CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2008 Conference on Cancer Prevention - Washington, D.C.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 16, 943-949, May 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-1012
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Shu, X. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tao, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Shu, X. O.

Polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 (Aromatase) Gene and Endometrial Cancer Risk in Chinese Women

Meng Hua Tao1,2,3, Qiuyin Cai1, Zuo-Feng Zhang2, Wang-Hong Xu4, Nobuhiko Kataoka1, Wanqing Wen1, Yong-Bing Xiang3, Wei Zheng1 and Xiao Ou Shu1

1 Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; 3 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York; and 4 Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China

Requests for reprints: Xiao Ou Shu, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, 6th Floor, Nashville, TN 37203-1738. Phone: 615-936-0713; Fax: 615-936-8291. E-mail: xiao-ou.shu{at}vanderbilt.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aromatase, encoded by the CYP19A1 gene, is a key enzyme in estradiol biosynthesis, which catalyzes the conversion of androstenedione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol, respectively. Given the critical role of estrogen in the development of endometrial cancer risk, we evaluated genetic polymorphisms of the CYP19A1 gene, including rs1065779, rs700519, rs28566535, rs752760, and rs1870050, in association with endometrial cancer in a population-based case-control study conducted in Shanghai, China. Genotypes of 1,040 incident endometrial cancer cases and 1,031 frequency-matched controls were included in the study. We applied a logistic regression model to derive adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Six common haplotypes with a frequency ≥5% were estimated; the highest frequency haplotype was GCACA (27.8% in cases and 26.2% in controls). We observed an inverse association between CYP19A1 haplotype TCATC and endometrial cancer in our population (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92). An inverse association was found between endometrial cancer and single nucleotide polymorphism rs1870050 in the promoter region with ORs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.68-0.97) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.80) for the AC and CC genotypes, respectively. We observed a multiplicative interaction between single nucleotide polymorphism rs700519 and body mass index among postmenopausal women (P = 0.01), with stronger associations between rs700519 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk among heavier (body mass index, ≥25) postmenopausal women. In summary, our data show that polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 gene may contribute to endometrial carcinogenesis. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(5):943–9)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Estrogens stimulate the proliferation of endometrial cells (1). Both prospective and retrospective epidemiologic studies have shown an increased risk of endometrial cancer with higher levels of estrogen, most frequently with estrone and total estradiol (2-6).

Before menopause, the ovary is the principal source of estrogen, whereas during and after menopause, estrogen is mainly produced in extragonadal sites (primarily in adipose tissue; ref. 7). Encoded by the CYP19A1 gene, aromatase is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of estradiol, catalyzing the conversion of androstenedione and testosterone to estrone and estradiol, respectively (8). The conversion of androstenedione to estrone increases as a function of aging and obesity (9). Previous studies have detected aromatase protein and mRNA in endometrial cancer tissue, whereas aromatase expression was undetectable or low in normal endometrial tissue and endometrial hyperplasia (10, 11). In vitro studies also have shown an increase in the aromatase activity of endometrial neoplastic cells, but not in normal endometrial cells (12), and a positive correlation has been found between enzyme activity and CYP19A1 mRNA in endometrial cancer tissue (13). Treatment of in vitro endometrial cancer tissues with aromatase inhibitors has shown that depletion of in situ tumor estrogen results in decreased cell proliferation of endometrial carcinoma cells (14). Given the important role of aromatase in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer, we hypothesized that functional polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 gene may be involved in endometrial carcinogenesis.

The CYP19A1 gene, located at 15q21.1, comprises 10 exons, and transcription begins in exon II. The multiple nontranslated exon I controls gene expression in a tissue-specific manner and under complex hormonal regulation (15). Polymorphisms in CYP19A1 have been evaluated for their association with breast cancer risk (16-23) and, to a lesser extent, with endometrial (24, 25) and prostate cancer (26, 27) and endometriosis (28). The CYP19A1 gene is highly polymorphic (16). Two of the polymorphisms, the tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism ([TTTA]n) in intron 4 and Arg264Cys (rs700519) in exon 7, have been frequently studied for breast cancer associations with inconsistent results (18-22). Identified in a Japanese population, the variant allele of the Trp39Arg (rs2236722) polymorphism was found to abolish or reduce aromatase activity (29). However, this polymorphism was inconsistently associated with breast cancer risk in two small-scale Japanese populations (17, 19). Located in the first exon, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs28566535 is close to the promoter I.4. Paynter et al. (24) found no association between rs28566535 polymorphism and risk of endometrial cancer.

