CEBP http://www.cancermicroenvironment.tau.ac.il/welcome2009.html Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 17, 1016, April 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0065
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wirgin, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wirgin, I.

Null Results in Brief

Polymorphisms in RAD51, XRCC2, and XRCC3 Are Not Related to Breast Cancer Risk

Jennifer Brooks1, Roy E. Shore1,2, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte1,2, Diane Currie3, Yelena Afanasyeva1, Karen L. Koenig1,2, Alan A. Arslan2,4, Paolo Toniolo2,4 and Isaac Wirgin2,3

1 Division of Epidemiology, Department of Environmental Medicine; 2 New York University Cancer Institute; 3 Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Program, Department of Environmental Medicine; and 4 Division of Epidemiology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York

Requests for reprints: Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10016-3240. Phone: 212-263-6512; Fax: 212-263-8570. E-mail: anne.jacquotte{at}med.nyu.edu


   Introduction
Top
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR...
 References
 
Highly penetrant, but rare, mutations in genes involved in double-strand break repair (i.e., BRCA1 and BRCA2) are associated with a risk for breast cancer of 40% to 65% by age 70 years (1, 2). Polymorphisms in other double-strand break repair genes are thought to contribute to the risk for the disease, either independently or through modifying the risk associated with rare mutations.

This study focuses on polymorphisms in three genes involved in the homologous recombination of double-strand breaks: RAD51 5' untranslated region 135 G>C (rs1801320), X-ray repair cross-complementing group 2 (XRCC2) Arg188His (rs3218536), and XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) in relation to breast cancer risk in the New York University Women's Health Study cohort.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR...
 References
 
The New York University Women's Health Study cohort collected questionnaires and blood samples from 14,274 healthy women ages 35 to 65 years in 1985 to 1991 (3). The current nested case-control study is matched for age and date at blood donation and includes incident cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed before March 1998, with further methodologic details described by Shore et al. (4).

DNA was isolated using Qiagen QIAamp Blood Mini Kits (Qiagen, Inc.; ref. 4). Genotyping was done using PCR-RFLP methods described previously (ref. 4; see Appendix 1 for gene-specific PCR conditions and primer sequences). Blood clots and/or cell aggregates were available for 48% of the women. For the remaining women, serum specimens were used. Genotype results from clots/red cells and serum showed excellent concordance between repeated samples (n = 73) in pilot studies (97% for RAD51 135 G>C, 99% for XRCC2 Arg188His, and 98% for XRCC3 Thr241Met). Quality control duplicates showed 100% concordance for all three polymorphisms.

Statistical Methods
Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed in controls using the {chi}2 goodness-of-fit test. The relationship between genotype and breast cancer risk was evaluated using conditional logistic regression and the additive coding model. The dominant model was also assessed for RAD51 and XRCC2 because of the small number of individuals with the homozygous variant genotype. Tests for interaction between genotype and ethnicity, family history, body mass index, and smoking were planned a priori.

Given our sample size (612 cases and 612 controls) and the allelic frequencies in our population, we had sufficient power (99% for RAD51 135 G>C, 99% for XRCC2 Arg188His, and 88% for XRCC3 Thr241Met) to detect associations of the magnitude observed by Kadouri et al. (5) for RAD51 135 G>C and Kuschel et al. (6) for XRCC2 Arg188His and XRCC3 Thr241Met.


   Results
Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR...
 References
 
Genotype frequencies did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.5). Variant allele frequencies were comparable with those previously reported for populations of Caucasians of European descent for XRCC2 Arg188His (8%; refs. 6-9) and XRCC3 Thr241Met (36%; refs. 8-14), but the variant allele frequency for RAD51 135 G>C of 9% was somewhat lower than previous reports (5, 6, 9).

Table 1 describes study subject characteristics. As expected, significant differences in body mass index and parity/age at first full-term pregnancy were observed between cases and controls. However, these variables were not associated with genotype. Ethnicity was significantly associated with breast cancer risk and genotype. Asian and Hispanic women had a lower risk for breast cancer than non-Jewish White women (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.81); this association is as expected (15). Ethnicity was significantly related to genotype for RAD51 GC/CC (P < 0.0001) and XRCC3 CT/TT (P < 0.0001) genotypes. Among Black women, 37.4% had at least one copy of the RAD51 135 G>C variant allele (non-Jewish White, 15.9%; Jewish White, 9.6%; others, 17.3%). The XRCC3 Thr241Met variant was most common (67.3%) among Jewish White women (non-Jewish White, 60.3%; Black, 38.4%; others, 40.8%). XRCC2 Arg188His variant was not significantly related to ethnicity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Characteristics of cases and controls

 
Unadjusted and ethnicity-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are presented in Table 2 . Although ethnicity was found to be related to genotype and risk, adjusting for ethnicity altered the odds ratios only slightly. In this population, none of the polymorphisms was found to influence breast cancer risk. The sum of variant alleles was also not related to risk (data not shown). Similar results were obtained when the analysis was restricted to Caucasians (data not shown). No significant interaction was found between genotype and ethnicity, body mass index, smoking, parity, or family history.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. DNA repair polymorphisms and breast cancer risk

 

   Discussion
Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR...
 References
 
Genetic instability acquired through inefficient double-strand break repair is believed to be a component of breast cancer susceptibility. RAD51 plays a central role in homologous recombination, through direct interaction with XRCC2, XRCC3, BRCA1, BRCA2, etc., to form a complex essential for the repair of double-strand breaks and DNA cross-links (especially XRCC2 and XRCC3) and for the maintenance of chromosome stability (16).

Studies have suggested that RAD51 135 G>C modifies the breast cancer risk of women with a family history of breast cancer (17, 18) or carriers of BRCA2 mutations (5, 18-21). However, results have been inconsistent (22-24). Studies of non–BRCA2 mutation carriers or women without a family history have found no association between RAD51 135 G>C and breast cancer risk (5, 6).

Results for XRCC2 Arg188His have been similarly mixed (6-8, 23). It is thought that this polymorphism has only a small effect on gene activity (7), although it may modify risk in those with low levels of plasma {alpha}-carotene (25) or plasma folate (26).

XRCC3 Thr241Met has been found to be associated with increased DNA adducts (27), chromosomal deletions (28), and sensitivity to ionizing radiation and cross-linking agents (29, 30). Some (6, 17, 31) but not all (10, 23, 25, 32, 33) studies have found XRCC3 Thr241Met to be related to an increased risk for breast cancer. Pooled analyses and meta-analyses show a small but significant increase in risk (8, 14, 22, 34).

Disruption of double-strand break repair is thought to contribute to carcinogenesis through the accumulation of genetic errors and genetic instability (35). However, in this study, the RAD51, XRCC2, and XRCC3 variants were found not to be associated with breast cancer risk. Unlike other reports, no relationship was found between RAD51 135 G>C and family history of breast cancer, perhaps because the participants in the study were not selected for having a family history of disease or being BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.


   Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR Conditions and Primer Sequences
Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR...
References
 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
 

   Footnotes
 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute Center grant CA 16087 and National Cancer Institute grant CA091892, Department of Defense grant DAMD17-01-1-0578, and Komen Foundation grant BCTR 2000 685.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 1/22/08; accepted 2/ 6/08.


   References
Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Appendix A. Gene-Specific PCR...
 References
 

  1. Begg CB, Haile RW, Borg A, et al. Variation of breast cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers. JAMA 2008;299:194-201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Antoniou A, Pharoah P, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:1117–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Shore R, Koenig K, et al. Postmenopausal levels of oestrogen, androgen, and SHBG and breast cancer: long-term results of a prospective study. Br J Cancer 2004;90:153–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Shore R, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Currie D, et al. Polymorphisms in XPC and ERCC2 genes, smoking and breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 2008;122:2101–5.
  5. Kadouri L, Kote-Jarai Z, Hubert A, et al. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies breast cancer risk in BRCA2 carriers, but not in BRCA1 carriers or noncarriers. Br J Cancer 2004;90:2002–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Kuschel B, Auranen A, McBride S, et al. Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility. Hum Mol Genet 2002;11:1399–407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rafii S, O'Regan P, Xinarianos G, et al. A potential role for the XRCC2 R188H polymorphic site in DNA-damage repair and breast cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2002;11:1433–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. García-Closas M, Egan KM, Newcomb PA, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and risk of breast cancer: two population-based studies in USA and Poland, and meta-analyses. Hum Genet 2006;V119:376–88.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Packer B, Yeager M, Burdett L, et al. SNP500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation, assay development, and frequency analysis for genetic variation in candidate genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D617–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Manuguerra M, Saletta F, Karagas MR, et al. XRCC3 and XPD/ERCC2 single nucleotide polymorphisms and the risk of cancer: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:297-302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Smith TR, Miller MS, Lohman K, et al. Polymorphisms of XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes and susceptibility to breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2003b;190:183–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Jacobsen NR, Nexo BA, Olsen A, et al. No Association between the DNA repair gene XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and risk of skin cancer and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:584–5.[Free Full Text]
  13. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1513–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Han S, Zhang H-T, Wang Z, et al. DNA repair gene XRCC3 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 48 case-control studies. Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14:1136–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Ries L, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2004. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006.
  16. Thacker J. The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer. Cancer Lett 2005;219:125–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Costa S, Pinto D, Pereira D, et al. DNA repair polymorphisms might contribute differentially on familial and sporadic breast cancer susceptibility: a study on a Portuguese population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;103:209–17.[Medline]
  18. Jara L, Acevedo ML, Blanco R, et al. RAD51 135G>C polymorphism and risk of familial breast cancer in a South American population. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2007;178:65–9.[Medline]
  19. Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A, Eisenberg S, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies cancer risk in BRCA2 but not BRCA1 carriers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:3232–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Wang WW, Spurdle AB, Kolachana P, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the 5' untranslated region of RAD51 and risk of cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:955–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Antoniou A, Sinilnikova O, Simard J, et al. RAD51 135G->C modifies breast cancer risk among BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from a combined analysis of 19 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81:1186–200.[Medline]
  22. Lee K-M, Choi J-Y, Kang C, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of selected DNA repair genes, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and breast cancer risk. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:4620–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Webb PM, Hopper JL, Newman B, et al. Double-strand break repair gene polymorphisms and risk of breast or ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:319–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Jakubowska A, Gronwald J, Menkiszak J, et al. The RAD51 135 G>C polymorphism modifies breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk in Polish BRCA1 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:270–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Han J, Hankinson SE, Ranu H, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study. Carcinogenesis 2004;25:189–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Han J, Hankinson SE, Zhang SM, et al. Interaction between genetic variations in DNA repair genes and plasma folate on breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:520–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Matullo G, Palli D, Peluso M, et al. XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD gene polymorphisms, smoking and 32P-DNA adducts in a sample of healthy subjects. Carcinogenesis 2001;22:1437–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Au W, Salama S, Sierra-Torres C. Functional characterization of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes using cytogenetic challenge assays. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:1843–50.[Medline]
  29. Fuller L, Painter R. A Chinese hamster ovary cell line hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and deficient in repair replication. Mutat Res 1988;193:109–21.[Medline]
  30. Caldecott K, Jeggo P. Cross-sensitivity of gamma-ray-sensitive hamster mutants to cross-linking agents. Mutat Res 1991;255:111–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Sangrajrang S, Schmezer P, Burkholder I, et al. The XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a case control study in a Thai population. Biomarkers 2007;12:523–32.[Medline]
  32. Smith TR, Levine EA, Perrier ND, et al. DNA-repair genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003a;12:1200–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Thyagarajan B, Anderson KE, Folsom AR, et al. No association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Detect Prev 2006;30:313–21.[Medline]
  34. The Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1382–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Reliene R, Bishop AJR, Schiestl RH, et al. Involvement of homologous recombination in carcinogenesis. Adv Genet 2007;58:67–87.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wirgin, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wirgin, I.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online