| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pediatrics, Stanley Division of Developmental Neurovirology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287 [Y. S., B. C., R. P. V.]; Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 455 Sao Paulo-SP, CEP 01246, Brazil [J. E-N.]; Institut Catala dOncologia, 08907, Barcelona Spain [F. X. B.]; Unit of Field and Intervention Studies, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 69372, France [N. M.]; Department of Pathology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam 1081 HV, the Netherlands [J. M. M. W., C. J. L. M. M.]; and Department of Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 [K. V. S.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 for trend, P < 0.001). Among controls, age was inversely associated with HPV-16 VLP seroreactivity (
2 for trend, P = 0.019). The sera were previously tested for antibodies to HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins; there was no correlation between antibody titers to HPV-16 E6 or E7 and VLPs. The HPV-16 serological assays were compared as screening tests for invasive cervical cancer. The sensitivity and specificity estimates were 47.4 and 75.6% for HPV-16 VLP serology, 63.4 and 89.9% for either HPV-16 E6 or E7 serology, and 53.6 and 93.6% for high titers of either HPV-16 E6 or E7 or VLP antibodies. The utility of HPV-16 VLP ELISA as a screening test for invasive cervical cancer is limited by a high seroprevalence in women with probable prior exposure to HVP 16 but without disease. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously reported the results of a case-control study of invasive cervical carcinoma in Brazil in which cervical specimens were examined for HPV DNA and serum specimens were tested for antibodies to HPV-16 E6 and E7 proteins (8) . In the present study, we have tested the case and control sera for antibodies to HPV-16 VLPs to relate this serological response to case or control status, HPV type in the cervix, presence of antibodies to E6 and E7 proteins, disease stage, and risk factors for sexually transmitted infections. We also evaluated HPV serology as a screening test for cervical cancer, which could be used in situations in which more sophisticated technology is impractical and cervical specimens are not available.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serum specimens were collected at the time of the gynecological examination, stored at -20°C, and available for 194 of 199 cases and 217 of 225 controls for this study.
VLP Production and Purification.
The baculovirus construct containing the L1 and L2 genes of HPV-16 was kindly provided by J. Schiller (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). Sf9 insect cells were grown in a spinner flask to a density of 2° 106/ml at 27°C in 500 ml of Graces insect media (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) with 10% fetal bovine serum, containing gentamicin and Fungizone of recommended concentrations. The cells from a 1-liter culture were infected with recombinant baculoviruses at a multiplicity of infection of
10 determined by plaque assay. After 1 h of incubation at room temperature, the cells were transferred to a total of 20 square tissue culture plates (245 x 245 mm; Nunc, Naperville, IL) containing 100 ml of Graces complete media with antibiotics in each plate. The infected cells were allowed to grow for 72 h at 27°C in a high-humidity incubator and harvested by gentle scraping with a pipette and pelleted by centrifugation. The VLPs were purified as described by Kirnbauer et al. (1)
. Successful preparation of VLP was confirmed by electron microscopic examination as well as SDS-PAGE.
ELISA.
Sera were tested by ELISA for antibodies against HPV-16 VLP as described (6)
. Briefly, wells of microtiter plates (Corning, Acton, MA) were coated with 50 µl of purified VLP at a concentration of 5 µg/ml in PBS (pH 7.4) and held overnight at 4°C. Fifty microliters of test sera diluted 1:10 in PBS containing 0.5% nonfat milk were added to each of two wells and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Specific antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated recombinant protein G (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) diluted 1:10,000 in PBS and 0.05% Tween-20 after 30 min of incubation with freshly prepared 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonic acid) and hydrogen peroxide solution (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD).
Seroreactivity was recorded as absorbance using a microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA). The cutoff absorbance for seropositivity was determined by reference to previously tested negative control serum samples obtained from children and college age women at low risk for HPV infection (6) . Sera with A > 0.183 were scored positive.
Detection of Antibodies to HPV 16 E6 and E7 Proteins.
Antibodies were detected by radioimmunoprecipitation of full-length HPV 16 E6 and E7 proteins prepared by in vitro transcription and translation as described previously (8)
.
Statistical Analysis.
The distributions of absorbance values were compared for cases and controls by Mann-Whitney U test (Kruskal-Wallis test for more than two groups). Frequencies were compared by
2 test or Fishers exact test (two-tailed). ORs and 95% confidence limits were calculated as approximations of relative risks using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Relationship between VLP and E6 and E7 antibody reactions among cases and controls were analyzed by Spearmans correlation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test, P < 0.001; OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.84.3). HPV-16 seropositivity was associated with cervical cancer even after controlling for HPV-16 DNA status (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.34.2).
|
|
|
0.400) were found most frequently in the HPV-16 DNA-positive cases. It is noteworthy that among the 32 antibody-positive controls that were negative for any HPV DNA by PCR, only 7 had high antibody titers to VLP.
VLP Antibody Response in Women with Selected Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer.
Cases and controls were examined for the relationship of VLP antibody prevalence and selected risk factors for cervical cancer (Table 2)
. In both groups, antibody prevalence increased with increasing number of lifetime sexual partners (
2 for trend, P < 0.001). Age at first intercourse was not related to HPV-16 seropositivity among cases, but a nonsignificant inverse trend was observed among controls. Antibody prevalence was not significantly different in different age groups of cases. Among the controls, age was significantly inversely associated with HPV-16 seropositivity (
2 for trend, P = 0.019). There was no association between HPV-16 VLP seropositivity and stage of disease or histological diagnosis (data not shown).
|
|
HPV Serology as a Screening Test for Cervical Cancer.
The serological assays were also evaluated as screening tests for invasive cervical cancer (Table 4)
. HPV-16 VLP serology had a sensitivity of 47.4% and a specificity of 75.6%, whereas HPV-16 E6 and E7 serology had a sensitivity of 63.4% and a specificity of 89.9%. If reactivity to any HPV-16 protein was considered indicative of the presence of cervical cancer, serology detected 80.2% of cases, but the specificity of the combined assays was low (68.7%). By adjusting the cutoff in each assay, it was possible to achieve a sensitivity of 53.6% and a specificity of 93.6% for high titers to at least one of the three antigens.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% is very similar to that reported in several studies of cervical cancer around the world, where the prevalence has ranged from 35 to 59% (11, 12, 13, 14)
. Although the highest seroprevalence was observed among women who had HPV-16 DNA in the genital tract (54.3%), a high seroprevalence was also seen in women who had other HPVs (38.6%) or no HPVs (44.8%) in the genital tract. The most plausible explanation for the high seroprevalence in women without a current HPV-16 infection is that serological markers reflect a history of HPV exposure, and women with cervical cancer associated with HPV types other than 16 commonly have been exposed to HPV-16 in the past. Cross-reactivity to L1 protein of other HPV types seems unlikely, because studies using sera raised against a particular VLP type have demonstrated no or minimal reactivity in ELISA with VLPs of other, even closely related, types (15)
. Even for women whose cancer was presumed to be associated with HPV-16, based on DNA assays of cervical scrapes, the proportion of women with antibodies to HPV-16 VLPs was low (54.2%). Because HPV capsid protein expression is almost never detected in invasive cancers, the absence of immune stimulation by capsid protein may lead to a decline in antibody titer with time. Consistent with this interpretation, we observed a significant decline in antibody titer with age among control women. However, the same trend was not observed among case women; thus additional factors probably contribute to the low seroprevalence among cancer cases. One possibility is that antibody titers in these women declined due to an immunosuppressive effect of cervical cancer. The OR of 2.8 for the association of antibodies to HPV-16 VLPs and cervical cancer was less than that for antibodies to E6 (OR, 18.5) or E7 (OR, 9.1). The weaker association observed for antibody responses to VLPs can be accounted for largely by the higher seroprevalence to VLPs compared with E6 and E7 proteins, among controls. An antibody response to VLPs among controls is consistent with numerous studies showing that VLP antibodies are markers of HPV infection (4, 5, 6 , 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) . Among cases, irrespective of their HPV DNA status, there was no correlation between seroreactivity to HPV-16 VLPs and HPV-16 oncoproteins. The reason for this is not clear, but it may reflect differences in the processes responsible for antibody responses to VLPs and to oncoproteins. E6 and E7 antibodies are known to be associated almost exclusively with invasive cervical cancer and to correlate with tumor burden. In contrast, antibodies to VLPs appear after infection and are probably related to the duration of vegetative DNA replication and expression of capsid proteins. Because the two processes are temporally disparate, it is not surprising that the antibody responses they induce are not correlated. A longitudinal study would be required to address the temporal relationship between antibody responses to different HPV proteins and stage of HPV infection.
The analysis of HPV-16 VLP antibodies in relation to risk factors for cervical cancer showed that seroprevalence markedly increased with an increasing number of lifetime sexual partners. Among controls, seroprevalence increased from 16% in subjects with one partner to 58% in those with more than four partners, and among cases, it increased from 34% in subjects with one partner to 73% in subjects with four or more partners. This pattern has been a consistent finding in epidemiological studies using VLP-based ELISA and would be expected for a sexually transmitted infectious agent (6 , 16 , 20 , 23) . The trend was seen in cases irrespective of the presence or absence of HPV-16 infection detected by PCR (data not shown). This observation implies that multiple sex partners and, consequently, the opportunity for multiple exposures to HPV-16 is a determinant of HPV-16 VLP seroreactivity independent of a persistent HPV-16 infection. A possible explanation for this is that repeated exposure to HPV-16 capsid proteins after a transient infection with HPV-16 further stimulates antibody production.
The use of molecular diagnostic techniques, particularly HPV DNA assays, in cervical cancer screening programs is currently under active consideration. Assays for HPV DNA are attractive screening tests because most, if not all, cervical cancers contain HPV genomes. Because HPV infections occur primarily in young, sexually active women, the specificity of PCR in older women at risk for cervical cancer is high. We compared three serological assays as screening tests for invasive cervical cancer. Nearly half of the cervical cancer cases were detected by HPV-16 VLP serology (47.4%), and almost two-thirds were detected by HPV-16 E6 and E7 serology (63.4%). The specificity of HPV 16 VLP serology was poor for a screening test (75.6%), and that of HPV-16 E6 and E7 serology was fair (89.9%). The optimal performance of serological assays was achieved by a combination of high titers of antibody to any of the three proteins (sensitivity, 53.6%; specificity, 93.6%). One caveat to the use of E6 and E7 serology for screening is that E6 and E7 antibodies are markers of invasive cervical cancer but not of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (24)
. Therefore, serological testing for E6 and E7 antibodies would not identify women with preinvasive disease. Although the HPV-16 VLP ELISA had a sensitivity of only
50%, testing for reactivity to VLPs of other oncogenic types would most likely increase the sensitivity of VLP serology. However, the specificity of VLP serology would be low, resulting in many false-positive results if the test were used for cancer screening. An effective and commonly used strategy in this situation is to combine a sensitive screening test with a highly specific confirmatory test. This strategy has been used successfully for HIV diagnosis by using ELISA for screening and Western blot for confirmation (25)
. VLP serology could, for example, be combined with a confirmatory PCR. Given the limited value of cytology in underdeveloped countries and the difficulties in obtaining cervical smears, it is worthwhile to consider the value of serological assays in cervical cancer screening programs in these regions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grant AI42058. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock Building, Room 1111, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: rviscidi{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: HPV, human papillomavirus; VLP, virus-like particle; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. ![]()
Received 3/ 2/99; revised 7/21/99; accepted 7/28/99.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dillon, T. Sasagawa, A. Crawford, J. Prestidge, M. K. Inder, J. Jerram, A. A. Mercer, and M. Hibma Resolution of cervical dysplasia is associated with T-cell proliferative responses to human papillomavirus type 16 E2 J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2007; 88(3): 803 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J P A Baak, A-J Kruse, S J Robboy, E A M Janssen, B van Diermen, and I Skaland Dynamic behavioural interpretation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with molecular biomarkers J. Clin. Pathol., October 1, 2006; 59(10): 1017 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Wang and A. Hildesheim Chapter 5: Viral and Host Factors in Human Papillomavirus Persistence and Progression J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, June 1, 2003; 2003(31): 35 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakagawa, R. Viscidi, I. Deshmukh, M. D. Costa, J. M. Palefsky, S. Farhat, and A.-B. Moscicki Time Course of Humoral and Cell-Mediated Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus Type 16 in Infected Women Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2002; 9(4): 877 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |