
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine and 2 Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Departments of 3 Epidemiology and 4 Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and 5 Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
Requests for reprints: Shelley S. Tworoger, Channing Laboratory, 3rd Floor, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-525-2087; Fax: 617-525-2008. E-mail: nhsst{at}channing.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
32 ng/mL) versus inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels had a modestly decreased risk of serous ovarian cancer (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.39-1.05). Overall, our results do not suggest that plasma vitamin D levels are associated with risk of ovarian cancer. However, we observed significant associations in some subgroups, which should be evaluated further in other studies because increasing vitamin D intake is an easy preventive measure to adopt. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(4):7838) | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several ecological studies reported that ovarian cancer mortality was inversely associated with UV-B exposure, which initiates vitamin D production in the skin, based on location of residence or occupation (17-21). In addition, some studies of dietary intake of vitamin D observed an inverse association with ovarian cancer risk (22, 23), but others did not (24, 25). It is difficult to study dietary intake of vitamin D because it is strongly correlated with lactose intake, which may increase risk of ovarian cancer (24, 26). Thus, plasma vitamin D levels may be more useful in investigating a potential relationship with ovarian cancer. However, to our knowledge, no study has examined the association between circulating vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer. Therefore, we examined whether plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (a measure of overall vitamin D status) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (the biologically active form) were associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a prospective, nested-case control study among three cohort studies: the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and the Women's Health Study (WHS). The three cohorts were combined to provide sufficient sample size to evaluate these associations.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1989 to 1990, 32,826 NHS participants (ages 43-69 years) provided blood samples and completed a short questionnaire (27). Briefly, women arranged to have their blood drawn and shipped with an icepack via overnight courier to our laboratory where it was processed and separated into plasma (heparin), RBC, and WBC components. Follow-up of the NHS blood study cohort was 98% in 2004.
Between 1996 and 1999, 29,611 NHSII participants (ages 32-54 years) provided blood samples and completed a short questionnaire (28). Briefly, premenopausal women (n = 18,521) who had not taken hormones, been pregnant, or lactated within 6 months provided blood samples drawn on the 3rd to 5th day of their menstrual cycle (follicular draw) and 7 to 9 days before the anticipated start of their next cycle (luteal draw, called timed samples). Follicular plasma was aliquoted by the participant and frozen. Other women (n = 11,090) provided a single 30-mL untimed blood sample. Luteal and untimed samples were shipped and processed identically to the NHS samples. Follow-up of the NHSII blood study cohort was 98% in 2003.
All samples have been stored in liquid nitrogen freezers since collection. These studies were approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at the Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Cases were diagnosed with ovarian cancer after blood collection but before June 1, 2004 (NHS) or June 1, 2003 (NHSII). Overall, 161 epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer cases were confirmed by medical record review (141 from NHS and 20 from NHSII). Mean time from blood draw to diagnosis was 80 months (range, 1-174 months). Cases were matched to three controls, who had intact ovaries at the time of the case diagnosis, on menopausal status at baseline and diagnosis, age (±1 year), month of blood collection (±1 month), time of day of blood draw (±2 h), fasting status, and postmenopausal hormone use at blood draw. For NHSII cases with timed samples, we additionally matched on day of the luteal blood draw (date of next menstrual cycle date of blood draw, ±1 day). Cases and controls had no previous history of cancer, except nonmelanoma skin cancer, before blood collection. Two controls that subsequently developed ovarian cancer were each matched to three controls and included only as cases in the analysis.
WHS. The WHS is a completed randomized trial examining low-dose aspirin and vitamin E supplementation for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease (29-31). Beginning in 1992, 39,876 female professionals in the United States were enrolled in the trial and completed a baseline health questionnaire. Women were >45 years of age and free of cancer (apart from nonmelanoma skin cancer) and cardiovascular disease at baseline. Blood samples were collected in EDTA and citrate tubes from 28,345 women before randomization. All samples were stored in continuously monitored liquid nitrogen freezers. We included women from the treatment and placebo groups and used citrate plasma for the assays. The effect of the intervention on vitamin D levels has not been specifically evaluated. The randomized trial was completed on March 31, 2004; at that time, morbidity and mortality follow-up were 97% and 99% complete, respectively. Participants are currently being followed in an observational study. The study is approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at the Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Women reported ovarian cancer on their follow-up questionnaires, and medical records were obtained to confirm the self-reports and to document the histology of the tumor. Cases were diagnosed with invasive ovarian cancer after blood collection but before December 1, 2004. Overall, 63 eligible epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified; the mean time from blood draw to diagnosis was 54 months (range, 6-120 months). Each case was matched to two controls (except for four cases for whom only one control match was identified) who had intact ovaries at the time of the case diagnosis, on menopausal status at baseline and at case diagnosis, age (±1 year), month of blood collection (±3 months), time since randomization (±6 months), and fasting status.
Menopausal Status. We considered a woman to be premenopausal if (a) she gave timed samples (NHSII only), (b) her periods had not ceased, or (c) she had a hysterectomy with at least one ovary remaining and was
47 (nonsmokers) or
45 (smokers) years old (32). Regardless of postmenopausal hormone use status, we considered a woman to be postmenopausal if (a) her natural menstrual periods had ceased permanently or (b) she had a hysterectomy with at least one ovary remaining and was
56 (nonsmokers) or
54 (smokers) years old (for the NHS and NHSII) or
60 years old (for the WHS). The remaining women, most of whom had a simple hysterectomy or were unsure of their menopausal status, were considered to be of unknown menopausal status.
Laboratory Assays
Vitamin D analytes (25-hydroxy and 1,25-dihydroxy) were assayed by RIA, as previously described (33), in four batches (two for NHS, one for NHSII, and one for WHS) at the laboratory of one of the authors (B.W.H.). Briefly, the RIA used radioiodinated tracers, with a prior acetonitrile extraction. Case-control sets and samples from the same study were assayed together, ordered randomly, and labeled to mask case-control status and quality control status. The intra-assay coefficient of variation from blinded, replicate, quality control samples (10% of the total sample number) ranged from 8.0% to 9.6% for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and from 8.6% to 14.1% for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. The correlation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in whole blood processed immediately versus processed 24 or 48 h after collection was 0.97 and 0.95, respectively.
Statistical Analysis
Outliers (34) were identified separately by sample type because samples collected in citrate tend to have lower values due to dilution by the preservative (35). For heparin plasma, those with 25-hydroxyvitamin D >60 ng/mL were set to missing (n = 1); there were no outliers for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. For citrate plasma, those with 25-hydroxyvitamin D <5.0 ng/mL (n = 2) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D <10.1 pg/mL (n = 3) were set to missing. Overall, 224 cases and 606 controls were available for analysis. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined using conditional logistic regression comparing quartiles of vitamin D concentrations, with cutoff points based on the control distribution within each plasma type (36). We also considered season-specific quartiles for three seasons: winter to early spring (January, February, March, April); summer to early fall (July, August, September, October); and late-spring/late fall (May, June, November, December). However, results did not differ from using overall cutoff points and thus only the latter are presented. Further, we examined whether having inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (<32 ng/mL; ref. 37) was associated with ovarian cancer risk; individuals with levels below this cutoff point have secondary hyperparathyroidism, impaired calcium absorption, and low bone mineral density (37). To correct for the dilution factor in citrate samples, we multiplied 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels by 1.163 (35) before classification of having inadequate levels.
Because vitamin D levels differed by sample type, we included probit scores of vitamin D levels as a continuous variable for all trend tests (using the Wald test) to standardize for between-sample variability (38); probit scores, unlike z scores, have a normal distribution even if the original data are skewed. We considered multiple a priori potential confounders including ever use of postmenopausal hormone, body mass index (BMI) at blood draw, parity, lactose intake, duration of oral contraceptive use, season of blood draw, age at menopause, tubal ligation, family history of ovarian cancer, physical activity, and duration of multivitamin use. The following confounders were included in the final model: ever use of postmenopausal hormone (yes, no), BMI (continuous), parity (continuous), lactose intake (quintiles, missing), duration of oral contraceptive use (never, <3, 3-<5, 5+ years), and season of blood draw (as noted above). Because there was some difference in the confounding by duration of oral contraceptive use and BMI at blood draw between studies, we included an interaction term between study and these two variables in models including these variables.
In secondary analyses, we excluded cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection and evaluated associations among only invasive or serous cases because etiologic factors may vary by histologic type; we only had enough serous cases to evaluate separately. We also stratified by season (summer, other), age at diagnosis (<55,
55 years), menopausal status at blood draw or diagnosis (premenopausal, postmenopausal), BMI (<25,
25 kg/m2), and multivitamin use (ever, never) because these factors may alter vitamin D levels. Interaction terms using the above cutoff points crossed with continuous vitamin D probit scores were used to determine the Pheterogeneity. These analyses used unconditional logistic regression adjusting for matching factors, including age at blood draw (continuous), fasting status (yes, no), time of blood draw (1-8 am, 9 am-noon, 1 pm-midnight), month of blood draw (continuous), menopausal status at blood and diagnosis (premenopausal, postmenopausal, unknown), and study (NHS, NHSII, WHS).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.22, NHS/NHSII or WHS).
|
|
25 kg/m2 (Ptrend = 0.04 and Pheterogeneity = 0.06, versus BMI <25 kg/m2; Table 3
). Among overweight and obese women, the RR comparing the top versus bottom quartile of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.16-0.93), whereas among lean women, no association was observed (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.61-2.23). The association with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D did not differ by BMI (>25 kg/m2: RR, 0.95;
25 kg/m2: RR, 1.08). The associations for 25-hydroxy and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D did not differ by age at diagnosis, multivitamin use, menopausal status at blood collection or diagnosis, or season of blood collection (data not shown).
|
32 ng/mL; ref. 37) versus inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels had a modestly decreased risk of ovarian cancer (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43-1.05); adequate vitamin D levels also were associated with a reduced risk of serous tumors (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.39-1.05; Table 4
). The association seemed to be stronger for women who were overweight or obese (RR, 0.47).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results generally are consistent with those observed in ecologic studies of UV-B exposure and ovarian cancer mortality (17-21), as well as with similar prospective studies of breast (39) and colon (40) cancers. For both of these cancer types and in our data, only 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were suggestively associated with a decreased risk, whereas no association was observed for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. This pattern suggests that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may be a better reflection of overall vitamin D exposure than 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (39), although 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is the active metabolite that binds to the vitamin D receptor (41). Interestingly, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations are tightly regulated, whereas 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are more responsive to sun exposure or intake of vitamin D rich foods or supplements (41). Recent data suggest that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may have independent effects at various target tissues due to extrarenal conversion to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, including in ovarian tissue (6, 7). Ovarian cancer cells and tissue contain measurable levels of 1
-hydroxylase and 24-hydroxlase (4, 7, 15), which can convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. It is possible that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D formed through this process only acts intracellularly or as an autocrine/paracrine factor, and therefore is not measured in circulating levels (42). If the proportion of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D from this latter mechanism is high, it is reasonable to then assume that circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D may better reflect exposure at the tissue level. Given that the correlation between the two analytes was relatively low in our study (Spearman r = 0.29), it is possible that only 25-hydroxyvitamin D may have an effect on ovarian cancer risk. However, this hypothesis should be explored in more detail in other studies.
Experimental data support a role of vitamin D analytes in ovarian cancer risk. A number of studies have observed that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth (5, 6, 11, 13-16) and increases apoptosis (12). High 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels also can increase vitamin D receptor expression in ovarian cancer cell lines (12). One study reported that 25-hydroxyvitamin D slightly increased cell growth of ovarian cancer cells; however, this effect was reduced on exposure to higher concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (15).
Interestingly, we observed that the association between vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk was stronger among overweight and obese women. The amount of adipose tissue in humans is inversely related to circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, likely due to uptake of vitamin D by fat cells (43-46). It is possible that this may lead to more bioavailable vitamin D at the tissue level or that circulating levels are better reflective of long-term tissue exposure in this subpopulation. A study of rats fed vitamin D indicated that adipose tissue levels of vitamin D increased significantly and that vitamin D was slowly released from adipose tissue, particularly during fasting (47). This suggests that adipose tissue may be an important factor in determining long-term vitamin D status (47). More research is needed to better understand these potential interrelationships.
Our study has several limitations and strengths. One limitation is that the NHS/NHSII and WHS collected different sample types (heparin and citrate plasma, respectively). In addition, citrate plasma can dilute specimens, thus lowering the measured concentrations (35), although the levels were similar between the two studies when adjusting for the dilution factor. Vitamin D levels also vary across the year; therefore, we matched cases and controls on date of the blood draw and also examined season-specific quartile cutoff points. Although there may be some general measurement error in our assay of vitamin D levels, using plasma levels provides an integrated measure of dietary intake, sunlight exposure, and genetic variability for vitamin D exposure. In addition, we only had one blood sample per person, which may not reflect exposure over the 14 years of follow-up. However, the intraclass correlation over 3 years was 0.70 for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 0.50 for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (48), suggesting that one sample is fairly representative at least over a 3-year period. The strength of this study was its prospective nature, with blood samples being collected before disease diagnosis. We also had >200 ovarian cancer cases, thus providing reasonable power to detect an association among all women and for serous tumors, but not for other ovarian cancer subtypes.
Overall, we observed no clear association of plasma vitamin D levels and ovarian cancer risk; however, our study is suggestive that inadequate levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D may be associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer of the serous subtype in overweight/obese women. These findings should be evaluated in future prospective studies because, if an association exists, increasing vitamin D intake/production could provide a simple and important mechanism for preventing ovarian cancer.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 11/21/06; revised 1/ 9/07; accepted 1/25/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-hydroxylase enzyme: evidence for skeletal, reproductive, and immune dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:7498503.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Tworoger, I-M. Lee, J. E. Buring, and S. E. Hankinson Plasma Androgen Concentrations and Risk of Incident Ovarian Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2008; 167(2): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Tworoger, I-M. Lee, J. E. Buring, M. N. Pollak, and S. E. Hankinson Insulin-like Growth Factors and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Nested Case-Control Study in Three Cohorts Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1691 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |