
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communication |
1 Nordic Bioscience Diagnostics A/S, Herlev, Denmark; 2 Institute of Bone Pathology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 3 Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; and 4 Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Ballerup, Denmark
Requests for reprints: Diana J. Leeming, Nordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev Hovedgade 207, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark. Phone: 45-4452-5216; Fax: 45-4454-8888. E-mail: djl{at}nordicbioscience.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|

CTX) could be a sensitive indicator of the presence of bone metastases in breast cancer patients. The present study was sought to investigate (a) the localization of
CTX epitopes in the proximity of a bone metastasis and (b) the relationship between number of metastases and the urinary excretion of 
CTX. Adjacent bone sections from breast cancer patients were stained for the presence of tumor cells (anti-cytokeratin antibody), osteoclasts (TRAcP activity), and
CTX (anti-
CTX antibody). The association between the extent of metastatic bone disease and urinary excretion of 
CTX measured with ELISA was assessed in 90 breast cancer patients (45 with bone metastasis and 45 without bone metastasis). Immunohistochemistry revealed accumulation of TRAcP-positive osteoclasts and intense staining for
CTX epitopes in the proximity of cytokeratin-positive bone metastasis. Areas of
CTX staining showed unstructured bone tissue under polarized light. In addition, there was a significant linear association between the number of bone metastases and the urinary levels of 
CTX in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease, independent of age and body mass index (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). The estimated relative increases in 
CTX associated with the presence of one, two, or three metastases are 38%, 57%, and 81%, respectively. Taken into account the 17% intraindividual variation of the assay, 
CTX could be a sensitive biochemical marker for the close monitoring of cancer patients aiming the facilitation of early metastasis detection. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(7):13925) | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metastatic bone disease is characterized by acceleration of bone remodeling at sites of the metastases. Collagen type I constitutes the main component of the extracellular matrix. The epitope 1207EKAHGDDR1214 is located in the C-telopeptide
1 chain of collagen type I and found as an
-form in the GD motif of newly synthesized collagen (1). It undergoes spontaneous nonenzymatic ß-isomerization with aging. In a previous study, Houzé et al. showed a significant correlation between scintigraphic scores of metastatic bone invasion and urinary ßCTX levels in breast cancer patients (2). However, in pathologic situations of high bone remodeling, quantification of degradation products from the newly synthesized collagen (
CTX) can be expected to provide an even more relevant biomarker. Indeed, three recent studies (1, 3, 4) undertaken in breast and prostate cancer patients illustrate the higher sensitivity of 
CTX for indicating the presence of bone metastases compared with ßßCTX.
The aim of this study was to investigate (a) whether
CTX epitopes are detectable in histologic sections of tumor infiltrated bone in breast cancer patients, (b) how number of bone metastases influence the urinary excretion of 
CTX in breast cancer patients compared with those without bone metastases, (c) the potentials of this marker for the early detection of skeletal invasion (one to three metastases).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The use of measuring urinary 
CTX for the detection of bone metastases was assessed in 90 breast cancer patients (45 without bone metastases and 45 with bone metastases). All patients were routinely scanned by radiography at the Cancer Institute Hospital in Tokyo, Japan (M.K.). Positives for bone metastases were verified by Tc99 bone scintigraphy together with computer tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging to verify the presence and determine the number of bone metastases as described previously by Soloway et al. (5). All patients with skeletal complications were newly diagnosed, and none of them had received therapies known to influence bone turnover for the past 2 years before entry to the study. All participants signed an approved written consent, and the studies were done in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration II and Standards of Good Clinical Practice. Local ethical committees have approved study protocols.
Histology and Immunohistochemical Localization of
CTX in Bone
Human bone specimens were decalcified and embedded in paraffin for preparation of sections with 5 µm in thickness. The sections were blocked in TBS containing 0.5% casein and incubated overnight at 4°C in a moist atmosphere with primary antibody diluted in TBS containing 0.5% casein or control without antibody. The primary antibodies employed were monoclonal; F44 raised against the
CTX epitope (Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark) and another raised against cytokeratin against pan-cytokeratin (CK-MNF). Osteoclasts were visualized by their specific TRAcP activity. After incubation, the sections were thoroughly washed in TBS and incubated with secondary peroxidase-labeled antibody (Mouse EnVision; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Finally, the peroxidase activity was visualized using 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine Plus (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and the nuclei were counterstained using Ehrlich's hematoxylin. The bone slices were then dehydrated through a gradient of alcohol (70-99%) and toluene and mounted in DPX. Pictures were taken using an Olympus BX-60 light microscope equipped with an Olympus C-5050 Zoom digital camera.
Quantification of
CTX in Urine
Second morning void urine samples was collected from all patients and stored at 40°C until analysis. The concentration of 
CTX fragments was measured by the ALPHA CTX ELISA (Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark) following the manufacturer's recommendations. This assay is a sandwich-format EIA that uses monoclonal antibodies raised against
-EKAHDDGR (
CTX) and measures cross-linked chains (
CTX). The monoclonal antibody is highly specific for the
-form of CTX with <1% cross-reactivity with the ß-form of CTX1. Urinary excretion of 
CTX was corrected for creatinine excretion, which was measured by standard routine method. The short-term intraindividual variation of the ALPHA CTX ELISA, determined in 17 healthy postmenopausal women providing five consecutive samples during a 14-day observation period, was 17%.
Statistical Analysis
Demographics of subjects with or without bone metastases was compared with Student's t test. The concentrations of 
CTX were calculated relative to the creatinine concentration and transformed logarithmically to obtain normality. The General Linear Models Procedure was used for the regression analysis assessing the relationship between increases in 
CTX level (relative to patients without bone metastases) and the number of metastases. Model check included test for normality and probability and residual plots. The Statistical Analysis System (SAS, Cary, NC) was used for all calculations.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CTX in Bone
CTX staining was seen throughout all seven bone sections in the presence of tumor cells and consequently a large number of active osteoclasts. Figure 1A to D
shows adjacent sections from a bone invaded by breast cancer. Areas with hyperchromatic nuclei and positive cytokeratin staining confirmed the presence of malignant tissue in these sections (Fig. 1A). In the proximity of the tumor, TRAcP-positive staining revealed numerous osteoclasts characteristic for osteolytic lesions (Fig. 1B). In addition, immunostaining also revealed diffuse presence of
CTX epitopes with more intensive staining at the sites of high bone remodeling (Fig. 1C). Control using no antibody showed no staining (Fig. 1D).
|
CTX staining is confined to areas of woven but not lamellar bone. This latter is also illustrated by sections of fully normal bone structure: large areas of lamellar bone do not reveal presence of
CTX epitopes (Fig. 1G and H).
Urine 
CTX in Breast Cancer Patients
The demographic data of breast cancer patients with or without bone metastases has been published earlier (3). In brief, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of age or body mass index, but the urinary excretion of 
CTX was highly increased in patients with bone metastases (P < 0.001; Table 1
).
|

CTX for the detection of metastatic invasion in breast cancer patients. Therefore, increases in urinary 
CTX in patients with bone metastases were expressed with reference to the mean value of patients without bone metastases. Figure 2
indicates the linear association between number of metastases and the relative increases in the urinary excretion of 
CTX in patients with distinctive metastases (n = 40; r = 0.56, P < 0.001); Superscan patients (75% of ribs, vertebrae an pelvic bone infected by bone metastases) were excluded. According to the model, the relative increases corresponding to the presence of one, two, and three metastases are estimated to be 38%, 57%, and 81%, respectively. We have previously reported that level and variance of urinary 
CTX in breast cancer patients without bone metastases and age-matched healthy controls are comparable (6).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CTX epitopes in bone tissue being in the close proximity of metastatic invasion and related osteolytic activity and (b) a significant association between urinary levels of 
CTX and the extent of skeletal invasion (i.e., number of metastases) in breast cancer patients. The findings provide insights into why collagenous biomarkers, and in particular, 
CTX is a valid marker for the detection of osteolytic metastases in breast cancer patients.
Breast carcinoma frequently metastasizes to specific organs, including lymph nodes, lung, and bone. The vast majority of bone metastases in breast cancer patients is osteolytic lesions (7), although mixed and osteoblastic metastases have also been observed (8, 9). The mechanisms of intercellular communication between bone and cancer cells have been recently proposed by Clines and Guise (10). Cytokines/hormones (interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-
) and parathyroid hormone-related protein secreted from breast cancer cells are known to stimulate receptor activator of nuclear factor-
B ligand and reduce osteoprotegrin expression in osteoblasts. This in turn leads to enhanced differentiation of osteoclast progenitor cells and formation/activation of osteoclasts. The result of these events is the disruption of normal bone remodeling with predominance of osteoclastic bone resorption-promoting osteolysis (11).
Secondary to the increased osteoclastic bone resorption, the activity of osteoblasts will also increase and facilitate continuous formation of new bone matrix at the margin of the metastasis. At the same time, growth factors (insulin-like growth factors, transforming growth factor-ß, platelet-derived growth factor, and bone morphogenetic protein) and cytokines from osteoclasts enhance the growth and survival of tumor cells and further stimulate the expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein. These mechanisms will collectively result in the increase of a vicious cycle (12) driving the intensive remodeling. Presence of
CTX epitopes in bone tissue being in the proximity of a metastasis is a reflection of accelerated turnover of newly synthesized collagen type I. Another evidence of intensive remodeling is the lack of matured, lamellar structure in bone tissue revealing
CTX-staining. Importantly, in matured, lamellar bone tissue distant from the bone metastases, no
CTX staining can be detected. Thus, these findings indicate that
CTX is closely related to skeletal sites of intensive bone remodeling, such as bone being in the proximity of bone metastases.
Numerous efforts have been made to use biomarkers of bone formation, resorption, and osteoclastogenesis for the detection and quantification of bone metastasis from breast cancer. In our recent study (3), we provided further evidence that the collagenous bone resorption markers 
CTX, ßßCTX, NTX, and ICTP measured in serum or urine showed significant increases in breast cancer patients compared with those without bone metastasis. The largest relative increases were revealed by 
CTX with increasing differences with the advancement of the metastatic disease. Our present findings indicated a significant association between the number of metastases and the increases in urinary 
CTX relative to age- and body mass indexmatched breast cancer patients without bone metastases. The estimated relative increases in 
CTX corresponding to the presence of one, two, or three metastases were 2- to 5-fold higher than the intraindividual variation. Although the present study is of cross-sectional design, the aforementioned results also nurture the notion that the indicative value of an increase in 
CTX levels for skeletal invasion can be improved when monitoring the same cancer patient with serial measurements.
In summary, our present analysis provide initial explanation to why 
CTX is a promising marker for the first-line noninvasive diagnostic of skeletal invasion in patients with known breast cancer disease.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Conflict of interest: D.J. Leeming, B. Li, P. Qvist, and I. Byrjalsen are full-time employees of Nordic Bioscience, a company engaged in the development and marketing of bone and cartilage markers.
Received 11/30/05; revised 2/27/06; accepted 3/13/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CTX): a sensitive indicator of metastatic bone disease. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:S65.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Leeming, A. Hegele, I. Byrjalsen, R. Hofmann, P. Qvist, M. A. Karsdal, A. J. Schrader, R. Wagner, and P. Olbert Biochemical Markers for Monitoring Response to Therapy: Evidence for Higher Bone Specificity by a Novel Marker Compared with Routine Markers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1269 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Garnero New Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover IBMS BoneKEy, March 1, 2008; 5(3): 84 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |