight (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) . In addition, truck drivers and railroad workers showed increased mortality due to cerebrovascular diseases and arteriosclerosis, and it was suggested that exposure to diesel exhaust played a contributing role (11) .
In epidemiological studies, detailed information on exposure is usually scarce, and because several confounding factors exist, the actual contribution of ambient air pollution as a risk factor of cancer is difficult to assess. Biomarkers such as adducts in DNA and proteins and cytogenetic alterations may help in identifying the exposure and revealing its early effects (12, 13, 14) . In this context, structural chromosomal aberrations are of special interest, because high chromosomal aberration levels in peripheral lymphocytes have been associated with an increased risk of cancer (15 , 16) . Because exhaust from diesel engines is a major contributor to the mutagenicity of urban air (17) and induces cytogenetic damage in both mammalian cells in vitro and rodents in vivo (18) , exposure to urban air polluted with diesel exhaust may also increase the level of chromosome damage in humans. Egyptian traffic policemen showed an increased frequency of chromosomal aberrations and SCEs5 in their peripheral lymphocytes (19) , and an increase in SCEs was also seen in a similar Indian study (20) . Policemen from the city of Genoa demonstrated exposure to benzo(a)pyrene, but no effect on SCEs or micronuclei in peripheral lymphocytes could be observed (21 , 22) . No association between occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and chromosome aberration frequencies could be seen in two Swedish studies (23 , 24) or in a Welsh study (25) .
Several studies have found associations between increased cancer risk and impaired DNA repair (26 , 27) . Therefore, individual differences in DNA repair capacity may generally influence the rate of genotoxic damage and cancer susceptibility from exposure to urban air pollution. Another potential source of individual susceptibility is the polymorphism of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes. A large number of chemical carcinogens present in ambient air are metabolized to the ultimate carcinogenic form or detoxified to less toxic or nontoxic metabolites that are excreted in the urine. These reactions are primarily mediated by members of the cytochrome P-450 family of enzymes and by conjugating enzymes such as glutathione S-transferases and N-acetyltransferases. High rates of metabolic activation and defective detoxification have been associated with an increased risk for certain types of cancer, with one example being lung cancer in individuals who lack GSTM1 activity due to a homozygous allelic loss of the GSTM1 gene (28) .
In a Danish national research program to evaluate genetic biomarkers to assess exposure to the genotoxic compounds present in urban air, bus drivers and postal workers in the Copenhagen were selected as the study population. To exclude contribution by active smoking, only nonsmokers were chosen. City bus drivers, in comparison with rural and suburban bus drivers, were observed to have elevated levels of bulky DNA adducts in their mononuclear WBCs (14) . An analysis of air pollution from personal air samplers demonstrated that bus drivers were exposed up to three times higher levels of naphthalene than mail carriers (29) . The present study reports results from the genetic monitoring of chromosomal aberrations as a measure of genotoxic damage and UDS as a measure of DNA repair. The findings are correlated with the genetic polymorphisms of two important xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, GSTM1 and NAT2.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study groups consisted of 81 male and 25 female bus drivers and 70 male and 31 female postal workers (Table 1)
. On the basis of bus routes driven during the past month, two researchers categorized the exposure of 100 bus drivers as high (city of Copenhagen), medium (suburbs), and low (countryside).
|
In connection with a health examination, heparinized blood samples were collected (on Tuesdays) from the bus drivers in August to November 1994 and from the postal workers in August to November 1995, with 612 persons being sampled per week. A self-administrated questionnaire concerning present and previous occupations, environmental urban air exposure, symptoms and diseases, familiar disposition, smoking, drinking and eating habits, physical activity at work and leisure, and contact with the health care system was filled in by all selected subjects and was completed during the health examination.
The nonsmoking status of the subjects was confirmed by serum cotinine analysis using a kit (STC Diagnostics Care, Bethlehem, PA). Sixty-one bus drivers had never smoked, whereas 45 bus drivers were ex-smokers with an average of 16 smoking years and an average time since quitting of 14 years [range, 0.534 year(s)]. Thirty-nine of the ex-smokers stated that they had smoked, on average, 20 cigarettes/day. Seventy-four postal workers had never smoked, and 27 were ex-smokers. The ex-smokers had smoked, on average, 15 cigarettes/day, with an average of 14 smoking years and an average time since quitting of 11 years (range, 1.527 years).
In comparison with the postal workers (Table 1)
, the bus drivers were, on average, older (mean, 45 years versus 38 years) and showed a higher mean BMI [weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters)]; 47% of bus drivers were classified as overweight (25 < BMI < 30), and 31% were classified as heavily overweight (BMI
30), whereas the respective percentages for postal workers were 34% and 16%.
UDS in Peripheral Mononuclear WBCs.
Peripheral mononuclear WBCs were isolated from 60 ml of whole blood (collected in sodium heparin) within 4 h after sampling by gradient centrifugation in Lymphoprep (Nycomed Pharma, Oslo, Norway), as described previously (30)
. The isolated cells were washed twice in RPMI 1640 (Grand Island Biological Co., Paisley, United Kingdom) and once in PBS [137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.4)] with centrifugation at 1200 x g for 10 min.
The ability of the cells to repair induced DNA damage was determined as UDS by applying the method described by Pero et al. (31) and modified by Knudsen (30) . Two million cells were resuspended in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine (200 mM; Merck 100289; Darmstadt, Germany) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (10,000 IU/ml penicillin and 10,000 µg/ml streptomycin; Grand Island Biological Co.) and treated at 37°C with 100 µM DMS (99% purity; Merck) for 30 min. The cells were then transferred to microtiter plates (200,000 cells/well) and incubated for 18 h at 37°C with 0.4 µM [3H]thymidine (925 GBq/mmol; Amersham Life Science, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) in RPMI 1640 supplemented as described above with the addition of 20% autologous plasma. To minimize replicative DNA synthesis, the medium also contained 10 mM hydroxyurea (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). UDS was determined as the cpm [3H]thymidine incorporated into 200,000 cells by eight duplicate measurements in a 1205 Betaplate liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland), using glass fiber filters to which the cells had been transferred using a Mach II cell harvester 96 (Wallac). Background UDS, which was determined in parallel cultures exposed to DMSO (99.8% purity; Merck), was subtracted from the results.
To control interindividual differences due to the variation of T- and B-lymphocyte content in the mononuclear cell fraction used for the UDS assay, the proportion of T- and B-lymphocytes and monocytes was studied by immunofluorescence. Specific monoclonal antibodies (Simultest CD3/CD19; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) toward B-lymphocytes (anti-Leu-12, CD19; fluorescein conjugated) and T-lymphocytes (anti-Leu-4, CD3; phycoerythrin conjugated) were simultaneously added on microscopic specimens of mononuclear cells. A separate cell sample was reacted with antibodies toward monocytes (anti-Leu-M3, CD14; phycoerythrin conjugated; Becton Dickinson). The percentage of B cells (orange-red) and T cells (green) and, separately, the percentage of monocytes (orange-red) were counted from a minimum of 200 cells in a fluorescence microscope.
Chromosomal Aberration Analysis.
From each donor, a 5-ml sample of heparinized blood was sent by air to Finland for the analysis of chromosomal aberrations. The majority of the shipments arrived at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health approximately 24 h after sampling. During the transfer, the samples were refrigerated and were not X-rayed. Two phytohemagglutinin-stimulated whole-blood lymphocyte cultures/sample were established in cell culture tubes (Falcon 3033; Becton Dickinson Labware, Lincoln Park, NJ) and cultured and harvested as described previously (32)
. For the analysis of chromosomal aberrations, 100 metaphases were scored from microscopic preparations using Cytoscan DF (Applied Imaging, Sunderland, United Kingdom) for metaphase finding. Chromatid gaps were defined to be wider than a chromatid but smaller than the width of two chromatids. All analyses were performed on coded slides by one observer.
Genotype Determination.
DNA was isolated from whole blood as described by Spurr et al. (33)
. The genotyping of NAT2 and GSTM1 was performed in duplicate, using techniques based on PCR, as described by Okkels et al. (34
, 35)
. The NAT2 genotypes were classified as slow acetylators (any combination of the variant alleles M1, M2, and M3) or rapid acetylators (heterozygous wild-type/variant and the rare homozygous wild-type), and the GSTM1 genotypes were classified as GSTM1 null (both alleles deleted) or GSTM1 positive (at least one undeleted allele).
Statistical Analysis.
The data were processed in a Clarion database (Top Speed Corp., Pompano Beach, FL) and transferred into the SAS/STAT software (Version 6.12, Fourth Edition, Vol. 2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to compare two samples. Because the discrete frequencies of chromosomal aberrations did not significantly deviate from the Poisson distribution, the data were further analyzed with a multiple log-linear Poisson regression model estimating the relative risks and their 95% confidence intervals (36)
. The level of significance was P <0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proportion of B-lymphocytes, T-lymphocytes, and monocytes in the mononuclear cell fractions of all subjects ranged from 228%, 3077%, and 251%, respectively.
The DMS-induced UDS (after subtraction of the DMSO background) ranged from -92 to 563 cpm/200,000 cells. In the bus drivers, the DMS-induced UDS activity correlated positively with the age of the subjects (r = 0.19; P = 0.05). No such correlation was observed in the analysis of the postal workers. In the bus drivers and postal workers, a significantly lower UDS value was observed in women (117 ± 123 and 129 ± 146, respectively) in comparison with men (189 ± 140 and 180 ± 102, respectively). No effect of the exposure category of the bus drivers on UDS was observed, and the bus drivers did not differ significantly from the postal workers (Table 1)
. Previous smoking had no influence on UDS.
The results of the chromosomal aberration analysis are shown in Tables 2
and 3
. In the bus drivers, log-linear Poisson regression analysis showed a significant negative dependence between DMS-induced UDS and the number of cells with gaps (P < 0.0005; Table 4
).
|
|
|
45 and >45 years), or previous smoking (comparison of ex-smokers and never smokers; data not shown).
|
|
To investigate the effect of the combinations of the metabolic genotypes, the bus drivers were divided into four groups according to the available GSTM1 (null and positive) and NAT2 (slow and rapid) genotypes (Table 7)
. A statistically significantly higher frequency was found for cells with chromatid-type aberrations and for the total number of aberrant cells (with or without gaps) in the GSTM1 null, NAT2 slow genotype group in comparison with the GSTM1 positive, NAT2 rapid genotype group. The GSTM1 null, NAT2 rapid and GSTM1 positive, NAT2 slow groups showed intermediate frequencies.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, chromosomal aberrations were used to assess genotoxic effects in bus drivers exposed to a high level of urban air pollution. Besides bus drivers, we also studied postal workers who are expected to be exposed to lower air pollution levels than bus drivers. All subjects were nonsmokers to exclude the effects of this common confounder that is known to affect chromosome aberration rates. Some of the individuals studied were ex-smokers, but no significant effects of previous smoking could be observed in the present study, although some of our previous data have suggested that the chromosome-damaging effect of smoking can persist for several years (32) .
The group of bus drivers studied here has previously been examined for aromatic DNA adducts in peripheral mononuclear cells; the results showed a clear exposure, with a 15-fold increase in the level of DNA adducts in comparison with a rural control group (14) . The present findings also suggest that the bus drivers have experienced genotoxic exposure. Compared with the postal workers in a multivariate Poisson regression model adjusting for the modifying effect of age, sex, and DNA repair, a significantly increased risk of chromosome aberrations was seen.
During the last 20 years, several nonpositive and positive studies on the association between exposure to diesel exhaust and cytogenetic damage have been published (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) , all of which included both smokers and nonsmokers and relatively small numbers of subjects. The present results showed that an effect of traffic-generated urban air exposure on chromosomal aberrations can be demonstrated in a carefully conducted study. The sensitivity of our analysis was increased by the relatively high number of study subjects and the exclusion of smokers, enabling us to show an effect at exposure levels that are presumably lower than those in the studies cited above.
An important factor that has not been taken into account in previous studies of urban air pollution and chromosome damage is the polymorphism of enzymes involved in the metabolism of air-borne carcinogens. The GSTM1 null genotype, resulting in total lack of GSTM1 enzyme activity, was associated with an increased level of chromosome damage in the bus drivers (especially those driving in the center of the city), but not in the postal workers, indicating an association with exposure. This pattern resembles our recent findings in a group of pesticide-exposed greenhouse workers and control persons in which the effect of smoking, another complex exposure, on lymphocyte chromosomal aberrations was seen only in GSTM1 null subjects (39 , 40) . In epidemiological studies, the GSTM1 null genotype has been associated with an increased risk of developing lung cancer by smoking (28) . Our previous study on the bus drivers showed no statistically significant effects of GSTM1 or NAT2 genotypes, alone or in combination, on the level of DNA adducts in mononuclear leukocytes, although the GSTM1 null genotype tended to be associated with higher adduct levels in all groups studied, including rural controls (14) .
Our present results on the bus drivers showed significantly higher levels of chromosomal aberrations in subjects with NAT2 slow, GSTM1 negative genotypes compared with those with NAT2 rapid and GSTM1 positive genotypes, the two other combinations of these genotypes giving intermediate results. The GSTM1 null, NAT2 slow combination has previously been described to enhance the level of thioguanine-resistant mutant T-lymphocytes and aromatic DNA adducts in nonsmoking male bus maintenance workers and controls (41 , 42) , urine mutagenicity in coke oven workers (43) , and the risk of malignant mesothelioma (44) . Interestingly, in our results, only the NAT2 slow (but not the GSTM1) genotype was a significant risk factor in the group of postal workers. This indicates that the NAT2 genotype effect is not due to exposure to a high level of urban air pollution but to something else common to all subjects. Alternatively, the NAT2 genotype might influence the baseline level of chromosome damage. Acetylation occurs in folate catabolism (45) and in various cellular processes such as the function of chromosomal proteins (46) and the interconversion of polyamines (44 , 47) , although the possible involvement of NAT2 in this connection is unknown. The NAT2 slow genotype has been reported to increase the risk of bladder cancer in exposure to aromatic amines (48) .
Another interesting result in the present study was that DNA repair, measured as DMS-induced UDS, was found to influence the frequency of chromosomal aberrations. There was a statistically significant negative association between the DMS-induced UDS in mononuclear cells and the number of (mostly chromatid) gaps in cultured peripheral lymphocytes. This indicates a protective role of high UDS activity toward chromosome damage. Comparable results were previously obtained in patients with psoriasis and skin cancer who had lower UDS activity and higher DNA damage than healthy subjects, in agreement with the idea that a low rate of DNA repair increases DNA damage (49) . Our findings suggest that (chromatid) gaps are the result of unrepaired lesions in DNA. Gaps, as we defined them (50) , have both an upper size limit (the width of two chromatids) to arbitrarily distinguish them from larger breaks and a lower size limit (the width of a chromatid) to avoid recording any small unstained areas in chromosomes as gaps. This probably means that many of our gaps are true chromatid breaks.
In this study, no exposure-related effects on UDS were found, which suggests that the exposure of the subjects did not alter their capacity to perform the type of DNA repair measured in the assay. Similarly, the metabolic genotypes did not affect the individual UDS values. The observed positive correlation between UDS and the monocyte content of the mononuclear cell fraction indicates a higher DNA repair capacity in monocytes than in lymphocytes. Previously, a wide interindividual variation in UDS induced by chemicals or UV radiation has been observed (51, 52, 53) . Besides interindividual variation in DNA repair capacity, the differential composition of peripheral mononuclear cells and differences among the leukocyte subsets in the ability to process DNA damage could account for this variation. Because induced UDS appears to be higher in monocytes and B-lymphocytes than in T-lymphocytes (54 , 55) , it is recommended that the samples be characterized with respect to the subsets of cell populations (30) or that UDS be recorded in one type of cells only.
The present study demonstrates a genotoxic effect of ambient air pollution, mostly attributable to traffic, in bus drivers driving in the center of a major city. An increased risk of cancer has been reported in Danish bus drivers (10) , and our results further support the view that genotoxic exposure is partly responsible for this finding. Interindividual differences in susceptibility are becoming an increasingly important issue in environmental carcinogenesis (56, 57, 58) . The present study shows that polymorphisms of major carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes affect the induced or spontaneous level of chromosome damage, suggesting that they should be taken into account when biomarkers of genotoxicity are determined. As in the present study, correlations between genotypes and effect biomarkers are usually observed at the group level, and such information can be used, e.g., in assessing risks associated with exposure to urban air pollution. However, the existing knowledge is not enough to justify screening of risk genotypes at the individual level, because many scientific, social, and ethical questions are still unanswered (59) . Studies like the present one enable prospective follow-up of the predictive value of biomarkers and metabolic genotypes/phenotypes. The predictivity may concern cancer risk, risk of cardiovascular diseases, or other diseases accessible in national registries. Such prospective follow-up studies have already been designed and performed by Nordic and Italian researchers (15 , 16) and by the European Study Group of Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health (60) . An association has been observed between high levels of chromosomal aberrations and increased risk of cancer.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Supported in part by a grant from The Danish Strategic Environmental Research Program. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Danish National Institute of Occupational Health, Lersø Parkalle 105, DK 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Phone: 45-39165200; Fax: 45-39165201. ![]()
3 Present address: Department of Occupational Health, Århus Kommune Hospital, DK 8000 Århus, Denmark. ![]()
4 Present address: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ålborg Hospital North, DK 9000 Ålborg, Denmark. ![]()
5 The abbreviations used are: SCE, sister chromatid exchange; GSTM1, glutathione S-transferase M1; NAT2, N-acetyltransferase 2; BMI, body mass index; UDS, unscheduled DNA synthesis; DMS, dimethylsulfate. ![]()
Received 10/ 6/98; revised 2/11/99; accepted 2/17/99.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. P. Krishnaja and N. K. Sharma Variability in cytogenetic adaptive response of cultured human lymphocytes to mitomycin C, bleomycin, quinacrine dihydrochloride, Co60 {gamma}-rays and hyperthermia Mutagenesis, March 1, 2008; 23(2): 77 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Vineis and K. Husgafvel-Pursiainen Air pollution and cancer: biomarker studies in human populations Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1846 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Georgiadis, J. Topinka, D. Vlachodimitropoulos, M. Stoikidou, M. Gioka, G. Stephanou, H. Autrup, N. A. Demopoulos, K. Katsouyanni, R. Sram, et al. Interactions between CYP1A1 polymorphisms and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the modulation of lymphocyte bulky DNA adducts and chromosomal aberrations Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2005; 26(1): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hagmar, U. Stromberg, S. Bonassi, I.-L. Hansteen, L. E. Knudsen, C. Lindholm, and H. Norppa Impact of Types of Lymphocyte Chromosomal Aberrations on Human Cancer Risk: Results from Nordic and Italian Cohorts Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 64(6): 2258 - 2263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. GARDE, A. M. HANSEN, J. KRISTIANSEN, and L. E. KNUDSEN Comparison of Uncertainties Related to Standardization of Urine Samples with Volume and Creatinine Concentration Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2004; 48(2): 171 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Hou, S. Fält, K. Yang, F. Nyberg, G. Pershagen, K. Hemminki, and B. Lambert Differential Interactions between GSTM1 and NAT2 Genotypes on Aromatic DNA Adduct Level and HPRT Mutant Frequency in Lung Cancer Patients and Population Controls Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2001; 10(2): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bonassi, L. Hagmar, U. Strömberg, A. H. Montagud, H. Tinnerberg, A. Forni, P. Heikkilä, S. Wanders, P. Wilhardt, I.-L. Hansteen, et al. Chromosomal Aberrations in Lymphocytes Predict Human Cancer Independently of Exposure to Carcinogens Cancer Res., March 1, 2000; 60(6): 1619 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |