This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mucci, L. A. Articles by Cnattingius, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mucci, L. A. Articles by Cnattingius, S.

Gestational Age and Fetal Growth in Relation to Maternal Ovarian Cancer Risk in a Swedish Cohort

¹ Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School and ² Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; ³ Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; ⁴ Department of Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece; ⁵ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Falu Hospital, Falun, Sweden; ⁶ Center for Clinical Research, Dalarna, Sweden; and ⁷ Cancer Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Lorelei A. Mucci, Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital, 181 Longwood Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-432-4565; Fax: 617-566-7805. E-mail: lmucci{at}hsph.harvard.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background: Pregnancy influences subsequent maternal ovarian cancer risk. To date, there is limited evidence whether two characteristics of pregnancy, gestational age and birth weight, could modify risk.

Materials and Methods: We studied 1.1 million Swedish women who delivered singleton births between 1973 and 2001. Information on infant gestational age and birth weight was abstracted from the nationwide Swedish Birth Register. Women were followed prospectively through linkage with other population-based registers for occurrence of ovarian cancer, death, or emigration through 2001. Hazard ratios [relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI)] from Cox models were used to estimate associations between gestational age, birth weight, and epithelial ovarian cancer risk.

Results: During 12.6 million person-years, 1,017 epithelial ovarian cancers occurred. Mean age at diagnosis was 43 years. Compared with women with term deliveries (40 weeks), women with moderately (35-36 weeks) or very (<35 weeks) preterm deliveries had increased risks of epithelial ovarian cancer (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0 and RR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-3.8, respectively). In contrast, women giving birth to small-for-gestational-age babies had a reduced risk (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.0). Stratifying on birth weight and gestational age, there was a strong protective effect of low birth weight on maternal risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among term deliveries, whereas birth weight seemed to have little effect among preterm births (P_interaction = 0.022).

Conclusions: Our results lend further support that the hormonal milieu of a pregnancy may modify long-term risk of developing ovarian cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(9):1828–32)

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer decreases with increasing parity (1-4), whereas incomplete pregnancies, such as spontaneous abortions or ectopic pregnancies, seem to confer no protection (5). These lines of evidence suggest that the protective effect of pregnancy on a woman may be modified by specific pregnancy characteristics over the course of childbearing.

The pregnancy hormonal milieu is characterized by elevated levels of estrogens, progesterone, and intrauterine growth factors, which are almost exclusively produced by the placenta. A woman's exposure to these hormones is markedly higher during the latter compared with earlier stages of pregnancy. Moreover, the duration of exposure to pregnancy hormones is greater for women who deliver term births compared with preterm births. Placental hormones and growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), are positively associated with fetal growth (6-10). Thus, birth weight and gestational age can be viewed as potential proxies of maternal exposure to pregnancy hormones.

Two previous studies failed to find an association between infant's birth weight and mother's risk of ovarian cancer (11, 12). However, birth weight reflects the influence of both gestational age and fetal growth, and these measures were not accounted for in the published analyses. To this end, we undertook a nationwide cohort study of more than 1.1 million women in the Swedish Birth Register between 1973 and 2001. These women were followed prospectively to study gestational age and fetal growth in relation to maternal risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Swedish Birth Cohort
The study base included all Swedish women with singleton births whose first birth was delivered from January 1, 1973, and whose subsequent births, if any, were recorded before January 1, 2002. Information on births during this time was obtained from the nationwide Swedish Birth Register established in 1973 and collecting information on 98% to 99% of all deliveries in Sweden (13). An individually unique national registration number, assigned to each Swedish resident, facilitated linkage of the birth register data with other nationwide population registers. The study was approved by the research ethics committee at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.

Exposure and Covariate Data
The birth register included standardized information from antenatal, obstetric, and neonatal medical records. The following maternal and infant variables were collected from each consecutive singleton delivery: maternal age (years), birth weight (grams), gestational age (through completed week), birth year, and infant sex. The birth register was recently validated, and the quality of the variables included in the present investigation is considered high (13). Through linkage with the education register, years of formal education completed as of December 31, 1997, were obtained from Statistics Sweden. If this information was missing, we retrieved similar information on completed education as of December 31, 1992. Data on bilateral oophrectomy [isolated bilateral ophorectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, and (vaginal and abdominal) hysterectomy combined with salpingoophorectomy] or other surgical removal of remaining ovarian tissue were obtained from the nationwide in-patient register, which maintained 85% of Sweden from 1978 and a nation-wide coverage from 1987 onwards.

Outcome Assessment
Information on incident ovarian cancer was derived from the Swedish Cancer Register established by the National Board of Health and Welfare in 1958. Swedish law mandates and regulates physicians and pathologists to report every newly diagnosed malignant tumor to the register, and case reporting is essentially 100% complete (14). All case reports are verified for completeness at one of six regional registries in Sweden, computerized, and then pooled in the Swedish Cancer Register. Cancer diagnoses are classified according to the International Classification of Diseases. To facilitate comparison over time, the cancer register includes information about the seventh version of the International Classification of Diseases classification (ICD-7) for all years. Invasive ovarian cancer was defined by ICD-7 code 175; borderline tumors were excluded from the analysis. The cancer register also includes histologic classification (PAD codes).

Information on deaths was available from the National Cause of Death Register, which includes dates of death from specific causes obtained from death certificates. Established in 1953 with complete coverage since 1961, this database maintains date and cause of death for >99% of deaths among residents (15). From the register of total population changes, we collected data on emigration from Sweden.

We excluded from the cohort women who were <15 years of age at their first birth or who were diagnosed with cancer before the index birth. Of the 1,176,784 million women identified, 2,432 have missing data on gestational age or birth weight and were excluded, so that the final sample size for analysis was 1,174,352. Through 2001, 1,173 cases of ovarian cancer occurred in the birth cohort, of which 1,017 (87%) were epithelial tumors, 61 (5%) were stromal, and 56 (5%) were germ-line ovarian cancers. Because of the variation in the risk factor profile for histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer (16), we focused on women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Statistical Analysis
Person-years were accrued from time of the index birth (i.e., latest birth) until a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer or censored at the date of other subtypes of ovarian cancers, emigration from Sweden, death, bilateral oophrectomy, or end of the study period (December 31, 2001), whichever came first. Incidence rates of epithelial ovarian cancer were calculated by dividing the number of incident cancers by person-years in each category. To estimate the total effect of pregnancy on a woman's risk of cancer, we calculated the mean gestational age and birth weight across each pregnancy, evaluating these variables as continuous, ordinal, and categorical variables to examine potentially nonlinear risk effects.

We used Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the relation between birth characteristics and maternal risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, calculating hazard ratios [relative risk (RR)] and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) as effect measures. The following factors were included in models as potential confounders: age at birth (continuously), birth year (ordinally), parity (categorically), infant sex, and maternal education (categorically). Additionally, we simultaneously adjusted for birth weight (categorically) and gestational age (ordinally) in the same model. Birth weight adjusted for gestational age provides an estimate of fetal growth. Tests for trend were estimated by modeling each exposure category ordinally in multivariable regression. To examine the joint effects of birth weight and gestational age, we cross-classified women according to both factors and compared the –2 log-likelihood from this model compared with a model with only the main effects. We further assessed the relation between birth characteristics and pregnancy stratifying by parity, comparing estimates among uniparous, biparous, and triparous women.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The cohort included 1,174,352 Swedish women who gave birth between 1973 and 2001 and contributed 12.6 million person-years to the study base. The cohort was relatively young, with a mean age at study entry of 28.8 years and a mean follow-up of 10.3 years. The mean age at cancer diagnosis in this young cohort was 43 years; age-specific incidence rates of ovarian cancer peak in most populations between the ages of 65 and 79 years (5). The distribution and incidence of cancer overall and stratified by parity is presented in Table 1 . As expected, the age-adjusted incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer decreased with increasing parity. The gestational age of pregnancies was similar across parity, whereas mean birth weight increased with increasing parity (Table 1). Because only 32 cancer cases occurred among women who had four or more births, these women were excluded from analyses stratified by parity.