In the present study, we evaluate CYP19A1 genetic polymorphisms, including rs1065779, rs700519, rs28566535, rs752760, rs1870050, in relation to endometrial cancer risk in a case-control study conducted in Shanghai, China.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study is a population-based case-control study. Eligible cases were identified from the Shanghai Cancer Registry, which is the largest and oldest population-based registry in China and captures >85% of incident cancer patients in urban Shanghai (30). Eligible cases included all permanent residents of urban Shanghai between the ages of 30 and 69 years who were diagnosed with endometrial cancer between January 1997 and December 2003. A total of 1,458 eligible endometrial cancer cases were identified and in-person interviews were completed for 1,204 (82.6%). The major reasons for nonparticipation were refusals (137 cases, 9.4%), death before interview (66 cases, 4.5%), inability to locate the subject (37 cases, 2.5%) or absence during the study period (12 cases, 0.8%), and health or communication problems (14 cases, 1.0%).

Controls were randomly selected from the Shanghai Resident Registry, which registers all permanent residents of urban Shanghai, and were frequency matched to cases by age (5-year intervals). The number of controls in each age-specific stratum was determined in advance according to the age distribution of incident endometrial cancer cases in 1996. Women who had had a hysterectomy (identified during survey) were not eligible (n = 36). Interviews were completed for 1,212 (74.4%) eligible women (n = 1,629). Reasons for nonparticipation of controls included refusal (340 controls, 20.9%), absence during the study period (61 controls, 3.7%), and other health or communication problems (16 controls, 1.1%).

A standardized structured questionnaire was administered to participants and covered demographic factors, menstrual and reproductive history, hormone use, usual dietary habits, prior disease history, physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use, weight history, and family history of cancer. All study participants were interviewed in person by trained retired nurses and physicians and their current weight, circumferences of the waist and hips, and sitting and standing heights were measured using a standard protocol. All measurements were taken twice. The averages of the measurements were used to calculate body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) and waist-to-hip circumference ratio. Menopause was defined as a cessation of the menstrual cycle for 12 months or longer, excluding periods of menstrual cessation due to pregnancy or breast-feeding. The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all institutes involved in the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The polymorphisms included in the study were chosen based on literature review and their potential functionality. Of the four polymorphisms [Arg264Cys (rs700519), Trp39Arg (rs2236722), rs28566535, and TTTA repeat] in the CYP19A1 gene that have been investigated previously in relation to cancer at the time we initiated our study, three were included. The Trp39Arg polymorphism has a low minor allele frequency in the Chinese population and thus was excluded from the study. Genotyping of the TTTA repeat polymorphism is still ongoing and results will be reported in the future. In addition, we searched SNP databases and included in the study two SNPs in the promoter region/untranslated exon (rs752760 and rs1870050) and one SNP in the intron-exon boundary (rs1065779) regions that have a minor allele frequency >10% in the Chinese population. Thus, five polymorphisms were included in the study: three SNPs (rs752760, rs1870050, and rs28566535) in the promoter/untranslated exon regions, one SNP (rs1065779) in the intron-exon boundary, and one SNP (rs700519) in exon 7 codon 264.

Genomic DNA was extracted from buffy coat fractions or buccal cells by using a QIAmp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Except for the rs700519 polymorphism, allelic discrimination of the CYP19A1 polymorphisms was assessed with the ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) using the Taqman genotyping assay with primers and probes obtained from Applied Biosystems. The assay IDs were as follows: C_8234755_10 for rs1065779, C_1664178_10 for rs28566535, C_798312_10 for rs752760, and C_11672268_20 for rs1870050. The Taqman assay method has been described previously (31). Briefly, the final volume for each reaction was 5 µL, consisting of 2.5 µL Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix, 0.6 µL of each primer, 0.2 µL of each Taqman probe, and 5 ng genomic DNA. The PCR profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 92°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 minute. The fluorescence level was measured with the ABI Prism 7900HT sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). Allele frequencies were determined by ABI Sequence Detection System software.

We were not able to design a Taqman assay for the CYP19A1 rs700519 (Arg264Cys) polymorphism. This SNP was genotyped using the MGB Eclipse (3' hybridization triggered fluorescence reaction) assay (Epoch Biosciences) following the method described in SNP500Cancer.5 The primers were 5'-GGATTTGAAAGATGCCATAGAAG-3' and 5'-CAACTCAGTGGCAAAGTCCATA-3'. The MGB Eclipse probes were AAAGACGCAGGAT-FAM and AAAAGATGCAGGA-TET. Five nanograms of lyophilized sample DNA were used to do a 5 µL MGB Eclipse assay. Reactions were set up using 2.35 µL of the 2x Jumpstart Master Mix (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.15 µL of 2.5 units/µL JumpStart Taq Polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.25 µL primers, and 0.25 µL probes. All reactions were set up in a 384-well plate. The PCR profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 2 min and 45 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 58°C for 20 s, and 76°C for 20 s. The end point dissociation (melting) curves were generated on the ABI 7900HT Sequence Detection System by monitoring fluorescence while heating the reactions from 30°C to 80°C at a 10% ramp rate. Dissociation curves of the first derivative of fluorescence and raw fluorescent values were then exported from the ABI Sequence Detection System software in text format for further analysis using the MGB Eclipse melt curve macro (Epoch Biosciences) for genotype scoring.

The laboratory staff was blind to the identity of the subjects. Quality control samples were included in the genotyping assays. Each 384-well plate contained four water, eight CEPH 1347-02 DNA, eight blinded quality control DNA, and eight unblinded quality control DNA samples. The concordance rates for the quality control samples were 98.7% for rs700519, 97.4% for rs75276 and rs1870050, and 100% for rs1065779 and rs28566535. In addition, we genotyped rs752760 and rs1870050 in 45 DNA samples of the Chinese participants used in HapMap and 24 DNA samples used in Perlegen as an additional quality control. The genotypes of the samples generated from our study were compared with data downloaded from HapMap6 and/or Perlegen7. The concordance rate between the data generated in our laboratory and the data from the above databases was 100%.

Among those who provided a buccal cell sample, 189 cases and 198 controls provided samples using a mouthwash method; 93 cases and 88 controls provided samples using a buccal swab method. Due to a very low DNA yield of the buccal swab method, we did not include buccal swab DNA samples in the genotyping. In addition, DNA from blood samples donated by 19 control subjects were not available because of their use in previous studies. Thus, DNA samples from 1,046 (86.9%, 857 blood and 189 buccal cell) cases and 1,035 (85.4%, 837 blood and 198 buccal cell) controls were included in the genotyping study. Genotyping data were obtained from 1,040 cases and 1,031 controls; a success rate of 98.1% and 99.6%, respectively.

The {chi}2 test was used to compare the distributions of CYP19A1 alleles and genotypes between cases and controls. The exact {chi}2 goodness-of-fit test was used to test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of the genotypes. Haplotypes were estimated with PHASE software using a Bayesian method (32). Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for associations with endometrial cancer risk. Interactions between genotypes and BMI (<25 and ≥25) and menopausal status (premenopausal/postmenopausal) were evaluated by constructing a multiplicative term in the logistic regression model. All analyses were adjusted for age. Potential confounding effects from other demographic factors and known endometrial cancer risk factors, such as educational level, BMI, age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, and oral contraceptive use, were also examined and no appreciable confounding was observed.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
The distribution of selected demographic characteristics and major risk factors for endometrial cancer among cases and controls are presented in Table 1 . Compared with controls, cases had an earlier age at menarche, later age at menopause, and longer duration of menstruation. Cases were also more likely than controls to have a higher educational level, a higher BMI or waist-to-hip circumference ratio, and a family history of colorectal, endometrial, or breast cancer among first-degree relatives, to be nulliparous, and to have never used oral contraceptives.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Comparison of cases and controls on demographics and selected endometrial cancer risk factors

 
The allele distribution of CYP19A1 genetic polymorphisms among cases and controls is summarized in Table 2 . All SNPs were consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among both cases and controls (P > 0.05). The frequencies of the common alleles for SNPs rs1065779, rs700519, rs28566535, rs752760, and rs1870050 among controls were 54.8%, 86.7%, 66.6%, 61.8%, and 68.6%, respectively. The allele frequencies of SNPs rs700519, rs28566535, and rs752760 were similar among cases and controls, and slightly more cases carried the rs1065779 G allele than controls (57.7% and 54.8% for case and controls, respectively). For the SNP rs1870050, the allele frequencies for cases (A, 74.6%; C, 25.4%) were significantly different from controls (A, 68.6%; C, 31.4%; P < 0.01). Based on observed genotype data, the estimated common haplotype (≥5%) frequencies for the SNPs are shown in Table 2. The estimated frequency of the CYP19A1 haplotypes was very different between cases and controls (P = 0.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Allele frequencies (%) of the CYP19A1 gene and haplotype distribution of CYP19A1 polymorphisms, the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study

 
The associations between CYP19A1 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk are presented in Table 3 . The TT genotype of SNP rs1065779 was associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer compared with the GG genotype (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99). Compared with the TT genotype of SNP rs752760, the TC genotype was related to elevated risk (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07-1.51), whereas the CC genotype was unrelated to risk (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.42). For SNP rs1870050, the AC genotype (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.97) and CC genotype (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.80) were both related to reduced risk compared with the AA genotype (Ptrend < 0.01), and the inverse associations were observed among both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. We observed no associations with endometrial cancer for the SNPs rs700519 and rs28566535 in our population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3. Associations between CYP19A1 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk

 
Because the main organ site of estrogen synthesis differs by menopausal status (i.e., ovary during the premenopausal period and fat tissue after menopause), we further analyzed gene-disease associations stratifying by menopausal status and BMI. We observed some variation in the risk estimates by menopausal status, but none of the tests for multiplicative interaction reached statistical significance. Similarly, no multiplicative interactions between genotypes and BMI were noted (data not shown). In addition, we analyzed gene-disease associations among postmenopausal women and stratified by BMI (Table 4 ). The rs1065779 TT genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer risk only in postmenopausal women (Table 3) and among women with a lower BMI (Table 4). However, tests for multiplicative interaction between this SNP and menopausal status or BMI were not significant. For SNP rs700519, the association between the TT genotype and endometrial cancer risk was in opposite directions for lean (BMI, <25) versus overweight (BMI, >25) postmenopausal women, and a test for multiplicative interaction was significant (Pinteraction = 0.01). We did not observe multiplicative interactions between SNPs rs28566535, rs752760, and rs1870050 and BMI among postmenopausal women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4. Associations between CYP19A1 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk among postmenopausal women

 
To evaluate the relationship between common haplotypes (≥5%) and endometrial cancer risk, a likelihood ratio test was done using the most common haplotype, GCACC, as the reference group, which contained the less common allele C at SNP rs752760 and common alleles for other SNPs, and pooling all haplotypes with frequencies <5% into a single category (Table 5 ). We found that haplotype TCATC containing common alleles at SNPs rs28566535 and rs752760 was inversely associated with endometrial cancer (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92). The associations showed little change after stratification by menopausal status. The haplotype GCATC was related to reduced risk (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44-0.93) among premenopausal women but unrelated to risk among postmenopausal women. We also evaluated the effect of the CYP19A1 haplotype by BMI status for all women and further stratified by menopausal status. We found no indication of an interaction between haplotypes and BMI status (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 5. Associations between haplotyes of CYP19A1 and endometrial cancer risk

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Given the importance of estrogens in the etiology of endometrial cancer, it is conceivable that polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 (aromatase) gene, a gene critical to control of the enzyme activity that converts androgen to estrogen (8), might serve as a potential determinant of endometrial cancer risk. In this large scale, population-based case-control study, we found that several SNPs and a haplotype of the CYP19A1 gene were associated with the risk of endometrial cancer.

The CYP19A1 gene comprises nine coding exons (II–X) with several untranslated first exons regulated by tissue-specific promoters (15). Elevated levels of aromatase expression have been observed in breast tumor tissue relative to normal breast tissue. The increased aromatase expression is accompanied by a switch in CYP19A1 promoter utilization, from the primary adipose tissue promoter I1.4 to promoter II, which drives aromatase expression mainly in the ovary, and up-regulation of the endothelial-type promoter I.7 and promoter I1.3, which is minimally used in adipose tissue (33). Similarly, compared with normal endometrium, elevated aromatase protein and mRNA also have been detected in endometrial cancer tissue (10, 11). This hints at a possible alternative in promoter utilization in endometrial cancer. However, genetic regulation of aromatase has not been extensively studied in endometrial carcinoma, in contrast to its role in breast cancer (34). SNPs rs1870050 and rs752760 are both located in the first exon, close to promoter I.1, the major promoter for the placenta. Our study found inverse associations between the AC and CC genotypes of SNP rs1870050 and endometrial cancer risk and a marginal positive association between the heterozygote of the SNP rs752760 and endometrial cancer. Within intron 9, SNP rs1065779 is 53 bp upstream of exon 10. Compared with the GG genotype, we observed an inverse association of endometrial cancer with the TT genotype of this polymorphism. To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate associations between these SNPs and endometrial cancer risk. The biological mechanisms underlying these associations are unknown. We cannot exclude a chance finding as a possible explanation. More studies are needed to investigate the potential role of these polymorphisms in endometrial cancer etiology and their biological functions.

The nonsynonymous SNP rs700519 occurs within the coding region and results in amino acid changes. Earlier functional studies have produced conflicting results, one finding no effect of the polymorphism and another study finding reduced aromatase enzyme activity (35, 36). We did not observe an association between the Arg264Cys (rs700519) genotype and endometrial cancer. Previous studies on the relationship between the Arg264Cys genotype and breast cancer risk have had inconsistent results (16, 19, 22, 23). The Cys allele has also been studied in association with prostate cancer, and inconsistent results were reported in Japanese populations (27, 37). The frequency distribution of this SNP differs substantially among ethnic groups. In our study, the frequency of the rare (Cys) allele (13.3%) was lower than that found in Korean (39%; ref. 23) and Japanese (26.7-54%) women (16, 19, 36). The frequency of the Cys allele was very low (<10%) among Caucasians (16, 22).

During and after menopause, endogenous estrogen is produced primarily in adipose tissue (7). Thus, it is possible that CYP19A1 polymorphisms may have a stronger effect among postmenopausal women, particularly those with higher BMI. Our data suggest that associations between rs700519 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk among postmenopausal women may be modified by BMI. Further studies are needed to confirm our finding and to elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.

Consistent with one prior investigation (24), we observed no association between SNP rs28566535 and endometrial cancer. In a study of postmenopausal Caucasian women not using postmenopausal hormones, Paynter et al. (24) reported that the rs28566535 C allele (5.1% of that study population) was not associated with risk of endometrial cancer nor with plasma steroid hormone levels. The minor C allele of rs28566535 has a much higher frequency (34.3%) in our study, which agrees with the frequency of this allele reported in a population-based case-control study of breast cancer we conducted in Shanghai (38).

We derived six common haplotypes at ≥5% estimated frequency with genotype information at five SNPs in CYP19A1. The highest frequency haplotype (27.8% in cases and 26.2% in controls) comprised the less common allele at rs752760 and the common alleles at other loci. Our results suggested an inverse association between endometrial cancer risk and the CYP19A1 haplotype TCATC (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92). The CYP19A1 haplotype TCATC contains rare alleles of rs1065779 and rs1870050 and common alleles for other loci. Haplotype GCATC was inversely associated with the risk of endometrial cancer only among premenopausal women. We did not observe any differences in the haplotype-disease associations when stratifying by BMI.

Strengths of this study include the population-based study design and a large sample size, which minimized the selection bias and led to relatively stable risk estimation. The detailed exposure information enabled an evaluation of gene-environment interactions. Nevertheless, the statistical power in subgroups of our study remained limited due to low frequencies of the variant alleles, which limited our ability to identify weak associations. The study applied the candidate gene approach and primarily focused on potential common genetic variance (>5%) and polymorphisms with amino acid changes. We cannot rule out the possibility that SNPs of CYP19A1 other than those included in our study may be related to risk of endometrial cancer. Given that multiple genes are involved in estrogen biosynthesis and metabolism (39), the confounding and/or modifying effects of other genes also cannot be excluded.

In summary, we found some evidence that common polymorphism of CYP19A1 genes plays an important role in the development of endometrial cancer among Chinese women.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Fan Jin for her contributions to implementing the study in Shanghai; Regina Courtney and Qing Wang for technical support in the laboratory; Bethanie Hull for technical assistance in the preparation of this manuscript; and all of the study participants and research staff of the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study for the support.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute USPHS grant R01CA92585.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

5 http://snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov/ Back

6 http://www.hapmap.org Back

7 http://genome.perlegen.com Back

Received 12/ 2/06; revised 2/26/07; accepted 3/ 2/07.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Akhmedkhanov A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Toniolo P. Role of exogenous and endogenous hormones in endometrial cancer: review of the evidence and research perspectives. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;943:296–315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Nyholm HC, Nielsen AL, Lyndrup J, Dreisler A, Hagen C, Haug E. Plasma oestrogens in postmenopausal women with endometrial cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:1115–9.[Medline]
  3. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Akhmedkhanov A, Kato I, et al. Postmenopausal endogenous oestrogens and risk of endometrial cancer: results of a prospective study. Br J Cancer 2001;84:975–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Potischman N, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, et al. Case-control study of endogenous steroid hormones and endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1127–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer MS. Obesity, endogenous hormone, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1531–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lukanova A, Lundin E, Micheli A, et al. Circulating levels of sex steroid hormones and risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer 2004;108:425–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Simpson ER. Sources of estrogen and their importance. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003;86:225–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, Means GD, et al. Aromatase cytochrome P450, the enzyme responsible for estrogen biosynthesis. Endocr Rev 1994;15:342–55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Nelson LR, Bulun SE. Estrogen production and action. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:S116–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bulun SE, Economos K, Miller D, Simpson ER. CYP19 (aromatase cytochrome P450) gene expression in human malignant endometrial tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994;79:1831–4.[Abstract]
  11. Watanabe K, Sasano H, Harada N, Ozxaki M, Sato S, Yajima A. Aromatase in human endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia. Immunohistochemical, in situ hybridization, and biochemical studies. Am J Pathol 1995;146:491–500.[Abstract]
  12. Bulun SE, Noble LS, Takayama K, et al. Endocrine disorders associated with inappropriately high aromatase expression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1997;61:133–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Berstern L, Zimarina T, Kovalevshij A, Maximov S, Volkov O, Thijssen JH. CYP19 gene expression and aromatase activity in endometrial cancer tissue: importance of the type of the disease. Neoplasma 2005;52:115–8.[Medline]
  14. Sasano H, Sato S, Ito K, et al. Effects of aromatase inhibitors on the pathobiology of the human breast, endometrial, and ovarian carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 1999;6:197–204.[Abstract]
  15. Zhao Y, Mendelson CR, Simpson ER. Characterization of the sequences of the human CYP19 (aromatase) gene that mediate regulation by glucocorticoids in adipose stromal cells and fetal hepatocytes. Mol Endocrinol 1995;9:340–9.[Abstract]
  16. Haiman CA, Stram DO, Pike MC, et al. A comprehensive haplotype analysis of CYP19 and breast cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort. Hum Mol Genet 2003;12:2679–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hirose K, Matsuo K, Toyama T, Iwata H, Hamajima N, Tajima K. The CYP19 gene codon 39 Trp/Arg polymorphism increases breast cancer risk in subsets of premenopausal Japanese. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1407–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ashan H, Whittemore AS, Chen Y, et al. Variants in estrogen-biosynthesis genes CYP17 and CYP19 and breast cancer risk: a family-based genetic association study. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7:R71–81.[Medline]
  19. Miyoshi Y, Iwao K, Ikeda N, Egawa C, Noguchi S. Breast cancer risk associated with polymorphism in CYP19 in Japanese women. Int J Cancer 2000;89:325–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Miyoshi Y, Ando A, Hasegawa S, et al. Association of genetic polymorphisms in CYP19 and CYP1A1 with the oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:2531–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Thyagarajan B, Brott M, Mink P, et al. CYP1B1 and CYP19 gene polymorphisms and breast cancer incidence: no association in the ARIC study. Cancer Lett 2004;207:183–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Hefler LA, Tempfer CB, Grimm C, et al. Estrogen-metabolizing gene polymorphisms in the assessment of breast carcinoma risk and fibroadenoma risk in Caucasian women. Cancer 2004;101:264–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Lee KM, Abel J, Ko Y, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 19 and 1B1, alcohol use, and breast cancer risk in Korean women. Br J Cancer 2003;88:675–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Paynter RA, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I. CYP19 (aromatase) haplotypes and endometrial cancer risk. Int J Cancer 2005;116:267–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Berstein LM, Imyanitov EN, Suspitsin EN, et al. CYP19 gene polymorphism in endometrial cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001;127:135–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Li L, Cicek MS, Casey G, Witte JS. No association between a tetranucleotide repeat polymogphis of CYP19 and prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:2280–1.[Free Full Text]
  27. Fukatsu T, Hirokawa Y, Araki T, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of hormone-related genes and prostate cancer risk in the Japanese population. Anticancer Res 2004;24:2431–7.[Medline]
  28. Kado N, Kitawaki J, Obayashi H, et al. Association of the CYP17 gene and CYP19 gene polymorphisms with risk of endometriosis in Japanese women. Hum Reprod 2002;17:897–902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nativelle-Serpentini C, Lambard S, Seralini GE, Sourdaine P. Aromatase and breast cancer: W39R, an inactive protein. Eur J Endocrinol 2002;146:583–9.[Abstract]
  30. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. VIII no. 155. Lyon: Interactive Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); 2002.
  31. Cai Q, Shu XO, Wen W, et al. Functional Ser326Cys polymorphism in hOGG1genes is not associated with breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:403–4.[Free Full Text]
  32. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 2001;68:978–89.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Bulun SE, Sebastian S, Takayama K, Suzuki T, Sasano H, Shozu M. The human CYP19 (aromatase P450) gene: update on physiologic roles and genomic organization of promoters. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003;86:219–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Harada N, Utsumi T, Takaqi Y. Tissue-specific expression of the human aromatase cytochrome P-450 gene by alternative use of multiple exons 1 and promoters, and switching of tissue-specific exons 1 in carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:11312–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ma CX, Adjei AA, Salavaggione OE, et al. Human aromatase: gene resequencing and functional genomics. Cancer Res 2005;65:11071–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Watanabe J, Harada N, Suemasu K, Higashi Y, Gotoh O, Kawajiri K. Arginine-cysteine polymorphism at codon 264 of the human CYP19 gene does not affect aromatase activity. Pharmacogenetics 1997;7:419–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Suzuki K, Nakazato H, Matsui H, et al. Genetic polymorphisms of estrogen receptor {alpha}, CYP19, catechol-O-methyltransferase are associated with familial prostate carcinoma risk in a Japanese population. Cancer 2003;98:1411–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Long JR, Shu XO, Cai Q, et al. CYP19A1 genetic polymorphisms may be associated with obesity-related phenotypes in Chinese women. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:418–23.[Medline]
  39. Dunning AM, Dowsett M, Healey CS, et al. Polymorhisms associated with circulating sex hormone levels in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:936–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. W. Bell, B. W. Brannigan, K. Matsuo, D. M. Finkelstein, R. Sordella, J. Settleman, T. Mitsudomi, and D. A. Haber
Increased Prevalence of EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer in Women and in East Asian Populations: Analysis of Estrogen-Related Polymorphisms
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4079 - 4084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
W. H. Xu, Q. Dai, Y. B. Xiang, J. R. Long, Z. X. Ruan, J. R. Cheng, W. Zheng, and X. O. Shu
Interaction of Soy Food and Tea Consumption with CYP19A1 Genetic Polymorphisms in the Development of Endometrial Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2007; 166(12): 1420 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Shu, X. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tao, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Shu, X. O.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online