This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1055-9965.EPI-07-0182v1 16/10/2101    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Michaud, D. S. Articles by Fuchs, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Michaud, D. S. Articles by Fuchs, C. S.

Prediagnostic Plasma C-Peptide and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Men and Women

¹ Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, and ² Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Departments of ³ Epidemiology and ⁴ Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health; ⁵ Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; ⁶ Departments of Medicine and Oncology, Lady Davis Research Institute of the Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Canada; ⁷ University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington; and ⁸ University of California at Los Angeles School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California

Requests for reprints: Dominique Michaud, Harvard School of Public Health, Kresge 920, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-432-4508; Fax: 617-566-7805. E-mail: dmichaud{at}hsph.harvard.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background: Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance have been proposed as underlying mechanisms for the increase in pancreatic cancer among long-standing diabetics and obese individuals. An association between serum insulin levels and pancreatic cancer risk was reported in a recent study, but the population was composed of heavy smokers and their findings may not be generalizable to nonsmokers.

Methods: Pancreatic cancer cases and matched controls were obtained from four large-scale prospective cohorts to examine the association between prediagnostic plasma levels of C-peptide and insulin and pancreatic cancer. One hundred ninety-seven pancreatic cancer cases were diagnosed during a maximum of 20 years of follow-up, after excluding cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection or with baseline diabetes. We estimated OR and confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression with adjustment for pancreatic cancer risk factors.

Results: Prediagnostic plasma C-peptide was positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.87-2.64, highest compared with the lowest quartile, P_trend = 0.005). The association was not modified by body mass index or physical activity but seemed to be slightly stronger among never smokers than ever smokers. Fasting C-peptide and insulin were not related to pancreatic cancer; however, we observed a strong linear association for nonfasting C-peptide and pancreatic cancer (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.30-13.8, highest versus lowest quartile, P_trend < 0.001).

Conclusions: Based on our finding of a strong positive association with nonfasting C-peptide levels, we propose that insulin levels in the postprandial state may be the relevant exposure for pancreatic carcinogenesis; however, other studies will need to examine this possibility. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(10):2101–9)

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
With a 5-year survival rate of <5%, pancreatic cancer is one of the most rapidly fatal malignancies (1). Because pancreatic cancer is typically detected at a late stage, prevention could play an important role in reducing mortality from this disease. In recent years, type 2 diabetes has become a more widely accepted risk factor for pancreatic cancer; numerous studies noted that long-standing diabetes is associated with a significant increase in the subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer (2, 3). In addition, a growing number of studies link obesity to risk of pancreatic cancer (4-8), lending support to a role for obesity in the etiology of pancreatic cancer.

Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance have been proposed as underlying mechanisms through which diabetes and obesity may be linked to pancreatic cancer risk. Insulin and insulin resistance seem to play a key role in colon carcinogenesis (9), and animal studies suggest that these pathways may be important in pancreatic cancer as well (10, 11). In a recently published prospective study of Finnish male smokers, a 2-fold increased risk was observed for men in the highest quartile of fasting serum insulin compared with the lowest quartile [relative risk (RR), 2.01; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.03-3.93; ref. 12].

Proinsulin is synthesized in pancreatic ß cells and is enzymatically cleaved to create insulin and C-peptide, which are secreted into the portal circulation in equimolar amounts when insulin is required. The half-life of C-peptide in the circulation is between two and five times longer than that of the more rapidly changing levels of insulin, and due to its relative metabolic inertness, is a more stable biomarker for ß-cell secretory activity. C-peptide measurements are preferable to insulin measurements because C-peptide is not removed by the liver, has slower metabolic clearance rate, and lacks cross-reactivity with antibodies to insulin (13).

To date, no study has examined plasma C-peptide levels in relation to pancreatic cancer risk. Moreover, the role of insulin and insulin resistance has not been examined in women or nonsmokers. Therefore, we prospectively examined the association between plasma C-peptide, insulin, and pancreatic cancer risk in four large U.S. cohorts of healthy men and women in which plasma samples were collected at baseline, before any diagnosis of cancer.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Populations
To obtain sufficient numbers of prediagnostic bloods for this analysis, we drew on four large prospective studies: the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), the Physicians' Health Study (PHS), and the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS). The HPFS was initiated in 1986 when 51,529 U.S. men ages 40 to 75 years responded to a mailed questionnaire. Participants of the HPFS are dentists, veterinarians, pharmacists, optometrists, osteopathic physicians, and podiatrists. The NHS was established in 1976 when 121,700 female registered nurses ages 30 to 55 years responded to a mailed questionnaire. The PHS was a randomized, double-blind trial of aspirin and ß-carotene among 22,071 male physicians, predominantly Caucasian, 40 to 84 years of age in 1982. The aspirin component of the trial was terminated in 1988 (14), the ß-carotene component was terminated in 1995, and all study participants are actively followed as an observational cohort. The WHI-OS consists of 93,676 postmenopausal women of ages 50 to 79 years who were enrolled between 1994 and 1998. The health of these participants was tracked over an average of 8 years via annual health forms and a clinic visit 3 years after enrollment. A brief description of each cohort is summarized in Table 1 .

Blood Collection
Blood samples were collected from 32,826 of the NHS participants in 1989 to 1990, from 18,018 participants of the HPFS in 1993 to 1995, from 14,916 of the PHS at baseline (1982-1984), and on all 93,676 WHI participants at the first screening visit (1994-1998). All blood samples were continuously stored in well-monitored liquid nitrogen freezers from blood collection to their retrieval for analysis. Details on blood draw, transportation, and storage in these cohorts are provided elsewhere [NHS (20), HPFS (21), PHS (22), and WHI (23)].

Pancreatic Cancer Cases and Matched Controls
For this analysis, we included cases of pancreatic cancer that were diagnosed at least 2 years after the date of blood draw and through 2004. Incident cases were initially self-reported by cohort participants on annual or biennial questionnaires and then confirmed with medical records or pathology reports. In addition, given the high fatality rate of pancreatic cancer, cases were often identified through follow-up of reported deaths (notified by postal authorities or next-of-kin) or when searching National Death Index for nonrespondents. Medical records were also requested for deceased cases. Pancreatic cancer cases with a prior history of malignancy (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer) were excluded from these analyses.

Eligible controls were cohort participants who were still alive and free of cancer at the date of the case's diagnosis and who had provided a blood sample. From among these participants, we randomly selected three controls for every case matching on cohort (which concurrently matched on sex), year of birth, smoking status (current, past, or never), fasting status (>8 h), and month of blood draw.

Given that C-peptide and insulin levels among diabetics are unlikely to reflect long-term exposure levels (due to changes from hyperinsulinemia to hypoinsulinemia during progress of disease), we excluded cases and controls who reported being diabetic before or at the time of blood draw (no exclusions were made for prior cardiovascular disease).

Laboratory Assays
Plasma C-peptide and insulin were assayed using ELISA with reagents from Diagnostic Systems Laboratory in the laboratory of Dr. Michael Pollak. Samples from matched sets were handled together, shipped together, and assayed in the same analytic run along with randomly inserted masked quality control samples. All laboratory personnel were blinded to the case/control/quality control status of the samples. The mean intra-assay coefficients of variation from the internal quality control samples (n = 24) were 7.3% for C-peptide and 5.5% for insulin.

Statistical Analysis
C-peptide and insulin were log-transformed to improve normality. To compare mean concentrations of C-peptide and insulin between matched cases and controls, we used the paired t test. To compare continuous characteristics between matched cases and controls, we used the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test and for categorical variables we used the ² test.

To estimate matched odds ratios (OR) of pancreatic cancer, we used conditional logistic regression models and included indicator variables for quartiles of C-peptide and insulin levels with cutpoints based on the distributions of the controls. For C-peptide, cutpoints were determined to be cohort-specific a priori due to substantial differences in population characteristics (e.g., age, sex, study design; Table 1) and in storage time, collection and instructions of blood samples. For insulin, given small numbers (as only fasting insulin was measured), cutpoints were based on the three cohorts combined (as only a couple of cases in PHS had blood collected during fasting, insulin was not measured in this cohort). In multivariate analyses, we adjusted for body mass index (BMI), multivitamin use, physical activity, time between last meal and blood draw, and high smoking dose among current smokers (25+ cigarettes per day in HPFS and NHS, 20+ cigarettes/d in PHS; note that this is in addition to matching by smoking status for tighter control but due to small numbers of current smokers, further stratification of smoking dose was not feasible as the statistical models were too unstable). All covariates included in the multivariate models were measured before blood collection (1988 for NHS and 1992 for HPFS) or at the time of blood collection (PHS and WHI). To test for trend, we entered the quartile-specific median value as a continuous value into the logistic regression model. Stratified analyses were done for factors that could modify the relation between C-peptide and pancreatic cancer (i.e., BMI, sex, age, smoking, fasting status, and physical activity). To estimate the stratum-specific ORs and to maximize power, we ran the stratified unconditional logistic regression models adjusting for matching factors in addition to the other covariates in the conditional logistic model. For the stratified analysis by fasting status, we created new cutpoints based on the distribution of C-peptide in the controls of fasting and nonfasting separately, as the C-peptide levels in these two subgroups vary. To test for statistical interaction, we entered into the model the main effect terms and a term of the cross-product, the coefficient for which was evaluated by the Wald test. We examined the possibly nonlinear relation between C-peptide and the OR for pancreatic cancer nonparametrically with restricted cubic splines (24). Tests for nonlinearity used the likelihood ratio test, comparing the model with only the linear term to the model with the linear and the cubic spline terms. Analyses were conducted using SAS release 9.1 (SAS Institute). Two-sided P values are given for all tests.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
After excluding cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection or with baseline diabetes, 197 pancreatic cancer cases and 571 matched controls with C-peptide levels were available for this analysis. Insulin levels were measured in 120 cases and 343 matched controls with fasting blood samples. Table 2 provides characteristics for the four individual cohorts included in the analyses. BMI was substantially higher in cases than controls in the PHS cohort, but not in the other three cohorts. For each cohort individually, cases tended to exercise less and were slightly more likely to be multivitamin users than controls. Age, smoking, and fasting status were matching factors. C-peptide levels were slightly higher in cases than controls in the HPFS, NHS, and PHS cohorts, but these differences were not statistically significant. In the combined data, cases had significantly higher C-peptide levels than controls when measured in nonfasting bloods, but C-peptide levels were similar in cases and controls in fasting blood (bottom of Table 2).

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1. Plasma C-peptide and pancreatic cancer risk among nonfasting individuals.

View larger version (6K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 2. Plasma C-peptide and pancreatic cancer risk among fasting individuals.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

To date, elevated postload and fasting glucose levels have been consistently associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in prospective studies with RRs ranging between 1.7 and 4.0 (12, 25-27). Furthermore, a high glycemic load (based on dietary intake) was associated with elevated pancreatic cancer risk in the NHS (28), suggesting that diet can similarly influence pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Although some data support a direct role for insulin in pancreatic carcinogenesis, mainly through its growth-promoting properties (29, 30), it is not known whether insulin per se is the underlying factor that explains the higher rates of pancreatic cancer risk among diabetics and obese individuals. Other studies suggest that peripheral insulin resistance and islet cell proliferation, but not insulin itself, play an important role in exocrine pancreatic cancer (11). In a recent prospective study of male smokers, fasting insulin levels were more strongly associated with pancreatic cancer risk than glucose levels or estimated insulin resistance, although all three were significantly associated with risk. Nonetheless, in that study, the relation between fasting insulin and pancreatic cancer was significant only among cases diagnosed 10 or more years after the baseline blood draw (12).

In the current study, the positive association between plasma C-peptide was limited to bloods obtained in a nonfasting state. The influence of fasting status on the relation between C-peptide and pancreatic cancer may explain why, in the main analysis that included both fasting and nonfasting specimens, the overall association did not appear linear and was somewhat modest in strength. In a recent NHS analysis of colorectal cancer, the observed association with C-peptide was similarly stronger among nonfasting blood specimens and was markedly attenuated in fasting participants (21). Other studies on colon cancer risk have observed similar findings for insulin as well as for C-peptide (31), suggesting that postprandial insulin may be a better measure for the association with cancer risk than fasting insulin levels. In a previous study, fewer meals per day and a lower caloric intake both conferred a lower risk of pancreatic cancer (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.96, for 1 versus 3 meals per day; ref. 32), supporting the hypothesis that postprandial insulin exposure may be important.

We did not observe an association between fasting plasma insulin levels and pancreatic cancer in this study (insulin was not measured in nonfasting bloods). This finding is consistent with the lack of association between fasting plasma C-peptide and pancreatic cancer in our study population. However, it is not consistent with the previous observation from the prospective study of Finnish male smokers where fasting insulin was positively associated with pancreatic cancer (12). However, as stated above, that study failed to detect a significant influence of fasting insulin when limited to cancers detected within 5 to 10 years after blood collection, which is similar to our range of follow-up. Moreover, these two populations are not directly comparable; one consists of Finnish male smokers, whereas our study represents healthy men and women with a low prevalence of current smokers at baseline. Of interest is that no association was observed for BMI and pancreatic cancer in the Finnish population (33), whereas we have previously reported strong positive associations for BMI in two of the four cohorts included in this analysis (the NHS and HPFS; ref. 4). One may speculate whether mechanisms of pancreatic carcinogenesis differ in these substantially different populations.

The strengths of our study include its prospective design, high follow-up rates in the individual cohorts, relatively large number of incident pancreatic cancer cases, matching on potential confounders to increase efficiency, and additionally controlling for potential confounders. The limitations of this study include potential residual confounding as a result of combining data from four cohorts; specifically some of the variables, such as physical activity, were not measured in the same manner across the four different cohorts. Another limitation is that we had only one plasma measurement per individual, which could potentially generate misclassification over time. However, previous studies suggest that plasma C-peptide levels are relatively stable over time (within-person correlation coefficient was 0.57 between two measures of fasting bloods taken 4 years apart; ref. 34). In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that measurement error was introduced in the laboratory assays, although our internal quality control data, which showed a relatively low coefficient of variability, suggest that the measurements were highly reliable. Moreover, any misclassification in plasma C-peptide that resulted from either change in levels over time or random measurement error would have biased our results toward the null. Finally, because 75% of cases in our study were diagnosed within 8 years of blood collection, we did not have the power to examine the association between plasma C-peptide and pancreatic cancer after a 10-year lag period. However, to minimize possible reverse causation, we excluded cases diagnosed in the first 2 years of follow-up from all our analyses; moreover, when we repeated our analysis after excluding cases diagnosed within the first 4-years, we observed similar associations.

Because this analysis pooled blood specimens from four distinct cohort populations, we used cohort-specific quantiles for C-peptide rather than pooling the raw data across cohorts, given the differences in the study participants and specimen collection. Although our analysis strongly supports the hypothesis that "high" levels of nonfasting C-peptide influence the risk of pancreatic cancer, the determination of a specific "high-risk" level of plasma C-peptide for future preventive guidelines would likely require a study of plasma C-peptide within a single, large prospective cohort with a sufficiently homogenous method of sample collection.

The 4-fold elevation in pancreatic cancer risk associated with elevated nonfasting plasma C-peptide levels in our study suggest that insulin levels in the postprandial state may be the most relevant exposure for pancreatic carcinogenesis. Additional studies are needed to examine the role of postprandial insulin and confirm our findings with nonfasting plasma C-peptide. More generally, however, our findings provide additional evidence that insulin is involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis and confirm a potential mechanism for the relationship between diabetes, obesity, and pancreatic cancer.

	Footnotes

 
Grant support: CA87969, CA55075, CA86102, CA95589, CA42182, CA90598, and a grant from the Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research (C.S. Fuchs).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 2/28/07; revised 7/ 6/07; accepted 7/24/07.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Cancer facts & figures 2006. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc., 2006.
2. Everhart J, Wright D. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1995;273:1605–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Michaud DS. The epidemiology of pancreatic, gallbladder, and other biliary tract cancers. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:S195–200.[Medline]
4. Michaud DS, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, et al. Physical activity, obesity, height and the risk of pancreatic cancer. JAMA 2001;286:921–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1625–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Patel AV, Rodriguez C, Bernstein L, et al. Obesity, recreational physical activity, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large U.S. Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:459–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Larsson SC, Permert J, Hakansson N, et al. Overall obesity, abdominal adiposity, diabetes and cigarette smoking in relation to the risk of pancreatic cancer in two Swedish population-based cohorts. Br J Cancer 2005;93:1310–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Spencer EA, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, et al. Anthropometry, physical activity, and the risk of pancreatic cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition 1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0800. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:879–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Giovannucci E. Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and colon cancer: a review of the evidence. J Nutr 2001;131:3109–20S.
10. Fisher WE, Boros LG, Schirmer WJ. Insulin promotes pancreatic cancer: evidence for endocrine influence on exocrine pancreatic tumors. J Surg Res 1996;63:310–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Schneider MB, Matsuzaki H, Haorah J, et al. Prevention of pancreatic cancer induction in hamsters by metformin. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1263–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Graubard BI, Chari S, et al. Insulin, glucose, insulin resistance, and pancreatic cancer in male smokers. JAMA 2005;294:2872–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Bonser AM, Garcia-Webb P. C-peptide measurement: methods and clinical utility. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1984;19:297–352.[Medline]
14. Steering Committee of the Physicians' Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. N Engl J Med 1989;321:129–35.[Abstract]
15. Martinez ME, Giovannucci E, Spiegelman D, et al. Leisure-time physical activity, body size, and colon cancer in women. Nurses' Health Study Research Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:948–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, et al. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:327–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Manson JE, Grobbee DE, Stampfer MJ, et al. Aspirin in the primary prevention of angina pectoris in a randomized trial of United States physicians. Am J Med 1990;89:772–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, et al. The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:S107–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Rich-Edwards JW, Corsano KA, Stampfer MJ. Test of the National Death Index and Equifax Nationwide Death Search. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:1016–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Alcohol, height, and adiposity in relation to estrogen and prolactin levels in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:1297–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Wei EK, Ma J, Pollak MN, et al. C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, glycosylated hemoglobin, and the risk of distal colorectal adenoma in women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:750–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. Steering Committee of the Physicians' Health Study Research Group. N Engl J Med 1989;321:129–35.[Abstract]
23. Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R, et al. Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:S5–17.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989;8:551–61.[Medline]
25. Gapstur SM, Gann PH, Lowe W, et al. Abnormal glucose metabolism and pancreatic cancer mortality. JAMA 2000;283:2552–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Jee SH, Ohrr H, Sull JW, et al. Fasting serum glucose level and cancer risk in Korean men and women. JAMA 2005;293:194–202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Batty GD, Shipley MJ, Marmot M, Smith GD. Diabetes status and post-load plasma glucose concentration in relation to site-specific cancer mortality: findings from the original Whitehall study. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:873–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Michaud DS, Liu S, Giovannucci E, et al. Dietary sugar, glycemic load, and pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1293–300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Wang F, Larsson J, Adrian TE, Gasslander T, Permert J. In vitro influences between pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells and pancreatic islets. J Surg Res 1998;79:13–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Ding XZ, Fehsenfeld DM, Murphy LO, Permert J, Adrian TE. Physiological concentrations of insulin augment pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and glucose utilization by activating MAP kinase, PI3 kinase and enhancing GLUT-1 expression. Pancreas 2000;21:310–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Giovannucci E, Michaud D. The role of obesity and related metabolic disturbances in cancers of the colon, prostate, and pancreas. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2208–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Silverman DT, Swanson CA, Gridley G, et al. Dietary and nutritional factors and pancreatic cancer: a case-control study based on direct interviews. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1710–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Pietinen P, Taylor PR, Virtamo J, Albanes D. A prospective study of medical conditions, anthropometry, physical activity, and pancreatic cancer in male smokers (Finland). Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:417–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Ma J, Giovannucci E, Pollak M, et al. A prospective study of plasma C-peptide and colorectal cancer risk in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:546–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. V. Matveyenko, S. Dry, H. I. Cox, A. Moshtaghian, T. Gurlo, R. Galasso, A. E. Butler, and P. C. Butler Beneficial Endocrine but Adverse Exocrine Effects of Sitagliptin in the Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Transgenic Rat Model of Type 2 Diabetes: Interactions With Metformin Diabetes, July 1, 2009; 58(7): 1604 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Jiao, A. Flood, A. F. Subar, A. R. Hollenbeck, A. Schatzkin, and R. Stolzenberg-Solomon Glycemic Index, Carbohydrates, Glycemic Load, and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in a Prospective Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2009; 18(4): 1144 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Wu, W. C. Willett, and E. Giovannucci Plasma C-Peptide Is Inversely Associated with Calcium Intake in Women and with Plasma 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D in Men J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 547 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. B. Hayes, R. L. Horst, K. E. Anderson, B. W. Hollis, and D. T. Silverman Serum Vitamin D and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 69(4): 1439 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G Mulholland, L. J Murray, C. R Cardwell, and M. M Cantwell Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of digestive tract neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 568 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, S. Weinstein, M. Pollak, Y. Tao, P. R. Taylor, J. Virtamo, and D. Albanes Prediagnostic Adiponectin Concentrations and Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Male Smokers Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2008; 168(9): 1047 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1055-9965.EPI-07-0182v1 16/10/2101    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Michaud, D. S. Articles by Fuchs, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Michaud, D. S. Articles by Fuchs, C. S.