The apparent dual effect of birth weight and gestational age on a mother's cancer risk is further shown by simultaneously stratifying on gestational age and birth weight (Table 3 ). We see a protective effect of low birth weight on maternal cancer risk among term deliveries, whereas birth weight seems to have little effect among preterm births. Among all women who had low birth weight babies (<2,500 g), women who delivered a preterm birth were at greater risk of developing ovarian cancer compared with term births (contrast RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.6). Preterm birth among higher birth weight infants remained a positive predictor, albeit weaker, of maternal ovarian cancer risk.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

The finding that gestational age influences risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among parous women lends support to the "progesterone deficiency hypothesis," whereby progesterone deficiency may increase the risk of ovarian cancer (17). Progesterone may be effective in suppressing epithelial proliferation, promoting cell differentiation and apoptosis, or removing premalignant cells from ovaries (18). During pregnancy, progesterone levels increase with gestational age (10), and thus, women with preterm births would have a pregnancy characterized by a relative deficit compared with term births. The progesterone deficiency hypothesis is further supported by evidence of lack of effect of hormone replacement therapy on ovarian cancer risk when progestins are continuously added (19). Moreover, twinning is associated with a reduced risk of maternal ovarian cancer (20-23), and pregnancy levels of progesterone are elevated among mothers who give birth to dizygotic twins (24).

In the present study, low birth weight was associated with a reduced risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after adjustment for gestational age. This unexpected finding, which was prominent in term pregnancies, needs to be confirmed, and we can only speculate about possible mechanisms. Although pregnancy levels of progesterone are positively associated with birth weight (25), fetal growth measures are likely to have a weak discriminatory ability as indicator of progesterone exposure (8). Exposure to IGF-I may be a more plausible possibility. Although IGF-I levels increase with gestational age, they are reported to decrease after 37 weeks of gestation and severely growth-restricted pregnancies have reduced IGF-I levels (26-29). A role of IGF-I on ovarian cancer is emerging, with higher levels associated with an almost 5-fold increased risk of developing ovarian cancer before 55 years in one prospective study (30).

We also found that the influence of gestational age and fetal growth of ovarian cancer may be more pronounced among uniparous women versus biparous or triparous women. Chance is an unlikely explanation, as we included more than 328,000 uniparous, 561,000 biparous, and 219,000 triparous women, of whom 401, 447, and 137 developed epithelial ovarian cancer, respectively. Selection bias is not an issue because we did a nationwide population-based study and found, consistent with literature (5, 20, 31), that the risk of ovarian cancer was higher among uniparous than multiparous women. The explanation for our finding of a differential effect may be related to inherent differences between uniparous women and women with higher parity. For example, uniparous women may, in part, represent women with a history of subfecundity. Infertile women may be predisposed to preterm delivery (32), and women with single pregnancies after in vitro fertilization have a doubled risk of preterm birth (33). There is also growing concern that fertility treatments that induce ovulation may influence ovarian cancer risk (20, 31).

A related possibility is the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCO). Highly related to subfertility and infertility (28), PCO is thus likely to be more common among uniparous compared with biparous women. PCO is associated with increased risks of ovarian cancer (34, 35) and preterm birth (36, 37) and reduced risk of small-for-gestational-age birth (38). PCO is also associated with hyperandrogenism and increased IGF-I levels (34), which may also impart effects in the risk of ovarian cancer (17, 28). PCO is notoriously underreported, and it is estimated that between 5% and 20% of all premenopausal women suffer from this syndrome (39). In the present data set, information about PCO was not available. Thus, we may only speculate whether the observed associations between gestational age, fetal growth, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among uniparous women may be explained, at least in part, by a high prevalence of PCO in this group of women.

The availability of population-based data from nationwide health registers in Sweden allows for a valid and efficient design to study birth characteristics and maternal ovarian cancer risk. The birth register and cancer register have virtually complete coverage of the population in Sweden, and linkages to the cause of death and population registers ensure minimal loss to follow-up. The large study base provided information on more than a thousand cases of incident epithelial ovarian cancers diagnosed primarily among premenopausal women over follow-up, affording substantial statistical power to evaluate the research question. Women in the cohort under study were young at entry, and the majority of cases were diagnosed before menopause. As such, these effects are generalizable to ovarian cancer occurring among premenopausal women. It will, of course, be important to examine the longer term influence of pregnancy during menopause.

For multiparous women, we modeled the mean gestational age and birthweight across pregnancies, thereby accounting for the average pregnancy experience of the women on her future cancer risk. We also examined the effect of the first pregnancy alone, the last pregnancy alone, as well as the joint effects across pregnancies. Qualitatively, the findings were similar.

Based on histopathologic review at the reporting medical center, we restricted the study to women diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, whereas borderline tumors were excluded. Histologic classification of ovarian cancer based on cell types in the ovary can be complex, given the cellular diversity of the ovary, and classification of tumors as borderline is somewhat controversial (40). The extent to which, the association of birth weight and gestational age differs for borderline and invasive tumors could introduce a bias. However, the number of borderline tumors, incorrectly classified as invasive, is likely to represent only a small proportion of the total overall and unlikely to impart significant influence on our risk estimates.

The reporting of birth weight and gestational age is standardized from the antenatal records and has been shown to be of high quality (41). Any misclassification would be minimal and nondifferential and would not account for the differential effect among uniparous and biparous women. Finally, we cannot exclude the possibility that residual confounding could explain the study findings. For example, the registries do not contain information on oral contraceptive use, a factor associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer (5). Although use of oral contraceptives may be correlated with birth weight and pregnancy hormones (42), it seems unlikely that use of oral contraceptives could impart substantial confounding to explain the findings among uniparous women, nor it would have a differential effect among the uniparous and biparous women.

In summary, novel findings from this large, prospective study suggest specific effects of pregnancy characteristics on maternal ovarian cancer risk. These effects highlight a potential role of fetal growth and gestational age during pregnancy in predicting a woman's future risk.

	Footnotes

 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute grant 5 R03 CA110709-02, Swedish Cancer Society grant 4844-B04-02XBB, Karolinska Institutet STINT award, and NIH National Cancer Institute training grant T32 CA009001 (L.A. Mucci).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 11/14/06; revised 7/ 3/07; accepted 7/10/07.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Adami HO, Hsieh CC, Lambe M, et al. Parity, age at first childbirth, and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet 1994;344:1250–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, et al. A prospective study of reproductive factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer 1995;76:284–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Modan B, Hartge P, Hirsh-Yechezkel G, et al. Parity, oral contraceptives, and the risk of ovarian cancer among carriers and noncarriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med 2001;345:235–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Liu Q, Lambe M, Baik I, et al. A prospective study of the transient decrease in ovarian cancer following childbirth. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:2508–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Gertig D, Hunter D. Ovarian Cancer. In: Adami HO, Hunter D, Trichopoulos D, editors. Textbook of Cancer Epidemiology: Oxford University Press; 2002.
6. Goodwin TM. A role for estriol in human labor, term and preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:S208–13.[Medline]
7. Kaijser M, Granath F, Jacobsen G, Cnattingius S, Ekbom A. Maternal pregnancy estriol levels in relation to anamnestic and fetal anthropometric data. Epidemiology 2000;11:315–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Peck JD, Hulka BS, Savitz DA, Baird D, Poole C, Richardson BE. Accuracy of fetal growth indicators as surrogate measures of steroid hormone levels during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:258–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Mucci LA, Lagiou P, Tamimi RM, Hsieh CC, Adami HO, Trichopoulos D. Pregnancy estriol, estradiol, progesterone and prolactin in relation to birth weight and other birth size variables (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:311–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Fisher DA. The unique endocrine milieu of the fetus. J Clin Invest 1986;78:603–11.[Medline]
11. Mogren I, Stenlund H, Hogberg U. Long-term impact of reproductive factors on the risk of cervical, endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer. Acta Oncol 2001;40:849–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Olsen J, Storm H. Pregnancy experience in women who later developed oestrogen-related cancers (Denmark). Cancer Causes Control 1998;9:653–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. The Swedish Medical Birth Register: A Summary of Content and Quality. Stockholm: Centre for Epidemiology, The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2003. Report no. 2003-112-3.
14. Cancer Incidence in Sweden 2004. Stockholm: Centre for Epidemiology, The National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden; 2005. Report no. 2005-42-9.
15. Causes of Death 2003. Stockholm: Centre for Epidemiology, The National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden; 2005. Report no. 2006-42-3.
16. Kurian AW, Balise RR, McGuire V, Whittemore AS. Histologic types of epithelial ovarian cancer: have they different risk factors? Gynecol Oncol 2005;96:520–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Risch HA. Hormonal etiology of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a hypothesis concerning the role of androgens and progesterone. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1774–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Munstedt K, Steen J, Knauf AG, Buch T, von Georgi R, Franke FE. Steroid hormone receptors and long term survival in invasive ovarian cancer. Cancer 2000;89:1783–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Riman T, Dickman PW, Nilsson S, et al. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in Swedish women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:497–504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Titus-Ernstoff L, Perez K, Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Baron JA, Greenberg ER. Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to ovarian cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2001;84:714–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Lambe M, Wuu J, Rossing MA, Hsieh CC. Twinning and maternal risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet 1999;353:1941.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Whiteman DC, Murphy MF, Cook LS, et al. Multiple births and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1172–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. La Vecchia C, Negri E, Talamini R, Conti E, Montella M, Franceschi S. Re: Multiple births and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:319–20.[Free Full Text]
24. Dionne CE, Soderstrom M, Schwartz SM. Seasonal variation of twin births in Washington State. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1993;42:141–9.[Medline]
25. Salas SP, Marshall G, Gutierrez BL, Rosso P. Time course of maternal plasma volume and hormonal changes in women with preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. Hypertension 2006;47:203–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Laviola L, Perrini S, Belsanti G, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction in humans is associated with abnormalities in placental insulin-like growth factor signaling. Endocrinology 2005;146:1498–505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Holmes RP, Holly JM, Soothill PW. A prospective study of maternal serum insulin-like growth factor-I in pregnancies with appropriately grown or growth restricted fetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:1273–8.[Medline]
28. Druckmann R, Rohr UD. IGF-1 in gynaecology and obstetrics: update 2002. Maturitas 2002;41 Suppl 1:S65–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Gohlke BC, Huber A, Bartmann P, et al. Cord blood leptin and IGF-I in relation to birth weight differences and head circumference in monozygotic twins. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2006;19:3–9.[Medline]
30. Lukanova A, Lundin E, Toniolo P, et al. Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 2002;101:549–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Riman T, Dickman PW, Nilsson S, et al. Risk factors for epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: results of a Swedish case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:575–85.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Filicori M, Cognigni GE, Gamberini E, Troilo E, Parmegiani L, Bernardi S. Impact of medically assisted fertility on preterm birth. BJOG 2005;112 Suppl 1:113–7.[Medline]
33. McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, Weiss G, Goldsmith LT. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1514–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Gadducci A, Gargini A, Palla E, Fanucchi A, Genazzani AR. Polycystic ovary syndrome and gynecological cancers: is there a link? Gynecol Endocrinol 2005;20:200–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Schildkraut JM, Schwingl PJ, Bastos E, Evanoff A, Hughes C. Epithelial ovarian cancer risk among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:554–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Thatcher SS, Jackson EM. Pregnancy outcome in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who were treated with metformin. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1002–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Weerakiet S, Srisombut C, Rojanasakul A, Panburana P, Thakkinstian A, Herabutya Y. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcomes in Asian women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol 2004;19:134–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Sir-Petermann T, Hitchsfeld C, Maliqueo M, et al. Birth weight in offspring of mothers with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2122–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Linne Y. Effects of obesity on women's reproduction and complications during pregnancy. Obes Rev 2004;5:137–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:617–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Cnattingius S, Ericson A, Gunnarskog J, Kallen B. A quality study of a medical birth registry. Scand J Soc Med 1990;18:143–8.[Medline]
42. Mucci LA, Lagiou P, Hsieh CC, et al. A prospective study of pregravid oral contraceptive use in relation to fetal growth. BJOG 2004;111:989–95.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Cnattingius, S. Eloranta, H.-O. Adami, O. Axelsson, P. W. Dickman, C.-c. Hsieh, L. A. Mucci, D. Trichopoulos, M. Lambe, and A. L.V. Johansson Placental Weight and Risk of Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer with an Early Age of Onset Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2344 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mucci, L. A. Articles by Cnattingius, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mucci, L. A. Articles by Cnattingius, S.