CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 15, 1421, July 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

In an article in the May 2006 issue (1), two errors were noted.

On page 836, a sentence read "In some cases, a tumor promotion assay is used, but there are no data from classic carcinogenic bioassays available to be used for calculating TEFs. (The most potent PCB by TEFs, congener 126, is not tumorigenic in a 2-year rodent bioassay; ref. 103)."

This text should be replaced with the following. "In some cases, a tumor promotion assay is used, but there is a single report in the literature of a classic carcinogenic bioassay available for an individual PCB congener (PCB 126) to be used to compare to TEFs estimated from other endpoints."

The citation for this sentence should be the following.

Walker NJ, Crockett PW, Nyska A, Brix AE, Jokinen MP, Sells DM, Hailey JR, Easterling M, Haseman JK, Yin M, Wyde ME, Bucher JR, Portier CJ. Dose-additive carcinogenicity of a defined mixture of "dioxin-like compounds." Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(1):43-8.

On page 836, a sentence is cited incorrectly. The sentence read "It is unknown whether the experimental studies used for the determination of TEFs can be extrapolated to humans and what is the appropriateness of these toxicologic noncancer end points for predicting human cancer risk (195, 196)."

The sentence should not have been cited and References (195) and (196) were placed in error.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Shields PG. Understanding Population and Individual Risk Assessment: The Case of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:830–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online